User talk:Cyberuly

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cyberuly!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Stemmi da classificare

[edit]

L'inserimento nella categoria coats of arms to be classified ha un solo scopo: permettere a chi è appassionato di ritrovare uno stemma anche se non ne conosce il nome o la titolarità. Se lo stemma dei Colonna, per fare un esempio, è classificato solo sotto Colonna ne consegue che chi cerca lo stemma dei Colonna lo troverà senz'altro, ma chi cerca di sapere a chi appartenga uno stemma rosso caricato di una colonna d'argento non riuscirà mai a trovarlo a meno che non sfogli tutte le possibili categorie di Commons. Ecco perché esistono le categorie della famiglia coats of arms, suddivise poi per paese, per tipo di stemma (familiare, civico, ecclesiastico, etc). In questo modo che è interessato può limitare la sua ricerca a poche categorie (poche si fa per dire ovviamente) invece che a tutte. Questo è il motivo per cui quando trovo uno stemma non classificato sotto una categoria araldica lo inserisco almeno nella categoria to be classified, con la speranza che poi qualcuno possa attribuirlo in maniera più corretta. Nel caso dei tuoi stemmi, li si potrebbe inserire o nella categoria più generale Coats of arms of families of Italy o in una più particolare relativa alle famiglie del territorio di cui si tratta (del tipo di Coats of arms of families of Bologna) e anche raggrupparle in una categoria analoga aPalazzo Pretorio (Fiesole) - Coats of arms of podestas. In questo modo chi è interessato potrebbe comunque ritrovare le immagini di questi stemmi senza dover girare troppo per Commons. P.S.: noto con piacere che anche tu utilizzi una Nikon e il Mac. Ciao Massimop (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nel tuo caso credo che la doppia attribuzione non sia fonte di equivoci, in quanto una facilita le ricerche a chi è interessato agli stemmi presenti su edifici, l'altra consente le ricerche per area geografica, in questo caso Firenze. Penso comunque che divenga inutile inserire il to be classified nella categoria relativa a Firenze. Conosco bene il lavoro di Sailko e lo apprezzo: sta fornendo una quantità di documenti impressionante. Ciao e buon lavoro. Massimop (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fiesole

[edit]

Thanks from Russia for your wonderful photos from Fiesole :) --Shakko (talk) 10:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Vista e processata. Il ticket è OTRS 2010070910003529, puoi caricare le immagini indicando questo codice. Ciao. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 09:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sì hai fatto bene, mi sono dimenticato che la foto era già stata caricata qui su Commons. A posto allora, ciao! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 14:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS II

[edit]

Ciao, scusa il ritardo. Ho processato il ticket stamattina e ho aggiornato il template nella pagina della foto. Ciao! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 03:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 03:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Villa_Bayon_(Florence) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]