User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niendorfer Marktkirche total.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niendorfer Marktkirche Orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niendorfer Marktkirche Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ex Graf-Goltz-Kaserne ZFA 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sinstorfer Kirche Kirchhof 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sinstorfer Kirche Dachreiter 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sinstorfer Kirche Ostseite 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sinstorfer Kirche und Friedhof 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friedhof Oejendorf Zentralkomplex 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friedhof Oejendorf Zentralkomplex 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Reiher
Hallo Dirtsc, da ist wohl etwas durcheinander geraten. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Wieso? Was soll durcheinander geraten sein? Ich habe am 14.3. ein neues Bild eingestellt und dabei das überflüssige "File:" vor dem Bild vom Vortag gelöscht. Mehr ist da nicht passiert. :-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Du hast in der Bildunterschrift auf Seidenreiher verlinkt, obwohl das Photo einen Silberreiher zeigt, wie auch aus Bildbeschreibung und Kategorisierung von File:Taubergießen_Reiher_01.JPG ersichtlich. Damit hast Du aus dem "Großen Egret" einen kleinen gemacht - zwei, von der Farbe der Federn mal abgesehen, sehr unterschiedliche Arten. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Das meinst Du! Wie peinlich! Und das wo ich mich schon mal selber damit beschäftigt hatte, welche Art ein weißer Reiher in unseren Breiten wohl sein müsste. Den Seidenreiher hatte ich damals ausgeschlossen. Da muss ich mich bei Dir auf jeden Fall noch wortreich entschuldigen. Soll ich es im Archiv richtigstellen? --Dirtsc (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Das hast Du ja im Archiv schon korrigiert. Dann ist ja alles in Ordnung. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Das meinst Du! Wie peinlich! Und das wo ich mich schon mal selber damit beschäftigt hatte, welche Art ein weißer Reiher in unseren Breiten wohl sein müsste. Den Seidenreiher hatte ich damals ausgeschlossen. Da muss ich mich bei Dir auf jeden Fall noch wortreich entschuldigen. Soll ich es im Archiv richtigstellen? --Dirtsc (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Du hast in der Bildunterschrift auf Seidenreiher verlinkt, obwohl das Photo einen Silberreiher zeigt, wie auch aus Bildbeschreibung und Kategorisierung von File:Taubergießen_Reiher_01.JPG ersichtlich. Damit hast Du aus dem "Großen Egret" einen kleinen gemacht - zwei, von der Farbe der Federn mal abgesehen, sehr unterschiedliche Arten. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alter Friedhof Harburg Einzelgrab 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nsg amrumer dünen sand und wind 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alter Friedhof Harburg Grabmal Hoff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
 Comment Nice but I'd suggest to correct the vertical lines --Moroder 16:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)New version. Maybe better. But I did only a slight adjustment, the memorial doesn't have that much real vertical edges. --Dirtsc 20:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Nice --Moroder 04:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hittfeld St. Mauritius Innen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf kriegerdenkmal 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hittfeld St. Mauritius 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf kriegerdenkmal 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hittfeld St. Mauritius 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf kriegerdenkmal 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf kirche 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf baron voght str 127 17985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf müllenhofweg 28 2 17972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf müllenhoffweg 2 1 29498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!
Hallo Dirtsc
Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 Deutschland!
Wir freuen uns, Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 21. Juni 2015 auf der WLE-Jury-Sitzung in Fulda ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!
Im Namen der WLE-Deutschland-Jury, Helfmann (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Du erhältst einen Sonderpreis
Hallo Dirtsc
Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Für Deinen Beitrag Amrum odde möwe vor schild erhältst Du einen Sonderpreis wegen Aufmunterung der Jury während der Jury-Sitzung.
Ich darf Dir verraten, dein Bild hat selbst zu vorgerückter Stunde für reichlich Belustigung gesorgt. Vielen Dank für den tollen Beitrag und überrasche uns weiterhin mit solchen guten Bildern.
Um in den Genuss Deines Preises zu kommen, wäre es nett, wenn Du Dich (bitte möglichst bald) mit community@wikimedia.de in Verbindung setzen könntest.
Im Namen der WLE-Deutschland-Jury, Helfmann (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Danke für den Sonderpreis. Freut mich, dass ihr euch genauso über das Bild amüsiert habt wie ich! Vor allem weil die Möwe auch noch so aussieht, als ob sie den Text lesen und sich überlegen würde ob sie denn nun in die Dünen watscheln soll oder nicht. Vielen Grüße an die ganze Jury und Danke für die aufgewendete Arbeit. --Dirtsc (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke
Hallo Dirtsc,
am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.
Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.
Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.
Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?
Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.
Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.
--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nsg barker heide wiesenrand südteil 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nsg barker heide nördlicher wald 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nsg barker heide wiesenteich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gf müllenhoffweg 16 29497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Ein lebendiger Strauß Natur
Hallo Dirtsc,
ergänzend sei darauf hinweisen, dass Du nun auf einem Poster die von der Jury vorgenommene Top-100 Auslese auch auf einem Blick bewundern kannst. Ein weiteres Poster stellt schöne Tiermotive zusammen, die von den einzelnen Juroren in ihrer Vorauswahl von 1000 Fotos enthalten waren. Mindestens eines Deiner Fotos kannst Du hier entdecken. Wenn du magst, kannst Du diese Poster in einer Größe von bis zu A0 ausdrucken.
Aber auch die Einbindung von Fotos in Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia ist eine Form der Anerkennung. Bereits mehr als 1000 Fotos – hier in einer separaten Galerie zusammengestellt - sind so in einzelnen Wikipedia-Beiträgen zu sehen. Und wenn Deine besten Fotos dort noch nicht zu finden sind – Du weißt sicher am besten, in welchen Artikel sie eingebunden gehören und die Wikipedia bereichern. Liebe Grüße von der --Brücke 14:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lsg amrum möwe kniepsand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nd hh garten de l aigle gr kirsche blüte 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nd hh garten de l aigle wiese 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - Urkunden
Hallo Dirtsc,
dieses Jahr wollen sich Organisatoren und WLE-Jury bei allen Teilnehmern, deren Bilder in die Auswahl der besten 100 gekommen sind, mit einer Urkunde bedanken.
Die Erstellung hat sich krankheitsbedingt verzögert, aber jetzt sind die Urkunden fertig. Um Deine Urkunde versenden zu können, benötigt das Community-Team unseres Fördervereins WMDE eine Postadresse. Eine kurze Mail mit der Benutzerkennung und einer Adresse an mailto:community@wikimedia.de würde genügen. Per Telefon (030-219 15 826-0) oder mit einer Postkarte (Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., Team Community, Tempelhofer Ufer 23/24, 10963 Berlin) sollte es ebenso klappen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
--Blech (talk) 21:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westerhever lahnung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Klasse Dein Foto mit der Katze am Brandshofer Deich, hab mich sehr drüber gefreut. Pauli-Pirat (talk) 10:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
- Vielen Dank für das Lob. Hat mich sehr gefreut, ein Orden wäre aber doch nicht gleich nötig gewesen. Deine Bilder freuen mich auch immer wieder, vor allem, weil oft Motive dabei sind, die noch nicht so endlos "tot fotografiert" sind, wie die Innenstadt und die Speicherstadt. Und irgendwann (so in drei bis vier Jahren) haben wir zur Zeit fünf bis sechs aktiven Denkmalfotografen dann auch alle geschützten Kulturdenkmäler in Hamburg dokumentiert... ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Moin Dirtsc, dankeschön, aber ich beschränke mich auf das ergänzen der Listen sowie auch der Motive, mehr nicht. Ich hätte es besser gefunden, wenn man den Fotografierenden eine Wahl gelassen hätte, ob die Fotos für die Denkmal-Listen am Wettbewerb teilnehmen sollen oder nicht. So gehen viele Fotos völlig unnnötig in den Wettbewerb, die nun auch alle angeschaut und bewertet werden müssen. Da hätte man viel Zeit sparen können. Viele liebe Grüsse und Dir noch einen schönen Abend.–—Pauli-Pirat (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
Hallo Dirtsc,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
Bernd Gross, 21:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leinpfad ufer 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 |
File:Clara und Walter Bacher.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rudolph Buch (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Was für eine merkwürdige Aktion! Wo kann ich bitte nachlesen, wie das begründet wurde und warum habe ich keine Gelegenheit bekommen, zu dem Löschantrag etwas zu sagen? --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, ich habe selber die entsprechende Diskussion eben erst wieder gefunden. Das klärt die Sache schon ein wenig. Aber ein Verweis darauf wäre nett gewesen. --Dirtsc (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winterhuder kai 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Sophien Hamburg-Barmbek Innen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Sophien Hamburg-Barmbek Innen Chorgestühl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ex shell überseering 35 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Überseering 33a 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Sophien Hamburg-Barmbek Turm 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rwe dea überseering 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edeka new york ring 6 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niendorfer Kirche und Alter Friedhof 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ex shell überseering 35 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Postbank sydneystr überseering 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ergo überseering jahnring 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City-Nord-Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City-Nord-Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Postbank sydneystr überseering 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
