User talk:Consuelo Fernandez

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Consuelo Fernandez!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Las Ideales 2012. Monique Bastiaans.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Las Ideales 2012. Monique Bastiaans.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cartel 8M Madrid 2019.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cartel 8M Madrid 2019.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sandra Alonso Villar.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sandra Alonso Villar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, did you get this image from the depicted lady? Who has shot it? You need to provide her/his permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

 Permission confirmed by OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sala II del Museo del Chocolate de Astorga (1).jpg

Hi Consuelo, did you get this image directly from the museum or did you want to say that you shot it in the museum? Apart from the photo itself, I see a potential problem with the drawing/graphic to the right of the image. It looks to be a recent work and to be original enough to be copyrightable. The freedom-of-panorama exception of Spain does not cover indoor-works (as in most countries). --Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hola Túrelio. Quiero aclararte que la fotografía de la Sala II ha sido proporcionada, junto con las de las otras salas, por el propio Museo del Chocolate de Astorga. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 13:50 1 December 2020

Hola Consuelo, ok. As the image now carries a permission-ticket by OTRS everything is fine. --Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Sobre postal Consuelo Álvarez, Violeta.jpg

File:Sobre postal Consuelo Álvarez, Violeta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hola Túrelio, sobre esta foto quiero averiguar si los sobres de franqueo postal y los sellos postales españoles tienen protección de derechos de autor, mientras tanto estoy a lo que la comunidad wikipedista diga. Si consideráis que es una foto a retirar, pues se retira de Commons, yo no me opongo. Se trataba del homenaje a esta escritora fallecida en 1959. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 1 de diciembre 2020 20:55

Hi Consuelo,

regrettably, spanish stamps are considered to be copyrighted, see: Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Spain. And even cropping away the stamp would likely not help in this case, as the "Portada del primer día" (if that is right spanish term for de:Ersttagsbrief) has been created only in 2019. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Consuelo Álvarez Pool, Violeta.jpg

Hi Consuelo, you need to provide a valid source for this image. It is rather surely not your own work (a true reproduction of an existing 2-dimensional work does not earn own copyright). You should also research for the date (year) of the original photography and the original photographer, as it needs to be evaluted whether it is already in the public domain or not. ([1], [2], [3]) --Túrelio (talk) 11:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hola Túrelio. La fotografía de la escritora Consuelo Álvarez Pool, seudónimo Violeta, es de autor desconocido, pero si tenemos en cuenta que en España las consideradas "meras fotografías" tiene unos derechos de autor con validez de 25 años, ahora es una fotografía de dominio público. La fotografía ha sido facilitada por su familia. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 14:30 1 December 2020

Hola Consuelo,

ok. But, then you should correct the entries for author and source. Also, it is be important to do a thorough research about the date of creation of the original photography. As the conditions for "simple photographs" to be in the public domain after 25 years, i.e. Template:PD-Spain-photo, are no that simple as it seems, because to be allowed on Commons, it needs to be PD in the counbtry of origiin (Spain) and in the U.S.; see the last section of the linked template-page. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Homenaje a los poetas Ángel Crespo y Pilar Gómez Bedate.jpg

File:Homenaje a los poetas Ángel Crespo y Pilar Gómez Bedate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hola Túrelio, yo soy la autora de la foto cuestionada, fue realizada en el exterior de la fachada lateral del Ayuntamiento del pueblo de Calaceite al anuncio del homenaje que se realizaba a los poetas Ángel Crespo y Pilar Gómez Bedate. Se trata de una fotografía tomada en la calle, nunca pensé que este acto vulnerara algún derecho. Por mi parte no me opongo a que se borre, no ha sido utilizada ni en la página de wikipedia de Angel Crespo ni en la de Pilar Gómez Bedate. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 2 diciembre 2020 19:47

Hola Consuelo,

though the image has already been deleted, just for your (and my) understanding: The 2 original pieces, which you reproduced in your image, i.e. the photography (left) and the cover-page (right), are to be considered still copyrighted, as their creators are likely not dead since >70 years, right? Now, if I understood you correctly, you took your photo while standing on the street, which might qualify it for freedom-of-panorama exception. However, where exactly were the 2 original pieces located, behind a window, in an exhibition-case, attached to an outside wall or alike, and, secondly, were they placed/installed permanently or just for a limited time during an exhibition? --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Fuente del Berro

Qué casualidad, justo he subido a Commons varias fotos de la Fuente del Berro y me he topado con la tuya. Acabo de crear una categoría y he metido también ahí tu foto. Me alegro que haya alguien que se preocupa por subir fotos de esos pequeños detalles. ¡Que tengas un buen día!--Benjamín Núñez González (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)