User talk:Didym/Archives/2021
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Didym, thanks for letting me know about the licence issue on this picture.
There is a public domain license associtated under this link: https://www.lexican.de/de/news-blog/153-lexican-business-v6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuenFing (talk • contribs) 18:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Grundsätzlich sollte als Quelle die Seite angegeben werden, auf der des Bild mit Informationen zur Lizenz zu finden ist, damit lassen sich viele derartige Probleme vermeiden. In diesem Fall fehlt aber weiterhin eine gültige Lizenz, Public Domain Mark 1.0 zeigt zwar an, dass das Bild wahrscheinlich gemeinfrei ist, ist selbst aber keine Lizenz. --Didym (talk) 22:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
hello. could you please have a look to my comment there? rubin16 (talk) 04:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Answered there. --Didym (talk) 22:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright
The related file to the left was upload in 2012, and the main uploader is currently inactive, so I wonder why you did not deleted it back then. Hope that you consider your decision of deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:908:4E1:4B60:E4B4:A9D2:F4E2:D505 (talk) 21:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader is not inactive (at least not on de), and not deleting a copyright violation for more than 7 years still does not mean it is not a copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!
Dear Didym
Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.
After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.
The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.
As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.
Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
MediaWiki
Hallo Didym, wie gehst es Dir so? Kannst Du über die übersetzten Seiten MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist-custom-SVG-thumbnail/de und MediaWiki talk:Commons-editnotices-template-subpage-translation/de mal drüberschauen udn die verschieben? Grüße, -- Brackenheim (talk) 10:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- ...und MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist-custom-double-apostrophe/de. -- Brackenheim (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Mit kleinen Änderungen verschoben. Nicht die Datei, sondern deren Name befindet sich auf der Negativliste. --Didym (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Macht Sinn :-) Besten Dank! -- Brackenheim (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Mit kleinen Änderungen verschoben. Nicht die Datei, sondern deren Name befindet sich auf der Negativliste. --Didym (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Please take a short survey regarding UCoC
Hello Didym,
I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.
As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.
You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.
Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello
Can you please check that I have added the Creative Commons CC0 permission link for this file into the correct section.
https://aiartmedia.com/image-released/
Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norttis (talk • contribs) 21:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, the OTRS was not even necessary, the permission link would have been sufficient. --Didym (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
ფოტოები ჩემია
გამარჯობა, ასე გავიგე, რომ ფოტოების მფლობელობაში ეწვი შეიტანეთ. ჩემი გადაღებულია ყველა. აქ სწორად გწერთ? ჩემი პირველი დღებია ვკ ზე. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ლიო (talk • contribs) 11:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- If you are referring to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ლიო, you should leave any comments at the deletion request and not here. --Didym (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Borrado de imágenes de la página de joc artista plástico
Quisiera saber las razones por las que fueron eliminadas las imágenes de las obras del artista plástico Joc, si las mismas fueron creadas y fotografiadas por el propio artista, en espera de su respuesta. Joc Joccuba16 (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Are there still any questions after reading COM:OTRS? --Didym (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Is this image the same image that you deleted per 2015 DR discussion? --George Ho (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- No, all five uploads under this name were different images. --Didym (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Good catch
Thank you for taking action on my suggestion to inspect the huge set of uploads im the deletion discussion I initiated that you just closed. Keep up the good work. Timtrent (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nominating just a few files in the initial DR was exactly the right approach. Maybe this is not necessary for a few hundred files, but I have done this before for even a few thousand files, and it certainly saves a lot of time if there is consensus to keep the files. --Didym (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Is this a copyviol?--Dipralb (talk) 11:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Most probably yes. I am unable to find the exact source, but there is a video on twitter that was probably taken from the same angle, starting about a second later. --Didym (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Can you delete it? However, also File:GaetanoCastrovilli.jpg and File:MattiaZaccagni.jpg are copyviols imho.--Dipralb (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- DRs are usually closed after 7 days (but there is a huge backlog at the moment), so the first one still has a few days left. The other two are now deleted. --Didym (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Can you delete it? However, also File:GaetanoCastrovilli.jpg and File:MattiaZaccagni.jpg are copyviols imho.--Dipralb (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bmantha
Sir, I am Dr. Rama Murty (Bmantha). I uploaded all these files, which are taken by me only. I have used various cameras and cell phone androids to take these pictures majority from the bodiversity park, visakhapatnam, and some through our research surveys by our members. Majority pictures are cropped in computer to get finest views. I am unable to understand the coyright words, infact I am new to this Wikipedia and Wikimedia world. I am still learning how to upload and edit. Please help or guide me in this regard, how to retain these pictures at least those exclusively with birds, or butterflies or plant pictures without persons. I solicit your valuable advise and help sir thanking you with regards Dr. Rama Murty --Bmantha (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- So you also lied when you wrote you did take these images. I do not see any way to restore these images. --Didym (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hola, la imagen de María Berja Vega procede de la página web oficial del senado de España a la que ofrece para artículos en noticias o para sitios web de esciclopedia. ¿Cómo puedo añadir la información? Saludos --Noah Irtu Rodríguez (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Where at the source do you see any indication of a free license? --Didym (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Can you delete it after 12 days?--Dipralb (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- However, also File:Soualiho Meïté during Derby della Madonnina 2021.jpg is a possible copyviol.--Dipralb (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done. There is currently a huge backlog at the deletion requests, but those will be handled sooner or later, so there is no need to request closing of individual DRs. --Didym (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
File: Ляху ВС ВИКИ 2.jpg + File: Элита Соколовская 2020.jpg
For some reason this file was deleted. It is my own picture. I believe that there is no any prove that it is not? (Victor111222 (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC))
- On small images without metadata, we usually have to assume they are not own work. If you are the photographer, you can reupload in full camera resolution with intact metadata. --Didym (talk) 20:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2021
Hallo Didym,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.
Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted file of Neeladevi
File:Neeladevi.jpg
This file was deleted on 31st December 2020. It is my aunt's picture and we have no copyright issue. I'd like to know why it was deleted. Thanks.
Soujanya sreenath (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- This was a photo of a photo. Who was the original photographer? --Didym (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not delete my photo! JulianneAnkley.jpg
I took this photo and personally own it. I agree to share it publicly. JenInTen (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- On small images without metadata, we usually have to assume they are not own work. If you are the photographer, please upload the image in full camera resolution with intact metadata. --Didym (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Guerre Sannitiche.jpg
Hello, thanks for the advice! I contacted Francesco Guerra, owner of the photo and friend of Pietro Radassao, owner of the page. Francesco Guerra agrees with the use of the photograph "Guerre Sannitiche.jpg". However, in compliance with the Wikipedia rules, he will send to the address "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org", the template form for the release of the file rights.
Thanks again ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AvvCatrame (talk • contribs) 22:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- To prevent deletion if the ticket is not handled within a week, I have replaced the warning template. --Didym (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
dont delete my own logo
you delete a file:Ipublish.jpg this is my own Company logo . Saidghzayel (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please read COM:PS. I do not see any reason to keep your logo. --Didym (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Abgeleitetes Werk ?
Hallo, ich habe das Bild File:Franz Marc Blue Horse 1911 Photo Mosaic.jpg erzeugt und hochgeladen und du hast es als abgeleitetes Werk markiert. Ich habe mittlerweile tatsächlichen Quellbilder verlinkt, dass Hauptmotiv war ja bereits enthalten.
Meiner Meinung nach, handelt es sich hierbei um kein abgeleitetes Werk, sondern um ein neues Werk, um eine Collage. Keines der Einzelbilder steht im Vordergrund. Das müsste ja sonst auch für alle anderen Mosaikfotos hier bei Commons zutreffen, so wie ich das sehe, aber nicht der Fall ist. Ich bitte das nochmal zu überdenken. VG F7a8 (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Spätestens mit der Verlinkung der Einzelbilder sollte das Problem gelöst sein. Falls das ohne großen Aufwand möglich ist: könntest du aus den Links noch Wikilinks auf die Dateibeschreibungsseiten machen? --Didym (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Regarding "Permission required"
You left this message on my talk stating that I require permission info: I responded, however I am not sure how to add proof for permission here Could you help me regarding this? I am new to wikimedia commons. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- (Text) CC BY-SA obviously only refers to the text on that page, which has been taken from wikipedia. There is no indiction of a free license for the images, and those are probably just taken from another source. --Didym (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for the information, is there a website where I can check if an image has a free license? I'm not sure exactly how to verify whether an image has a free license. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- This depends on the site, but usually you can find information on the license somewhere at the bottom, sometimes behind a link. However, in most cases you will find restrictions that make the image not acceptable for Commons. --Didym (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, just one more question. Now, if I want to upload the image in this website to wikimedia commons for example, since it says that the "Content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License" and when I click on the link it says "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format", does this mean that I am allowed to do so? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, this is a CC BY 3.0 license, which means you can upload the image. As this is an external source, don't forget to add {{Licensereview}}. --Didym (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, just one more question. Now, if I want to upload the image in this website to wikimedia commons for example, since it says that the "Content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License" and when I click on the link it says "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format", does this mean that I am allowed to do so? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- This depends on the site, but usually you can find information on the license somewhere at the bottom, sometimes behind a link. However, in most cases you will find restrictions that make the image not acceptable for Commons. --Didym (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for the information, is there a website where I can check if an image has a free license? I'm not sure exactly how to verify whether an image has a free license. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Please see: Special:Diff/568868143. The global group has been renamed, but I'm not sure if my edit is the best solution. Is it possible to change the code in a way that vrt-permisisons is enabled also when somebody has still 'otrs-member': { enabled: true }
in their local .js? Any assistance welcome. Thank you! --Krd 14:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Da gäbe es bestimmt eine Möglichkeit, allerdings lohnt sich das bei weniger als 30 Nutzern eher nicht. Wenn es keine Einwände gibt, werde ich die Einbindungen noch heute Abend ersetzen. --Didym (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Das wäre auch eine gute Lösung. Danke! --Krd 21:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I do not understand you possible reasons
You deleted my images with general reasons I cannot understand. Particulary Calle del Predio.jpg is an image that certainly fullfills all the requeriments listed. All of them. So, could you please explain why are you deleting this image? The reasons to delete the other two images are also too difficult to understand but to delete Calle del Predio.jpg is amazing. Why? This street was named as a scientific women in a educational decition of our Ministery to give visibility to women science contributions. And you decide to delete this image... why? The other two images are part of an educational movement to avoid discriminations in a country so, why are you deleting them? Could you explain better than with generalities, please? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.164.172.193 (talk) 22:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Liliana Babbage, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted: File:Ejecutivo con Llamamiento.jpg
The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including: use in any work, regardless of content creation of derivative works commercial use free distribution See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. And also: File:Llamamiento Asamblea Constituyente .jpg File:Calle del Predio.jpg Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC) {{unsignedIP2|06:10, 14 July 2021|181.164.172.193}
- Those files are all copyright violations, again: please read COM:L. --Didym (talk) 14:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pease, just unerase the image you delete and you claimed to be out of license or something like that. Here you have the image you deleted with no reason at all:
- https://santafe.conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/sites/102/2014/10/calle3.jpg
- So, please, put it back. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.164.172.193 (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Again: read COM:L. You did not take this photograph and this means you can't upload and tag it with any license. --Didym (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- So, please, put it back. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.164.172.193 (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Let read this:
- "Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License" in this webpage https://santafe.conicet.gov.ar/las-calles-del-predio-conicet-dr-alberto-cassano-ya-tienen-los-nombres-de-destacadas-figuras-de-la-ciencia-argentina/ of CONICET where you may find the contents and the file of the image. Do you know what menas "Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License"? As the file is upon Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License you should not delete it just because I did not shot the photo. Sure, I did not shot it but it is on Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License. Argentina is a country with public science organizations and CC licenses. So, please, read about these rules and put the file back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liliana Babbage (talk • contribs) 21:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- I do not understand when is enough. The context web page is: https://santafe.conicet.gov.ar/las-calles-del-predio-conicet-dr-alberto-cassano-ya-tienen-los-nombres-de-destacadas-figuras-de-la-ciencia-argentina/
- It is a CONICET webpage as you might notice. The page includes the image and the following note:
- Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License ... with the link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- So, when is enough for you? It is clearly a Creative Commons license the license for the image.
- What else do you need? Please, put the image back and/or, let me upload it to the wikicommon repository without asking more and more requirements with no reason at all.
- I do not forget to sign my messages by the way. Why are yoy including this issue in the message I had sent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liliana Babbage (talk • contribs) 23:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- So why did you upload this as own work? You have to provide the source when uploading, not after being asked multiple times. I will not do anything on this, but you can use COM:UD. And by the way: you did forget to sign, so the bot (not me) is right. --Didym (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- I do not forget to sign my messages by the way. Why are yoy including this issue in the message I had sent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liliana Babbage (talk • contribs) 23:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! May I ask why you deleted that photo? Its uploader had referred to the relevant position of the Wikimedia legal team, which you've left with no comments. --INS Pirat (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Even if this is no copyright violation, it would qualify for deletion as a low quality out of scope file, so certainly not worth taking the risk of keeping a possible copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for explanation. --INS Pirat (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Löschen: Bernhard Onken Stein.jpg
Ich hatte einen Antrag auf Löschug dieser Datei gestellt, der abgelehnt wurde. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt gab es bereits eine weitere Datei mit ähnlichem Namen: BernhardOnkenStein.jpg. Beide Dateien sind meine Arbeit. In der Zeit zwischen beiden Aufnahmen wurde der Stein gesäubert, so dass es m. A. keinen Sinn machen sollte, die erstere, unsaubere Datei weiterhin zu behalten. Auch sind die Metadaten der ersten Datei inkorrekt, da defekt. Ich stelle daher erneut den Antrag, die Datei: "Bernhard Onken Stein.jpg" zu löschen. --Fibe101 (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Es liegt weiterhin kein Löschgrund vor, die beiden Bilder zeigen den Stein in völlig verschiedenen Zuständen mit 10 Jahren Abstand. Ein neuer Löschantrag könnte nur mit neuen Argumenten gestartet werden, und dann auch nicht einfach an die alte Diskussion angehängt, sondern als neuer Abschnitt. --Didym (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2021
Hallo Didym,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …
Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.
Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Schválení dvou obrázků autora Lubomír Lichý
Zdravím Vás, 23. 8. jsem na Commons nahrál dva obrázky Lubomíra Lichého (moje premiéra na Commons). Druhý den jsem na OTRS přeposlal e-mail pana Lichého s podepsanou přílohou (uvolnění souborů na Commons). Jak poznám, že už jsou obrázky uvolněny? Teď jsem se na obrázky díval a pořád tam mají výstrahu, že mohou být smazány. Tak teď nevím (jsem tu začátečník), zda je to běžný čas, než to na OTRS zpracují, nebo zda je ve formuláři na uvolnění souborů nějaká chyba, nebo zda jsem třeba neudělal chybu v e-mailové adrese na OTRS... Děkuji za odpověď S pozdravem Jirka Mikulka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirka Mikulka (talk • contribs) 08:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good, but it may take a few days or even weeks until the ticket is processed. --Didym (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/WLM2021UA-invitation.png/300px-WLM2021UA-invitation.png)
Привіт!
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Police
I have seen you suggest to delete an archive I uploaded some time ago. Well, as I do not visit this page enough to see all bullshit people do I was surprised someone who what did in life was to upload a Rousseau painting photo. You cannot read read in portuguese I suppose. But you are fast enough with your fingers to judge someone else. But not enough fast to upload a work of your own. Maybe you can you use what illegitimize. Be careful because my work has ISBN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luiscnun (talk • contribs) 22:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Are you referring to File:Educação Militante.pdf? That file was deleted almost two years ago for not falling within our project scope. --Didym (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/WLM2021_Ukraine.png/300px-WLM2021_Ukraine.png)
Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
Регіон | К-ть пам'яток | К-ть фото |
---|---|---|
Севастополь | 1 | 1 |
АР Крим | 12 | 51 |
Закарпаття | 26 | 96 |
Миколаївщина | 29 | 81 |
Рівненщина | 36 | 186 |
Херсонщина | 36 | 83 |
Житомирщина | 55 | 324 |
Донеччина | 57 | 153 |
Тернопільщина | 62 | 234 |
Буковина | 75 | 220 |
Луганщина | 82 | 90 |
Львівщина | 82 | 351 |
Кіровоградщина | 88 | 181 |
Волинь | 98 | 270 |
Одещина | 115 | 383 |
Сумщина | 129 | 414 |
Дніпропетровщина | 139 | 278 |
Київ | 159 | 248 |
Хмельниччина | 166 | 538 |
Полтавщина | 171 | 594 |
Харківщина | 175 | 625 |
Київщина | 181 | 651 |
Черкащина | 186 | 455 |
Прикарпаття | 240 | 305 |
Вінничина | 242 | 775 |
Запоріжжя | 253 | 317 |
Чернігівщина | 305 | 519 |
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
- «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
- «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
- «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Permission granted by email
Permission on the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stefan_Markovski_with_the_renowned_French_writer_Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric_Beigbeder.jpg was given by email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macliterature (talk • contribs) 16:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- And already processed less than two hours later. --Didym (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Bernhard Onken Stein
Bernhard Onken Stein.jpg
Hiermit bitte ich dich, deine Entscheidung, das Bild - nicht - zu löschen, zu überdenken.
Ich hatte den Stein, schmutzig wie er war, fotografiert und hochgeladen. Danach habe ich das hiesige Gartenamt gebeten, den Stein vom Rhododendron zu befreien und zu säubern. Das haben sie wider Erwarten auch getan. Daraufhin habe ich ein neues Foto gemacht und ebenfalls hochgeladen. Somit war das erste Bild überflüssig und konnte gelöscht werden. Die zeitliche Differenz zwischen beiden Bildern war nur wenige Wochen. Das erste Bild gibt eine falsche Zeit an, da die Zeiteinstellung bei dieser ersten Kamera defekt war. Das - zweite - Bild hat einen ähnlichen Namen (ohne Zwischenräume).
Dank für dein Verständnis - Gruß --Fibe101 (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Und warum soll das jetzt ein Löschgrund sein? Die Antwort vom 23. Juli gilt weiterhin unverändert. Höchstens das falsche Datum könnte man korrigieren. --Didym (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weil einer der Gründe für das Nicht-Löschen deine Vermutung war, die Aufnahmen lägen 10 Jahre auseinander. Da das aber nicht stimmt, verliert es damit seine Relevanz. --Fibe101 (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Фото
Здравствуйте!
Спасибо, отправила.
Поэт Эстет (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Поэт Эстет
- It looks like there is a problem with the permission. Please make sure all questions are answered. --Didym (talk) 19:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Sarah Lipstate photo
Hi, thanks for getting in touch - I'm afraid I don't know what else I can do with this image, because I uploaded it at the request of the subject of the page on account of the old one being out of date. It's a publicity image she supplied, as you can see from the Twitter link. I'd rather not hassle her for any further action as she's already been very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDRobson (talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, licensing pictures requires permission of the photographer. Please read COM:VRT for further steps. --Didym (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Bitte um Freigabe
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/WikipediaStuttgart_2021-09.jpg/220px-WikipediaStuttgart_2021-09.jpg)
Moin Didym,
kannst Du bitte für dieses Bild von unserem Treffen bei Giovanni eine Freigabe an den Support schicken?
