User talk:Ec1801011
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:BUF logo (1).png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BUF logo (1).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BUF logo (1).png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 23:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fasci logo.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fasci logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fasci logo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mladorossi flag.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mladorossi flag.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:ZBOR logo.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ZBOR logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ZBOR logo.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Zbor1 logo.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Zbor1 logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zbor1 logo.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:ItalianSocialMovement flag.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ItalianSocialMovement flag.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ItalianSocialMovement flag.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 16:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slovak Peoples Party alternate flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 17:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slovak Peoples Party.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 17:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fascist Rallies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Catherine Laurence 12:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fascist Rallies 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Catherine Laurence 12:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Franco photo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Rrburke (talk) 14:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logothetopoulos.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logothetopoulos.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logothetopoulos.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rrburke (talk) 14:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Milan Stojadinović portrait.jpg
- File:Horia Sima portrait.png
- File:Octavian goga.jpg
- File:Ion gigurtu.jpg
- File:Fascist Movements.jpg
- File:Sven Olov Portrait.jpg
- File:Jorge-gonzlez-von-mares.jpg
- File:Celmins gustavs.jpg
- File:Horia Sima.png
- File:Pelley Portrait.png
- File:Milan Stojadinović portrait.png
- File:Gustavo Barroso portrait.jpg
- File:Nicolás Rodríguez Carrasco.jpg
- File:Joe Maria portrait.png
- File:Salvador abascal.png
- File:KurtVonSchuschnigg.png
- File:O'duffy.jpg
- File:Hristo-lukov.png
- File:Leon degrelle.jpg
- File:Francisco rolo preto.jpg
- File:Young Egypt Party members.jpg
- File:EEE meeting.jpg
- File:Vlajka rally.jpg
- File:Re--union-du-Parti-National-Breton.jpg
- File:Hallgren Konrad.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rrburke (talk) 14:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- These photos are important historical sources that should be available for all to view. You may delete them but you are censoring history. Ec1801011 (talk) 14:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Commons only accepts free files. See Commons:Licensing. Moreover, you falsely claimed that these photographs were your own work. --Rrburke (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I do not claim these photos are owned by me I simply upload them to provide important photographic sources for pages which lack them. Nobody should "own" historical photographs on the internet, they should be available for all to view. Ec1801011 (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- With every single file you uploaded, you added the line |source={{own}}, which means you are claiming to be the photographer. These claims are obvious nonsense. --Rrburke (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you are talking about, I upload my own files through wikicommons Upload Wizard. I do not claim to be the photographer, that is a ridiculous claim. Ec1801011 (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Scanning or photographing an existing work does not make a photograph "your own file". The copyright to the file remains with the copyright-holder of the original. See Commons:Derivative works. --Rrburke (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I still don't understand why you claim that I claim these photos to be my own work, they are not. These are historical photos that I have uploaded, if you can provide proof that any of these photos are copyrighted then I will be more than happy to remove them. Ec1801011 (talk) 17:21, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Scanning or photographing an existing work does not make a photograph "your own file". The copyright to the file remains with the copyright-holder of the original. See Commons:Derivative works. --Rrburke (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you are talking about, I upload my own files through wikicommons Upload Wizard. I do not claim to be the photographer, that is a ridiculous claim. Ec1801011 (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- With every single file you uploaded, you added the line |source={{own}}, which means you are claiming to be the photographer. These claims are obvious nonsense. --Rrburke (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- I do not claim these photos are owned by me I simply upload them to provide important photographic sources for pages which lack them. Nobody should "own" historical photographs on the internet, they should be available for all to view. Ec1801011 (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Commons only accepts free files. See Commons:Licensing. Moreover, you falsely claimed that these photographs were your own work. --Rrburke (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
When you uploaded these files with the upload wizard, on the second screen you had to choose between two radio buttons: one said "This file is my own work". The other said "This file is not my own work". Virtually all of the files you uploaded contain the line "Source: Own work", so you chose option one. "This file is my own work" means pretty much what it sounds like, that the photograph is your own work. So when you say "I still don't understand why you claim that I claim these photos to be my own work", that’s why: because you clicked on a button that says "This file is my own work" every one of the twenty-six times you uploaded one of these files.
