User talk:Artium72

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Artium72!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  Bahasa Indonesia  . +/−


Your image or other content, File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff - "Liebende Eltern".jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

> Permission for all Uploads of my paintings, works, images etc made by the Users Artium72 and Donald1972 at Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. signature Matthias Laurenz Gräff < Is an INSUFFICIENT statement of permission. No useable license has been specified. Please fix web page to clearly state CC-BY-SA-4.0, and then apply at COM:UDR to have it undeleted. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ronhjones, I will do!

Greetings--Artium72 (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff - "Liebende Eltern".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 03:42, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weltrotkreuztag auf Stift Göttweig mit Matthias Laurenz Gräff und Wolfgang Sobotka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgia Kazantzidu, Franz Schnabl, Matthias Laurenz Gräff 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 18:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]