User talk:Dittaeva
Image:Tux.png
[edit]I have restored the Image:Tux.png. Thanks. Rafał Pocztarski 17:18, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hi - your cahnges to the template have broken all current uses of that tag, so I will revert it for now. Please note the discussion that I have now copied to the talk page of the template and let's dicuss changes there. Maybe it would be a good idea to change the usage of the template or to have an alternate version, but let's talk about it first. -- Duesentrieb 14:37, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
I understand why you removed the image, since we now have the pull-down menu for licensing. Please note that the menu does not contain all possible tags, and writing a licensing tag in the summary field still works and is sometimes necessary -- it's the only way to dual-license something, too.
I agree the screenshot is outdated, but let's work to improve the page in question, not merely take stuff off. Let's upload a better screenshot, okay? We need to edit the instructional text, too. — Xiong熊talk* 06:50, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- I expect you have posted this message at the wrong talkpage because I have no idea what you are refering to. --Dittaeva 07:30, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Did you make this edit [1] with edit sum removed outdated image? — Xiong熊talk* 04:31, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
- I did, sorry that I didn't notice. I agree that the page needs improving. If I had the time and interest I would improve it, I don't however, and think the page is better without the image than with. --Dittaeva 09:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Egyptian mural Thebes.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Kajk ✉ 06:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Jesus on the cross.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Tirpitz_altafjord.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Afrikaner commandos.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Oppland vapen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |