User talk:Bart Versieck

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bart Versieck!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Faunawatch.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eelke Bakker (106).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eelke Bakker (106).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MoiraMoira (talk) 08:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wshamstringstretch

[edit]

Bemoei je met je eigen zaken, mijn omschrijving klopt en is al ruim 10 jaar zo. Jij wilt toch terugkomen op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia? Dan zal ik vooral doorgaan, want voor zulk gedrag ben je juist daar geblokkeerd.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS in de fitness- en bodybuildingwereld worden wel degelijk Engelstalige termen gebruikt, zoals reps (zie NL-wiki) en ook stretch. Hamstring is zowel een Engelstalig als een Nederlands woord. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ik zal bij uitzondering uitgaan van goede wil, maar doe het niet weer, dan plaats ik een opmerking bij je arbcomverzoek. Wel toevallig dat je op die foto uitkomt, na weken (upd. maanden) van afwezigheid hier, zeker gezien in het fotoalbum op de NL:Wikipedia? Ik zou het niet wagen, dan refereer ik daarheen. Toch nog een vriendelijke groet, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Blijkbaar ben ik niet de enige die de omschrijving wou wijzigen, maar goed dan, en inderdaad, doch het is toch niet verboden om op die foto uit te komen, man? Bart Versieck (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

[edit]

Эlcobbola talk 17:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb hier alléén maar als "Bart Versieck" bijgedragen, dus daar klopt absoluut noppes van, hoor! Bart Versieck (talk) 22:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Translation: "I've only contributed here as "Bart Versieck', so the accusations of sockpuppetry are unfounded". In case you are innocent I hope this can be resolved, if you did commit sockpuppetry admitting it and then promising to adhere to what is expected of contributors will actually get you unblocked more quickly. Ik hoop dat je weer snel kan bijdragen, maar je moet wel weten dat een bewerkingsoorlog niet acceptabel is met één of met meerdere gebruikersaccounts. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since you are an English speaker and writer I will answer you in that language as well: I understand what you mean, but I honestly did not start an edit war anywhere, and I repeat that I only have been using this account while contributing over here (i.e. at "Wikimedia Commons"). Bart Versieck (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A user check was done and it was positive, that means negative for you. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
En nu in het Nederlands: ik herhaal dat ik op deze "Commons" enkel maar ingelogd als Bart Versieck heb bijgedragen, dus ik ben géén leugenaar, hoor! Bart Versieck (talk) 12:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I want to contribute to Wikimedia Commons again, and I apologize for using a sock puppet account. I won't do this again. Bart Versieck (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Unblock reason: "I give you another chance. Happy editing! Taivo (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Thanks, man! Bart Versieck (talk) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]