User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snbw orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now Poco a poco 17:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1553 gutzkowstr 11 sued.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent uploads :)


Hallo Dirtsc, ich habe eine neue Version der Datei hochgeladen. Der Änderungsumfang: Korrektur der Perspective, kleine Drehung und mehr Dynamic Range (Optimierung vom Histogramm). Viele Grüsse! Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Unterstützung! Ich hoffe, dass ich diese Perspektivkorrekturen demnächst auch selber erledigen kann. Dirtsc (talk) 08:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kkga dach detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, but please add English descriptions to your candidates. --Kadellar 13:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Added english descriptions to all of my candidates. I hope to remember this for future nominations. --Dirtsc 06:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Danke schön! QI for me. --Kadellar 21:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adventskirche Hamburg-Schnelsen, Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Minor CA, but good --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erlk loh gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me --Kreuzschnabel 10:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rö2 eckturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but good quality, though.-- Smial 10:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smt türschliesser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Lens has some problems with corner sharpness, f/8 or f/11 would perhaps help. --Smial 10:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kko pfeiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meilenstein Bordesholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erlk loh westeingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective/tilt correction. Mattbuck 21:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
✓ DoneTried a correction. Please review again. --Dirtsc 18:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 19:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ws31 und ws35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 09:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg near Oevelgönne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment IMO it need perspective correction, all the buldings are tilted--Christian Ferrer 14:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
OK I hope the new version looks better. --Dirtsc 15:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 Support OK --Christian Ferrer 16:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg leaving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280) at Port of Hamburg near Waltershof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support --Christian Ferrer 14:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tellingstedt kirchplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment A perspective correction is needed, I think. --JLPC 09:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 CommentUps, I was a little bit too fast with this nomination. I corrected the tilt. Please look again. Perspective could be a little bit strange, because the ground rises to the left. --Dirtsc 17:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Better now (and sorry for the delay). --JLPC 12:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lkwb eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight ccw tilt Poco a poco 18:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
OK made a 2nd try, take a look --Dirtsc 19:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Test perspective

Hi Dirtsc You can download my test ou your picture at : http://we.tl/NOQJ0sKglO For information I use Adobe lightroom and for your picture I make that : transformation verticale -6 and transformation horizontale -19 and little crop at the base but less than you. Friendly --Christian Ferrer 04:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)}}

Thank you! I'll do that in the afternoon or in the evening and take a look at it. --Dirtsc (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I didn't had the time to take a look until today. But you're right, your perspective correction is much better. I think it is a matter of the used software. Until some weeks ago, I was only able to do tilt corrections, now I'm using a test version of DxO with is much better then everything I used before. Maybe I should consider using lightroom, it seems to be able of doing more selective perspective corrections. I'll talk to a friend who uses lightroom during the next days. But what to do with the image? Shall I upload the version you send to me? --Dirtsc (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
The picture is also a bit noisy, but your perspective corrections are not too bad, I will promote it.

Friendly --Christian Ferrer 20:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)}}

Thanks! See you in QIC ;-) --Dirtsc (talk) 04:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMCS Iroquois (DDG 280).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity Church in Hamburg-Allermöhe, main part of the altar by Hein Baxmann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ekfa fenster süden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ekfa fenster süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolai neu nikolaustuer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nienk süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zb kuhwerder deck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 06:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kberg choransicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kberg kriegerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chro altarraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO it need perspective corrections and a little bit cropped at the base up to the first bench --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 Question Can you be more specific about the needed perspective correction? I already made one, but maybe not good enough. Crop can be done. --Dirtsc 12:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Take as reference the column at right and the corner at left, these must be upright --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
OK I made a new version, but I fear there will now be different problems. Please take a look. --Dirtsc 17:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
The principle seem good but why crop the left? I try on my PC, I can uploaded my version to make you understand what I mean --Christian Ferrer 17:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I made one more version. If yours is better, take yours. --Dirtsc 21:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Go to your english talk page to see my test --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 Support A bit noisy too, but enough quality for me --Christian Ferrer 20:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clemens Schultz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ekfa fenster details norden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ekfa fenster details norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Taken from the inside, possibly a copyright problem (built 1960, no FOP) / von Innen keine Panoramafreiheit, daher möglichweise Urheberrechtsverletzung. -- Aisano 20:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 Comment The image is taken with knowledge and permission of the congregation. They have been informed of the publication last year. --Dirtsc 21:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Very nice, no copyright issues due to COM:FOP#Germany. Mattbuck 17:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lkwb turm detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you bring up the blue in the sky please - it seems quite red. Mattbuck 08:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I made the sky bluer, though I'm no friend of selective color enhancement. Please take a look. --Dirtsc 17:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
It's necessary sometimes - cameras use whitebalance software and sometimes it gets it wrong. Mattbuck 23:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kberg innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 19:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anbetung nikolaikirche (MHG).dt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Bk südfenster.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bk südfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa cruz hamburg bukai 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me: I think that f/5.6 is not good for this kind of picture, but the picture has quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

