User talk:DresdenBell

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DresdenBell!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File source is not properly indicated: File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auweia, bitte etwas sorgfältiger arbeiten! Schauen wir uns mal File:Prinzessin Anna Monika Pia von Sachsen, Herzogin zu Sachsen 8.jpg:

Quelle: Meinetwegen ok, aber da steht wesentlich mehr an Quelle auf dem Bild drauf, z.B. wer es veröffentlicht hat
Datum: Gefragt ist das Datum des Erstellens oder der Veröffentlichung des Bildes, das reicht so nicht.
Autor: Der Weblink is kompletter Unsinn. Der Autor steht doch auf dem Bild, das müsste man genauer anschauen, suchen wer das ist und wann er gelebt hat (der Autor)
Permission: {{PD-art|PD-GermanGov}} geht garnicht. Bitte nochmal nachlesen was "Template:PD-GermanGov" ist. Das sind Hoheitszeichen des Staates, Gesetzestexte, aber doch nicht willkürliche Fotos die von irgendwelchen Webseiten geholt sind. Das zweite, PD-art, bräuchte vielleicht noch einen Beleg, nämlich den Beleg, dass der Autor seit 70 Jahren tot ist wie es die Vorlage behauptet.

Da ist einiges zu tun, du hast gerade einen kompletten Satz völlig falsch beschrifteter Bilder hochgeladen, bitte diese erstmal verbessern. --Martin H. (talk) 20:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anderes Beispiel: File:Beisetzung S.M. Friedrich August III. von Sachsen 5.jpg. Der Autor dort ist ganz klar lesbar, ist mir völlig unklar wie man 1) den Autorennamen nicht in das richtige Feld übertragen kann und wie man 2) einfach Behaupten kann, der Autor sei spätestens 7 Jahre nachdem er das Bild erstellt hat tot umgefallen und das obwohl das Attelier sogar mit einer Onlinequelle noch 1940 nachweisbar ist, das Bild also nicht gemeinfrei ist. Ich habe im Commons:Forum mal um Hilfe gebeten dieses furchtbare Chaos aufzuräumen. Eine Liste mit problematischen Dateien folgt, sollten die Probleme nicht behoben werden, werden die Bilder gelöscht. Immerhin 1 Bild habe ich bereits gelöst :) --Martin H. (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 day for the following reason: removing warnings, re-adding nonsense license templates.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Quellen und Uhrheber sind echt. Erst recht, wenn die URL auch stimmt. Außerdem sind deine Gestaltungen und Glossenumbauten in der Schablone unerwünscht. Ich habe keine Fehler begangen.--DresdenBell (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doch. Du hast nichteinmal die einfachsten informationen von den Bildern abgeschrieben die dort draufstehen - nämlich den Autoren. Das ist aber notwendig um den Urheberrechtsstatus zu belegen. Du sagst die Autoren seien seit 70 Jahren tot, auf welcher Basis? --Martin H. (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Quellen und Uhrheber sind echt. Erst recht, wenn die URL auch stimmt. Außerdem sind deine Gestaltungen und Glossenumbauten in der Schablone unerwünscht. Ich habe keine Fehler begangen.--DresdenBell (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Gerade wollte ich noch eine Quelle einfügen. Das geht nun nicht, weil du mich geblockt hast. Und deine Spam-Liste brauche ich nicht sehen, da diese Übersicht ich mir in der Gallerie ansehen darf. --DresdenBell (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Außerdem ist das eine Lüge, dass ich Fehlbeschriftungen gemacht hätte. --DresdenBell (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop you disruption

If you really think that a file should be deleted (but read the criteria for deletion first!), you should file a normal request for deletion. The easiest way to file a proper DR is by using the "delete" button in the left column on image pages. But your removal of information and your malformed templates are just disruptive. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Schloss Sonnenstein

Hallo Dresdenbell, bei den von dir hochgeladenen Simulationen des künftigen Aussehens von Schloss Sonnenstein lässt sich die Quelle bzw. der Urheber nicht nachvollziehen. Wenn man davon ausgeht, dass Bilfinger Berger der Urheber ist, müsste seitens Bilfinger Berger die Weiterverwendung innerhalb der Creative Commons Richtlinien freigegeben werden. Das müsste aus der Beschreibung eindeutig hervorgehen (z. B. über eine Verlinkung einer entsprechenden Freigabe durch Bilfinger Berger). Der Punkt "Genehmigung" müsste also noch mal nachkorrigiert werden, sonst droht die Löschung der Bilder (wäre Schade darum). MfG, --Norbert Kaiser (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ kurdî ∙ la .lojban. ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This user is a suspected sockpuppet of Kay Körner.
Please refer to logs and contribs for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erste_Schwarz-_Rot-_Goldene_Fahne_1815_(ausst.).jpg

File:Erste_Schwarz-_Rot-_Goldene_Fahne_1815_(ausst.).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.