User talk:Dockino

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dockino!
File:WB 77-Sex Pistols promo (video).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Secret (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.elmundo.es/metropoli/2006/04/28/musica/1146175224.html says, the image is from denmark. --Martin H. (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youre the expert, I only want to mention, that a fansite is not that reliable and that searching for "the kinks sweden" of course produces false positives. The photo session mentioned there on September 2 is related to this cover. I see no convincing evidences that this photo was taken and first published in sweden. --Martin H. (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thats of course a good sign and it was also the very first aspect I compared in the two images (besides the traffic sign). The image is missing any evidence where it was first published (thats themuch more importatnt information, more important than the place of creation). With my dispute I only wanted to express that the information is everything else but satisfying from a point of someone checking the accuracy of source and that the license tag is used legitimately. --Martin H. (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Dockino!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WB_77-Rotten_promo_(full).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Secret (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WB_77-Rotten_promo_(video_2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Secret (talk) 00:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DCGeist/DocKino

[edit]

Hey :) I'm sure this message won't get through to you, honestly because I genuinely, really hope you're dead. If you're not, and you see this, I just wanted to remind you that you're a fucking piece of shit. You always were and always will be. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 101.165.135.181 (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:WB 77-NMTB promo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]