User talk:Barbette47
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
File:DSC1021-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Delsaut (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo de Raphael
[edit]Bonsoir Barbette47,
Je suis désolé d'avoir demandé la suppression de la photo de Raphael. Il y a régulièrement des personnes qui, par méconnaissance du droit d'auteur, reprennent une photo d'un site pour la placer dans Wikimedia Commons. Quand ce sont des photos qui ne sont pas des photos de scène ou des photos prises dans une manifestation publique (salon du livre, festival...), c'est généralement suspect car les photographes professionnels placent rarement leurs photos sur Wikimedia Commons. En plus, je vois que la photo est créditée à plusieurs endroits "Joël Haroche". Votre pseudonyme est assez éloigné (et c'est votre doit bien sûr) et donc, ça n'aide pas à vous identifier. Je pense qu'il y a des procédures pour prouver votre identité et donc votre droit. Croyez bien qu'évidemment je voulais éviter, avant tout, que les droits de l'auteur de cette photo soient bafoués. Je vais mettre un message sur la page de suppression mais attendez-vous à devoir faire une action pour prouver votre identité. --Delsaut (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Capture d’écran 2019-06-29 à 14.03.12.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Capture d’écran 2019-06-29 à 14.03.12.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Capture d’écran 2019-06-29 à 14.03.12.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
File:DSC1021-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Didym (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
File:DSC1021-2-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Didym (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo de Raphael
[edit]Bonsoir,
Je suis vraiment désolé de vous causer des problèmes. J'ai envoyé un message à celui qui a supprimé le fichier et qui n'a pas vu la phrase que j'avais ajouté ou ne l'a pas comprise. Je m'attendais à ce qu'un administrateur vous contacte pour vérifier votre identité. Je vois que vous avez reçu un message indiquant que vous pouviez faire une demande de dé-suppression (sic) (Commons:Undeletion_requests). Je vous conseille de le faire en mentionnant votre véritable identité. Je pense qu'ils ont des "procédures" pour la vérifier. --Delsaut (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Re-bonsoir,
- L'administrateur qui a supprimer l'image m'indique que vous devez utiliser l'outil OTRS car l'image a déjà été publiée ailleurs auparavant. Voir les explications sur la page OTRS. --Delsaut (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
File:DSC1021-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Gbawden (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
File:.DSC1021-2.pg[edit] I am requesting the undeletion of the file mentioned in the headline. I am the author of that photo that was shot at Raphael private home in 2016 at the occasion of the publication of his book "Retourner à la mer" which was to receive the very prestigious "prix Goncourt" for short stories. I authorized the artist to use this portrait at his convenience, that is why you could find it on a Franceinter page, as it was probably used by other web site with the artist permission. But I am the only owner of the copyright and of the original raw file and I can prove it. Therefore I would appreciate if you could undelete this file as soon as possible. Thank you in advance. Best regards.--Barbette47 (talk) 07:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)--Barbette47 (talk) 07:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)