User talk:Ebergerz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ebergerz!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Shiatsu.jpg

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Shiatsu.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 13:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Minorax: I think there is a mistake regarding this. Can you please change the quick deletion notice to a normal one while this is reviewed? The file comes from flikr with full atrribution with a CC compatible license with some uses restricted as you can see here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/shiatsu_loft_berlin_katrin_werner/5861011893 If you check the license for the file it is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ : Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

And all the requirements of attribution, non-comercial and sharealike are fulfilled, so can you please clarify what is wrong?

Thanks in advance--Ebergerz (talk) 16:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons does not accept NC or ND files. See COM:L. Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 16:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, unfortunately I was wrong as I had only encountered the CC-BY-SA -which are ok) before and not the CC-BY-NC-SA which are not ok. I found this page to be very clarifying: COM:FLICKR --Ebergerz (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Shiatsu.jpg

File:Shiatsu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Quite number of hits for this on the internet other than the claimed source Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

 

---

Your image or other content, File:Shiatsu.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Herbythyme: Quisiera hacer una aclaración. Creo que has cometido un error ya que yo no recree la imagen borrada (la cual como puedes ver en la discusión anterior entendí porqué no estaba permitida) sí reutilicé el nombre del archivo, ya que entendí que estaría disponible ya que la imagen no autorizada ya no existía y asumí que si el archivo final no podía tener el mismo nombre el sistema me advertiría de ello. Si hubieras visto la información podrías haber notado que eran dos imágenes distintas provenientes de fuentes diferentes. Nunca intentaría subir de nuevo una imagen que se borró por política de wikimedia. La imagen que subí la segunda vez viene de pixabay que es el copyright holder y permite su uso gratuito y redistribución incluso comercial. Como tal, obviamente va a aparecer en otros sitios que la hayan utilizado, pero yo di la atribución correcta a quien tiene el copyright, cosa que era extremadamente fácil de verificar, o también podría haber provisto yo si hubieras dado tiempo a ello. puedes verlo tanto en el link original como aquí https://www.google.com/search?q=+Pixabay+Masaje+Shiatsu+Vuelta+-+Foto+gratis+en+Pixabay&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwj-uo6Sn5LnAhVKYBoKHVwJCfgQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=+Pixabay+Masaje+Shiatsu+Vuelta+-+Foto+gratis+en+Pixabay&gs_l=img.3...5438124.5438124..5438468...0.0..0.175.175.0j1......0....1..gws-wiz-img.h-eeO5KDXC4&ei=nKUlXv78D8rAadySpMAP&safe=images&tbs=sur%3Af Si la foto no cumple con las políticas de wikimedia a pesar de tener permitido el uso y redistribución incluso comercial sin requerir ni siquiera atribución por parte del copyright holder, entiendo que se me explique el porqué y sea borrada. Pero no parece haber sido el caso y que se me diga que estoy recreando una imagen borrada cuando no lo hice es una falta de cuidado en el procedimiento. ¿Me podrías decir cómo proceder en este caso para que la situación sea aclarada? Gracias de antemano. --Ebergerz (talk) 14:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

I apologise for my error. I did try and see the licensing on Pixabay but could not see it properly. I have restored the file for now anyway.

I hope this is satisfactory (and please ignore the warning about). I'm sorry but my "es" does not allow me to reply in your language. Hopefully you can translate my words. If not please alert me again and I will seek help from a fluent es speaker . --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Herbythyme thank you for the quick reply. Do not worry, I can understand how it may have looked with me using the same filename for the new upload. I may have contributed to the confusion with it, just wanted to be clear of suspicion of bad faith even if the file does not comply with the policy, as that is something I'd never do. It seems that the original image url in pixabay now requires a free registration to see it (maybe a cookie thing....) It is still under the same license though: Pixabay License: Gratis para usos comerciales. No es necesario reconocimiento. (free for comercial use, no attribution required) They list the details fo the license here: https://pixabay.com/es/service/license/ please do check them to see if the are acceptable for wikimedia materials as I'm by no means an expert. Thank again. --Ebergerz (talk) 15:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tyler Henry during a reading in 2016.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tyler Henry during a reading in 2016.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tyler Henry during a reading in 2016.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)