User talk:Cccefalon/Archives/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath-Denkmal-01 Zum-Eulenbroicher-Auel-19 Haus-Eulenbroich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very high quality, try nominating it at featured pictures candidates --Someone35 13:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath-Denkmal-04 Gerottener-Weg Wegekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dust spot (see note). Good quality, but I'm not sure if it's something dark. Too tight at top (rule of thirds: The horizontal part of the cross is too much above)--Lmbuga 10:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! China Sichuan Jiuzhaigou Jiuzhaigou-Tibetan-Theatre Actors-in-colorful-costumes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Mattbuck 12:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Württemberg Schloss-Lichtenstein ViewFromNorthSide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely, but fails 2MP requirement. Mattbuck 12:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done - Uploaded a version with better resolution (now 2,5 MP), please review again --Cccefalon 09:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Love it. Will make it my desktop background. --Bep 19:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SabahArtGallery-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please remember to leave a blank line between a nomination and another --The Photographer 12:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice and very clean graphical work : QI for me. --JLPC 17:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SabahArtGallery-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SabahHeritageSteamTrain-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo. --ArildV 11:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SabahArtGallery-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition with good sharpness. Pymouss 16:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SabahStateMosque-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment a bit disturbing left side(See notes), but acceptable --Rjcastillo 01:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuaran Sabah LingSanTemple-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nabalu Sabah MarketDay-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 07:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder von Roisdorf

Hallo, wir bekamen einen Hinweis (ticketnummer 2013013110007819) das diese Beiden Bilder vertauscht wurden:

Und die Zuordnung in dieser Liste sollte entsprechend getauscht werden.

Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donggongon Sabah Menhir-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kota Kinabalu Sabah NationalDepartmentOfCultureAndArts-SabahBranch-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment tilted --Rjcastillo 23:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I disagree with that opinion. Not every perspective view is "tilted". It cannot be, that latterly only buildings with absolutely vertical lines have a chance for promotion! --Cccefalon 05:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Imho it really needs tilt correction and a bit more resolution (EOS 5D Mark III). --Iifar 18:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done uploaded a new version --Cccefalon 08:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donggongon Sabah Menhir-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:58, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuaran Sabah ViewsFromLingSanPagoda-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, but a bit unbalanced. Please upload a new crop so that the sides are cropped to the same amount. Mattbuck 11:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done cropped symetrically now. --Cccefalon 17:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)nice composition --Rjcastillo 02:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

WLM Köln 2013

Hallo, Du hast an den Wiki Loves Monuments-Aktionen Köln in den letzten Jahren teilgenommen. Auch in diesem Jahr gibt es Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM), und auch einen Fotowettberweb für Kölner Denkmäler dazu. Hier findest Du alle Informationen rund um WLM-Köln 2013. Zudem freuen wir uns auf einen Besuch am Aktionstag 8. September 2013 (Tag des offenen Denkmals) ab 10.00 Uhr vor dem Kölner Rathaus, wo wir Dir mit Denkmallisten, Rat und Tat zur Seite stehen. Den direkten Link zum Bilderupload für WLM-Köln findest Du hier. Viel Erfolg!

