User talk:DarwIn/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sicalis citrina (Stripe-tailed Yellow-finch), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chordeiles pusillus (Least nighthawk).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callicore sorana ("80") ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Augastes scutatus (Hyacinth visorbearer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neohelice granulata (Burrowing crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saltator atricollis (Black-throated saltator).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sciurus aestuans (Brazilian squirrel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Canário-rasteiro (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canário-rasteiro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Olá, DarwIn. Tire-me uma dúvida, por favor: pode haver algum direito sobre uma imagem que eu fiz de uma pessoa que agora já está morta ? Tirei fotos em 2001 e o sujeito morreu em 2012. Que eu saiba, a única pessoa que poderia reclamar direitos de imagem seria a própria pessoa que aparece na foto. Como ela faleceu, concluí que não há problemas com relação a isso. Estou correto ? Posso publicar essa imagens como trabalho próprio e licenciá-las sob Creative Commons ? Só para constar, o sujeito deu consentimento implicitamente, já que até fez pose para a foto. Clausgroi (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Seal of Sikkim color.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpacemanSpiff 08:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Jack Cooper in Ives studio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KDS4444 (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

15:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

IMG

Olá, Darwin

Preciso de sua ajuda sobre uma imagem no commons. Eu estava fazendo um upload de uma imagem para uso na wiki-pt e antes de salvar o artigo, me deparei com uma imagem idêntica aqui no commons, mas acredito que a imagem do commons não esteja de acordo com as diretrizes, você pode verificar para mim? A imagem em questão é esta. abraços Mvictor talk 23:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Olá Marcelo Victor, a licença que constava nesse ficheiro de facto não estava correcta, mas a imagem em si cumpre com as directrizes do projecto, por ser uma imagem de formas geométricas simples e texto: {{PD-simple}}. Idealmente esse tipo de imagem deveria estar traduzido em SVG, para se obter o máximo de qualidade. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 03:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Olá Darwin, minha duvida era justamente na licença. obrigado Mvictor talk 15:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Ferramenta para propor várias eliminações de uma só vez

Boas Darwin.

Sabe de alguma ferramenta que simplifique o envio para eliminação com {{Delete}} de vários ficheiros simultaneamente. É muitíssimo comum um VDA não vir só, mas em enxurrada, e é uma seca fazer tudo manualmente.

Obrigado. Cpts. --Stego (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

PS: BTW: acha que estas eram caso de Speedy Delete? --Stego (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Imagem para eliminação

Olá DarwIn, descobri que és administrador aqui do Commons e desde quando comecei a editar aqui, tive alguns problemas. O primeiro foi com o arquivo File:Wendell Lira.jpg que foi marcado para eliminação, por VDA, mas está sobre licença livre como é possível ver no sítio. O mais recente é sobre o arquivo File:Black-breasted Buttonquail (Turnix melanogaster).jpg que foi marcado para eliminação pelo facto de sua licença ser livre, mais está na licença 2.0 como é possível ver no Flickr. E agora, o que eu faço? Mr. Fulano (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mr. Fulano: Olá. A primeira, eu próprio apaguei e fechei a PE, porque era um caso perdido. O site de facto tem essa licença, mas ela só se aplica às imagens produzidas por eles, que não era o caso dessa. Quanto à licença da outra, de facto não é aceite porque é "não comercial", nós apenas aceitamos comerciais e que permitam modificações, normalmente "CC-BY-SA". O que pode fazer é enviar uma mensagem ao autor da imagem no Flickr, perguntando se ele aceita mudar a licença da imagem para uma licença livre, de preferência para "CC-BY-SA-4.0". Essa eu não apaguei ainda, para dar tempo a que isso seja feito, já que há boa possibilidade de ter sucesso. Saudações, -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Como que eu aviso ao usuário do Flickr? É que eu não sei nada sobre esta rede social e não faço a menor ideia de como faço isso. Mr. Fulano (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
@Mr. Fulano: Basta criar uma conta lá, se já tens facebook, ele entra automaticamente usando esse perfil. Depois é só enviar uma mensagem ao fotógrafo, e esperar a resposta.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Categories for retable, reredos and altarpiece

Hi! I was wondering if you could help me with something, as I'm unusued to working in commons (I do some work at Wikipedia). I noticed that you had edited the category for "altarpieces" before and thought you might want to help. I think the categories for altarpieces, reredos and retables are a mixed up as it is. If I understand things correctly, in English a "reredos" is a large, elaborate screen typically found in the very back of a church, standing alone behind the altar. A "retable" is placed closer to the altar or even upon it. An "altarpiece" refers to both, and is a porte-manteau term for objects of artistic value placed in the vicinity of the altar. At least this is the conclusion I've drawn from the Getty Art & Architecture Thesaurus (see here, here and here). Do you agree with this conclusion, and if so, would you be able to change the categorisation of the images accordingly? Or if you can point me in the right direction, I'd be grateful. Thanks a lot! Kind regards, Yakikaki (talk) 14:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Yakikaki, I answered your question at the topic you opened at the Village Pump. Thank you very much for informing me about that discussion.-- Darwin Ahoy! 04:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

19:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Bloqueio

Boa Tarde DarwIn Eu só Oque Conversa Contigo Na Wikipedia sobre o Bloqueio ja que Um usuário Bloqueiado Não Pode Adicionar Um Topico Então Pede Empresto De Conta Porfavor Peço Um Desbloqueio Já havia Te dito a rasão Disseste ja estou desbloqueiado mas não Porfavor desbloqueie só este IP 105.168.1.160 Que è o Meu Clica Aqui Ruma José (talk) 16:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

@Ruma José: Mas na pt-wiki usas outro nome? Eu nunca falei com um Ruma José lá...-- Darwin Ahoy! 17:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Por isso eu te disse emprestei está conta porque usuário bloqueiado não envia mensagem eu só o Francisco Mateus, Ruma José (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

@Ruma José: Olha que aqui as contas não podem ser emprestadas, se continuas a usar a do Ruma José, essa conta acabará por ser bloqueada. Tem calma, que eu vou ver a tua situação, quando tiver a certeza que sabes realmente como isto funciona. Até agora, não é o que parece...-- Darwin Ahoy! 18:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Desculpa era só para te contactar no commons Ruma José (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)