User talk:D.328
My Engrish is poor...
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for all pics like Image:ね-bw.png improving the [[Chinese stroke order:Asian alphabets]], your pics are really nice/pretty, thank you ^,..,^y Yug (talk) and all the Chinese stroke order team :] 16:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Well, I can't spend so much time to draw the pics, so I'm going to do this slowly. I'm easygoing :-p -- D.328 17:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- That's fine too, you make a nice job, your help is welcome even slowly :] Yug (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Adipic_Acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DMacks (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks to the information. I've just written my opinion. --D.328 2011/01/31 08:52 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Xylitol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 20:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Malonic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kopiersperre (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Arima dam specifications.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arima dam specifications.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Qurren (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
This is not wave dash, but a standard tilda! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.67.74.135 (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Your point is off target from the outset because it's not possible to determine whether it's a wave dash or a tilde based on the appearance of the glyphs. Furthermore, the image you're referring to is an output of a wave dash in a Japanese font. -- D.328 2024/02/16 05:13 (UTC)