--Superbass (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC) (Team WLM-Köln)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Palace-of-Justice-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Large-format-camera Globus-M-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Large-format-camera Globus-M-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Ministry-of-the-Federal-Territories-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 19:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Ministry-of-Finance-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Hari-Merdeka-2013-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 19:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Welcoming-Contingent Hari-Merdeka-2013-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 14:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Hari-Merdeka-2013-Parade-181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Hari-Merdeka-2013-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 17:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portable-Refractometer-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah OldAnglicanCemetery-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality! Nicely chosen depth of field --High Contrast 23:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 00:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Ibu-Pejabat-Polis-Kontinjen-Sabah-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gray cropping artefacts at the left front. Otherwise good. --Tuxyso 21:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC) ✓ DoneYou are right, I forgot to readjust after tilt correction. Uploaded new version. --Cccefalon 21:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
looks good now. --Tuxyso 22:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Harvesting-machine-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Ladang-Sapong-Dwellings-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --P e z i 23:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Ladang-Sapong-Dwellings-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --P e z i 23:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah CharteredCompanyMemorial-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Ministry-of-Agriculture-and-Agro-based-Industries-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambong Sabah Footbridge-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I cannot really understand why a photo from a full frame (!!) camera is downscaled below 3MP. --Tuxyso 08:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment The size of the upload should not be the criteria for the QI assessment, should it? If you like the photo and you want to have a personal copy with higher resolution, feel free to ask me, I will send it to you. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are completely right and it is nothing wrong with your nomination but this contradicts my personal idea of real free content. Maybe someone else promotes this (good) photo. --Tuxyso 09:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support After clarification of some misunderstandings. --Tuxyso 10:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambong Sabah Footbridge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I cannot really understand why a photo from a full frame (!!) camera is downscaled below 3MP. --Tuxyso 08:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment The request for nomination is size > 2 MB. If there is a new request that nominations require full size upload, I will do that. --Cccefalon 09:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such requirement. Nonetheless artifically downscaling is a bit pity and I would like to encourage you to provide full size version of your good photos. --Tuxyso 09:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support After clarification of some misunderstandings. --Tuxyso 10:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KgPadang Sapulut-Sabah SwingingBridge-over-SgTalangkai-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidenheim-Marienkirche-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Applied tilt correction. --Cccefalon 23:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:Manila Philippines Water-buffalo-sculpture-at-Burnham-Green-01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Water-buffalo-sculpture-at-Burnham-Green-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Tropical-storm-over-Pasig-River-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manila Philippines Ceiling-of-Binondo-Church-01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Ceiling-of-Binondo-Church-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Handmade-brooms-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 17:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Batad-Rice-Terraces-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Ifugao-Tribesman-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The cables in the foreground do not help. However, I think that the quality is good. --Barcex 10:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ranau Sabah POW-RouteAtTaviuHill-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambunan Sabah Battlefield-Battle-of-Tambunan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice but tilted, see the houses in the background. To me, pillars, trees, houses in the background tend to lean to the left. Could you please try to fix? --Myrabella 13:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Rotated slightly clockwise; I think this will do the trick. --Cccefalon 16:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Lost of contrast and sharpness after the edit. I may give a try. --Myrabella 07:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gosh, you are right - I made a mistake while working on the last version. I hope, the third try will now be satisfying! --Cccefalon 09:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Acknowledged, OK to me now. --Myrabella 14:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Pizza-Taxi-in-Makati-Business-District-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines The-old-Post-Office-Building-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Interesting view. Only a little problem with some clouds (see note, please). --JLPC 15:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing; I uploaded a version where the flaws were fixed. --Cccefalon 18:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not completely but enough for QI. --JLPC 22:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Batad-Rice-Terraces-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --Myrabella 17:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Intramuros A-prefered-picnic-ground-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambunan Sabah Battlefield-Battle-of-Tambunan-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beijing China Beijing-National-Stadium-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. --Hockei 21:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Shell-Museum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --P e z i 19:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Billboard-Celebrations-50years-of-PRC-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments dust spot (see notice), otherwise OK --P e z i 19:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Removed! --Cccefalon 20:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now --P e z i 21:17, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bingyu-Valley Liaoning China Traditional-Rafts-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI (nice pic) --P e z i 19:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah BigLettersOfTown-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but a bit small. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portable-Refractometer-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Welcoming-Contingent Hari-Merdeka-2013-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Hari-Merdeka-2013-Parade-229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xlendi Gozo Stormy-Weather-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sliema Malta Colored-Balconies-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 03:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valetta Malta Victory-Bell-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition --Martin Kraft 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar Tachileik-Shwedagon-Pagoda-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar Tachileik-Shwedagon-Pagoda-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noise level just ok --Poco a poco 19:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hongkong China Avenue-of-stars-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beijing China Beijing-National-Stadium-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wied Iz-Zurrieq Malta Stormy-Weather-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dust spot in the sky at left. Please remove it. --Cayambe 09:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the hint. It will be removed by tonight. --Cccefalon 10:15, 5 November 2013
✓ Done --Cccefalon 18:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)(UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LValetta Malta Shop-in-Valetta-Old-Town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Ankor-Thom-Statue-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines Shop-sign-in-Chinatown-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manila Philippines The-old-Post-Office-Building-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabah Malaysia Hari-Merdeka-2013-Parade-187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but the composition seems a little off. Can you crop out say 100-200px on the right? Mattbuck 10:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uplaoded a newly cropped version, also in higher resolution and eliminated white areas. --Cccefalon 15:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 21:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Tha-Prom-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Tak-Pak-Kung-Chinese-Temple-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Local-Taxi-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambulian KotaBelud Sabah Traditional-houses-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambulian KotaBelud Sabah Traditional-houses-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lohan Sabah Masjid-Al-Kauthar-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ; only two spots easy to fix (see note, please). --JLPC 16:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
