User talk:Bakersund
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
--Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Bakersund, did you shoot he earlier uploaded b/w photos, such as the above linked one, also from public ground or in the artists studio? --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio, I shoot all pictures about the sculpture - studio and outside in front of the church. P.S.: Is this the right way to answer your question? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakersund (talk • contribs) 15:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, the reason I am asking is that this sculpture is still copyrighted by the sculptor until 70 years after his death. However, in Germany (and some other countries) for works of art that are permanently installed in public space there is an exception which allows anybody photographing the work of art and using the image deliberately; this is called freedom of panorama. This exception could be claimed for the images which were taken outside the church. Therefore, I had already added the appropriate FoP-template to them. However, if the images with the black background had been shot inside the church or in the studio of the artist, then we cannod claim FoP for them and we need a permission from the artist. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, hab gerade gesehen, dass du aus Erfurt kommst, dann können wir weiter auf deutsch sprechen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio, schön, dass wir deutsch reden können! Danke für die Hinweise, Du kennst Dich scheinbar besser aus als ich mit den Lizensen (das Prinzip ist mir schon klar). Ich habe die Skulptur gebaut und fotografiert (Studioaufnahmen von einem Freund, der mir die Rechte übertrug, erwähnen könnte ich ihn ja, würde er sich freuen) Ich stelle die Fotos ins Netz im Wissen, dass sie benutzt werden können, die urheberrechtliche Erwähnung des Künstlers vorausgesetzt. Ich habe die Außenfotos hinzugefügt, da es m.E. sinnvoll bzw. aufschlussreich ist, die Skulptur an ihrem Bestimmungsort zu sehen. Mir ist schon bewusst, dass es nun recht viele Fotos sind, die meine Skulptur darstellen - jedoch eine Skulptur hat viele Ansichten/Facetten - ich halte es für interessant/notwendig, wenigstens einige davon zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die Erwähnung des Künstlers (auch wenn das oft vergessen wird) halte ich auch für fair - den Link zur Webpräsenz habe ich eingefügt, da über mich noch kein Wikipedia-Eintrag existiert. Mir ist auch aufgefallen, dass ich nicht alle Fotos in alle Kategorien verlinken kann (wäre eine überproportionale Präsenz des Werkes), deshalb werde ich zu den Kategorien nur jeweils zwei Darstellungen (eine linke, eine rechte) verlinken. Können die Lordsiegelbewahrer von Wikipedia diese Ansichten teilen? Liebe Grüße — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bakersund (talk • contribs) 16:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nicolai Benignus-total 08.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nicolai Benignus-total 08.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nicolai Benignus-total 08.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nicolai Benignus-total 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |