User talk:Canislupusarctos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

firefox layout

[edit]

hey, really great pictures! just wanted to let you know that the layout of the "recent photos" section in your user page doesnt work well in mozilla firefox. Canislupusarctos 13:29, 3 August 2007

  • Thanks, it doesn't work very well in MS Explorer either... I think that some adjustment on the "Gallery" format wer made while I was on vacancies. Anyway, it depends much on the size of your screen Alvesgaspar 16:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
File:SHAEF badge in Arc de Triomphe .JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SHAEF badge in Arc de Triomphe .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Licencias

[edit]

Hola,

La verdad es que bajé esa foto del sitio del Experimental, la recorté y le di otro formato (jpg). Yo asumía que eso podía caer en "trabajo propio". Lo mismo hice con el escudo del Junior y me lo borraron. El viernes me fui para el archivo de El Heraldo y tomé unas fotos al periódico de cuando el profesor Assa murió, recorté su foto, la pasé a jpg y la subí. Esa tampoco cae en la categoría "trabajo propio"? Si es así, cuál sería el tipo de licencia para esos trabajos? Saludos,--Jdvillalobos 15:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 00bfe26807fd190a65c3cfc9e310e8de

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Mapas SIM

[edit]

Hola que tal !

Bueno, este mensaje es para comunicarte que realice unos cambios en tus mapas svg de los departamentos de Colombia, ya que les añadí relieve y los hice mas estilizados. Te comento esto para que por favor no me los reviertas.

También te comento que termine la serie de mapas tuyos que nombraste como "Colombia-xxx-SIM.svg" (incluso con la misma descripción), de modo que ahora están las 2 opciones de mapas vectorizados, para el que quiera escoger.

PD: me podrías decir que significa la palabra SIM ??

Shadowxfox (talk) 11:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help inkscape

[edit]
Can you help me?

Jcwf (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Cheetah_range-spanish.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44 (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Mapas de Colombia, escala en las Islas.

[edit]

Hola Canislupusarctos. Muchas gracias por lo elogios, me dedique a la cartografía de Colombia en wikipedia porque veía que antes habían muchos mapas que no se ajustaban a la realidad, no mostraban los contornos como eran o eran demasiado sencillos. Debo decirte que si me respondiste pero en mi página de wikipedia en español y pues esa discusión la archive a principios de este año, así que no hay problema.

Con respecto a lo de la escala de las islas de San Andrés y Providencia, y Malpelo, me parece buena idea, lo malo es que no se cual es la escala verdadera como para ponerla en los mapas. Y como me dices un programa para hacerlo en masa tampoco conozco. Shadowxfox (talk) 01:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pienso adecuar este mapa File:Colombia location map2.svg (de mi propia autoria) con el relieve para los mapas localizadores de departamentos, no se que opines. Así podria poner realmente el tamaño de las islas de San Andres y Providencia. Shadowxfox (talk) 01:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:SHAEF_badge_in_Arc_de_Triomphe_.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Present distribution of wolf subspecies eur.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Present distribution of wolf subspecies eur.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre 2 (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Baranoa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Manatí (Colombia).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]