User talk:Boattoad/Archive 7
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
File:馬公天主堂|中庭聖母像.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.
And also:
- File:馬公天主堂|聖母像.jpg ( Nominator : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statues of Virgin Mary in Taiwan )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- My opinion those pictures of status or temple paintings is public area, according to the "Threshold of originality", all of them shall be keep instead of deletion. (More and more temples in Taiwan would reconstruct in the present, or even destroyed already, if we delete those artwork, I am afraid that we could not see the image anymore, it will be an kind of disaster to Taiwanese folk religious art.)--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:西衛里活動中心:壁畫彩繪 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:西衛里活動中心:壁畫彩繪 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:西衛里活動中心:壁畫彩繪 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:西衛有鱗鼻 28.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Solomon203 (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Audio Pronunciation Request for 泰米爾語
I see your audio pronunciations in lingua libre. That's Excellent! My request is record an audio Pronunciation for 泰米爾語 Thank you Sriveenkat (talk) 07:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
請教
您好,我剛才建立Cliffs of Penghu,在對照片的分類進行調整時,碰巧看見有一個很特別的現象。我查看分類的編輯歷史,澎湖這些村里的分類是你在2022年時建立,所以我就冒昧前來詢問你。我知道澎湖每個鄉市有下轄村里,依照村里從所轄的鄉市再拆分出來,如此分類是沒有問題,可是卻對原來的各鄉市分類維持不動,形成被分類的對象是同時存在既有鄉市又有村里的二個分類。比如鯨魚洞,原來是歸類在西嶼鄉,經由你建立新分類小門村,將鯨魚洞歸類在小門村,但是鯨魚洞原來的分類西嶼鄉並沒有因為小門村歸類而被移除,形成鯨魚洞既是歸類在小門村,也同時歸類在西嶼鄉。特別的現象在於小門村是歸類在西嶼鄉,因為它的分類名稱叫Villages in Siyu Township, Penghu County,中文翻譯不就是「澎湖縣西嶼鄉的村」?我不確定是不是我誤解了,因此想請你確認,可否請你解說?--125.230.86.13 14:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- 第一個原因是我可能是有所遺漏、沒有改到;第二個是,我也有可能顧忌「鯨魚洞」是西嶼鄉知名景點,需要檢索「鯨魚洞」圖片的人比較多也比較廣(譬如英語維基或維基導遊),我擔心如果把它分太細,細到村里的地步,這樣可能讓想尋找「鯨魚洞」的編輯不容易尋找,所以才保留「西嶼鄉」的分類。原則上我不介意其他編輯對分類有所調整,請放手照閣下的心意調動亦可。--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Pān-toh (food) in Taiwan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
125.230.88.199 07:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
請問
你命名「Pān-toh (food) in Taiwan」是否就是Roadside Banquet?如果是,那麼就有問題了。因為Pān-toh是指向宴會,而你是將它指向食物,那麼宴會為何會變成食物呢?還有,維基百科是寫Roadside Banquet,而你卻用Pān-toh,如此命名不一致,這又是為何?這些疑問,你在分類頁面上並沒有留說明,所以在使用者角度來看,留下未知,可能會產生二種結果:(1) 誤解而誤用 (2) 沒有人去用。這二種結果都不是我們樂見,那麼你既然建立此分類,我想你應該也希望能發揮此分類的使用價值,所以這還需要你的協助,以釐清上述的問題。如果有必要,我會認為與維基百科命名一致會是最佳。--125.230.88.199 06:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- 那就改回來吧!--Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 08:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)