User talk:Cariner

Hello, Cariner. When nominating images for deletion, please don't overwrite the image information. Just add the {{Ifd}} tag, that's all you need. Sandstein 21:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove the contents of the image description pages. Adding a {{Ifd}} or {{Delete}} tag suffices. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Please have a reason aside from "Ugly picture. Decreasing the quality of Wikipedia." when nominating images. "Ugly picture" is not a deletion criteria. Also note that this is not Wikipedia. --Cat out 23:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Beasides, commons does not only serve wikipedia. Commons is NOT wikipedia -- Drini 22:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Here is the criteria Redundant/bad quality. Don't delete other people's requests, even if it is not valid. There will be administrators to decide whether these images should be kept or not. Cariner 18:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

For your info I am an administrator. --Cat out 18:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

You are not categorized as an administrator. Anyway, please be aware of the Commons:Deletion guidelines#Redundant/bad quality ctiteria. My request is in good faith. Please don't make arbitrary judgements. Cariner 18:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

You can be assured that I am indeed an administrator here on commons, not that it is a big thing. I merely dislike the admin category.

Your nominations for "bad quality" includes high res orbital satellite images of metropolitan areas and other perfectly good images, I frankly find that disruptive.

--Cat out 08:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess I should list the reason of Redundant in addition to Bad Quality. Image:Shenyang from International Space Station.jpg is redundant and bad quality compared with image:Shenyang 123.38236E 41.77365N.jpg, which is better high re orbital satellite image of metro Shenyang. Is this ok with you? Cariner 18:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes you would need to tell us why it is redundant and link to the other version so we know its genuinely redundant.

I do not consider either image redundant or bad quality. Both are good orbital pictures of same region.

--Cat out 15:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Manchukuo.svg

http://www.akiraifukube.org/arctic_forest.htm is not the source of this image. It is not a copyvio, but a flag from the 1930s. Kjetil_r 20:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zhongshan Square, Dalian.jpg

Please stop adding {{Idw}} to this page. The deletion request has been rejected. Any further such edits will be treated as vandalism. Sandstein 20:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Images for deletion

Please stop nominating images for deletion. Note that because of your persistant nominations of perfectly good images, many administrators have begun to treat your image nominations with a standard "remove this nomination on sight."

This is a warning: If you continue acting on this behaviour, you will be blocked from Commons for exhausting the patience of the community. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 22:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I am giving Cariner a three day cooling period. Any administrator is welcome to reverse or endorse this action. --Cat out 08:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I removed the block, this user had not had an opportunity to violate the warning issued. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 17:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Shenyang from International Space Station.jpg

Some pictures may be better than others. That does not however exclude each other. The images can perfectly stay both on Commons, without harming anybody.

Also in my personal opinion, neither one of the images is preferable. They both show the same city in different ways, possibly even using different satellites or at least different color techniques.

Hope this helps, -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Start a discussion with Cariner

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikimedia Commons the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Cariner. What you say here will be public for others to see.

Start a discussion