User talk:Bontenbal
The MIT images may be copyrighted. Without a notice we do not know for sure, but we cannot assume PD. You could email the webmaster and ask for permission. This usually works best with private or non-profitorganizations. You can also check http://norbert.home.cern.ch/norbert/Baghdad/, which looks like a private homepage with lost of good pics ([1]). Email is at the bottom of the page. Good Luck -- Chris 73 13:27, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Thank you Chris!
Hmm, da läuft jetzt was schief. Ich habe Category:UN World Heritage Sites samt Unterkategorien entdeckt. Deine Kategorie ist definitiv eine Doppelung. Was tun? Ich habe ein paar Denkmäler in Deine Kategorie eingetragen, aber eigentlich gehören die nach Category:World Heritage Sites in England.
Ich werde die auch in diese Kategorie eintragen. Dickbauch 18:20, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Diese Kategorie hätte ich noch nicht gesehen! Ich denke wir müssen das zusammen bringen. Weiss aber nicht welche der Beste ist. Bontenbal 18:43, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Denke die schon vorhandene weiter zu nutzen ist am sinnvollsten. Das hast Du ja auch am Dorfbrunnen schon geschrieben. =;o) Dickbauch 10:31, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Demography
[edit]Thanks for your thanks !--Valérie75 17:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
As I understand it, attribution in some form is required when using work licensed under the GFDL. So where's the attribution for this picture which I made and uploaded to Wikipedia? (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dazu.jpg) --Calton 07:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Shapur I.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
Wikipeder 22:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Al_Azhar,_Egypt.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Al_Azhar,_Egypt.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Armenians
[edit]Dag Bontenbal
Kun je me wat meer details verstrekken over het beeld "Armenians Fighting Ottomans...." ? Dank bij voorbaat Michel wal 20:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Armenians_fighting_against_the_ottomans_during_wwi_van.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Madmax32 22:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:412px-Qusayr amra dancer.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:412px-Qusayr amra dancer.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 11:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Judaism in Amsterdam has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Ilse@ 21:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Women in Antioch (PD).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:Image:Women in Antioch (PD).jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jodo (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token d676e765b1ba60974110d2c01a719725
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Hassan_Nasrallah_demo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.51.133 01:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Laappaal Amsterdam.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nissan Leaf aan Amsterdamse laadpaal.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Laadpaal Amsterdam.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Detail laadpaal Amsterdam.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Category:Flags_of_the_Palestinian_National_Authority has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Orrlingtalk 02:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Khayam 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 11:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Mughal empire large.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vinod rakte (talk) 10:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Yazd.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jooja (talk) 09:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
?Are you sure about this image
[edit]Good afternoon, I'm an Iranian and was thinking about [image]. Just used google translate to translate what you fellas added in Nederland language about this image. It looks you think this image is taken in Band-e Charak. We think it's taken in kharg island. As it's written in the article:
In 1753 the Dutch Empire established both a trading post and a fort on the island after securing perpetual ownership of the island from Mir Nasáir, the Arab ruler of Bandar Rig, in return for a present of 2000 rupees.[2] In 1766 the Dutch fort was captured by Mir Mahanna, the governor of Bandar Rig.[3]
In some persian articles, this fort is called "Fort Mosselstein". e.g.
or
Even in dutch articles you can see such name. e.g.
How about to change the discription? I'm not familiar with Nederland language then could you change the discriptions? Rohalamin (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your comment. The source of this image is Leiden University: [5]. Please use google translate if you don't know Dutch, it's not that hard ;-). I don't know where fort Mosselsteyn is but at the time (2008!) I relied on iranchamber.com. However, feel free to update if you think otherwise. Regards, Bontenbal.