User talk:Ecelan/Archivo marzo 2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Strasbourg - Font de Janus 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ecelan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Solanum

[edit]

Hi. This is certainly an eggplant. They don't have to be black. You get red ones, green ones white ones. Yours happen to be red ones. Also check the Flower. Where did you take the image? Out in the wild or in a garden? Amada44  talk to me 20:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He añadido una nueva versión, cambiando la parada "Séptimo Arte" por su nombre real, sentido Gran Vía: "La Ventana Indiscreta" y sentido Valdespartera: "Los Pájaros"

Cuando la he subido en commons me ha aparecido la imagen con rectángulo negro en vez del texto que he puesto, aunque cuando la modifico en Inkscape me aparece el texto bien. No se si lo podrás arreglar. --Robot8A (talk) 15:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, no he modificado muchas imágenes en Inkscape (esta era la 3ª) y no me he leído ningún tutorial. --Robot8A (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alhama de Aragon

[edit]

I have added an explicit description of how Spanish law treats such flags and shields, so you can remove the tags now from File:Bandera alhama de aragon.png and File:Escudo alhama-de aragon.png. Cheers. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Toros de Osborne

[edit]

Reabierta Commons:Deletion requests/Toros de Osborne. Salud. --Javier ME (talk) 09:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Juntos Podemos

[edit]

Pues, el comando de Tomás Hirsch era el Juntos Podemos. Tomás Hirsch no era el dueño, pero sí (en teoría) su comando pues eran equivalentes. --B1mbo (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pues no, tal como Zapatero no es el titular de los derechos del logo del gobierno español. Acá fue el Juntos Podemos (que es el titular en este caso) a través de sus encargados del comando presidencial quienes permitieron el uso y reproducción del archivo. --B1mbo (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¿?

[edit]

Mira colega, en verdad me cansan tus argumentos inválidos y tontos, explícame por qué dices que violé derechos de autor en un trabajo propio exijo uan respuesta de inmediato.

Es molesto que usuarios de tu poca categoría esten molestando a otros que tratan de implementar datos valiosos a este lugar, me parece que debo reportarte por tus continuos abusos injustificados.

--Neo ender (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikivacaciones.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Santosga (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

logos metrobilbao y euskotren

[edit]

Hola, he visto que me has eliminado dos imágenes, correspondientes a los logotipos de metrobilbao y euskotren, y no he entendido qué es lo que se me pide, son imágenes de geometría simple creadas por mí... Si te puedes pasar por mi página de discusión a echar un vistazo y si me puedes aclarar algo te lo agradezco ;) Un saludo --Laukatu (talk) 17:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Entiendo lo que me dices, pero he visto otras imágenes en wikipedia (por poner un ejemplo, el logo de renfe) que están hechas de la misma forma, imagino, y ahí siguen... son también candidatas a ser borradas? Gracias por atenderme, no estoy muy metido en estas cosas :) --Laukatu (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Ecelan, había puesto la iglesia en la categoría Category:Monasterio del Santo Sepulcro, Zaragoza porque es la iglesia de ese monasterio [1]. No sé si hay otra forma de indicar esa relación. Gracias --Cruccone (talk) 10:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal

[edit]

Hallo, thank you for your proposal. I asked and obtained to delete the entry about me in the Italian Wikipedia because I thought it was unfit to be at the same time a Wikipedian, and a person into the Encyclopaedia. It looked like I was a Wikipedian merely to have my name put into it. But since I am not a contributor to the Spanish version of Wikipedia, I have no reason against your proposal. Actually, I am rather flattered by it. Thanks in advance, then. :-) --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

[edit]
Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Ecelan,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transcripción de nombres en Mapa de Termópilas y Artemision

[edit]

Hola, Ecelan. He visto tu traducción del mapa Termópilas_y_Artemisio_-_es.svg. Hay un error importante: donde dice "Focea" debe decir "Fócide". Además debería decir "Escíatos" (transcripción española) en lugar de "Skiathos" (transcripción inglesa), por más que esté así en la Wiki española. Por último hay una errata en "Estrecho de Art[e]misio", donde falta la [e]. Creo que estas modificaciones sólo las puedes hacer tú porque es tu archivo. Gracias. --Pompilos (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Ecelan, gracias por las mejoras que has hecho en el mapa. Lo que no tenía claro es si una versión modificada por mí "taparía" la tuya o tendría que subirla como archivo nuevo, alternativo digamos. --Pompilos (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Ecelan, patrullando archivos nuevos me he encontrado con una foto tuya de Torrelapaja. Me ha resultado curioso, pues ahora mismo (y siempre por estas fechas) estoy muy cerca de ahí :) y mañana, de hecho, pasaré por ahí, 4 días después que tú. Quizás me dé por tomar una foto de la iglesia y desbancar la tuya :P Poco a poco (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cuenta conmigo, parece interesante y el caso es que nunca me había llamado la atención. Feliz Año! Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done :) --Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Termas de Calatayud

[edit]

Hola, pues tienes razón, vaya metedura de pata, no vi quien creó la categoría, pero si fuiste tú, debí haber preguntado antes. Recibe mis disculpas. El caso es que debería haberlo sabido por motivos que ya te explicaré :) Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pilar2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

ALE! ¿…? 08:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilar2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 08:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]