User talk:DeuxPlusQuatre
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Reventtalk 17:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- The file you uploaded had some kind of encoding issue (it's duration was 13 d 22 h 25 min 16 s!), Yann uploaded a different working copy taken from the YouTube channel. Reventtalk 17:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Portrait20160914.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Civa (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Le Petit journal illustré Cecile Brunschwig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Le Petit journal illustré Joliot Curie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Le Petit journal illustré Suzanne Lacore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Le Petit journal illustré bpt6k718253b.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Duplat-Clisson-1832.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Malary-Cacault-1843-cadre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Malary-Cacault-1843.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lemot-Salomon-1790.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Mur-Les-Fameuses-2017.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mur-Les-Fameuses-2017.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- I corrected the attributions of pictures.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Mur-Atlantide-2017.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mur-Atlantide-2017.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- I corrected the attributions of pictures.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Mur-Folle-Journee-2017.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mur-Folle-Journee-2017.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- I corrected the attributions of pictures.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Mur Les Utopiales Nantes 2017.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mur Les Utopiales Nantes 2017.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- I corrected the attributions of pictures.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
J'ai reçu un signalement comme quoi cela ne serait pas Saskia de Ville. Pourriez-vous vérifier ?
Meilleures salutations
--AntonierCH (d) 18:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Je ne sais pas comment vérifier. Le programme de France Musique affichait Saskia de Ville. Si c'est l'intéressée qui a fait le signalement, on peut lui faire confiance. En y regardant de près, j'ai également en doute.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 08:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Cela vient de l'intéressée ou d'un-e représentant-e de celle-ci. Je voulais écarter le fait que cette photo pouvait lui sembler défavorable et qu'elle voulait simplement son retrait. --AntonierCH (d) 09:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- J'ai modifié la description et enlevé la catégorie. Mais il reste le nom du fichier. Pour éviter la même méprise, je propose la suppression du fichier. --DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 12:05, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Cela vient de l'intéressée ou d'un-e représentant-e de celle-ci. Je voulais écarter le fait que cette photo pouvait lui sembler défavorable et qu'elle voulait simplement son retrait. --AntonierCH (d) 09:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Juliette Rennes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fernanda Melchor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Photos week end sorcières à Sion
[edit]Bonjour DeuxPlusQuatre, j'ai posté un message sur la PDD d'Opsylac en te pinguant à propos des photos de la visite des archives de l'archevêché de Sion. Vous avez toutes deux pris des photos de parchemins du XIIe siècle lors d'une visite organisée et payée par les sans pagEs (un véritable trésor pour la connaissance libre) avec ton appareil qui représente un trésor inestimable pour la connaissance libre. Si elle n'arrive pas à télécharger vu que tu es partie avec les photos dans l'appareil, tu as la possibilité de faire un ticket OTRS en mettant tous les liens vers les photos téléchargées dans un seul mail. --Nattes à chat (talk) 09:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- J'ai fait le dispatch des photos à chaque personne en respectant les droits à image et auteures. Je n'ai pris aucune photo aux archives. Quand je prends des photos pour les mettre sur Commons, je note les dates, le sujet, etc. de façon à pouvoir les exploiter ensuite. Je suis tout simplement incapable de dire de quoi il s'agit pour les photos prises aux Archives.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 09:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Josephine Meckseper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JMXStudio (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Clovis Maillet
[edit]Bonjour DeuxPlusQuatre, pourrais tu modifier le titre de cette photo File:Louise Hervé-Chloé Maillet.jpg qui utilise le deadname de Clovis Maillet? Cette photo est reprise dans un article sur wikipedia.Nattes à chat (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Pas de souci, tu sais comment faire pour l'enlever. Il me semble. Bien cordialement.--DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oui évidemment, mais je trouve un peu trash de le faire sans te demander :). Nattes à chat (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour DeuxPlusQuatre, Je suis désolée d'utiliser cette discussion mais je ne trouve pas le chemin pour créer une nouvelle discussion... Je suis Camille Froidevaux-Metterie et je voulais d'abord vous remercier pour avoir mis à jour ma page en intégrant mon dernier ouvrage. Je me souviens en avoir discuté avec l'une de vos amies venue m'écouter à Nantes, un grand merci donc pour cette actualisation ! J'ai en revanche remarqué que vous aviez changé la photo "officielle" en insérant une nouvelle photo pris lors de cette conférence à Nantes. Elle me représente sous un jour qui ne me convient pas, j'y fais une curieuse grimace et, surtout, j'y vois ma sœur et cela produit un effet assez curieux et désagréable. Auriez-vous la gentillesse de rétablir le portrait précédent ? J'en profite aussi pour vous demander s'il est possible de remplacer "écrivaine" (que je ne suis pas) par "philosophe", (ce que je suis :) En vous remerciant vivement par avance de votre aide, Bien à vous,Simone&Iris (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Simone&Iris. Il n'existe pas à ma connaissance une autre image sur Commons vous concernant. Vous pouvez verser une image qui vous convient davantage. Cette image doit être libre de droit. La procédure est plus facile si elle n'est pas réalisée par un·e photographe professionnelle. C'est bien la personne qui a pris la photo, qui verse la photo dans Commons. En général, la personne qui prend la photo et la personne photographiée sont disctinctes sauf en cas d'utilisation du retardateur. Veiller à garder les métadonnées. J'espère avoir répondu à vos questions. DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Si si, il en existe bien d'autres, notamment celle qui était affichée depuis le début de la page : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camille_Froidevaux-Metterie.png
- Et j'en est reversé une hier : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camille_Froidevaux_Metterie.jpg
- Je précise que ces photos ont été prises par mon mari et non par un photographe professionnel (mais il est réalisateur, elles paraissent donc assez "pro"), elle sont donc totalement libres de droits.
- En revanche, je n'arrive pas à changer la photo moi-même, étant trop ignorante des procédures techniques.
- Auriez-vous la gentillesse de le faire ? Une fois encore, je ne comprends pas ce qui a motivé le changement...
- En vous en remerciant,
- Bien à vous Simone&Iris (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Super, les photos n'étaient pas référencées. Il manquait la catégorie pour qu'elles soient bien classées. Voilà qui est corrigé. Bien à vous. DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Claire-Andrieu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
92.173.123.153 09:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Miriam Cahn.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--ManFromNord (talk) 07:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jamila Jendari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |