User talk:Chs87

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chs87!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung

Hallo, schau dir wegen der passenden Kategorien für deine Fotos bitte mal Commons:Kategorien und Commons:Categories an. Beschreibende Kategorienamen sind im internationalen Projekt Commons meist englischsprachig. Bitte erfinde nicht frei assoziierend eigene Namen, sondern suche im vorhandenen Kategoriebaum die passendsten Kategorien, und zwar die spezifischsten. Also z. B. nicht "Fluss" bzw. Category:River, sondern Category:Elbe in Hamburg oder gar deren Unterkategorien. Dabei hilft es manchmal, wenn man ins Suchformular ein Schlüsselwort eingibt und im Suchergebnis schaut, wie die ähnlichen Bilder kategorisiert sind. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Computer Security Symbol - Virus.jpg

File:Computer Security Symbol - Virus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Domdomegg (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Computer Security Symbol - Passwort (grün).jpg

File:Computer Security Symbol - Passwort (grün).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Domdomegg (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Chs87!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Domdomegg (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien etc.

Hallo! Du hattest mich per Mail direkt angesprochen. Die Antwort sende ich mal über deine Diskussionsseite, denn das direkte Versenden einer Mail ist eher unüblich. Und hier kann auch mal jemand anders eine Antwort schreiben. Und wenn ich dir das direkt sagen darf, hier meine Anregungen für deine Bilder:

Urheber ist nicht eine Internetadresse, sondern immer eine Person. Gib also bitte den korrekten Urheber an. Idealerweise solltest du das selbst sein. Wenn nicht, muss eine Einverständniserklärung vorliegen, die im OTRS zu hinterlegen ist.
Die Lizenzangaben auf der Webseite passen nicht zu denen, die du hier bei Wikimedia Commons angibst.
Die Kategorisierung erfolgt nicht nach Stichwörtern, sondern nach den hier existierenden Kategorien. (Es kann schon mal sein, dass erst eine anzulegen ist.) In der Regel sind diese englischsprachig. Nimm am besten dein Bild und such dir über die Suchfunktion ein ähnliches heraus. Schau wie dieses kategorisiert ist.

Grundsätzlich kann ich einen Blick in die Hilfeseiten empfehlen. Dort findest du auch Hinweise zur Lizensierung und Kategorisierung. --XRay ^talk 13:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see such images on Wikimedia projects?

Images like these may often be found on dubious news sites on the internet, but on Wikipedia and it's sister projects gladly they are totally uncommon. This is not shutterstock. As other people have already pointed out, your way to categorize them was not acceptable. So for now I have moved all your images of this kind to Cyber stuff by Chs87 - and removed them from all other categories. If you don't like the name, you can easily rename it. You may also group similar images in subcategories (use Cat-a-lot), and put these subcategories (not the images themselves!) in a few appopriate categories like Cybercrime. (I could not do that, because I think these images should not be here in the first place.)

There is also the question of copyright - i.e. the question if you really created these images yourself. I would like to ask you which 3D rendering software you have used to create the two rightmost images in the gallery above. Watchduck (quack) 17:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ Watchduck (quack): I can tell you where these pictures are used. For example the chineese wikipedias picture for SPAM is using such images of mine.

Well yeah, all of that stuff is created by me. If you dont trust me i could send you some picture in very high resolution. (260 mega pixels.)

So guys... I am so kind to share my stuff with the world for free... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.175.65.246 (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CHS87 (chs87) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.175.65.246 (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. My question was how you created these two images. Just give us a short description what you did. Ideally you could provide the source code (like I did for this image). You can describe it in German if you want. Watchduck (quack) 18:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Watchduck: If they're out of scope or copyright problems, they should be deleted, not hidden. You've effectively removed these images from the category system, leaving them only in one user category. This doesn't seem appropriate. As long as they're not delete-worthy, they should be categorized, and whether they're delete-worthy shouldn't depend on whether Chs87 can give you a satisfactory answer to how he/she created them (which could, of course, be entirely fabricated or could be true but unconvincing). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhododendrites. As stated above, for now I have moved them to this category, because their categorization was not ok - as critisized by other users above. This is the necesseary first step towards their correct categorization - if they are kept. Maybe you can agree that this can wait for a few days. I would like to hear a few thought how this should be categorized. Watchduck (quack) 19:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I did miss the "for now". Thanks for clarifying. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:32, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created a deletion request, so we can get some opinions whether this is in scope or not. I don't think it is. Watchduck (quack) 16:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Seriously I don´t get where you see the trouble with theese pictures. Theese pictures are very (!) relevant to wiki* and other sites. Here you can see one example of this "unnecessary" stuff. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E9%82%AE%E4%BB%B6 Useless? I don´t think so.

It really takes hours and hours to create that stuff and even sites like harvard law school, trend micro, f5 and many others are using this free media of mine. So please be careful with judging my stuff no matter YOU like it. I watched at some of your picture and ask myself, wether theese pics of you are relevant... But i don´t create a deletion request, because I really think, there will be someone who LIKES and USES your pictures. I hope you can comprehend this. --Chs87 (talk) 18:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added the picture in question to the list of exceptions, mentioned in the request. I know that many web sites use images like these, but Wikimedia sites usually don't. In my opinion these images belong on a site like Shutterstock, and not on Commons. Commons does not provide webspace for images that may be useful to someone, but for images that may be useful for Wikimedia sites. And I simply don't think that this is the case here. BTW: I don't think it is likely that they will be deleted, but at least I want to give it a try.

The major point here is that Wikimedia pages are illustrated in a way you would expect from an encyclopedia or an academic paper, and not in a way you would expect from a newspaper, or clickbaity websites. If you would add images like these to articles in the English Wikipedia like w:Spamming, w:Computer security or w:Hacker (computer security), you would see them removed within hours. (At least I hope so.) --Watchduck (quack) 19:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Watchduck (quack) 16:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And yet another one:

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Watchduck (quack) 16:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3D images, copyright

tl;dr: Chs87 created the 3D images with Cinema 4D, and there seem to be no copyright issues.

Wow ist dieses Forum anstrengend. Jetzt habe ich eben ne Erklärung geschrieben und jemand anders schreibt auch was und meines ist weg. Also nochmal: Ich nutze Photoshop CC und Cinema 4D und manchmal noch Gimp, wenn ich unterwegs bin. Bitte erkläre genauer was du mit Source Code meinst fürs Bild. Übrigens: ALLE Bilder sind meine. Ich verstehe nicht, warum man gerade über Copyright diskutiert, auch wenn ich es nun mal mit den Kategorien verbockt habe. Wieso soll ich mich nun für die Bilder, die mir gehören, rechtfertigen? Ich sagen bei euren ja auch nicht grundlos: "Sind das wirklich eure?". Danke für euer Verständnis - falls notwendig rechtfertige mich dann halt dennoch... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chs87 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn ihr wollt, könnt ihr hier - wie auch immer die Original-Datei untersuchen. https://www.dropbox.com/s/4tg3gr8ljzpq2zu/PC%20mit%20Virus%20und%20Polizei-Band.jpg?dl=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chs87 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn ihr wollt, kann ich euch auch die Photoshop-Datei zusenden, dann könnt ihr da Ebenen usw. sehen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chs87 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3D-Grafiken wie File:Computer mit Virus und Polizei-Band.jpg und File:Roter Würfel - Red Cube - Zoom.jpg zu machen ist ziemlich komplex, daher finde ich es schon berechtigt mal nachzufragen. Es ist hier auch üblich dranzuschreiben, welche Software man für sowas benutzt hat. (Bei meinem Beispielbild steht z.B. dran, dass ich das mit POV-Ray gemacht habe.) Photoshop ist mir egal. Mich würde interessieren wie du die dreidimensionalen Sachen gemacht hast, z.B. den Computer selbst oder die grüne Kugel mit den Kegeln drauf. Wie hast du die weißen und roten Würfel gemacht? Wie hast du die Positionen der Lichtquellen oder der Kamera eingegeben. Es sieht für mich einfach aus, als hättest du nur aus dem Internet runtergeladene Sachen weiter verwurstet. Das einzige was ich frage ist wie du die 3D-Sachen gemacht hast. Alles andere ist mir völlig egal. Watchduck (quack) 19:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, aber ich verwurste nicht. Also wie soll man es beschreiben, was ganz leicht ist: Neues Würfelobjekt. 4 mm Dicke, 80 cm Tiefe, 60 cm Höhe. Einfach geschätzte Werte der Abmessungen meines PC. Dann Ebene geklont. Andere Seite fertig. Neue Würfen. Anpassen an die Breite des Towers. Die Knöpfe vorn wieder mit nem Clone Objekt. Licht hinzufügen geht über den entsprechenden Button dazu. Achja dann noch ein Material erstellen, dass nett reflektiert wie Alu es nun mal tut. Den Virus daneben: Eine Kugel erstellt, Kegel dazu erstellen und umdrehen sodass sie aus der Kugel rausstechen. Farbe drauf. Spiegeloptionen. Zack. Ja insgesamt dauert das schon 2-3 h. Wenn du willst, können wir telefonieren, dann kannst du mich gern ins Kreuzverhör nehmen. Zu den Würfeln: Einen Würfel erstellt, Kanten abgerundet, geklont nach Raster, Bild exportiert. Einen Würfel per Farbfilter in Photoshop eingefärt.... Langt dir das? Willst du meine Projektdateien? Ich bin ehrlich gesagt etwas traurig, wie es hier gerade zugeht. --Chs87 (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC) Ich habe dir jetzt noch ein paar weitere Files in den Link https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xanobifdj0j65pv/AAAM9bpqvE5rOxF3aTUCTUTta?dl=0 gelegt. Wofür auch immer... --Chs87 (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keine weiteren Fragen euer Ehren. Mal sehen ob noch ein paar Meinungen zur Kategorisierung reinkommen. Watchduck (quack) 19:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Da ich dich für einen engagierten User hier halte (Es ist schließlich Sonntag 22:00 Uhr), hier die Frage. Wäre es ggf. möglich, dass wir mal telefonieren die Tage? Ich würde gern 1-2 Fragen klären, hinter die ich hier nicht steige. Ansonsten schönen Abend noch. Ich bin jetzt off, muss morgen arbeiten. --Chs87 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Telefonieren mache ich nicht. Einfach hier fragen. Es ist auch aus Transparenzgründen besser alles auf den Diskussionsseiten zu klären, und so können auch Andere in die Diskussion einsteigen. (Auch Emails sind unüblich, wie oben ja schon jemand geschrieben hat.) Watchduck (quack) 20:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ +/−

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ +/−

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Hacker - Hacking - Lupe von Nullen und Einsen - Password - LUPE - blau.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hacker - Hacking - Lupe von Nullen und Einsen - Password - LUPE - blau.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hacker - Hacking - Lupe von Nullen und Einsen - Password - LUPE - blau.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== Hello! I wrote the mail like you wanted. If I can help you out, please let me know. --Chs87 (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

File tagging File:Käfigmutter und Schraube.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Käfigmutter und Schraube.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Käfigmutter und Schraube.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Steinsplitter (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Chs87

Contents

Kategorisierung

File:Computer Security Symbol - Virus.jpg

File:Computer Security Symbol - Passwort (grün).jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Categories

Kategorien etc.

Where do you see such images on Wikimedia projects?

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

3D images, copyright

Please sign your postings

Please sign your postings

File tagging File:Hacker - Hacking - Lupe von Nullen und Einsen - Password - LUPE - blau.jpg

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

File tagging File:Käfigmutter und Schraube.JPG

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Navigation menu

User talk:Chs87

Kategorisierung

File:Computer Security Symbol - Virus.jpg

File:Computer Security Symbol - Passwort (grün).jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Categories

Kategorien etc.

Where do you see such images on Wikimedia projects?

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

3D images, copyright

Please sign your postings

Please sign your postings

File tagging File:Hacker - Hacking - Lupe von Nullen und Einsen - Password - LUPE - blau.jpg

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

File tagging File:Käfigmutter und Schraube.JPG

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Navigation menu

Search