Danke und herzlichen Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Mit ticket:2021103110008027 erledigt. --Didym (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo
Dear Didym,
Vielen Dank for taking notice of the photo added to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_ter_Meulen. I have now asked Prof Ter Meulen to provide a declaration of consent according to the template you kindly provided. Wigner789 (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have replaced the no permission template to prevent deletion until the ticket is handled. --Didym (talk) 22:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hamis Kiggundu
Thank you for the deletion of swathes of material. I'm glad I was not in error by nominating them. Timtrent (talk) 22:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- I hope I was able to locate all files from this complex. --Didym (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- I am sure more will slip in from time to time. The Kiggundu article on en WP shows he has not been averse to paying journalists. There is a citation to that effect. With enough of us alert to it, in the plagiarised words of Gandalf, "They shall not pass!" Timtrent (talk) 23:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- And at once we have more uploads. See Category:Hamis Kiggundu. The editor is blocked already. I have nominated the latest two files for speedy deletion as re-creations. Uploader is User:BLaurain. There is an en WP SPI at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Izaaqnewton with the new sock Timtrent (talk) 19:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- I am sure more will slip in from time to time. The Kiggundu article on en WP shows he has not been averse to paying journalists. There is a citation to that effect. With enough of us alert to it, in the plagiarised words of Gandalf, "They shall not pass!" Timtrent (talk) 23:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Meine Dateien
Hallo Didym, ich habe für alle!!!! von Ihnen gelöschten Datein die angefordeten Unterlagen innerhalb der Frist längst nachgereicht!!! ich erwarten mir daher die sofirtige Wiederherrstellung der Dateien! Erika39 (talk) 17:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Und wo soll diese Freigabe sein? Ich konnte trotz Suche nichts finden. Gibt es da eine Ticketnummer? --Didym (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe für jeden einzelnen File den Freigabe-Assistenten verwendet und dort das Urheberrecht nachgereicht! Erika39 (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- PS.: Bereits am 26. Oktober mit der jeweiligen Nachricht, dass die Anfrage bearbeitet wird. Erika39 (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Der Freigabe-Assistent generiert nur eine Mail, im VRTS kann ich aber nichts finden. Wenn es eine automatische Antwort gegeben hat müsste diese eigentlich die Ticketnummer enthalten, mit der könnte ich nachschauen, warum bisher keine Freigabe erfolgt ist. --Didym (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich bin hier leider kein Experte, weiss daher auch nicht wo ich eine Ticketnummer finden kann. Ich könnte jetzt alle Dateien noch einmal hochladen. Wäre es nicht gescheiter sie stellen sie wieder her und ich gebe das richtige Urheberrecht an. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- In der Eingangsbestätigung müsste am Ende die Ticketnummer, beginnend mit 20211026 stehen. Sollte die Freigabe tatsächlich unaunffindbar sein, bleibt nur das erneute Absenden, erst danach können die Bilder wiederhergestellt werden. --Didym (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- a) wo finde ich diese Eingangsbestätigung und b) wie kann ich bei gelöschten Bildern den Freigabe-Assistenten verwenden? Danke vorab für die Hilfe. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Die Eingangsbestätigung solltest du per Mail erhalten haben (an die Adresse, von der aus die Freigabe verschickt wurde), also wahrscheinlich in deinem Posteingang. Für den Freigabe-Assistenten ist es relativ egal ob die Datei gelöscht ist, der Dateiname lässt sich trotzdem angeben. --Didym (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe jetzt die Freigabe für File:1995 - 50 Jahre Huber PR-Text 2.pdf erneut beantragt. Die Ticketnummer lautet: 2021120110011889. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Habe jetzt für alle fraglichen Dateien um Freigabe angesucht und für jede eine Ticketnummer. Wie gehts jetzt weiter? Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Abwarten und Rückfragen beantworten. --Didym (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Dem Wikpedia-Supporter liegen inzwischen alle von ihm gewünschten Bestätigungen vor. Können sie die Dateien nunmehr wieder herstellen? Besten Dank und liebe Grüße Erika39 (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sobald die Freigabe akzeptiert wurde werden die Dateien wiederhergestellt. Das macht allerdings der Bearbeiter des Tickets und nicht ich. --Didym (talk) 20:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Dem Wikpedia-Supporter liegen inzwischen alle von ihm gewünschten Bestätigungen vor. Können sie die Dateien nunmehr wieder herstellen? Besten Dank und liebe Grüße Erika39 (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- Abwarten und Rückfragen beantworten. --Didym (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Habe jetzt für alle fraglichen Dateien um Freigabe angesucht und für jede eine Ticketnummer. Wie gehts jetzt weiter? Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe jetzt die Freigabe für File:1995 - 50 Jahre Huber PR-Text 2.pdf erneut beantragt. Die Ticketnummer lautet: 2021120110011889. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Die Eingangsbestätigung solltest du per Mail erhalten haben (an die Adresse, von der aus die Freigabe verschickt wurde), also wahrscheinlich in deinem Posteingang. Für den Freigabe-Assistenten ist es relativ egal ob die Datei gelöscht ist, der Dateiname lässt sich trotzdem angeben. --Didym (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- a) wo finde ich diese Eingangsbestätigung und b) wie kann ich bei gelöschten Bildern den Freigabe-Assistenten verwenden? Danke vorab für die Hilfe. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- In der Eingangsbestätigung müsste am Ende die Ticketnummer, beginnend mit 20211026 stehen. Sollte die Freigabe tatsächlich unaunffindbar sein, bleibt nur das erneute Absenden, erst danach können die Bilder wiederhergestellt werden. --Didym (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich bin hier leider kein Experte, weiss daher auch nicht wo ich eine Ticketnummer finden kann. Ich könnte jetzt alle Dateien noch einmal hochladen. Wäre es nicht gescheiter sie stellen sie wieder her und ich gebe das richtige Urheberrecht an. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Der Freigabe-Assistent generiert nur eine Mail, im VRTS kann ich aber nichts finden. Wenn es eine automatische Antwort gegeben hat müsste diese eigentlich die Ticketnummer enthalten, mit der könnte ich nachschauen, warum bisher keine Freigabe erfolgt ist. --Didym (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- PS.: Bereits am 26. Oktober mit der jeweiligen Nachricht, dass die Anfrage bearbeitet wird. Erika39 (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe für jeden einzelnen File den Freigabe-Assistenten verwendet und dort das Urheberrecht nachgereicht! Erika39 (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism by 182.239.64.0/18
Hello, Didym. As the title mentioned, this cidr nominated File:Jimmy Au Sui-wai in June 2008.jpg for deletion twice with some incomprehensible reasons. Could you help to follow up? Thank you. -- Lethal Magma (talk) 13:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- The same vandalism on File:The closed Kwai Fong Station exit E.jpg. But vandalism every few months is not enough for page protection or a range block. I am now watching both pages, if this continues we might need a few page protections. --Didym (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Francisco Peralta Torrejón
Hello Didym, small typo. ...An extra permission may be requires if there are works of other authors visible in these photo... should probably read ...An extra permission may be required if there are works of other authors visible in these photo... Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- That part was copied from Template:ChristianMichelides and the typo apparently remained unnoticed since 2016. --Didym (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Newsweek Magazine Cover
Newsweek magazine cover of Jacqueline Bisset from 1977 that was added to Jacqueline Bisset entry was deleted for copyright violation. What are wikipedia's policies regarding a widely reproduced magazine cover? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shilpakala (talk • contribs) 00:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Please see COM:L. --Didym (talk) 13:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)