User talk:Benzebuth198
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Coats of arms crown addition : don't
[edit]Hi. Please don't add crowns to existing coat of arms images, otherwise it breaks Wikipedia/other projects aesthetics where the images are already used, especially in the case of small icons. Just create crowned coats of arms in new files instead. Thanks. — Bjung (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
OK I'll create new ones
Attribution
[edit]Hello Benzebuth198. Someone complained that files you uploaded are derivs of other files and that the previous contributors weren't properly attributed (.e.g. [1], [2]). I reverted the edits, because this is not a reason for deletion. I do not know if the files are really derivatives, however I am just reminding you that according to the CC-BY-SA license you have to properly attribute previous contributors in the image information (in the Source/Author field). So if this information is missing, it should be filled in the image descriptions. Regards, and keep up the good svg work :) - Badseed talk 22:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry :(,
I become so accustomed to the "CC0" that I didn't take care of the " Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported". I've now attributed the work in source/author. It is ok now ? If not, don't hesitate to tell it to me.--Benzebuth198 (talk) 14:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Blason Maison de Schwartzenberg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dereckson (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Coat of arms of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre
[edit]Hi, I'm writing an article about the coat of arms of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, I've just watched the CoA on commons and in a book I own... In the book the paws of the greyhounds don't overlap the escucheon. Could you please change the CoA so the front paws touch the sides of the escucheon? Compare the arms on the site of the municipality. No need to make the oval shaped escucheon smaller, just move the dogs a bit more to the sides. If you need help, just ask Adelbrecht/Lemmens, Tom or Archmedus, both are well known with the heraldry of the Low Countries. Thank you in advance, Dqfn13 (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, first of all thanks to you to write an article over heraldry (mainly over Belgian heraldry :p). Then, I changed the CoA but I'm not sure it looks better now.It can stay like this for me, but I think it was more "natural" for the dogs to hold the escutheon between their paws. Furthemore, no (heraldic) error was done on the past version. In all cases, good continuation on wiki ! --Benzebuth198 (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
PS: Woluwe-Saint-Pierre is in Belgium, not in Low Countries (even if I dont know from where came the Hinnisdael Family, which gave his arms to the municipality), good to know if you wanna write an article over it :p
- Low Countries revers to Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. They use mainly the same rules as they became seperate countries only in 1830 (Belgium) and 1890 (Luxembourg). I must admit, Archmedus is more knowledged about the Netherlands. Dqfn13 (talk) 20:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)