User talk:Cypris
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 07:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
category:Coats of arms of cities in Alpes-Maritimes
[edit]coucou,
Il faut categoriser tes images comme par exemple ici --Chatsam (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Nevers ducal.JPG was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Nevers ducal ascenseur.JPG was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Nevers ducal cons muni.jpg was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Nevers ducal expo 01.JPG was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Nevers centre culturel jaures 02.jpg was uncategorized on 6 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
date
[edit]pour les date c'est la Category:Buildings by date a+ --Chatsam (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Philippe JEANNET -Cypris- nevers carte postale 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chesdovi (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journees secu 2011 etat major 2011-10-08 01.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journees secu 2011 etat major 2011-10-08 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journees secu 2011 etat major 2011-10-08 01.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 17:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 10.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
INeverCry 20:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Elisa servier.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Elisa servier.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Elisa servier.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2009 st etienne 07.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2009 st etienne 07.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2009 st etienne 07.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 20.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 20.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 20.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 09.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 09.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 09.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 08.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 08.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 08.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 07.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 07.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 07.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 03.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 03.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 02.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 02.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 08.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 08.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 08.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 07.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 07.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journee nat act secu civi 2009 07.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 02.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 02.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 02.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 06.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 06.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journee nat act secu civi nevers 2009 06.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 29.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 29.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 29.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Journee nat sp 2009 03.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Journee nat sp 2009 03.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Journee nat sp 2009 03.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 24.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 24.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 24.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 02.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 02.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 12.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 12.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 09.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 09.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 09.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 01.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 01.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 29.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 29.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 29.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 20.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 20.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 20.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 16.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 16.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres nat 2003 bourg 16.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 26.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 26.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 26.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 30.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 30.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 30.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 28.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 28.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 28.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 19.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 19.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 19.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 17.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 17.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 17.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 21.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 21.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 21.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 24.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 24.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 24.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 14.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 14.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 14.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 16.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 16.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 16.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 10.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 10.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 22.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 22.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 22.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 11.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 11.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 11.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 13.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 13.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 13.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 12.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Congres dpt58 2006 chatillon 12.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 09:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Elisa servier, photo par Nickolas Lorieux.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Elisa servier, photo par Nickolas Lorieux.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Elisa servier, photo par Nickolas Lorieux.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 31.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cjp24 (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 47.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 42.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 41.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 40.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 38.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 36.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 35.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 30.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 27.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 26.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 22.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 21.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 18.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 17.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 15.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 03.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 01.JPG
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 49.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 48.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 46.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 47.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 45.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 44.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 43.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 42.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 41.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 40.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 39.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 38.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 37.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 36.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 35.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 34.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 33.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 32.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 30.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 29.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 28.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 27.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 26.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 25.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 24.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 23.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 22.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 21.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 20.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 19.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 18.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 17.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 16.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 15.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 14.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 13.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 12.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 11.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 10.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 09.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 08.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 07.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 04.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 05.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 06.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 03.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 01.JPG
- File:Musee blandin reouverture 29-09-2013 02.JPG
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:01 entree sud 11-04-2012 1.JPG
- File:04 tour sechage et tour manoeuvres facade est 11-04-2012 1.JPG
- File:02 facade arriere nord 11-04-2012 1.JPG
- File:02 facade arriere nord 11-04-2012 5.JPG
- File:04 tour sechage et tour manoeuvres facade est 11-04-2012 2.JPG
- File:02 facade arriere nord 11-04-2012 4.JPG
- File:01 entree sud 11-04-2012 3.JPG
- File:02 facade arriere nord 11-04-2012 2.JPG
- File:01 entree sud 11-04-2012 2.JPG
- File:St-amand cnifop 17-03-2012 10.jpg
- File:St-amand potiers 17-03-2012 02.jpg
- File:St-amand cnifop 17-03-2012 09.jpg
- File:Nevers aeroport sangsue 08-03-2012 02.JPG
- File:Nevers aeroport sangsue 08-03-2012 01.JPG
- File:Nevers pompiers sangsue remise 08-03-2012 03.JPG
- File:Nevers pompiers sangsue avant 08-03-2012 01.JPG
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Septennat 04.JPG
- File:Septennat 05.JPG
- File:Septennat 06.JPG
- File:Septennat 07.JPG
- File:Septennat 09.JPG
Yours sincerely, Cjp24 (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Saint-Amand-en-Puisaye, office de tourisme, 17-03-2012 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cjp24 (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Coyau (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
37.171.67.192 14:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)