"if you can provide proof that any of these photos are copyrighted..." It doesn’t work like that: you have the onus backwards. Please see Commons:Project scope/Evidence. —Rrburke (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally actually explaining how this works instead of just accusing me of stealing others people work and claiming it as my own. I chose option one every time because I assumed that option meant I was uploading a file that does not yet exist on wiki commons. If what you want is for me to provide sources of where I got each photo I can do so but i'm unaware of where I should provide sources. Ec1801011 (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- These files were deleted without me being informed on how to provide the relevant information for them to not be deleted, I ask for them to be restored. Ec1801011 (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- OK, so you read "This file is my own work" and thought it really meant "I am uploading a file that does not yet exist"? Why? When I read it, I think it just means "This file is my own work". --Rrburke (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- I should not need to explain my reasoning when I have already provided justification and shown willingness to not only resolve the situation but provide the necessary information for every single file uploaded. Files which were created and owned by me have also been deleted and I have been unjustly branded a thief for "stealing" my own content. These ridiculous claims and the way in which I have been interacted with have shown me the unprofessional and immature nature of Wikipedia admins and also allowed me to understand why Wikipedia admins hold the reputation of incompetent bureaucrats which I was warned of by other users. Because of this situation I have no interest in contributing to this site anymore and will be undoing any edits I have made across the site. Ec1801011 (talk) 11:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- OK, so you read "This file is my own work" and thought it really meant "I am uploading a file that does not yet exist"? Why? When I read it, I think it just means "This file is my own work". --Rrburke (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- These files were deleted without me being informed on how to provide the relevant information for them to not be deleted, I ask for them to be restored. Ec1801011 (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Franco photo 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Rrburke (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Corneliu Codreanu Photo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Rrburke (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ion Gigurtu Portrait.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Ion Gigurtu Portrait.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ion Gigurtu Portrait.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Octavian Goga Photo.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Octavian Goga Photo.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Octavian Goga Photo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Copyright status: File:Horia Sima photo.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Horia Sima photo.png
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Horia Sima photo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Warning
[edit]Do not reupload deleted content. Jcb (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- I am re-uploading content which features the relevant sources and copyright information, the lack of this info is the reason why the files were deleted in the first place. I was under the impression that if I re-upload these files with the relevant info then I could use them.Ec1801011 (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Also why have you deleted files that were not re-uploaded content? Ec1801011 (talk) 14:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nope, copyright violations cannot be uploaded here if you specify where you stole them from. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean "stole". I haven't stolen anything. I clearly stated where I got them from and selected the option that stated "I found it on the Internet — I'm not sure". What are you talking about? Also you still have not answered my question to why you deleted the files that were not re-uploads. Ec1801011 (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have also just discovered that you have deleted flags and logos for parties that I created myself. I have gone out of my and spent my time researching to provide historically correct content because it is a hobby of mine and have been thanked by users for doing so. So why have you without any explanation deleted them? Please could you at least provide an explanation to why you have deleted this content that I created so I know what rule I have broken.
- The following files were created and are owned by me, you have deleted them with the reason that I have no permission, I should not have to seek the permission of myself to upload my own content. That is ridiculous.:
- File:UBNL flag.png
- File:Romanian nazi flag.png
- File:NRF.png
- File:Francist Movement flag.png
- File:Zbor Logo2.png
- File:Yugoslav National Movement.png
- File:NS Flag 5.png
- File:NS Flag 3.png
- File:NS Flag 4.png
- File:NasjonalSamling flag.png
- File:Sudeten German Party flag.png
- File:National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands flag1.png
- File:NSB logo.png
- File:NSB alternate flag.png
- File:NSB Flag.png
- File:Flemish National Union.png
- File:Flemish National Union flag.png
- File:The Fasces League (France).png
- File:PNB flag.png
- File:Blueshirts logo.png
- File:National Syndicalist Movement logo.png
- File:Verdinasologo.png
- File:Greek National Socialist Party.png
- File:Vlajka flag.png
- File:Vlajka logo (1).png
- File:IKL flag.png
- File:Perkonkrusta logo.png
- File:CEDA logo.png
- File:Fatherland League flag.png
- File:ItalianSocialMovement flag.png
- File:ArgentineCivicLegion logo.png
- File:Argentine Civic Legion (Argentina).png
- File:NSU logo2.png
- File:National Synarchist Union flag2.png
- File:GOLD SHIRTS FLAG.png
- File:Silver Legion of America.png
- File:Silver legion logo.png
- File:Danish Nazi flag.png
- File:Danish Nazi alternate flag.png
- File:Mladorossi flag.png
- File:Redshirts flag.png
- File:SocialCreditflag.png
- File:Social Credit flag.png
- I have also just discovered that you have deleted flags and logos for parties that I created myself. I have gone out of my and spent my time researching to provide historically correct content because it is a hobby of mine and have been thanked by users for doing so. So why have you without any explanation deleted them? Please could you at least provide an explanation to why you have deleted this content that I created so I know what rule I have broken.
