User talk:DresdenBell

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DresdenBell!


File source is not properly indicated: File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:S.M._Friedrich_August_III._von_Sachsen_35.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auweia, bitte etwas sorgfältiger arbeiten! Schauen wir uns mal File:Prinzessin Anna Monika Pia von Sachsen, Herzogin zu Sachsen 8.jpg:

  • Quelle: Meinetwegen ok, aber da steht wesentlich mehr an Quelle auf dem Bild drauf, z.B. wer es veröffentlicht hat
  • Datum: Gefragt ist das Datum des Erstellens oder der Veröffentlichung des Bildes, das reicht so nicht.
  • Autor: Der Weblink is kompletter Unsinn. Der Autor steht doch auf dem Bild, das müsste man genauer anschauen, suchen wer das ist und wann er gelebt hat (der Autor)
  • Permission: {{PD-art|PD-GermanGov}} geht garnicht. Bitte nochmal nachlesen was "Template:PD-GermanGov" ist. Das sind Hoheitszeichen des Staates, Gesetzestexte, aber doch nicht willkürliche Fotos die von irgendwelchen Webseiten geholt sind. Das zweite, PD-art, bräuchte vielleicht noch einen Beleg, nämlich den Beleg, dass der Autor seit 70 Jahren tot ist wie es die Vorlage behauptet.

Da ist einiges zu tun, du hast gerade einen kompletten Satz völlig falsch beschrifteter Bilder hochgeladen, bitte diese erstmal verbessern. --Martin H. (talk) 20:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anderes Beispiel: File:Beisetzung S.M. Friedrich August III. von Sachsen 5.jpg. Der Autor dort ist ganz klar lesbar, ist mir völlig unklar wie man 1) den Autorennamen nicht in das richtige Feld übertragen kann und wie man 2) einfach Behaupten kann, der Autor sei spätestens 7 Jahre nachdem er das Bild erstellt hat tot umgefallen und das obwohl das Attelier sogar mit einer Onlinequelle noch 1940 nachweisbar ist, das Bild also nicht gemeinfrei ist. Ich habe im Commons:Forum mal um Hilfe gebeten dieses furchtbare Chaos aufzuräumen. Eine Liste mit problematischen Dateien folgt, sollten die Probleme nicht behoben werden, werden die Bilder gelöscht. Immerhin 1 Bild habe ich bereits gelöst :) --Martin H. (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 day for the following reason: removing warnings, re-adding nonsense license templates.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Quellen und Uhrheber sind echt. Erst recht, wenn die URL auch stimmt. Außerdem sind deine Gestaltungen und Glossenumbauten in der Schablone unerwünscht. Ich habe keine Fehler begangen.--DresdenBell (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doch. Du hast nichteinmal die einfachsten informationen von den Bildern abgeschrieben die dort draufstehen - nämlich den Autoren. Das ist aber notwendig um den Urheberrechtsstatus zu belegen. Du sagst die Autoren seien seit 70 Jahren tot, auf welcher Basis? --Martin H. (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Quellen und Uhrheber sind echt. Erst recht, wenn die URL auch stimmt. Außerdem sind deine Gestaltungen und Glossenumbauten in der Schablone unerwünscht. Ich habe keine Fehler begangen.--DresdenBell (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Gerade wollte ich noch eine Quelle einfügen. Das geht nun nicht, weil du mich geblockt hast. Und deine Spam-Liste brauche ich nicht sehen, da diese Übersicht ich mir in der Gallerie ansehen darf. --DresdenBell (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Außerdem ist das eine Lüge, dass ich Fehlbeschriftungen gemacht hätte. --DresdenBell (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop you disruption

[edit]

If you really think that a file should be deleted (but read the criteria for deletion first!), you should file a normal request for deletion. The easiest way to file a proper DR is by using the "delete" button in the left column on image pages. But your removal of information and your malformed templates are just disruptive. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Schloss Sonnenstein

[edit]

Hallo Dresdenbell, bei den von dir hochgeladenen Simulationen des künftigen Aussehens von Schloss Sonnenstein lässt sich die Quelle bzw. der Urheber nicht nachvollziehen. Wenn man davon ausgeht, dass Bilfinger Berger der Urheber ist, müsste seitens Bilfinger Berger die Weiterverwendung innerhalb der Creative Commons Richtlinien freigegeben werden. Das müsste aus der Beschreibung eindeutig hervorgehen (z. B. über eine Verlinkung einer entsprechenden Freigabe durch Bilfinger Berger). Der Punkt "Genehmigung" müsste also noch mal nachkorrigiert werden, sonst droht die Löschung der Bilder (wäre Schade darum). MfG, --Norbert Kaiser (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Erste_Schwarz-_Rot-_Goldene_Fahne_1815_(ausst.).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 15:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwarz-_Rot-_Goldene_Fahne_vom_12._Juni_1815.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 16:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burganlage_Neues_Landratsamt_Pirna-Sonnenstein_Nr.10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

X-Weinzar (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, DresdenBell!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Albrechtsorden Ehrenkreuz mit Schwertern.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Albrechtsorden Ehrenkreuz mit Schwertern.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Albrechtsorden Ehrenkreuz mit Schwertern.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andere Benachrichtigungen zusammengefasst:

Und gelöscht. Offensichtlich habe ich das damals vergessen zu tun. Diese Uploads sind klare Urheberrechtsvereltzung. Kopiert von verschiedenen Webseiten, hier hochgeladen entgegen Commons:Licensing bzw. Commons:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. --Martin H. (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+File:Sächs.-Ernestinische Kriegsverdienstmedaille 1815.jpg
+File:Sächsisches Lebensrettungsehrenzeichen.jpg
+File:Friedrich August Medaille Vorderseite.jpg
--Martin H. (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Erste Schwarz- Rot- Goldene Fahne 1815 Wartburg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Erste Schwarz- Rot- Goldene Fahne 1815 Wartburg.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Erste Schwarz- Rot- Goldene Fahne 1815 Wartburg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Holy_League has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 10:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]