User talk:DarkNight0917

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DarkNight0917!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts.webp]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have deleted a number of files that you incorrectly tagged with {{PD-textlogo}}. That license is only for images that consist of simple text and basic geometric shapes. Files like File:Soma's Sacred Seeds logo.png with artwork, and File:Rockhampton Zoo logo.jpg with complex shaded letters, do not qualify for this license. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Formosa University logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Larryasou (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vita Coco 2023 Packaging.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapparium Afro-Eurasia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 17:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Winkelman, Arizona.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Flag of Winkelman, Arizona.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ww2censor (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Quartzsite, Arizona.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hammersoft (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading files with a {{PD-USGov}} license unless the images are specifically made by the United States Government, as opposed to a state or community. You've uploaded a great many of these images with these licenses, and they are all invalid. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hammersoft: I understand. I was under the impression that I could do that, as I had started out uploading files of flags in California under {{PD-CAGov}}, so I assumed the case would be the same for {{PD-USGov}} under the rest of the states as well. Guess I was wrong. - DarkNight0917 (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Flag of Delta Junction, Alaska.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently uploading media that is in violation of Commons' licensing policy, despite our warnings not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See block log.
(toolbox: contributionspage moves)

Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  suomi  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی 

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "Hello. I understand why I was blocked, and I understand that I've ignored a warning given to me two years ago that I've completely forgotten about. I see that I've been reckless in uploading images and tagging them under {{PD-logo}} when they are not. I, instead, should have uploaded these with a non-free rationale on Wikipedia. Going forward, I will be much more careful in deciding whether or not an image should go on Commons and will analyze each image to see if they agree with the licensing rules set out. As for the flags, I stopped uploading them incorrectly after I received the warning, so I think that it is unjust for me to get blocked for something I was unaware of before. I have been more careful as well when uploading flags in the future, and making sure they are actually in the public domain. I also apologize to Hammersoft for using a flippant "Guess I was wrong." in my reasoning for that warning. In the future, at all times, I will make sure I have read into the details of each license I use and make sure I am using it correctly. If there is anything else I need to address, please let me know. DarkNight0917 (talk) 06:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)"[reply]
Unblock reason: "I believe you. Happy editing! Taivo (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

On a side note, I am confused as to why File:Angeles Abbey Memorial Park Airplane 1928.jpg was deleted, as the source given states the picture was taken in 1928, meaning it is in public domain per {{PD-US-expired}}. DarkNight0917 (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will let another administrator decide the unblock request. Regarding that file, it appears that you did not read the license you used. PD-US-expired requires publication before 1929 - not just being taken before 1929. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thank you. DarkNight0917 (talk) 17:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]