User talk:Beata May

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eluveitie!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Beata May!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Serwus

[edit]

Widzę, że większość Twoich obrazów zrobiona została na HTW, ciekaw jestem ile przepraw z ochroną na Heathrow miałaś/eś, kilka razy się tam zamierzyłem z aparatem i zawsze kończyło się to rozmową z panami w jaskrawym zielonym :) Pozdrawiam. Chalger (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JAL123 image

[edit]

Hi! Please change "survivors' sittings" to "seat locations of survivors" since the latter is a form that would be used by native English speakers Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the great pictures coming! Ham (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After Googling Emergence by David Breuer-Weil, which you added to the page today, I found out that the work is a temporary installation (see here). This has meant that I've sadly had to take it off the list, as it would be untenably big if all the temporary installations of recent years were included on it. I hope I've made amends by adding it to the page w:Hanover Square, London, and that you're not discouraged from adding further pictures by my actions! Thanks, Ham (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ob 08 sculpture, St Giles High Street, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO (maybe a small perspective correction?).--ArildV 09:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope now is better --Eluveitie 10:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Good now.--ArildV 10:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 777-337ER - Air India (VT-ALK).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paternoster Square, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Decent quality. --Tomer T 08:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymph statue, Berkeley Square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 11:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dover Town Centre and Dover Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dover Lifeboat City of London II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Florstein 12:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suffragette Memorial, Christchurch Gardens, London .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is tilted and could need also a perspective correction Poco a poco 11:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I changed name of file, I mean I've requested it (I don't really know how it works) and I corrected perspective. --Cédric Amey 11:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't request a new name, but rather a tilt, because the monument is not straight Poco a poco 12:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Right, sorry. Done! --Eluveitie 04:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough Poco a poco 14:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Charles George Gordon statue, Embankment, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! I Goat Sculpture, Spitalfields, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality seems good (margins on blue sky are to be expected), and FOP in UK is no problem. Perspective of background is not an issue imo. -- Aisano 22:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 777-236ER - British Airways (G-VIIV).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Jebulon 09:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Admiral Horatio Nelson, Nelson's Column, Trafalgar Square, London.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. JLPC 21:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herring Gull (Larus argentatus), Brighton, England.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 19:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Eluveitie 20:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

RAF Bomber Command Memorial

[edit]

Thank you for your photographs of the Bomber Command Memorial. They've really brightened up the article. Harrison49 (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, in relation to File:Boeing 767-341ER - Star Alliance (LOT - Polish Airlines) (SP-LPE).JPG can you tell me what airport this was at. Cheers, russavia (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rename request

[edit]

Please kindly rename this account to Beata May, as per my request. Thank you --Eluveitie (talk) 10:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

aircrafts

[edit]

your photo are beautiful --Rippitippi (talk) 07:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gullfoss, South Iceland (2012).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Þingvellir National Park, Iceland (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. A little noisy though. I wonder if lower ISO could have been used. --Ximonic 07:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 757-23N(WL) Air Astana P4-KCU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Too bad that this photo has only badge size. --Cccefalon 07:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embraer ERJ-190STD (ERJ-190-100) KLM Cityhopper PH-EZM AMS-LHR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Below 2MP requirement. --Cccefalon 15:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Uploaded over 2MP version --Beata May 08:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Thank your for the higher resolution. --Cccefalon 07:49, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

CCW

[edit]

Hi (sorry, poor English) CCW = to the left (CounterClockWise). CW = ClockWise (to the right).

It is used to indicate inclination towards that side of the picture. Thanks for your pictures--Lmbuga (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons talk:Quality images candidates#For Newbies ...--Lmbuga (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dyna fyr (Dyna Lighthouse), Oslo, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Blue is oversaturated. Also, seeing the histo, I recommend to push the histo a little bit to the bright side. --Cccefalon 08:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC) *  Comment ✓ Done Uploaded another version --Beata May 06:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's better now. Can pass as QI imo. --Cccefalon 08:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oslo Opera house (2015)(2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mýrdalsjökull glacier, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Palace, Oslo (2015).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me now! --Hubertl 13:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Beata May, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! European robin (Erithacus rubecula), Bristol, UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]