User talk:Capitolium4025

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Capitolium4025!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 13:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Figura Serpentinata.tif

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Figura Serpentinata.tif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 10:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! У каждой производной работы необходимо указать источник оригинального изображения, имена скульпторов и фотографов, а также привести согласия фотографов на публикацию их снимков под свободной лицензией или доказательства, что фотоработы также перешли в общественное достояние, как и скульптуры. Фотографирование трёхмерных объектов создаёт новое авторское право фотографа. Sealle (talk) 10:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Вы напрасно не вступаете в диалог, поскольку делаете по-прежнему не то, что нужно. Вносить информацию нужно в поля Author, Source и Description. Поле Caption - вспомогательное, и никак не решает проблему. По каждой иллюстрации нужны: 1) Автор скульптуры, годы жизни; 2) Автор фото, годы жизни, источник. 3) Автор дополнительных элементов, нанесённых на фото, годы жизни, источник. Sealle (talk) 17:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would add what is needed, but I can't, I don't have enough qualifications. And the illustrations are a pity if they were removed. They are very much needed. I have all the rights. If you could help then that would be good --Capitolium4025 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Никак не пойму, читаете ли Вы хотя бы то, что я пишу. Обсуждение лучше вести в одном месте. На указанные выше вопросы Вы можете тоже ответить прямо здесь. Sealle (talk) 18:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • А я не пойму, что я ещё должен сделать. Я Вам написал на User:Sealle|Sealle и попросил о помощи, если это возможно
    • Для помощи Вам я написал выше достаточно объёмное сообщение, но реакция на него — совершенно не та, которая там запрошена. Для начала внимательно перечитайте написанное выше. Пока всё выглядит как «я взял это из книги 2008 года» и никак не объясняет, почему Вы объявляете это собственной работой. Sealle (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Я не могу найти: Author, Source и Description. Но дело в том, что я не взял откуда то, а сделал сам Capitolium, который загрузил и есть Власов В. Г. Я автор и я указал это в подписях на файлах, а также источник, а на викискладе ясно написано: собственная работа --Capitolium4025 (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Правильно ли я понимаю, что именно Вы самостоятельно: 1) создали эти скульптуры, 2) сфотографировали их? Sealle (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • В подписях указаны раздельно авторы, годы и местонахождения скульптур и отдельно автор фотографий и графических схем. Фотографии я действительно делал сам, равно как и схемы. Это и называется собственной работой и в моём словаре указан копирайт --Capitolium4025 (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:6 санта пуденциана Img223.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:6 санта пуденциана Img223.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Книга Давидовой 1.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Книга Давидовой 1.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Quick1984 (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]