User talk:Carlos Luis M C da Cruz
Nossos primeiros passos e nossa FAQ ajudam após o registo. Explicam como colocar a interface do Commons em português, como carregar um arquivo e que licenças usar para carregar arquivos. Você não necessita de habilidades técnicas para contribuir aqui. Seja audaz contribuindo e assuma a boa-fé para com as pessoas. Esta é uma wiki - é realmente fácil. Mais informação está disponível no Portal comunitário. Se você tiver alguma questão, deixe uma mensagem na Esplanada, na mesa de perguntas (em inglês) ou em #wikimedia-commons, o canal de IRC da Wikimedia. Você pode também contatar um administrador em sua página de discussão. Se você tiver uma pergunta específica sobre o copyright, pergunte em Licenciamento (em inglês). |
| |
(P.S. Você gostaria de responder esta mensagem?) |
Patrícia msg 18:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Castelo
[edit]Boa noite Carlos! a imagem do castelo já está no artigo. A transferência é simplíssima: basta vc copiar a imagem em full size (abra a imagem em outra janela e clique sobre ela novamente: ela abre e logo diminui, então aparece um quadrinho no canto inferior direito, clique nele que ela volta ao tamanho grande, daí clique sobre ela com o botão direito do mouse e salve para seu computador), depois carrega-a no commons clicando em "enviar arquivo", e quando aparecer o quadro descritivo inserir os dados necessários, sempre fazendo um link para o endereço da imagem original e do autor, além de data, permissão, seu nome como carregador e outras infos que vc julgar interessantes.
Vá até a imagem Image:Rathfarnham Castle.jpg e clique em "editar", vc verá a anatomia do quadro descritivo, assim basta copiar o modelo e fazer as adaptações para cada caso. se tiver outras dúvidas dê um grito que lhe dou mais dicas. um abraço! tetraktys 23:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Bom dia Carlos. Gostaria se fosse possível que fosse substituida a fotografia da fachada do Museu de Santa Maria, pois esta foto é antiga e o museu já apresenta uma nova imagem. Obrigado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msmazores2019 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 10:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
--Legoktm (Talk | Bot) 11:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Re:Gestão de Categoria
[edit]Olá Carlos,
Parece-me que uma boa subcategoria será "Churches of Vila do Porto", e talvez outra categoria relacionada com a natureza e ainda outra com artesanato, que acha? Vou ver das convenções de nomenclatura para tais categorias e criar o que for apropriado. Cumprimentos, Patrícia msg 18:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:M ciclismo 5.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--BrokenSphere 18:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cast mouros 47.jpg is uncategorized since 16 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cast mouros 45.jpg is uncategorized since 16 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cast mouros 34.jpg is uncategorized since 16 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Conv esperanca 3.jpg is uncategorized since 17 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Forte n sra dos remedios 3 plantas.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
Castelo Branco
[edit]Carlos, obrigado por corrigir a categoria da foto de Castelo Branco! --Fulviusbsas (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Re:Albergaria...you are absolutely right: I made a terrible error in that category, and only noticed it yesterday. I confused the one of the Portuguese settlers of the time, with the name of this parish. I intend to remedy that as soon as possible. Appreciate your assistance, and thanks for compliment. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 07:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Appreciate the follow-up comments. Just so you know, I am living in the Azores, and am familiar with the place names: I am a GIS technician, Masters in Geography, and working at the Centro de Vulcanologia GIS department in Ponta Delgada for a computer/mapping company. Regarding the village of Vila do Porto, I understand that Category:Vila (Vila do Porto) is not the best option, but trying to keep the parish/municipality categories consist, I thought it would be more appropriate then Category:Vila do Porto (Vila do Porto). I tried a similar name change with the parish of Velas (Category:Velas (Velas)) and others editors suggested not changing it from Category:Velas (town), which in itself is completely incorrect.Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC) Maybe
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:MaryAndHorus.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MaryAndHorus.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fabuland_3665_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Re: Quinta dos Loridos / Buddha Eden
[edit]Hello Carlos, categorias criadas e conteúdo organizado. Espero que não te importes, mas fiz eu mesmo a categorização, pois a árvore de categorias de Portugal ainda está muito pobre, e assim aproveitei para criar mais uns raminhos... Então o tio Berardo fez mais uma das suas folies, desta vez no Bombarral? O conteúdo é muito bom, mas o lugar não ajuda nada.. :\ Compara essa secura com o jardim oriental que ele fez no Monte: Monte Palace Tropical Garden. Até dá pena ver essas preciosidades entre pinheiros bravos e coroas-de-henrique que já conheceram melhores dias. :\ Abraços, -- Darwin Ahoy! 11:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Rotation of thumbnails
[edit]Hallo Carlos Luis M C da Cruz, I have reverted your upload at File:Elevador Lacerda.jpg and File:São Tiago -entrance.JPG. Please do not rotate a scaled down size. Instead use RotateLink to request bot help. Sadly it currently needs three days. But the quality is higher!
Anyway: Obrigado, for trying to help! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 01:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Saibo, Thanks for the information, but the subject is too difficult to my eyes: could you, please, help doing the appropriate request? Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 13:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry: you had already fixed it! Many thanks, Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 13:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oi Carlos Luis M C da Cruz, yes, it is fixed now.
- For future: If there is a image mis-rotated in an article you can go to the file page on Commons and then use the "request rotation" link directly below the image on the file page to order the bot. In general some people here at Commons try to fix all images which have wrong rotation information - so the problem should be gone in some weeks. Just reply here is you want. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Legoland_vikings_river_splash_1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.131.15 21:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Clube Naval de Santa Maria
[edit]Olá Carlos. Criei a categoria "Clube Naval de Santa Maria" e localizou-o na categoria "Vila (Vila do Porto). Espero que ajudei. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Criar novas categorias
[edit]É muito fácil criar novas categorias. Basta no fundo da página escrever o nome da categoria pretendida e gravar. Em seguida clicar no nome da categoria (que estará a vermelho) e editar a nova página colocando as categorias desejadas. No caso da Categoria "Lugar dos Afectos" coloquei "Category:Aveiro, Portugal" e "Category:Amusement parks in Portugal" ambas dentro de duplos parênteses rectos!
Muito obrigado e boas contribuições Joseolgon (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2012 (UTC).
Alfândega do Funchal
[edit]Olá Carlos! Que obra é essa? -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz. You have new messages at DarwIn's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:ArriveeAuTempleDePhilae.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Carlos Luis M C da Cruz. You have new messages at JotaCartas's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File tagging File:Modulex billund.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Modulex billund.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Modulex billund.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Stefan4 (talk) 22:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Telegrafo portuguez.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 21:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Image rotation
[edit]In future you can just add the template {{rotate|90}} with the degrees needed to the image and a bot will do it for you. Ww2censor (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)