User talk:Brandenads

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brandenads!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:A selection of different helmets.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 03:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Minesweeper Most Common Game Style.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, I've moved it to a discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minesweeper Typically Found Theme Style.png so this can be looked at properly. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Quick Brown Fox Newspaper Reference.png

[edit]

This doesn't seem to match the original printed version of the Boston Journal - did you find it online somewhere else, or type it up yourself? --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I guess I am a little confused. If screenshots of Microsoft products are considered copyright, then why aren't Microsoft's logos copyright? Commons has logos for Office Programs, Windows, the company name itself, and more. Each one states that the design is simple shapes and graphics, and does not meet the threshold of originality. Logos are often fiercely protected as trademarks, and many have graphic elements beyond simple shapes. Can someone explain?

Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Trademarks has some context. My rough understanding is that protection of a trademark only kicks in when someone misuses it (like someone selling their own software with Microsoft branding, when it's not Microsoft software), and Commons doesn't concern itself with policing that, it just notes that a uncopyrightable geometric logo is also a trademark. You can ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright if you want some expert explanation. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:FoxJumpingDog.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 17:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]