WLM
Moin Dirtsc,
... und ich sage nur SPEICHERSTADT. Ich fürchte, Deine Stimmung bzgl. der WLM-Hamburg-Bilder steigt nicht wirklich und mein Ericushöft-Bild trägt vielleicht auch nicht wirklich zur Besserung bei, wobei Bilder mit dem kompletten Höft aus dieser Perspektive wirklich fehlten. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ein Bild von einem Motiv, das man kennt ist ja in Ordnung. Vor allem, weil Du Recht hast, Dein Bild zeigt einen anderen Blickwinkel und sehr schön die Veränderungen durch die HafenCity. Aber dass da schon wieder der gleiche Blick mit den gleichen Speichern und dem stimmungsvollen (würg!) Abendhimmel dabei sein muss, geht mir gehörig auf den Senkel. Ich werde mich jetzt versuchen, ein wenig zu beruhigen und dann schreibe ich die nächsten Tage mal meine Kommentare dazu... Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 16:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Bevor Du dich beruhigst, fassen wir doch noch mal hier intern zusammen (mit gewissem Hamburger Blickwinkel und ohne auf den WLM-Disks Jury-Bashing betreiben zu wollen)
- das Bild vom Rathaus gibt es so noch nicht, aber das Licht hat m. E. nichts mit der Realität zu tun (oder hat sich da was in letzter Zeit geändert)
- das Elbtunnel-Bild ist von unterirdischer Qualität
- Wandrahmsfleet und Kontorhausviertel gibt es jeweils schon x-fach
- insgesamt drei Mal das Olympiastadion (ok, z. T. neue Blickwinkel, aber ein jährliches Abo auf 1-3 Auszeichnungen?)
- von Schloss Moritzburg kann man übrigens auch sehr schöne Fotos machen ...
- an den Bildern 87/2015 und 33/2014 kann man sehr schön die Wirkung unterschiedlicher Brennweiten verdeutlichen
- den Sonderpreis der Jury gibt es schon in sechsfach höherer Auflösung als Featured Picture
- ... noch weiteres?
- Warum rennt man da noch herum und versucht neue Denkmäler bzw. neue Blickwinkel auf alte zu finden? Irgendwie braucht die Jury m. E. mehr Zeit, um solche Ergebnisse zu vermeiden, so man sie denn vermeiden will. --Ajepbah (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Deine letzten beiden Sätze kann ich nur unterschreiben. Mal sehen wie ich so noch Zeit finde, dann schaue ich mir die Sachen mal genauer an. Aber diverse Doppelungen in den WLM Top 100 der letzten Jahre habe ich schon gefunden. Wandrahmsfleet und Ericus gabs schon einmal, die Lahnbrücke mit Limburger Dom im Hintergrund auch. Speicherstadt bei Nacht ist insgesamt recht oft dabei gewesen, Berliner Olympiastadion auch. Stimmt, wir können hier vielleicht am besten mal sammeln, was uns so aufgefallen ist. --Dirtsc (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Bevor Du dich beruhigst, fassen wir doch noch mal hier intern zusammen (mit gewissem Hamburger Blickwinkel und ohne auf den WLM-Disks Jury-Bashing betreiben zu wollen)
Moin @Ajepbah: ! Ich habe mal die Hamburg-Motive, die seit 2011 bei WLM unter den Top100 waren, aufgelistet. Da sieht das gar nicht mehr so stark nach Doppelungen aus. Aber ein deutliches Übrgewicht von Speicherstadt / Kontorhausviertel kann man schon erkennen. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 19:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Dirtsc, eine schöne Zusammenstellung. Ich glaube aber, dass nicht Doppelungen das Nervige sind, sondern dass immer wieder die absoluten Standardmotive (normalerweise von Neulingen) hochgeladen werden und uns diese einfach zum Hals raushängen. Die Aufnahmen gibt es im Normalfall schon auf Commons oder tauchen in diversen Büchern, Broschüren, Zeitungsartikeln auf wie z. B. das Wasserschloss oder eine Röhre des Alten Elbtunnels. Außerdem kann ich nicht immer so ganz den dokumentarischen Aspekt von künstlerischen schwarz-weißen "XYZ im Nebel/Gegen-/Abendlicht"-Aufnahmen erkennen (diese fehlten aber dieses Jahr zum Glück weitgehend). Es gibt immer auch Ausnahmen, das Kesselhaus zur Blauen Stunde ist m. E. gut gelungen, dies ist aber auch keine Standardaufnahme ... --Ajepbah (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ich sammele noch mal mehr Informationen zu den Bildern und habe meine Vorstellungen hier zusammen getragen. Noch bin ich nicht fertig, wie man sieht. Aber vielleicht fällt Dir noch was ein, was man zu den Bildern sammeln könnte um belegbare Aussagen zum Nutzwert der prämierten Bilder machen zu können. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 16:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nachtrag @Ajepbah: ich habe die o.a. Tabelle ausgefüllt so weit wie ich das konnte. Bitte prüfe das mal. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Dirtsc, die Tabelle sieht für gut aus, danke für die Arbeit. Bei der Anzahl der vergleichbaren Bilder müsste man m. E. eigentlich gucken, wie viele vergleichbare Bilder zum Upload-Zeitpunkt schon vorhanden waren. Das wäre mir zumindest aber wirklich zu aufwendig ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nachtrag @Ajepbah: ich habe die o.a. Tabelle ausgefüllt so weit wie ich das konnte. Bitte prüfe das mal. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ich sammele noch mal mehr Informationen zu den Bildern und habe meine Vorstellungen hier zusammen getragen. Noch bin ich nicht fertig, wie man sieht. Aber vielleicht fällt Dir noch was ein, was man zu den Bildern sammeln könnte um belegbare Aussagen zum Nutzwert der prämierten Bilder machen zu können. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 16:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ex shell überseering 35 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leinpfad 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Postbank sydneystr überseering 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nsg barker heide blüte vogelbeere 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Donnerbesen
Hallo Dirtsc,
ich war schon drauf und drann das Bild in die Fotowerkstatt zu geben. Dann habe ich mir aber gedacht: frag erst einmal den Fotografen selbst ;)
Möchtest du das Bild vom Donnerbesen noch so bearbeiten, dass der Besen noch ein wenig besser zur Geltung kommt? (gerade rücken, entzerren) Gerne auch so, dass man durchaus noch sieht, dass er sich in einer Fachwerkwand befindet. Der Artikel zur de:Blitzschlange würde sich freuen.
Liebe Grüße, Anika (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Moin! Ich probiere mich demnächst mal dran. Mittlerweile sollte das kein Problem mehr sein. 2012 hatte ich noch nicht die gleiche Softwareausstattung wie heute und die Kirche von deren Seitenwand das Bild stammt war eines meiner ersten richtig großen Projekte (Artikel und Fotodoku). Wenn Du schon was zur Blitzschlange geschrieben hast, kommt dann auch noch ein Artikel zum Donnerbesen? ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ich habe fast mein gesamtes bisheriges Wikipedialeben nach Literatur gesucht, die mehr als drei Worte umfasste (oder mehr als "mit Blitschlange im Giebel"). Am Sonnabend war es dann soweit
. Wenn dir also Literatur zum Donnerbesen (von dem ich Sa zum ersten Mal las) in die Finger kommt, auf die man aufbauen könnte: Warum nicht? --Anika (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ich habe fast mein gesamtes bisheriges Wikipedialeben nach Literatur gesucht, die mehr als drei Worte umfasste (oder mehr als "mit Blitschlange im Giebel"). Am Sonnabend war es dann soweit
- Und ich hatte gehofft, Du hättest vielleicht mehr Quellen zu solcher Art von traditionellem Bauschmuck. Schade. Aber das Du erst vor kurzem von Donnerbesen gelesen hast, wundert mich nicht, die Dinger gibts auch eher in meiner Gegend (Elbmarschen) als in Deiner Gegend in Sachsen. Mal sehen, was sich da so machen lässt. Um das Bild kümmere ich mich gegen Ende der Woche, ich bin gerade beruflich unterwegs. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- So, ich habe eine entzerrte Version hochgeladen. Ist die für Dich in Ordnung? Viele Grüße --Dirtsc (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Und ich hatte gehofft, Du hättest vielleicht mehr Quellen zu solcher Art von traditionellem Bauschmuck. Schade. Aber das Du erst vor kurzem von Donnerbesen gelesen hast, wundert mich nicht, die Dinger gibts auch eher in meiner Gegend (Elbmarschen) als in Deiner Gegend in Sachsen. Mal sehen, was sich da so machen lässt. Um das Bild kümmere ich mich gegen Ende der Woche, ich bin gerade beruflich unterwegs. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office building Überseering 33a in Hamburg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wohnanlage heimat ecke gazellenkamp 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ergo new york ring 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruine Gebrochen Gutenstein 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office building New-York-Ring 1 in Hamburg-Winterhude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office building Überseering 40 in Hamburg-Winterhude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alsterkrug ch 463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gazellenkamp 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Julius vosseler str 7 front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wacholderpark Fuhlsbüttel 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vogt wells str 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gazellenkamp 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 457 doerpsweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!
Hallo Dirtsc!
Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben.
Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.
Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:
- Die WLM-Vorjury hat alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
- Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
- Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.
Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.
Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC))
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecke alsterkrug zepp 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
office building Überseering 24 in Hamburg-Winterhude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
office building New-York-Ring 6 in Hamburg-Winterhude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.