User talk:Camulogene77

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Camulogene77!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Emile Levassor.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Emile Levassor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 19:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Emile Levassor.jpg

File:Emile Levassor.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Camulogene77,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:JFPfevrier2006.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JFPfevrier2006.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 16:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

File:JFPfevrier2006.jpg

File:JFPfevrier2006.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 20:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

LangSwitch in headers

Hi; please don't use {{LangSwitch}} in headers (like == {{LangSwitch|[…]}} ==) as this makes it impossible to link to the respective section of the page. Thanks,    FDMS  4    17:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

I do not know if you're making a joke, otherwise the links it works very well (if you stay in the same language) or you can include an anchor.

• ==<Span id=1></span>{{LangSwitch|}}==
• -> [[Page#1]]

and still other solutions ...Camulogene77 (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

As you just mentioned, using LangSwitch in headers requires staying in the same language – that means that if I wanted to include a stable link to a section with a LangSwitch header, I'd have to translate the link into all languages used in the section header since I can't make any assumptions about the display language of the user clicking on it. You're right, a (since it requires linking users to check the source code somewhat impractical) workaround would be to use {{Anchor}}. Please either keep section headers the way they are or at least create an anchor. Two more things: Please don't mass-replace the term insignia with something else and avoid wikilinks in headers (impedes responsiveness and accessibility).    FDMS  4    23:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

I still do not see the problems, if you want, I can help you. regard.Camulogene77 (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Pourquoi ?

Camulogene77,

une petite erreur de clic de souris à l'occasion d'une séance de catégorisation de photos d'édifices parisiens est à l'origine du petit souci que tu as détecté. Merci pour ta vigilance. Cdt.--GO69 (talk) 07:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

The many, many problems with langswitch (gallery "Sexual identity symbols")

The "langswitch" template element was really originally intended for software interface messages (i.e. the underlying Wikimedia software telling you that some kind of error has occurred in a language that you'll understand). Unfortunately, some people seem to want to extend langswitch to uses for which it was not designed, and to which it is not suited. If you want to check if translations between the different languages are correct, or see file descriptions in a language different from the language you see software interface messages in, then langswitch does nothing for you. The rigid inflexible simplistic "langswitch" approach is simply not capable of handling the various diverse situations and needs which arise in the context of multilingual image diescriptions. AnonMoos (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Help

How can I upload a photo? Sajib Babu (talk) 15:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

hi, look: Special:UploadWizard

Venezia

The work of @Oursana: is very well done and useful. Your behavior is abusive and goes against our rules of good conduct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

serious ? it's joke ?

The work of our friend aims to facilitate accessibility and establish links for the uninitiated to our work habits. He spent time and I found his approach useful. This gallery is not well done and is pleased to see that one of us looks after it constructively. She throws her job at work is insulting. I think you will understand that it would be useful to re-establish it. This is in a spirit of goodwill that drives us all. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: I think it would be good if an administrator would follow your work on the page in question. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

The links to the kiwi were done like that, before wikidata. Now, it's useless to stun the gallery for nothing. There is nothing insulting to evolve the gallery, even if its previous work is obsolete--Camulogene77 (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour, ces liens ne font de mal à personnes, sauf de les enlever, ce qui apparement gène le ou les contributeurs réguliers de cette page, qui ont certainement du passer beaucoup de temps à les mettre en place. C'est une travail collégial, alors tachez de convaincre les autres contributeurs réguliers avant de faire un tel changement. Je vais rétablir la page telle qu'elle était, n'insister pas dans cette direction, ni n'annuler pas ces modifications. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Cette liste de liens incomplète ne fait de mal à personne sauf à la galerie qui s'alourdit inutilement, pour exemple: Paris comporte plus de 200 liens wikipédia, ce qui augmenterai considérablement le poids de la galerie déjà lourde. Je n'ai pas de solution pour ces "contributeurs réguliers" qui sont gênés par l'évolution du site (qui a clairement "amélioré" sa navigation inter-langue depuis Wikidata). Et désolé, mais le travail produit n'est pas forcement définitif (le mien y compris). Aucune discussion n'a été ouverte à ce sujet, y compris sur la galerie de Venise. S'il vous plait, veuillez arrêter d'annuler mes modifications sans raison correcte et valable, merci. --Camulogene77 (talk) 13:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Make the link is not burdened pages. Redundant images yes. They are gradually re-evaluated. The galleries have for first public the neophytes, who do not have the reflex to go on the left side to seek their language. One seeks to facilitate their navigation, this is the purpose of this work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Unproductive and disruptive editing after warning. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

see [1] Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vulcania exterieur 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Vulcania exterieur 2.jpg
• File:Vulcania exterieur 3.jpg
• File:Vulcania exterieur 4.jpg
• File:Vulcania interieur 1.jpg
• File:Vulcania interieur 2.jpg
• File:Vulcania interieur 3.jpg
• File:Vulcania interieur 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Mercedes Benz gallery

@Camulogene77: Hey, I've seen you've been working on the Mercedes-Benz gallery. Me too. I've planned a complete refresh but wasn't completely ready by now. Is it ok if I implement your edits of the page in my version before I replace the sections I updated as a whole? --Steinfeld-feld (talk) 13:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Of course, just respect the work of everyone, good work and good continuation.--Camulogene77 (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

This is what it looks like by now right before completion. How does it look to you? I felt the refresh was necessary after all the years with only small maintenance edits. --Steinfeld-feld (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Very good work, well done.

Thanks, I will move it to the page Mercedes-Benz even today or maybe tomorrow. --Steinfeld-feld (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

special:diff/228276514

Please don't use machine translation. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Scotland

It most certainly is NOT a joke. When you introduce a header from Wikidata at the beginning of a list of Council Areas of Scotland, it should read "Council areas of Scotland". "Council area of Scotland" is incorrect, as is the Wikidata item of that name. I thought that Wikidata was supposed to be a collaborative project, but if it can't even get the names of its items correct, it should be shut down forthwith. Please fix it there before making any more mistakes. I'm not prepared to have Commons looking illiterate, so I've reverted your reversion of my edit, which I note you didn't even have the courtesy to discuss. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Well, I was really thinking about a joke or a small mistake but apparently, you are serious. The subchapters are always a list of the chapter, but the titles are not always in the singular? This is not a rule on Wiki? I do not know if you are English or if you think that everyone reads English but, wikidata is the project that binds all the others and allows very easily the multi-language (also the multi-alphabet), I propose you to consult the UK gallery in Chinese (or Hindi, Russian, Hebrew, Arabic, ...(not Latin)) and you will understand the problem. Since you are an administrator, I let you correct that correctly. Regards, --Camulogene77 (talk) 14:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Of course I'm serious, because I understand how our users- who are not limited to other Wikipedias- will expect to see these things. I disagree that Wikidata should somehow be seen as somehow "above" other Wikimedia projects, because that means those projects will rely upon it to be correct when it demonstrably isn't, and those projects should not be forced to follow Wikidata. In the current example, "Council areas of Scotland" in en:Wikipedia is part of an article and is a category. In Commons, it is also a category. Now, categories for numerous things on Commons are, or should always be, named in the plural. It is much too onerous for us to change things here to be incorrect, and far easier for Wikidata to follow us, because we take categorisation seriously here and have been doing it for much longer. As for the UKGallery you refer to, it's not quite right even in its native language, which you might think is a "must". Hope that helps. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

I do not understand: "who are not limited to other Wikipedias", how can we be "limited to others"? If a Wikimedia is "above", it's Meta-Wiki. Each project has its own use, Wikipedia for the encyclopedia, Commons for the medias and Wikidata for centralizing (just gathering) all Wiki projects, on the same theme. Wikidata does not impose rules on other projects, it just allows multi-language navigation between projects and Commons must be, by definition, multi-languages. In the current example, "in: Wikipedia: Council areas of Scotland" is a redirect to a paragraph of an article, not a special page (list page), nor a category; and why "in: Wikipedia" should be "above"? I agree on the naming of the categories, but this is not the case here (galeriie). Imagine all the galleries in their native language, how to read the Beijing gallery in Chinese, israel in Hebrew, moscow in Russian? and bombai, in Hindi or Tamil? How many languages ​​do you read (except English)? The "must" is the language of the visitor, right? do you prefer the "LangSwitch" method? but it is much less convenient than Wikidata. Why not go yourself to Wikidata to correct YOUR language? which method do you recommend for internationalization? --Camulogene77 (talk) 11:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

The "must" is not restricted to English language; it's a basic courtesy that any reader would expect to see their native language rendered without errors. The problem here is that names of Wikidata items are singular when they should be plural, or at least being capable of rendition as a plural. Take {{Q729}}. It renders as a heading in the Commons galley as "animal" rather than "animals". Headings for lists of things in English are plural- anything else is simply incorrect. Looking at that Wikidata items as far as I can tell everything it links to is expressed in the plural, which might have suggested that the name of the wikidata item should also be plural, whatever the language. {{Label}} could be fixed to add a "name" field to enable a correct version to be used, but that template is widely used and stresses the servers if used many times on a page- but doing that would be "pasting over the cracks" when the error lies on Wikidata. Should I go to Wikidata and fix it? Absolutely NOT. I shouldn't be having to use my valuable time to fix errors in other Wikipedias whose ways and customs I am not familiar, since it's more than a full-time job dealing with things on Commons. AS for your other questions, they are irrelevant to the actual problem, which lies in Wikidata and nowhere else. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Galeries

Bonjour.

Ne pas utiliser =={{label|Q…|link=-|capitalization=ucfirst}}== s.v.p. où qu’il y a remplacements {{National symbols}}, {{Maps}}, {{Landscapes}}, {{Nature}}, etc. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

bonjour, quel est l'intérêt de ces modèles ? {{Nature}} est traduit en 2 langues alors que {{label|Q7860|link=-|capitalization=ucfirst}} est traduit en 133 langues. Si la raison est le "pluriel" (pas pour "Nature"), les titres de paragraphe dans les galeries sont toujours aux "singulier" (sauf exception). --Camulogene77 (talk) 14:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Europe - Europa

here you are still introducing grammatical errors in the English language. You have previously been told that this is unacceptable. You were also invited to open a discussion to the wider community and I note you have not done that. So this is your last warning: Fix it on Wikidata before adding any more items on Commons, otherwise you will be blocked until the problem is fixed. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

You tell me that the item "d:Q41346237: Interactive map" displays an error in the English language, but in English or in the other four languages, I do not see any errors (but I could be wrong), if you could give me more precision on the error, I will go there correct of course. Regarding my different and as it is recommended here, I made contact directly on his page of discussion. It will be good, before blocking me, to make sure of my bad time, which is really not the case. Camulogene77 (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Given the impact of your imports from Wikidata, I'd think the Village Pump would be the best place to go. This would attract discussion from as wide a range of editors as possible. Talk pages of specific Galleries are unlikely to be seen as widely. As for your "bad time", I'm not accusing you of bad faith editing or vandalism, just disruption, which needs to be addressed before you go any further. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

It would be preferable that the person who in a problem opens the discussion, no? I went to see on the Village Pump and I saw no discussion about the use of {{Label}}. The problem of the singular/plural is about to be solved, to see: Talk:Mediterranean Sea. If I did not understand your problem, I invite you to open a discussion (if have not already made) and I shall bring you my point of view, it is it advisable to you? Camulogene77 (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Iceland: use plurals

(Copied from Hike395 talk page) hello, do you think the plural is more important than the translation of +70 languages, many of which are "non-Latin"? Camulogene77 (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

I believe you have set up a False dichotomy. Before my edit, the section headers in Iceland were incorrectly singular in 70+ languages, which looked unprofessional. Using Wikidata is not the only way to internationalize section headers. For commonly-used section headers, see templates like {{LanSwWholePlants}}, where correct grammar is used for all languages.

From the comments of Garam, Incnis Mrsi, Rodhullandemu, there does not seem to be consensus for using Wikidata in section headers. If you wish to keep importing singular phrases from Wikidata, please start a discussion at the Village Pump. Thank you! — hike395 (talk) 12:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: Unproductive and disruptive editing after multiple warnings; you've been told not to import Wikidata headings without fixing the grammar.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: can you explain which page namely caused such a harsh reaction? Currently I see minor edit marks—in most cases utterly inappropriate—as a greater Camulogene77’s disruption than occasional ungrammatical {{Label}}s. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Moreover, Camulogene77 contributes to customized multilingual headings; see template:Churches (hist • logs • abuse log). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Plurals are still incorrect after these edits. That's unacceptable, and this editor has been informed of this on more than one previous occasion. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

On a noticeboard now. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

You've exhausted all discussion with me? Why the rush to appeal over my head so soon? Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

My question was clear enough to expect a sort of answer. Moreover, blocking users due to content disputes, especially involved blocks, are a serious matter needing review by more people than one Incnis Mrsi. Also, Rodhullandemu why did you copy Christian Ferrer’s block rationale into the template message? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

It's not a content dispute when several users have complained about edits. Camulogene has been invited so seek consensus for his changes but as far as I can see has failed to do so and if so, that's disrespectful. Let him file an {{Unblock}} request if he thinks he's on strong ground or is prepared to comply with consensus. I copied the rationale because it fitted the situation. Let's leave it to the other admins now because I have a huge backlog of uploads to manage. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I initially interceded on your behalf because felt that Rodhullandemu’s block is punitive, not preventive. But, instead on arguing in defence of your edits, you quarrel with yet another sysop now. It will not make you happy on Commons, sure. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

I want to fight with nobody, I'm waiting for a response for more than a week, how to have a clear answer please? Camulogene77 (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Aéroport d'Angoulême - Cognac

Aéroport d'Angoulême - Cognac has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robby (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)