User talk:Caballero1967/Archive 12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


In VI

I do not welcome you in V, and I am very sorry because I like your work. Continues to provide images and captions to do good. Come often VI where I'll help you with pleasure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for your words, encouragement and suggestion. In fact, I went to the page and changed it to the picture you recommended, which I had planned to show as a set with the other. Please, let me know what do you think. --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 22:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio de Montesino by Antonio Castellanos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

"America" is awoken

Very good appointment. I modified the scope to make it acceptable. If you watch an artwork it is necessary: the name of the artwork and the author.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks. That was a wise move. I am learning bit by bit. Cheers, --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 09:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Error

See here Lee Cannon steals other people's images and places them on his flickr account. That is why he was blacklisted on WikiCommons. You are an innocent party. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: Sorry for the bother, then. Please, take those pictures off and away, and also, could you please, remove the warning signs you left on my Talk Page. They are horrible! :) Thanks. --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 06:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can remove the warning signs from your talkpage by yourself as the images have not yet been deleted and an Admin will check to see that you have been notified. Thank You for understanding. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Leoboudv: What does that mean, then. Do I have to wait for an administrator? Can you or I delete the pictures? --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 06:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Leoboudv: Thank you. You are very kind. --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 11:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Allegory of America" engraving by Jan Galle after Jan van der Straet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramic view inside Mother Bethel A.M.E. Church, Philadelphia, PA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Entrance to Ensenada Honda, Culebra, Puerto Rico.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Entrance to Ensenada Honda, Culebra, Puerto Rico.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Noteː Learning experience for user. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

@Túrelio: Túrelio, is there a way for an artist to have his or her name recognized in Wiki Common's media? This is what the artist wrote to me: "Me parece bien siempre y cuando se de credito de la imagen y de donde proviene." (en: "It is fine with me as long as there is credit to the image's source."). I am struggling to understand how on one side we are trying to promote free interexchange, but we can't acknowledge credit. Thanks. --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Caballero1967, hmm, I don't really understand that reasoning. As most images on Flickr are under a CC license, we do of course credit the author. See for example: File:Bandaged Chico.jpg. The autor is credited 1) in the author-entry, and 2) (optionally) in the license template. What more of credit could we provide? Of course, we have no control over re-users on external websites. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Thanks for writing back. It seems that the main difference with the example you provided above is that the one I used here had a license that did not allow "Derivatives" and could not be redistributed if bundled or changed. But if we follow the logic you stated above, Wikipedia (or Wikimedia) is not seeking "derivatives" from the pic and we cannot be held responsible for what others would use it afterward. Isn't? If that is true, then, we could have used the one I posted. Regardless, I am asking the artist to change the license from (CC BY-ND 2.0) to perhaps (CC BY-SA 2.0). I think that most of the confusion is between this two forms of licenses. It is too much hassle if you want good pics for your articles. Let me know what you think of the previous question. Cheers, --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 19:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, no. The fact that we do not accept media which do not allow either commercial use or creation of derivatives, is in our founding policy (COM:L). There is no way to bypass that. However, you could indeed try to convince the artist to change his license of Flickr to CC-BY-SA or CC-BY, at least for 1-2 days. You could then upload the image to Commons, let the Flickr-Review bot run and confirm the license. Thereafter, the artist may change the license on Flickr back to its original status. --Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for everything. Hopefully he will respond favorably. Cheers, --Caballero//Historiador ☊ 20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:En la orilla de Joyuda.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:En la orilla de Joyuda.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC) (Noteː Learning experience for user. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File:Cenando en Joyudas, Cabo Rojo.jpg

File:Cenando en Joyudas, Cabo Rojo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BRP ever 10:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC) (Noteː Learning experience for user. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File tagging File:Desiderio arias-441x441.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Desiderio arias-441x441.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Desiderio arias-441x441.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Josve05a (talk) 19:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC) (Noteː User tried but artist did not respond to requests for permission. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File:Andrés Jiménez.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Andrés Jiménez.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC) (Noteː User tried but artist did not respond to requests for permission. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File:Edwin Colón Zayas.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Edwin Colón Zayas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC) (Noteː User tried but artist did not respond to requests for permission. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File:Arbor Day 2012, in Blacksburg, VA.jpg

File:Arbor Day 2012, in Blacksburg, VA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

B (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC) (Noteː User is the author but requested admins to delete this file. Caballero//Historiador ☊ 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Resolved

File:Beekman Winthrop in 1906.tiff

Caballero, I have requested that a file you uploaded be renamed. You might want to follow it up at HERE. Sorry if I didn't contact you about this before as I had been looking to get this fixed for several months but never found the time until now. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 01:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy11 Thanks. Whenever possible, would you share your rationale? Caballero//Historiador ☊ 15:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caballero,
There is nothing in Paul Miller's 1946 book, available here, to identify that man in the picture as Gov. Beekman Winthrop. Miller's book simply states that Gov. Winthrop and the mayor were accompanying Roosevelt. A "key" as who is who in the pic is not given. Roosevelt isn't an issue: anyone will recognize him anyway.
But, despite the book not stating who is who, there are a few clues as to who is Winthrop and who is Oppenheimer.
(1) Protocol: For one thing, political protocol has it that the next highest-ranking government official always stands to the right of the president ("to the right", but not as the pic is taken, but as they line up or --as in this case-- as they walk). That would point to Governor Winthrop as the man walking on the right of the president (again, "on the right" as they walk, not from the angle of the camera) and to Mayor Oppenheimer as the man with the tall black hat on the left of the POTUS.
(2) Hats: The only person in the pic wearing a Spanish-style hat (the tall black hat) is the man with the long beard walking left of the president. That's a hint that Oppenheimer, not Winthrop, is the the man with the talk black hat. The other men there (except of course for the Puerto Rico policemen who are wearing their uniform hats) are all wearing American-style hats.
(3) Facial hair: If we use the entire image of that photo, located here, and get a close-up to compare the faces and facial hair of Winthrop (he wore an Anglo-style beard/mustache combo, not a long beard, see it here) vs. Oppenheimer (he wore a distinctively 2-prong long beard, see it here), we can see that the man to the left of the president with the tall black hat must be Mayor Oppenheimer.
(4) Eyeglasses: The man to the right of the POTUS is wearing eyeglasses, which Winthrop wore. Oppenheimer, on the other hand, isn't known to have worn eyeglasses. This means that the man to the right of the president must be Winthrop. If Winthrop is to the right of the POTUS wearing glasses, he could not be also the man to the left of the POTUS wearing no eyeglasses.
All 4 hints are consistent among themselves, as well as against the evidence of the pictures, so the man with the tall black hat must be Mayor Oppenheimer, not governor Winthrop.
BTW, the book says it was mayor Simon Moret in the picture, but this is an error. Simot Moret wasn't mayor until 1907, but the visit was on November 21, 1906 (https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/december-11-1906-message-regarding-state-puerto-rico), so Moret wasn't mayor yet and the sitting mayor was Oppenheimer. More importantly, there are also several newspaper (both US and PR) reports that state the president was met by Oppenheimer (not Moret). You can research them if you want.
Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural Celebrating the countries independence (cropped).tiff

File:Mural Celebrating the countries independence (cropped).tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramona Hernandez.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ramona Hernandez.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No COM:FOP for 2D works in Puerto Rico.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creator of [:[File:"America" (Engraving) Nova reperta (Speculum diuersarum imaginum speculatiuarum 1638).tif]]

Hello Caballero,

I know it's a bit since you uploaded the file. Can you remember where you got the name of the engraver of this image from? The file description says Jan Galle but the inscription in the picture itself mentions "Theodor Galle sculp." who was Jan's father. I wanted to add the creator's name to the structured data tab and stumbled across the discrepancy. Thank you! Matthias.Wolf (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would think it's not Jan Galle. It is Theodor Galle because a The MET Museum here states it's Theodor and a museum would have done their homework to get it right. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caballero1967/Archive_12&oldid=726912729"