✓ Done Yeah, always the birds! fixed. --Cccefalon 20:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keningau Sabah Post-Office-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Tak-Pak-Kung-Chinese-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keningau Sabah Roman-Catholic-Diocese-of-Keningau-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please have a look to the building on the left. It needs perspective correction.--XRay 12:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done You are right! I uploaded a new version. --Cccefalon 15:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --XRay 16:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valetta Malta Ship-leaving-Grand-Harbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Myrabella 12:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar Tachileik-Shwedagon-Pagoda-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Better now --Moroder 16:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Two-Chinese-at-Xinghai-Bay-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy in the background, but overall good quality. Lovely shot. --Jastrow 12:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines View-of-the-Town-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs some mild perspective correction. Mattbuck 21:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Applied perspective correction. --Cccefalon 18:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jastrow 08:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Swimming-Pool-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 15:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya malaysia Putra-Mosque-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Swimming-Pool-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Petronas-Tower-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Wisma-Dang-Badang-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valetta Malta Carriage-at-St-Elmo-Bay-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar MaeSai Thailand-Border-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks a bit washed out, but it's a nice street shot. --Tuxyso 07:43, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Swimming-Pool-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but OK for QI. --Tuxyso 07:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leshan China Buddhist-Monk-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, nice ambience --Isiwal 15:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Laksamana-Muhammad-Amin-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Main-Entrance-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tonle Sap Siem Reap Cambodia Girl-steering-her-boat-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I added a Personality rights info. There seems to be a trace of CA at the upper hand. --NorbertNagel 10:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, fine QI --Isiwal 18:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ankor SiemReap Cambodia Artist-crayoning-the-ruins-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Germany Ceiling-of-Church-St-Nikolai-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Public Service-Department-of-Malaysia-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Florstein 17:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Ankor-Thom-Statue-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Suor-Prat-Towers-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Ankor-Wat-Statue-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia World-Heritage-Stele-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leshan Sichuan China-Old bridge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Batad-Rice-Terraces-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit lacking detail? Unsure, but IMO this is not QI. Mattbuck 21:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded a new version of the photo. --Cccefalon 18:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better, but now oversharpened. Can you upload an intermediate version - closer to the sharpened version, but not as overly done? Mattbuck 18:34, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Let's see, if this is more satisfying ... --Cccefalon 22:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'd have gone a bit sharper, but OK. Mattbuck 22:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luang-Prabang Laos Buddhist-Monks-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mekong-River Laos jetty-at-Pak-Ou-Caves-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malacca Malaysia Colourful-bicycles-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malacca Malaysia Pittoresque-houses-along-Sungai-Melaka-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart Germany Residential-Buildings-in-Solitude-Area-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Suor-Prat-Towers-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Sri-Johor-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banaue Philippines Banaue-Rice-Terraces-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Ankor-Wat-Statue-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather green sky I think, few dust spots. Mattbuck 22:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done removed two tiny dust spots and reduced green saturation. --Cccefalon 18:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 20:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malacca Malaysia Colourful-Two-ladies-with-umbrellas-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. And I like it very much.--Jebulon 10:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mauritius Mangal-Mahadev-Statue-in-GangaTalao-01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauritius Mangal-Mahadev-Statue-in-GangaTalao-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Membakut Sabah Blue-House-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Membakut Sabah Pei-Yin-Primary-School-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 22:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lübeck Germany Heiligen-geist-Hospital-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Historical-Tramway-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Fire-and-Rescue-Station-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Fire-and-Rescue-Station-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --EpsilonEridani 15:21, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Hong-San-Tze-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Fire-and-Rescue-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background could be sharper - f9 or f11 had been a better choice, but imho still OK for QI. --Tuxyso 20:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Fire-and-Rescue-Station-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang-Mai Thailand Taxis-at-Arcade-Bus-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia-Menara-TH-Selborn-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menggatal Sabah OldColonialHouse-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamparuli Sabah SwingingBridge and LandBridge-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inanam Sabah GerejaBasel-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah PerpustakaanNegeriSabah-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papar Sabah KwongFookKungTemple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Germany University-Library-Neues-Palais-Haus-11-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Swimming-Pool-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Likas-Sports-Complex-Swimming-Pool-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lohan Sabah Masjid-Al-Kauthar-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keningau Sabah SMStFrancisXavier School 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid Spain Metropolis-Building-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments bit noisy, but stil QI --Taxiarchos228 19:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidenheim-Feldmarschall-Rommel-Denkmal-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kimanis Sabah Workers-in-Palm-Oil-Plantation-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halicki 23:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Islamic-Arts-Museum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuebingen Germany Old-quarter-at-River-Neckar-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaub Germany Burg-Pfalzgrafenstein-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- Spurzem 23:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Banteay Srei-Relief-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support bit unsharp on top but still QI IMO --P e z i 21:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Ankor-Thom-Statue-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Bahagian-Pinjaman-Perumahan-and-Perbendaharaan-Malaysia-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KgSerusup SulamanBay Sabah Local-Fishingboats-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though I'd personally sharpen lightly and raise lower levels. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian China Kiosk-inmiddle-of-a-Housing block-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian China Police-Car-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keningau Sabah TownView-fromGuangJiTemple-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sungei-Pelek Negeri Sembilan Malaysia Menu-of-Sri-Bagan-Floating-Restaurant-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lübeck Germany Arcades-at-former-Chancellery-House -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lübeck Germany Entrance-sign-at-a-brickstone-house-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 19:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness and details. --Tuxyso 22:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xian China Cultural-Performance-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --JLPC 16:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Hong-San-Tze-Temple-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 23:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang-Mai Thailand Brick-wall-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Old-town-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Black-Dragon-Pool-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China Railway-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 19:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Ornamented-Door-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian China Housing block-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments If I'm not wrong, you have to provide the name of the author (here, the architect), if not, there is no FoP in PRC I'm afraid.--Jebulon 20:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Are you crazy? The communist system has no naming of architects for a standard housing block were you can find millions in the country .... --Cccefalon 21:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment dust spot (see notice)? --P e z i 23:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)You could provide your explanations without calling me "crazy". I'm mentally fine, thank you. Hope it is the same for you.--Jebulon 09:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ok, bad word withdrawn and my apologies. But I hope, you got my point about chinese standard housing blocks. --Cccefalon 14:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ removed possible dust spot. --Cccefalon 16:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)  Support think it's OK now --P e z i 17:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidenheim-Feldmarschall-Rommel-Denkmal-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang-Rai Thailand Clock-Tower-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable --Poco a poco 22:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama-Aufnahme

