User talk:Dellex

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichhörnchen im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets QI-requirements --Mbdortmund 01:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

[edit]
Thanks!

Hoi Dellex,

ich sag mal spontan herzlichen Dank für all die flotten Flitzis :-) Gelungene Aufnahmen … ich hab hier auch noch'n paar Nüsse herumliegen, die werd ich die Tage bestimmt wieder bei unseren gelegentlichen Gästen los ;-)

Gute Grüße --:bdk: 15:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich finde Deine Aufnahme von diesem kleinen Kerl total geil! Hab das Bild in der Wiki im Eichhörnchen eingebaut. Schönen Jahreswechsel --Dellex (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jo, die ist in der Tat niedlich, ist allerdings nicht von mir, hatte ich nur zu Urzeiten (als frei lizenziertes Bild) gesucht, gefunden und hochgeladen (damals waren gute Eichhornbilder noch sehr rar).
Schön übrigens, dass Du Dich so um den Artikel kümmerst. Habe gerade beim kurzen Drübergucken bemerkt, dass File:Swimming red squirrel.jpg nicht unser heimisches Eichhörnchen zeigt, sondern eine andere Art. Insofern sollte es wohl besser nicht in dem Artikel auftauchen – das kannst Du ja in einem der nächsten Edits machen ;-) Dir natürlich auch einen guten Sprung ins neue Jahr! --:bdk: 15:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok, hab es gesehen, es stammt aus Kanada. Ich werde es demnächst raus nehmen. Gruß --Dellex (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, frisch im neuen Jahr fällt mir noch etwas zum Review ein: Du könntest evtl. mal unseren Hörnchenexperten ansprechen, ob er momentan Lust und Zeit hat, auch bei dem Artikel mitzuhelfen. Und dann hab ich noch über ein weiteres Fundstück gelacht, dass ich Dir nicht vorenthalten möchte:

  • Eichhorn imitiert Meerschwein
  • Vorbild
    Vorbild
  • Imitat
    Imitat

Ungewöhnliche Sitz- oder Liege(?)-Haltung für'n Eichhörnchen, sieht man zumindest nicht häufig ;-) --:bdk: 09:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kopfschüttelnder Eisbär.JPG

[edit]

Hello,

Do you remember in which zoo you took this picture ? If it is a zoo in Germany, you might be able to select one of the categories within Category:Polar bears in zoos in Germany. Teofilo (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was in Tierpark Berlin. Category:Ursus maritimus in Tierpark Berlin --Dellex (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Teofilo (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fighting red kangaroos 1.jpg

[edit]

Dear Photographer, I am interested in including your fighting red kangaroos photo in a children's book. It would be among other photos of Kangaroos. It would be used at a size of 2"x3" approximately. I will have a credit page for any photography I use outside of my own. Is there a way that I can get your full credit information for this usage. Thank you.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Dellex,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Dinosaurierland Rügen

[edit]

Hallo Dellex, ich habe diese Kategorie soeben angelegt. Bitte kategorisiere weitere Bilder vom Dinosaurierland Rügen dort hinein. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Dellex, gibt es einen Grund warum Du Deine Bilder nun trotz besseren Wissens weiter falsch kategorisierst? Die von Dir vergebene Category:Dinosauria ist falsch, denn Deine Bilder zeigen keine Dinosaurier, sondern Dinosaurier-Modelle. Und zwar die vom Dinosaurierland Rügen. Wo also ist das Problem? -- Ies (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo les, ich war so vertieft darin, die Bilder hoch zuladen dass ich deine Nachricht nicht gesehen habe. Es war mir schon klar dass meine Kategorie nicht ganz richtig war, aber ich wollte mich später darum kümmern. Es war wirklich keine böse Absicht. Danke dafür, dass du es bereits erledigt hast. --Dellex (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rote Haselnüsse.JPG

[edit]

Hallo Dellex, das sieht mir sehr nach der Sorte "Rotblättrige Zellernuss" aus. Die bekommt auch rote Früchte. Schaue mal bei Google. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Als ich sie fotografiert habe, war ich sehr überrascht. Ich verstehe nicht viel von Pflanzen, finde sie nur sehr schön. Solche Nüsse hatte ich noch nie gesehen und es scheint als ob du Recht hast. Es sieht so aus, als ob das wirklich Rotblättrige Zellernüsse sind. Danke! --Dellex (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rote Mirabellen1.JPG

[edit]

Hallo Delex, bist Du sicher, dass das auf den Fotos Mirabellen sind? Es gibt nur eine Mirabellensorte mit roten Früchten, die Gleisweilerer Mirabelle von der gibt es ca. 20 ausgewachsene Bäume in Gleisweiler/Rheinland Pfalz. Das auf dem Foto sieht mir mehr nach Kirschpflaume aus. Siehe auch [[1]] und [[2]] um den Unterschied erklären. Die beiden Arten werden sehr oft verwechselt.--Tara2 (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 14:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dachspfote vorn.jpg

[edit]
File:Dachspfote vorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Plectranthus (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alvarado.jpeg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Alvarado.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: El pintor Humberto Garavito murió en 1970.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alvarado.jpeg

[edit]
File:Alvarado.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indohyus Skulptur.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Indohyus Skulptur.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Dino park is privately owned and does not fall under FOP Germany
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dellex&oldid=447634913"