File:VistadelLagoNahuelHuapi.jpg

Hi, I fixed the picture. Regards!!!! --Ezarateesteban 10:34, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Do you read this message? Ezarateesteban 13:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes I did. I'm sorry, but there was not much time left for commons during the working days of the week. I'll take a look today. :-) --Dirtsc (talk) 12:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuapostolische tegelweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 06:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Support vessel "Putlos" of the german navy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Royal Dutch Shell oil refinery in Hamburg-Harburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8056 Öllager Rethe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Vassil 06:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8030 Schuten Ellerholzhafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 7976 Cap San Diego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support a bit blown, just OK for QI though --A.Savin 16:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 7965 Speicherstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Vassil 06:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8299 Teerhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oderhafen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellerholzkanal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8241 Deichtorcenter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 7964 HTC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment QI for me if correction of the perspective distortion--Lmbuga 02:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I made a slight horizontal correction. I hope that was the problem you saw. --Dirtsc 18:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
QI for me. No. See notes, but maybe you do not agree with me.--Lmbuga 20:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq innenraum nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8320 St Katharinen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Sorry, it's very tilted IMO, but it could be QI--Lmbuga 21:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
I made a new version, please take a look. --Dirtsc 13:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
QI for me--Lmbuga 19:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8244 Cityhochhäuser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentNice and good quality, but it needs a little perspective correction and perhaps it's bit tilted CW--Lmbuga 17:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
I made a new version, please take a look. --Dirtsc 13:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Good quality--Lmbuga 19:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8099 CTA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Other time the same problem (you know), but in this case is clearly QI for me. Good quality--Lmbuga 17:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq südwestansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Slight perspective correction could be applied, but is not really necessary. --Smial 10:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment QI for me if perspetive correction--Lmbuga 20:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I made a new version. Take a look. --Dirtsc 16:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 Support Good--Lmbuga 08:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8308 Chilehaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 07:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8260 Hbf und Alster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite soft but not too bad IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 07:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Marienkirche (Quickborn), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marienkirche (Quickborn), interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchsteinbek hintereingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchsteinbek haupttür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality  Support --Christian Ferrer 14:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Good Shepherd Church in Hamburg-Langenfelde, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Hamburg-Flottbek, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria-Magdalena-Church in Hamburg-Osdorf, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Re: Two images of greek islands on QIC

Dear Dirtsc, thank you for commenting my pictures. I developed them from RAW and definitely increased saturation and vibrance. I agree that they became way too oversaturated. In addition, noisy sky was pointed out in another comment. I hope to fix these issues and upload new versions this evening; I will drop you a note here afterwards. Heuschrecke (talk) 14:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello again. Sorry, at a first reading I thought you were talking about another pair of the pictures I posted at QIC: File:Neos_Marmaras_Bay_01.jpg and File:Neos_Marmaras_Bay_02.jpg. It's them that I fixed today. As for the pictures you mentioned, I also developed them from a RAW file and so definitely increased saturation from the default level in Lightroom (because not increasing saturation at all results in very dull colors), and played with color curves.

It's now hard to remember what the reality exactly was, but I have another picture similar to File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg that I shot in JPEG rather than RAW. On that picture, the color of the sky and the sea is the same as on File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg and the greens are much duller. But again, the greens are always too dull if I shoot in JPEG. To sum it up, I tend to think File:Kelyfos_sunset.jpg is rather ok. Perhaps one could desaturate the greens a little bit.

Next, the color curves in File:Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg were specifically adjusted to make the sunset more dramatic. Namely, I increased intensivity of light reds. The real sky was less red. I personally find such color enhancement acceptable if it makes a picture more beautiful; however if you disagree I will be happy to know your opinion here or in the QIC nomination.

Finally, please feel free to modify the pictures and to introduce your version if you wish. I can send you raw files upon your request. Cheers, Heuschrecke (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zb kuhwerder heck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but the cropped antenna is not optimal. Have you got a slightly wider crop at the top? --Tuxyso 20:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately not, I'm sorry. --Dirtsc 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
IMHO nonetheless OK. --Tuxyso 06:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellinger kirche haupttür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 19:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zgh westansicht2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Heuschrecke 15:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellinger kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellinger kirche eingangsseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Notable CA in the upper tree branches, but QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 07:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellinger kirche seitenfenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oeoemrang hues giebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq fenster süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.-ArildV 19:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq turmspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.-ArildV 19:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oeoemrang hues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please correct CA on left trees and the left wall. I promote right now. Heuschrecke 18:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 Comment Hope the correction is OK. Thank you. --Dirtsc 20:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smhh Tympanon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sso Eingangstuer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Need WB --The Photographer 17:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you please specify your problem with the white balance? --Dirtsc 16:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
The image shows washed, like a fog --The Photographer 19:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
New, maybe better, version uploaded. --Dirtsc 21:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk aussen Glockenturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq rundbogenfenster 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tree is disturbing --The Photographer 17:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
If you want to take a photo of the windows with light on them you can't avoid either the trees or the shadows of them. So I decided to show both. --Dirtsc 16:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Or take same picture in different day hour and different angle --The Photographer 16:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC) I never decline this picture. its posible, change from nomination to Discuss directly? --The Photographer 12:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
I just wanted to avoid a lengthy discussion without enough space to write it down. ;-) But of course you are right, I should not have changed the status directly to "Discuss". Sorry. --Dirtsc 21:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 Support Good quality and composition. --Smial 10:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk aussen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Perspektive eine Kleinigkeit überkorrigiert. -- Smial 08:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Stimmt, danke! Hatte mich rechts an einer nicht-senkrechten Linie orientiert. Neue Version ist hochgeladen. --Dirtsc 15:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Boar ey, dreimal gepurged, fünfmal Browsercache geleert, dann endlich die neue Version zu Gesicht bekommen. Ok now. --Smial 16:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk aussen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk aussen Wetterfahne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjepp fenster süd 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mkq turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cut down and perspective problem --The Photographer 17:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
OK to me, though maybe a bit dark. Mattbuck 21:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk grabplatten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 19:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Severinkirche

Dein Bild von dem Orgelprospekt kommt ein bißchen düster … was hältst du hiervon? Könnte außerdem etwas perspektivische Entzerrung verkraften, die im Bild rechte Kante stürzt etwas. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Deine Version ist von der Perspektive her besser. Mit meinen Mitteln habe ich es nicht besser hinbekommen, ohne die linke Seite zu weit nach oben zu verschieben. Aber auf meinem Monitor sieht Deine Version für mich etwas zu hell und bunt aus. --Dirtsc (talk) 21:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Ich habe gerade noch mal was Neues in meinem Tool gefunden. Man lernt doch nie aus. Ich lade eine neue Version hoch. Schau mal bitte drauf. --Dirtsc (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Bevor ich es irgendwann vergesse. Vielen Dank für die Tipps und das Beispiel. Ich habe mal wieder was dazu gelernt. --Dirtsc (talk) 05:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

QIC

Du hast natürlich völlig recht, ich habe bei der Nominierung nicht genau genug hingeschaut. Mag das Bild halt ;-). Das Objektiv ist auch nicht so doll, braucht eher f/11 für taugliche Schärfe. Da ist man aber trotz Sonne bei Verwendung eines Polfilters schnell bei ISO 800 oder höher, wenn man bei 100mm oder länger nicht verwackeln will. Auch ist der Antiwackel bei meiner damals verwendeten k-x nicht so doll, spielt gelegentlich Streiche. Bei dem Rundgang habe ich allerdings ganz bewußt ziemlich viel mit dem Tele in den engen Gassen geknipst und das Weitwinkel in der Tasche gelassen. Inzwischen nehme ich manchmal auch nur die 50mm Festbrennweite dafür, was an der Cropkamera ja auch schon ein kurzes Tele ist. Man muß damit zwar oft sehr viel laufen (Turnschuh-Zoom), gewinnt aber Perspektiven, die keine beknackten Superweitwinkelverzerrungen liefern, dafür aber unnötiges Beiwerk, störende Reklame o.ä. schön ausblenden oder bei relativ offener Blende (das 50er ist so ab f/2 brauchbar, bei 2.8 reht gut) mit Schärfeverläufen arbeiten. Ich kann nur empfehlen, mal längere Brennweiten auszuprobieren. -- Smial (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC) (der sein 12-24mm deswegen aber nicht einmottet)

Das Motiv fand ich wirklich ganz ausgezeichnet Ich mag solche Detailaufnahmen mit Tele, die sich eine ganz spezielle Ansicht heraus greifen. Hättest du das Bild mit analoger Ausrüstung gemacht, hätte man wahrscheinlich auf dem Abzug gar nichts zu bemängeln gehabt. Heute kann aber jeder die Bilder mal eben auf das Doppelte vergrößern und sieht dann jeden Fehler. Viele Deiner Probleme kenne ich selber nur zu gut. Ich hatte hier auch schon ein Bild nominiert, das in "üblicher" Größe wirklich schön war, beim Review sind aber alle Unschärfen aufgefallen. Ich kämpfe ja selber immer mit der Schärfe und bin da gerade sehr kritisch geworden, weil das hier bei QIC auch immer wieder bemängelt wird. Das ist kein einfaches Thema und ich bin gerade dabei, hier einiges zu lernen. Wahrscheinlich muss ich demnächst mal was an meiner Objektivausstattung tun. --Dirtsc (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotsenstation Seemannshöft NW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phb dt 8336 Teerhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotsenstation Seemannshöft NW 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualilty.--ArildV 06:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ssevk innen orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Still needs perspective correction, disturbing object on the left edge --Kreuzschnabel 19:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
A new try is online. --Dirtsc 15:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 Support --Kreuzschnabel 20:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sls querhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment left side slightly blurred, nonetheless, QI for me --Rjcastillo 12:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabstein faltings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chro gesamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Wittduen Dachreiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Wittduen Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Dirtsc/Archive,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Dirtsc/Archive,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo