User talk:C.Löser

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Schöne Winterfotos von Greifswald

[edit]

..nur, um das mal zu erwähnen ;). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Und Nachschub gibt's auch schon wieder! :-) --C.Löser (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist ein Traum ;). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

[edit]

Genau das hatte ich auch noch vor. Werde auch bei sonnigem Wetter und Zeit mal hinfahren. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beim Anblick des Fotos bekam ich jedes Mal Angst, dass die Elbe ausläuft. ;-) --C.Löser (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Jellinek

[edit]

Hallo, weißt Du noch, woher Du das Photo hast? File:Georg Jellinek.jpg Momentan schaut es so aus, als habe es die falsche Lizenz und ich würde mich gern, um eine bessere Version bemühen. Danke für die Auskunft. Liebe Grüße --Catfisheye (talk) 22:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Catfisheye, ich weiß leider nicht mehr, wo ich das Bild her hatte. --C.Löser (talk) 04:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, aber selbst gescannt? Grüße --Catfisheye (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, es war aus dem Netz, aber ich weiß nicht mehr woher. Ich kann daher auch nicht mehr sagen, ob der public-domain-tag so stimmt. Das Bild wurde vor 1900 aufgenommen. Falls der Fotograf damals 30 war und mit 70 gestorben ist, dann wäre er jetzt seit 70 Jahren tot. Vielleicht habe ich damals eine falsche Rechnung angestellt. Ich bezweifle auch, dass bei dem Bild überhaupt stand, wer es aufgenommen hat. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 06:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ich denke, dann wäre es besser es löschen zu lassen. Sorry. :( Liebe Grüße --Catfisheye (talk) 21:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ja ich guck nachher mal dass ich es irgendwo eintrage. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 10:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hinweis

[edit]

Da ich dich hier wahrscheinlich am ehesten erreiche und du ja auch im Themenfeld das ein oder andere beigetragen hast, auch für dich der Hinweis auf diese Liste. Falls du also mal etwas beitragen kannst und möchtest, würde (sicherlich nicht nur) mich das sehr freuen. Na, und in Quelle 3 habe ich ja etwas gesehen ... :-). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Niteshift, momentan habe ich nichts Neues beizutragen. Das zur Übersicht des Elbegewässersystems war nur ein ganz kleiner Beitrag zu Nebengewässern in Schleswig-Holstein. Gruß! --C.Löser (talk) 05:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priele

[edit]

Hallo C.Löser, für Priele gibt es Category:Priels. Die Elternkategorien sind dort zwar (noch) etwas abenteuerlich, aber ansonsten passende Bilder darfst Du gerne da reinsetzen. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 12:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, ich hab die Kategory "Priele" angelegt und die Kategorie "Priels" zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, da die korrekte Pluralform von "Priel" "Priele" lautet. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm, ich hatte ohne weitere Kontrolle darauf vertraut, dass "Priels" ein Wort ist, dass es auch in der englischen Sprache gibt. Das scheint nicht so zu sein. Ein korrekter Kategoriename wäre dann wohl “Tidal creek” oder “Tideway” [1]. Das deutsche "Priele" scheidet völlig aus, wenn es eine englischsprachige Bezeichnung gibt! -- Ies (talk) 14:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
“Tidal creek” scheint mir nur eine Umschreibung zu sein, “Priel” ist hingegen der Eigenname für (deutsche) Watt-Fließgewässer. Oder ist “Tidal creek” ein Fachbegriff und identisch mit dem deutschen “Priel”? Ich weiß auch gar nicht, wo/ob es außer im dänischen, deutschen und niederländischen Wattenmeer sonst noch Priele gibt. --C.Löser (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tyramine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo C.Löser, wenn du nicht furchtbar viel dagegen hast, würde ich dieser Datei gerne einen etwas spezifischeren Namen geben, weil sie aufgrund des total unspezifischen ständig mit anderen Bildern überschrieben wird. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja das wäre nett - der damals von mir gewählte Name ist wirklich alles andere als aussagekräftig. Hast du Administratorenrechte? Kannst du dann bitte auch gleich File:Collage2.jpg und File:Collage3.jpg umbenennen (die drei gehören zusammen)? Vielleicht in "...Auge im Himmel", "...Auge im All" und "...Auge im Feuer". Die Verlinkungen in den Wikiprojekten werden dann vermutlich automatisch geändert? Danke & Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Auge im Feuer" - hmm, hoffentlich macht Sauron da kein Copyright geltend ;-) ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Danke ;-) --C.Löser (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
This barnstar for you to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikimedia Commons Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot :-) --C.Löser (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nur der Interesse halber... Gehe ich recht in der Annahme, dass diese einst im Lockstedter Lager standen?--1970gemini 14:58, 19 Februar 2012 (UTC)

Die Gemeinde Hohenlockstedt (bis 1956: Lockstedter Lager) ist aus dem Lockstedter Lager hervorgegangen. Ich gehe daher davon aus, dass sich das Denkmal schon immer an seinem heutigen Standort befand. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi C.Löser, könntest Du hier die Nummerierung der Reste hochstellen? Danke --Mabschaaf (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mabschaaf, das Bild ist nicht von mir, ich habe es lediglich aus der en.WP hierher geholt. Das Bild stammt von en:User:Cacycle. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Beta-Phenethylamine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 15:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piperonal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 15:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2C-I.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NMT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NET.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:DBT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MIPT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:DIPT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tryptophan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dopamine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 02:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moin. Du hast einige Kategorisierungen, die ich durchgeführt habe, rückgängig gemacht. Was spricht denn dagegen, diese Kategorien anzuwenden, ebenso wie es bei allen anderen auch erfolgt ist?! -- MfG Snoopy1964 (talk) 05:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Snoopy1964, gegen die Einordnungen spricht nichts. Nur habe ich statt der Einordnung einiger der Fotos der Denkmale die entsprechenden Kategorien eingeordnet, so dass nun alle Fotos der entsprechenden Denkmale erfasst sind, siehe Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Beidenfleth. Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 10:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Uebersicht Phenylethylamine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 15:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mir egal, ist ja nun als SVG zu haben. Nur achte bitte mit darauf, ob Leute, die lediglich aus Bitmaps Vektorgrafiken machen, Werke anderer als eigene ausgeben und unter einer anderen Lizenz veröffentlichen. Das ist in doppelter Hinsicht eine Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Denn durch die Konversion in ein anderes Datenformat entsteht kein neues Werk. In diesem Fall ist die Konversion nicht mal ein Analogon zur Übersetzung. Danke & Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:3,4-DMA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 20:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, C.Löser, es wär schön wenn du zu dem Bild auch die genauen Geokoordinaten hättest (ist im Wald, also schlecht über Googlemaps oder Bing ermittelbar). Ich hoffe du weist noch wo das Bild entstanden ist. Ich brauch das, weil ich da grad den Verlauf der Alsenbahn versuche darzustellen (Arbeitsseite ist: [[2]], ich hab da auch noch diverse andere potenzielle Maststandorte gefunden, wo noch Reste zu fotografieren wären, da du dich ja in der Gegend "rumtreibst" wäre es schön, wenn du da noch mehr fotografierst, für mich ist das etwas weit weg, aber ich hab vor im Sommer da mal einiges mit dem Fahrrad zu erfahren. --Jom (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jom, ich weiß leider nicht mehr genau, wo ich das Foto gemacht habe, und bin auch nicht mehr oft in der Gegend unterwegs. Ich kann nur ungefähr sagen, auf welcher Strecke das Foto entstand: es gibt (erkennbar z.B. in google earth) in Sude eine Linie von Südsüdost nach Nordnordwest, durch Abweichungen von den zu erwartenden Grundstücksgrenzen und Gebäudezuschnitten determiniert. Diese Linie kann man nach NNW durch das Heiligenstedtener Holz verlängern (dort stimmt sie mit verbliebenen Waldschneisen überein). Die vier von mir hier hochgeladenen Fotos (erste 4 Fotos aus der Category:Alsensche Drahtseilbahn) entstanden alle im mittleren Drittel des Waldes und liegen auf dieser Linie, die dem ehem. Verlauf der Drahtseilbahn entspricht. Ich hoffe, das hilft! Gruß --C.Löser (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe einen Kartenausschnitt mit dem südöstlichen Ende der Drahtseilbahn bei Alsen. Aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen kann ich das Bild aber hier nicht hochladen. Du scheinst keine Email eingetragen zu haben; das Werkzeug "E-Mail an diesen Benutzer senden" taucht auf deiner Benutzerseite nicht auf... --C.Löser (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]