- What do you mean "stole". I haven't stolen anything. I clearly stated where I got them from and selected the option that stated "I found it on the Internet — I'm not sure". What are you talking about? Also you still have not answered my question to why you deleted the files that were not re-uploads. Ec1801011 (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Nope, copyright violations cannot be uploaded here if you specify where you stole them from. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Also why have you deleted files that were not re-uploaded content? Ec1801011 (talk) 14:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- All these files were created by me, if the content is based around copyrighted content I understand however this is highly unlikely due to the nature of the content (long disbanded political parties). These files should not need permission as they were created by me and the ones that are "re-uploads of deleted files" are only so because you have deleted the original files for reasons that do not make sense to me. I can accept content I have found elsewhere and have used (without the intent of violating copyright) but when it comes to my own content I take more issue. These files have existed without prior problems by other admins and so I hope this mistake on your behalf can be resolved. Because of this countless pages have been negatively affected. Ec1801011 (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- If you don't understand that it's illegal to grab files from the web and upload them here, then please do not upload anything here. You started reuploading a several blatant copyright violations, that had been deleted just before. In such a case we just flush all the uploads to be sure. You cannot expect us to examine file by file if you are uploading copyright violations and even reuploading them after deletion. We are all volunteers and we are busy enough without such uploaders. Jcb (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- What is the point of having the option "I found it on the Internet — I'm not sure", if when a user uses it they are accused of "stealing" and it being "illegal"? As I have explained before the re-uploading of content was not out of malicious intent but rather my interaction with other admins gave me the impression that if files were re uploaded with copyright information then they would be up for review still with the possibility of deletion but also with the possibility of being available to use. I still don't understand how it's stealing when right from the start I have stated that I do not own the photographical content. Also as explained with previous admins I am new to uploading on Wikipedia and was unsure with how to properly upload images and how to check copyright.
- If you don't understand that it's illegal to grab files from the web and upload them here, then please do not upload anything here. You started reuploading a several blatant copyright violations, that had been deleted just before. In such a case we just flush all the uploads to be sure. You cannot expect us to examine file by file if you are uploading copyright violations and even reuploading them after deletion. We are all volunteers and we are busy enough without such uploaders. Jcb (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- All these files were created by me, if the content is based around copyrighted content I understand however this is highly unlikely due to the nature of the content (long disbanded political parties). These files should not need permission as they were created by me and the ones that are "re-uploads of deleted files" are only so because you have deleted the original files for reasons that do not make sense to me. I can accept content I have found elsewhere and have used (without the intent of violating copyright) but when it comes to my own content I take more issue. These files have existed without prior problems by other admins and so I hope this mistake on your behalf can be resolved. Because of this countless pages have been negatively affected. Ec1801011 (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
If you admit then that you have not checked the files that I own before deleting them then when will they be restored? I have submitted an OTRS for my work to be allowed to be used freely however it says there is a backlog of 175 days. I understand Wikipedia is run by volunteers and that the size of content being used means these things take time however that seems like a ridiculous amount of time to have to wait just so that I can use my own content. It is especially frustrating when you admit that you did not even review the content before deleting it. This could all have been resolved if you had simply contacted me before deleting almost all my files that I uploaded which the majority where of my own creation. Ec1801011 (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- The option "I found it on the Internet — I'm not sure" is in fact in place especially for uploaders like you, to help us detecting copyright violations. Jcb (talk) 21:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- So when will the files that have not broke copyright violations be restored? Ec1801011 (talk) 12:19, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:VB logo.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:VB logo.png
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:VB logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 05:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:VB logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Dutch NSB flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 02:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:BUF logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Tol.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Source
[edit]Hello, could you possibly tell me where did you get the source for the freethinkers party logo? Thank you in advance. Ιπποκράτης2020 (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Loyalty to resitance bloc logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Argentine Civic Legion logo.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Argentine Civic Legion logo.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Argentine Civic Legion logo.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Taichi (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
National Partnership
[edit]Hello, can I ask you where did you find design of the National Partnership flag.png? Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
No response, marking the file now. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)