User talk:Ashley Pomeroy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ashley Pomeroy!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality image!

[edit]

Gratz mate!
I candidated your Planar lenses 7050.jpg image to Quality images - it has been successfully reviewed and promoted! Enjoy! SkywalkerPL (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planar lenses 7050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right one is a bit out of focus, but the quality is enough for QI I think. - A.Savin 11:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ОЦ-14 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Someone not using his real name (talk) 13:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted your upload of a higher resolution version of this image as it is not clear that the higher resolution version is freely licensed as the low res one is. While there is some debate over whether downsampling actually creates a new work which can be released freely without also releasing the original, until it is a settled matter we must apply the precautionary principle. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Soft photos

[edit]

They were both taken in low light which means that the lens is shooting wide open which starts to create depth of field issues. They were also taken with a canon 16–35mm f/2.8L USM II lens which isn't the sharpest lens going (I've switched to an 11-24mm lens for most such images now).Geni (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 23:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, IagoQnsi (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I have transferred a colour-correction you made of a US government image to File:SUPER CONSTELLATION FUSELAGE DISPLAYED ABOVE BUILDING DEEP IN EVERGLADES - NARA - 544610 (color correct).jpg.

This is because the original upload at File:SUPER CONSTELLATION FUSELAGE DISPLAYED ABOVE BUILDING DEEP IN EVERGLADES - NARA - 544610.jpg explicitly requests that it not be overwritten. I moved your version of the image in preference to it being lost when that file was reverted to the original version.

Unfortunately, as I don't entirely understand the procedures for transferring the template data to a modified upload, the information is a bit jumbled. Please feel free to correct this if you so wish. Thank you for your understanding. Ubcule (talk) 20:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lidice Memorial 0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please attribute the author, to make sure that QICbot will notify them and not you. --A.Savin 14:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Sorry, fixed. Buidhe 21:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. --A.Savin 11:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toblerone 3362.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davidwr (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pussy 2198.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]