User talk:Bastien Sens-Méyé~commonswiki
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 16:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Joseph Schumpeter.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Farinet Michel.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sol Hopii.jpg was uncategorized on 22 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Equation OPERA résultat final de la mesure de la vitesse du muon du neutrino.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Equation OPERA mesure de la vitesse du muon du neutrino par rapport à celle de la lumière.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Guang-jiong Ni.jpg was uncategorized on 28 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Le Saviez-vous.gif was uncategorized on 29 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Saviez-vous.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Le SAVIEZ-VOUS.gif was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SAVIEZ-VOUS.gif was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Did you know.gif was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:MORPH.gif was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Did you know.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ni.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Farinet_Michel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Joseph Schumpeter.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Schumpeter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joseph Schumpeter.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucrèce.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lucrèce.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Lucrèce.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Guang-jiong Ni.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Guang-jiong Ni.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Guang-jiong Ni.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ben.MQ (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sol Hopii.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sol Hopii.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sol Hopii.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ben.MQ (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Equation_OPERA_mesure_de_la_vitesse_du_muon_du_neutrino_par_rapport_à_celle_de_la_lumière.jpg
[edit]File:Equation_OPERA_mesure_de_la_vitesse_du_muon_du_neutrino_par_rapport_à_celle_de_la_lumière.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ben.MQ (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Equation_OPERA_résultat_final_de_la_mesure_de_la_vitesse_du_muon_du_neutrino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ben.MQ (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Ni Guang-Jiong.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ni.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ni.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Did you know.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 18:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:B-s-m.GIF
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:B-s-m.GIF. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:B-s-m.GIF]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
McZusatz (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:François Guillemot 2012.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:François Guillemot 2012.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:La contrepeterie du jour.GIF
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:La contrepeterie du jour.GIF. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:La contrepeterie du jour.GIF]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
McZusatz (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Space Biden
[edit]Salut,
Sachant que Biden ne pourra pas s'appeler comme ça, pourrais-tu renommer (ou faire renommer) le fichier File:Biden (planète mineure).jpg que tu as créé ? D'ailleurs, sur quoi se base cette "vue d'artiste" que tu as créée ? Forme, couleur, satellite (le point blanc), tu te bases sur quoi ? Pas sur que l'image soit trs représentative en tant que telle. Mis à l'échelle avec d'autres objets ce serait peut-être plus clair (malgré le facteur 2 sur l'estimation du diamètre), mais là ça ressemble à ce qu'on appellerait du TI si c'était du texte dans un article.
Bonne soirée.
SenseiAC (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Salut SenseiAC. On peut simplement appeler cette illustration du nom officiel de l'astre récemment présenté au public? Bonne soirée aussi. Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oui c'est ça, simplement "2012 VP113.jpg" ça irait très bien. De même ici autant enlever "Biden" qui sera pas conserver comme nom à terme (cf. article wp:fr pour l'explication). Et éventuellement mettre un VP113 un peu plus petit sur l'image avec Cérès pour avoir des dimension plus vraisemblables (le diamètre moyen tourne plutôt vers 500 km [intervalle large : ~300-1000 km ; intervalle "court" ~ 300 - 650 km] contre 950 pour Cérès). SenseiAC (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Je vais m'en occuper dans la soirée (j'ai eu mille trucs à faire aujourd'hui ;-). Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Pas de problème, merci bien. SenseiAC (talk) 17:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Tiens par curiosité, tu as utilisé quoi pour faire l'effet "rayon de soleil" ? C'est sympa je trouve et c'est plus clair concernant le "point blanc". Bonne soirée. SenseiAC (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Mille excuses pour le retard de la réponse. J'ai utilisé Gimp. Tout simplement ;-). Bonne année Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Tiens par curiosité, tu as utilisé quoi pour faire l'effet "rayon de soleil" ? C'est sympa je trouve et c'est plus clair concernant le "point blanc". Bonne soirée. SenseiAC (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Pas de problème, merci bien. SenseiAC (talk) 17:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Je vais m'en occuper dans la soirée (j'ai eu mille trucs à faire aujourd'hui ;-). Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oui c'est ça, simplement "2012 VP113.jpg" ça irait très bien. De même ici autant enlever "Biden" qui sera pas conserver comme nom à terme (cf. article wp:fr pour l'explication). Et éventuellement mettre un VP113 un peu plus petit sur l'image avec Cérès pour avoir des dimension plus vraisemblables (le diamètre moyen tourne plutôt vers 500 km [intervalle large : ~300-1000 km ; intervalle "court" ~ 300 - 650 km] contre 950 pour Cérès). SenseiAC (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bastien Sens-Méyé. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bastien Sens-Méyé~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
19:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
02:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Nostradamus Salon de Provence Centuries.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Racconish 💬 20:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Nostradamus Salon de Provence.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Habertix (talk) 19:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Nostradamus Salon de Provence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |