User talk:Base64

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VHHH baggage claim area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:VHHH baggage claim area.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:VHHH baggage claim area.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Mywood 09:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shun Lee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For sure QI, very well done. --B.navez 15:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

question

can you give me your contact information, i need help figuring out how to do HDR images like you do.. i can't seem to master it no matter what. please advise :) thanks!Evilarry 14:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you use instant messaging, like windows live messenger? --βαςε_LXIV™ 08:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

HKNeedImprovement1-cloned.tif

As I write this it is 90% uploaded to http://carol.gimp.org/GIMP/2008/Jun/HKNeedImprovement1-cloned.tif -- it just finished. GIMP warned me that it was opening a 16 bit image so I don't know how well my tif will blend with yours. I have no experience with this and as I said earlier and elsewhere, my eyes and reading haven't seen much to show or explain the difference.

This was definately more complicated so if you think there are spots or even the whole thing that should be redone -- yours will be the second eyes to see it (not really but as far as determining good enough from needs help they are) let me know. It should be a beautiful image when it is put together. -- carol (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, good to hear from you. Thanks for your hard work, may I ask is it possible to smoothen the edges of the circular healing mark?

If I use the the you sent to me, it will be like that, when the pano is merged.

By the way, I have a discovery, I found a segment that is not blended: right HERE, this would give you an idea of the brightness. The lower right hand corner matches the first TIFF I gave to you. --βαςε_LXIV™ 12:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

::I mean, are you able to make the light-direction of the the blown advertisement' on top of the building "shine upward" instead of shining "left-upward"? Thank you so much --βαςε_LXIV™ 12:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

HEY HEY, I did another great thing, I used the TIFF you cloned and I put a 50% opacity layer of the original segments,then I cloned the borders out, then: It turned this!!!!!! . I'll upload the FINAL pano soon. --βαςε_LXIV™ 13:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Finished!! HERE IS THE PRODUCT:

Link

I will add descriptions later.

--βαςε_LXIV™ 14:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like you were busy and productive while I slept. That is a beautiful image, the layer thing seems to have worked very very well. I am often not so fond of HDR images (and that is what this is?) but this is just about the most perfect use of whatever that is. I should read up on that to see if there are other uses for it. Giving me something to clone from should have been good had I been awake for it :)

-- carol (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, you're at UTC-8(without DST) and I'm at UTC+8, it's nice working with you.

By the way, I've nominated it to COM:FPC, and COM:QIC. I didn't nom it to EN WP because I'm not sure about the reaction. May I ask, what do you think about it?--βαςε_LXIV™ 09:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wan Chai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hong Kong Night Skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very high quality, resolution and details. Good candidate for FP. --Lestath 23:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Wan Chai.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Wan Chai.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 11:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hong Kong Night Skyline non-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good technical quality and sharpness. Freedom to share 13:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

image and web page stats

I rarely look at web page stats, my own and others. That being said, I looked today at the wiki stats. The edit of your image is 514 in the list of traffic here in between an actual car image (a BMW) and an image whose name sounds like the car Volvo but is actually more of the subject which is the greatest amount of image page traffic here.

Any idea the reason it would rank so high? -- carol (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean by "Edit"? Where do you see the stats? --Base64 (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I got that wrong. It is "Restitch" and it wasn't 514, that was the number of hits. Today it is 327 with 471 hits. I look at this list and know that I am not like most people, I guess.... -- carol (talk) 13:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nagoya Castle(Larger).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do you mind if I withdraw the other version? -- carol 03:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Sure, I don't know which template to use to withdraw. --Base64 03:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC) The image is very beautiful (including the goldfish) and the template is easy when you know it is there. -- carol 03:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nagoya Castle(Larger).jpg

Hi, I thought that a little added saturation and sharpness will benefit your image. So I uploaded the new version no top of it without your permission. It's nothing major, but If you don't like it, please feel free to revert it back. I'm sorry if it's not better. But I thought uploading a new file for a minor edit is useless.

Have a nice day! --Arad (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Nagoya Castle(Larger).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nagoya Castle(Larger).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops

Ooops, thanks! naerii 09:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

simply a nice experience

I cannot thank you enough for allowing me (and working with my software things) to edit that image of yours (the POTD today). While I feel badly when I remember that you needed to finish the edit of it -- it has really been just a nice experience from then through today when I get to smile when I see it on the Main Page.

For your hand in this, the photography, the stitching, the perfect use of an often abused special effect -- allowing me to do anything with it was quite a privilege. Knowing it is here and there will always be access to it to show how and when and how much to apply affects towards the improvement of what might already be a perfectly good photograph. All of these things just make a longer list of reasons to continue to enjoy this.

So, simply, thank you for this image and allowing my participation with it! -- carol (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shun Lee Crisco edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Wan Chai.jpg

File:Wan Chai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 124.217.188.6.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)