User talk:Bleff

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bleff!

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I am a dedicated user with over 15 years of experience and over 35,000 contributions to Wikimedia projects. I am very passionate about Wikipedia and in editing articles, which is one of my greatest pleasures. Proof of this is that I have created 90 articles on the English Wikipedia, of which 8 are B-status and 3 are GA-status. In addition, I have taken 5 pre-existing articles to this level and was recognized with the "Awesome Wikipedian" distinction. Most of my edits have been in good faith and the hundreds of images I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons sought to improve the articles visually, always with the intention of respecting licenses. Regarding the use of post-1971 Argentine photos, I followed a common practice among other Argentine users and believed it was allowed because they are treated as public domain in my home country. I commit myself from now on not to upload any Argentine photo that is not in the public domain in 1996 at URAA time. In the specific cases of File:Granda cantante.jpg and File:Rosario, periodista.jpeg, the photos were provided to me by Josué Ricardo Rivas, who claimed to be the intellectual owner of them. I suggested to him, for his own ease, to create his own account in Flickr but, after the file's deletion and my banning, I asked him to please make the consensus statement for the VRT. I decided to wait for confirmation of his email to make my appeal, but after no response from Rivas I decided to write this text. Editing Wikipedia is my biggest hobby and a very important activity for me and I will continue contributing in the right way if you please let me.Bleff (talk) 03:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)"[reply]
Unblock reason: "The fact that you are good user in other projects does not mean anything in Commons. There was a case, where a user was indefinitely blocked in en.wiki and bureaucrat in Commons – why not vice versa? Still I decided to unblock you, because you seem to understand your mistake and hopefully it is not repeated. Happy editing! Taivo (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

File:Perón y Rucci en Ezeiza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

70.34.229.242 11:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isabel Perón en la CGT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

70.34.229.242 12:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]