Hallo Cccefalon! Vielen Dank für deine konstruktiven und sinnvollen Anmerkungen zu File:San Francisco Panorama from Twin Peaks 2013.jpg. Ich werde eine entsprechende Bearbeitung heute Abend vornehmen. Bzgl. der helleren Bereiche auf der rechten Seite wäre eine andere Möglichkeit rechts etwas enger zu schneiden und die helleren Bereiche damit loszuwerden. Allerdings finde ich, dass das Panorama gerade im vorderen rechten Teil viele spannende Details besitzt, die ich ungerne killen würde. Was meinst du? --Tuxyso (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Tuxyso, ich gebe Dir vollkommen recht; ich würde da keine Details wegnehmen wollen. Ich würde lediglich vorschlagen, die Tiefenstaffelung - vorne dunkler mit mehr Kontrasten und hinten heller mit weniger Kontrasten - auch im rechten Teil des Bildes zu erhalten bzw. zu betonen. Ob es geht, weiss ich nicht, bevor Du also eine verschlechtertes Panoramabild hochlädst, schreib in dem Fall lieber einen Kommentar, dass es nicht geht. Aber der Versuch ist es wert! Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe mal eine neue Version hochgeladen. Ich denke diese ist besser als die vorherige. Was meinst du? --Tuxyso (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ja, es hat sehr gewonnen. Dass noch ein paar Vögel da sind, ist meines Erachtens o.k.; die sind einigermassen scharf umrissen. Ich habs schon in den grünen Bereich befördert. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kannst du die Vögel noch mal markieren? Ich hatte kurz nach dem Upload gesehen, dass über den Häusern und Wäldern auch noch Vögel zu sehen sind. Danke schon mal. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich glaube es sind zu viele. Ich schaue mal was ich finde. Denke das sollte dann passen. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, ganz links scheint ein ganze Schwarm geflogen zu sein. Ein paar gehen sicher easy zu retuschieren. Aber wenn das nicht ein unscharfer Klumpen ist, dann ist da halt ein Vogel. Das ist auch nicht schlimm. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neue Version ich hochgeladen. Danke noch mal für dein sorgfältiges Durchschauen des Fotos. Panoramaaufnahmen werden auf QIC leider gerne mal ignoriert. Davon ab finde ich die Details allerdings auch sehr spannend bei dem Foto. Z.T. kann man die Schriftzüge auf weit entfernten Gebäuden lesen. Das 85mm/f1.8G gilt ja nicht zu unrecht als eines der momentan schärfsten Nikon-Objektive :) --Tuxyso (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, die werden völlig zu Unrecht nicht beachtet. Und es steckt sehr viel Arbeit in Panoramaaufnahmen. Ich versuche meine Akzente in der Bewertung auf gute Kompositionen zu setzen und auf Aufnahmen, die vom Photographen Geduld und Ausdauer erfordern. Dazu gehören Panoramaaufnahmen und auch Aufnahmen von fliegenden Insekten (obwohl ich Großaufnahmen von Insekten gruselig finde). --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a red frame in a green one, QIC

Hallo Cccefalon,

I think you should be aware of this discussion, because even if it is anonymous, you are involved by one of your comments and actions in the QIC page. This is interesting.

MvG, --Jebulon (talk) 09:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, good hint, I will observe the discussion. Indeed, I was very unsure about the appropriate prceudre when I changed the result of the assessment from red to green. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Personal message: I've corrected the perspective of the Colosseum, according to your request. Would you be kind enough to have another look, please ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sure, I will do that. When I leave a comment for a review, it usually means, that the motif of the photo already convinced me and that I am willing to promote it, when the discussed flaws are resolved. I am now in a short break of a meeting, so I can probably review it after work. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-Avenue-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Haloing around the monument. Mattbuck 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ new version --Cccefalon 19:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Support think it's OK now. --P e z i 17:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

QIC-Kommentare

Hi, nur weil’s mir gerade aufgefallen ist: Setz deinen Kommentar immer hinter die Downpipe | am Ende der Nominierung. Sonst steht dein Kommentar zwar auch da, aber immer noch „Review needed“ drunter, weil dein Kommentar für die Software noch zur Nominierung gehört. Weitere Kommentare werden dann mit <br> angefügt, aber zwischen Nomination und Kommentaren muß das | bleiben. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 09:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, das wusste ich nicht! Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde das ab sofort befolgen! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Main-Entrance-of-Railway-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China Waiting-for-departure-at-Kunming-central-station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-Avenue-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:53, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China International-Olympic-Sports-Center-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London UK Sculptures-at-Westminister-Abbey-Westgate-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 12:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Old-town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Shop-in-old-town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A slight perspective correction is needed on the left imo. QI, then. --JLPC 17:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ added perspective correction --Cccefalon 21:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better now. --JLPC 22:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona Spain Interior-view-in-Casa Batlló-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I love it --Moroder 23:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Putra-Mosque-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather dark, even with expected rain, and some CA on the right. Can you brighten the building and tree without affecting the sky too much? Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment New version with brighter foreground and better crop due to compositional reasons. --Cccefalon 17:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shame about the greenery on the left, but a lot better. Mattbuck 16:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of that. Of course I could cut the branches but I would cut the turret, too. And a half turret would be more disturbing --Cccefalon 20:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KotaBelud Sabah Rice-Padi-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Odd marks in the sky need fixing, and a bit oversharpened. Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done True .. removed the objects and reduced sharpening. --Cccefalon 19:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The sharpness was acceptable before, but a bit too much if doing it from scratch. Your new version however is simply unsharp. Could you remove the spots without touching the original sharpness? Mattbuck 19:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I can do that. But might it be, that giving a full resolution photo is producing that effect? Mind to review the second (previous) version and give me a feedback? --Cccefalon 20:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Uploaded a new version on the basis of the first one with removed spots and only a slight reduction of sharpness. --Cccefalon 15:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My issue is that when you blur, you blur the hut thing, which needs the sharpness. But the background does show noise. Mattbuck 15:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done ok, I didnt touched sharpness and applied partial denoising to the background. --Cccefalon 16:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Smial 14:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shigu Yunnan China Pile-of-Tiles-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finowfurt Germany Janow-Kapustin-Memorial-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finowfurt Germany IFA-Firefighting-Vehicle-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Sweet-Corn-on-an-internet-café-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't know how to understand your comment. I am not disapponted at all, one QI more, that's good for the project --Poco a poco 21:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was just a joke. It meant, that you could not know, that the pagoda is inclined due to a problem with the underground. Anyway, thank you for promotion. --Cccefalon 23:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China East-temple-Pagoda-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you increase the blue, and maybe fix the haloes around the top? Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I tried, but unlucky situation: Increasing blue brings up the halo. Reducing this halo is not possible with LR and I have no PS for tone-mapping. Feel free to send the photo to CR. --Cccefalon 19:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Mattbuck 20:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

QIC template

Hi Cccefalon, danke dass du mich an die 48-Stunden-Regel für das QIC-Template erinnert hast. Ich werde mich daran halten. Grüsse, --Cayambe (talk) 12:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, gerne. Ich dachte mir schon, dass das keine böse Absicht war. Passiert mir manchmal im Eifer des Gefechts auch. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There's a rule about that? I thought it was just to summarise the current position and never be updated. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes there is. You will find it under "Rules" (bullet nr. three) and it reads as follows: The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Road-sweeper-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 23:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maulbronn Germany Building-within-the-monasterys-walls-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yunnan China Farmer-in-his-grainfield-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xian Shaanxi China Bell-Tower-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shigu Yunnan China Bicycle-at-the-local-market-of-Shigu-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Old-town-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice sea of roofs. --Myrabella 18:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bingyu-Valley Liaoning China Gate-at-the-barrier-lake-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Buddha Statue-in-Dalian-Labour-Park-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 17:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Crane-booms-in-Dalian-harbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lushunkou Lianoning China Memorial-at-Marine-Artillery-Museum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment remove dust spot (see note).
✓ Done --Cccefalon 14:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Flying-a-kite-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Windmill-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Noodlemaker-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian China Wanda-Center-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments If I'm not wrong, you have to provide the name of the author (here, the architect), if not, there is no FoP in PRC I'm afraid.--Jebulon 20:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ named --Cccefalon 22:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. --Mattbuck 11:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Ruan-Player-in-Dalian-Labour-Park-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Former-Passenger-Waiting-Hall-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bingyu-Valley Liaoning China Rock-formation-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing picture, I cant underestand why the temple is cut, but IMHO is QI --The Photographer 01:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guangton Yunnan China Station-master-of-railway-station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chengdu Sichuan China Du-Fu-Thatched-Cottage-Park-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality (and nice composition) --P e z i 21:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hong Kong China Towboat-in-Victoria-Harbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aomen China Mailbox-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 21:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Police-woman-in-front-of-town-hall-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and interesting. Please correct the tiny "cut" problem in the left corner above, and I'll support--Jebulon 18:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done oups ... thank you for the hint. --Cccefalon 19:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Good now !--Jebulon 19:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China Billboard-in-Dongba-Language-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sintra Portugal Palácio da Pena-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 16:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-04a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 14:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-04b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 14:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Water-Calligraphy-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Buddha Statue-in-Dalian-Labour-Park-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corvus-corone-corone-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Heritage-shops-in-old-town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --Pleclown 13:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Doors- in-old-town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lübeck Germany Sleeping-Lion-at-Holstentor-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian China International-Airport-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor SiemReap Cambodia Horse-at-Angkor Wat-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China-Firefighting-Equipment-in-Old-Town-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China-Stage-of-Jade-Dragon-Mountain-Theatre-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chengdu Sichuan China Du-Fu-Thatched-Cottage-Park-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Probably useful ;-) --Moroder 07:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hong Kong China Wong-Tai-Sin-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Olympic-Square-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalian Liaoning China Botanic-Garden-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:29, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit green, and I think too much sky. Otherwise good. Mattbuck 17:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Resolved --Cccefalon 19:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Still too much sky - just crop some off and it'll be ok. Mattbuck 22:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ new version --Cccefalon 18:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 20:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 19:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hong Kong China Avenue-of-stars-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Red-and-yellow-ribbons-at-Chongsheng-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the photo and composition, but I think its a small CW tilt.--ArildV 11:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done You were right, I uploaded a new version. --Cccefalon 16:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)  Support --ArildV 18:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan Handcrafted-Coppersmith-Works-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 10:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 10:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 10:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sintra Portugal Palácio da Pena-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batalha Portugal Mosteiro da Batalha-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support very good sharpness, QI for me --A.Savin 18:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisboa Portugal Mosteiro dos Jerónimos-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a bit of sharpening. Mattbuck 21:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done altered sharpening and luminance details --Cccefalon 22:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 00:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

FP promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sintra Portugal Palácio da Pena-01.jpg, which was nominated by Tomer T at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sintra Portugal Palácio da Pena-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honau Baden-Württemberg Germany Lichtenstein-Castle-in-winters-atmosphere-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dali Yunnan China Chongsheng-Temple-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay. DerHexer 13:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimaraes Portugal Praça-de-S-Tiago-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimaraes Portugal Largo-do-Toural-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I really like that. DerHexer 23:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimaraes Portugal Praça da Oliveira-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath-Forsbach Germany-Forsbacher-Hof-after-renovation-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 11:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath Germany Old-townshall-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untereschbach Germany The-last-trolley-of-ore-from-Lüderich-mine-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guimaraes Portugal Paço-dos-Duques-de-Bragança-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Too dark, the face. I'm not convinced with the crop --Moroder
✓ Done brigtened face and applied 1:1 crop. Thanks for the advise. --Cccefalon 11:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Dieses Haus hat keine parallelen Strukturen. ;-) Es ist das verrückteste und in sich schiefste und verbogenste Haus, das ich jemals gesehen habe. Wenn man davor steht, wundert man sich, dass es überhaupt hält - und das über einen so langen Zeitraum. Selbst die Giebelwand macht nach dem ersten Geschoss einen Knick nach außen, und dann nach dem dritten einen Knick nach innen. Du wirst an dem ganzen Haus keine parallele Linie finden, jedes Fenster ist einzeln krumm und schief eingesetzt. Aber das nur zur Erklärung, warum es keinesfalls "entzerrt" werden soll. Smial hat mit dem Stitchingfehler recht, von daher sowieso kein QI.

Der Ort ist übrigens wirklich sehenswert, so eine Ansammlung von so alten Häusern, die derart windschief nur aneinander halten, gibt es wohl nur sehr selten. Leider ist noch sehr viel Sanierungsbedarf.

Viele Grüße, Stepro (talk) 14:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Stepro, ich finde die Häuser sehr schön; ich lebe selbst in einem Fachwerkhaus - allerdings weitaus weniger kunstvoll, als die von Dir photographierten. Das Problem mit den schiefen Häusern bei denen eine perspektivische Korrektur schwierig ist, kenne ich; manchmal ist es wirklich verdammt schwierig den richtigen Weg zu finden. In diesem speziellen Fall war allerdings ausschlaggebend, dass das davor aufgestellte Systemgerüst ebenfalls perspektivisch verzerrt ist. Systembaugerüste sind konstruktiv so konzipiert, dass sich beim Zusammenbau immer rechte Winkel ergeben. Sie dürfen auch nur lotrecht aufgestellt werden. Ich möchte nicht besserwisserisch klingen, sondern lediglich ein paar Anhaltspunkte liefern, die einer kritischen Bewertung standhalten und die man auch sehr gut nutzen kann, wenn eine anspruchsvolle Architektur nicht auf den ersten Blick erkennen lässt, in welche Richtung sich die Perspektive verschoben hat.
Ich verstehe natürlich auch, dass jeder "sein Baby" durch die QI-Bewertung durchkriegen möchte, aber manchmal macht einem die notwendige Perspektivkorrektur und die damit einhergehende, "rahmensprengende" Entzerrung einen dicken Strich durch die Rechnung. Das hat mich auch schon oft geärgert, aber schlussendlich bin ich dann doch zufrieden, wenn ich nachher kein faules Ei in meiner QI-Sammlung habe :)
Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Naja, wie gesagt, es hat sowieso Stitchingfehler und ist daher nicht QI-geeignet. Das kommt davon, wenn man mit einer 50mm Festbrennweite vor so einem Haus steht. ;-) Ich hatte damals glaube ich schon 3 Programme durchprobiert, bis ich endlich ein vernünftiges Bild zusammenhatte. Mal sehen, vielleicht versuche ich es irgendwann nochmal neu zu stitchen. --Stepro (talk) 22:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Palace-of-Justice seen-from PJC-Gate-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goood quality.--ArildV 08:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath-Denkmal-03 Hauptstrasse-229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaragoza Spain Building-at-Expo2008-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 20:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putrajaya Malaysia Putra-Mosque-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Lob...

... für deine ausführlichen und immer hilfreichen Reviews auf QIC, z.B. 1, 2, 3. Gerade bei negativen Bewertungen hilft es enorm, wenn man etwas ausführlicher schreibt und auch positive Aspekte benennt. In dem Sinne heben sich deine Reviews positiv von vielen anderen ab. Selbst auf FPC schaffen es manche User ja nicht mal mehr als zwei Wörter "No Wow" oder auch gar nichts bei negativen Kommentaren zu schreiben.
BTW: Ich habe Frau Schwesig noch etwas gecroppt, kannst ja mal schauen, ob es dir so besser gefällt. Zu der Schärfe habe ich auch etwas geschrieben: Bei Frauenporträts darf die Haut aus meiner Sicht ruhig etwas weicher sein bzw. von Schärfung ausgenommen sein. Wenn man sich die Haare und den sonstigen Detailreichtum der Aufnahme anschaut finde ich die Schärfe sehr gut. Z.B. ist mir die Haut bei diesem Foto schon fast zu scharf. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Dein Lob! Ich habe mich sehr darüber gefreut, da ich mir manchmal auch wirklich Sorgen mache, dass ich Leute verärgere weil ich sehr viele Bilder bemängele oder gar zurückweise. Ich weiss ja selber, wie sehr man manchmal an einem Bild hängt!
Was das Bild von Manuela Schwesig betrifft, so sind hier zwei Dinge zu sagen:
  • Das Bild ist mit dem neuen Beschnitt wesentlich besser geworden, da die Gesichtsgröße jetzt in einem harmonischen Verhältnis zur Bildgröße ist. Frau Schwesig füllt nun auch viel dominanter das Format aus. Sehr schön! Allerdings hätte in diesem Fall der etwas weitere Beschnitt bei mir nicht zu einer Abwertung geführt, da es insgesamt noch durchaus im Rahmen des zulässigen und üblichen lag.
  • Der Einsatz von Weichzeichner ist in der Gestaltung eines Portraits zulässig und vom Kunden durchaus erwünscht. Der Grad der Weichzeichnung ist dann durchaus Geschmacksache. manche Photokünstler sezten die extreme Weichzeichnung sogar als künstlerisches Mittel ein. In Deinem Fall war alles im Rahmen des üblichen und mein Hinweis war in diesem Fall als reine Meinungsäußerung zu verstehen und nicht als Bewertungskriterium.
Nochmals Danke für Deine ermutigende Zuschrift! Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Von ausführlichen Reviews können alle nur profitieren, also nur weiter so! In dem Fall von Frau Schwesig war ich vielleicht etwas voreingenommen, da ich das Bild bearbeitet habe :) - ich bin gespannt, ob der Fotograf noch entsprechend kennzeichnet. Und ja, in der Tat habe ich ganz moderat mit dem NIK Skin Softener nachgearbeitet, habe aber darauf geachtet, dass es keinesfalls übertrieben aussieht. Ich finde bei Frauenporträts ist das durchaus zulässig. Es kann auch sein, dass das Gesicht bei ihr weicher aussieht als bei anderen Politikerinnen, da sie 1. jünger ist und 2. vermutlich auch als Landesministerin jemanden hat, der sich um ein perfektes Make-up gekümmert hat - die Haut war schon im RAW sehr weich.
Was ich Dir unbedingt noch als Tip mitgeben möchte: Für Portraitshootings habe ich immer einen Mattierungspuder zur Hand, den ich sowohl bei Frauen wie als auch bei Männern unmittelbar vor dem Shooting anwende. Auf diese Weise werden lästige Glanzlichter auf Stirn und Nase und Wangen vermieden. Profis aus dem Showbiz oder der Politik wissen, dass das eine notwendige Massnahme ist, um gut auf den Photos oder auf der Mattscheibe auszusehen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Guter Tipp, allerdings war ich beim eigentlich Shooting - genauso wie beim gesamten Landtagsprojekt - nicht involviert. Ich hatte in dem Fall nur die Nachbearbeitung übernommen (und auch nur bei diesem einen Bild). Ansonsten finde ich, dass Frau Schwesig weniger als andere Politiker glänzt. Von privaten Porträtaufnahmen kann ich dieses lästige Glanzproblem, das du ansprichst, aber nur bestätigen. Wo bekommt man solches Puder denn?
Ein Problem mit dem ursprünglichen Foto bestand darin, dass der Hintergrund nicht homogen ausgeleuchtet war. Deswegen hatte ich dem Urheber angeboten die RAW-Bearbeitung zu übernehmen (inkl. der Standard-Schritte bei der Porträtbearbeitung). Das Hintergrund-Problem ist z.B. hier zu erkennen. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QI

Hello, Thanks for your careful reviews. I noted that you change from nomination to "decline" because of inconclusive result after end of assessment period. According to the guidelines nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion (or decline), archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2013 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image. QIbot does it automatically.--ArildV (talk) 09:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, it does it 8 days after the last comment, not 8 days after nomination. If there are legitimate questions about an image at review, two days is often not enough to get an answer. Just leave them as nomination and if no one comments, eventually they'll disappear on their own. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you for the kind hint. In my perception, the Bot is not processing the removal of unassessed photos, if there is a long list of comments which overwrites the Review needed status. In the past we had an overdue of some assessments and I gave it a push. The entry of ArildV's nomination of December 8 should have been processed this morning, however it is still there. Ok, if matt is right, it is taking longer. For now, I am not convinced, that the QIbot really does it automatically but it's ok for me, if I keep my hands off. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It adds "Category:Unassessed quality images" to nominations it reviews (except those in discuss section). -mattbuck (Talk) 09:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Dear Uwe, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco2 14:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Nebelhornbahn-Snow-groomer-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 21:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Nebelhornbahn-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition. -- Felix Koenig 21:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar Tachileik-Shwedagon-Pagoda-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Skisprungschanze-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 12:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Nebelhornbahn-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Nebelhornbahn-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality & great shot. --NorbertNagel 10:45, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tachileik Myanmar Tachileik-Shwedagon-Pagoda-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rundum Sabah Sekolah-Kebangsaan-Rundum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipitang Sabah Fly-Jalur-gemilang-Campaign-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipitang Sabah Haji-Hassim-Mosque-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:26, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rösrath-Forsbach Germany-Forsbacher-Hof-after-renovation-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Malaysia Gereja-Basel-Sing-Kang-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf Germany Rechbergstrasse-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipitang Sabah Sapawi-Ahmad-during-Fly-Jalur-gemilang-Campaign-2013-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good, but imho the red channel is strongly oversaturated. A bit oversaturation might be OK with this remarkable red shirt. --Tuxyso 08:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I do not agree: If there would be an oversaturation of the red channel, you easily could see too much red within the lips. However, the red in the face is not oversaturated. Watching the histo, you will necessarily see a lot of red because the red parts in the photo are big. If in doubt, we could ask of course some other reviewers. --Cccefalon 11:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure, seems a bit unsharp. Mattbuck 20:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 16:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
[reply]