User talk:Ardfern/Archive 12
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
OE-LZD
Hello Ardfern, why this? This source clearly lists N677AC in the history of the airframe. --GeXeS (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The convention is that we leave out registrations of leasing companies (unless of course there is actually a file/photo). Planespotters.net requested we do so as they are just about the only source listing these and we were not listing Planespotters as a source (there is also some controversy about whether they are even a reliable source). Hope this clarifies. Ardfern (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I see, thank you. Yes, it kind of makes sense. --GeXeS (talk) 13:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The convention is that we leave out registrations of leasing companies (unless of course there is actually a file/photo). Planespotters.net requested we do so as they are just about the only source listing these and we were not listing Planespotters as a source (there is also some controversy about whether they are even a reliable source). Hope this clarifies. Ardfern (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Current and former fleet
Hi Ardfern,
I found categories about current and former fleet. I thought that it's mistake and just delete some, but found that you create these categories.
I think, that over time this information will become outdated if no one controls it... So, as my opinion - much better to simply keep a history of a particular aircraft on a page with its category. Is there some consensus about categories of aircrafts? Or why did you do that? --DS28 (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- There was discussion about this in 2018 and I have been creating these since then (now 514 airlines). They were created so that you could see what was in service and not, rather than just lists of all aircraft where you could not differentiate and were therefore not very useful. Myself and quite a few others update it all the time. Difficulty of maintenance is not a reason not to provide something actually useful. If you have deleted any could you restore them please. Ardfern (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi again. I found you changed categories inside Category:Aircraft of Air Canada Rouge. I thought we found desicion, how to use current fleet category: You create category "AirlineName current fleet" and all other inside it. Category "Aircraft of AirlineName by type" don't used for categories about current/former fleet. Am I wrong? --DS28 (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I changed the cats because what you had done did not make any sense. What is the decision you refer to? I am not aware of it and would have opposed it if it led to the changes you made. Ardfern (talk) 12:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I added some points on the Village Pump. I can't see how you think we had found a decision, just putting something up on Village Pump does not constitute a decision. Would still like to understand your point re Aircraft by Airline Name by type. Ardfern (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- We spoke at COM:AN, and you didn't answer to my comment - so I thought you agree, that's my mistake. --DS28 (talk) 00:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- I added some points on the Village Pump. I can't see how you think we had found a decision, just putting something up on Village Pump does not constitute a decision. Would still like to understand your point re Aircraft by Airline Name by type. Ardfern (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
New aircrafts spotted at CGN
Good morning Ardfern, if you have time I would be happy if you could add descriptions and better categories for
- Category:D-AZFA (aircraft) - new aircraft on Commons
- Category:D-AWSI (aircraft) - new aircraft on Commons
- Category:D-AJHW (aircraft) - new operator?
Thanks a lot for your help. Raymond 08:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Raymond, all done Ardfern (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Raymond 12:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Ashton upon Mersey
The name of the settlement and its ward is "Ashton upon Mersey" not "Ashton on Mersey" so I'm wandering why you moved it? Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ashton on Mersey widely used on large number of sources I consulted, including maps, particularly on the Metropolitan Borough of Trafford website itself where it is listed as a ward named Ashton on Mersey. Hard to believe they got it wrong. Ardfern (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- In a Google search for Ashton on Mersey ward all the results show "upon" (example). Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Newcastle Pride 2015, Newcastle upon Tyne, July 2015 (20).JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Vera (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Image of OO-DPN in 2004
Good morning Ardfern, I found in my image archive previously unpublished File:DHL - Boeing 757-236(SF) - OO-DPN - Cologne Bonn Airport-3219561.jpg. Do you have some information to create Category:OO-DPN (aircraft) properly? Raymond 08:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Raymond, job done, all info added Ardfern (talk) 11:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 11:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exchange Street, Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 11:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Regent Square, Ordsall, April 2020 (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (02).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (01).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Surnames_in_Afghanistan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Manchester templates
Hi. I noticed that you changed {{Manchesteryear}} in early April before changing some of the associated categories over the following months. You then appear to have moved on to other things, which has left most of the navigation templates and categories broken. To correct this, I have reverted the template to the previous version and placed your new code in {{CityOfManchesteryear}}. I note that your new code places a category of "Greater Manchester [by year]," which will only work back to the creation of Greater Manchester in the 1970s. If you want to return to converting the categories from the mid-1970s you can use the new template. The conversion does leave a residual problem in that there are many subcategories that you have left unconverted and there are images and subcategories for the wider Manchester area sitting in the City of Manchester categories. Out of curiosity, did you get consensus for such a drastic change before starting implementation? If not, I'd advise starting a discussion in future as others could help out with the transfer once the structure of the templates and categories are agreed. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- When I started adding files to Manchester cats I found great confusion and little consistency between City of Manchester and Manchester cats. I merely tried to improve the situation by bringing some consistency. I did not see it as a drastic change nor one needing discussion. In my experience discussion has never ever resulted in getting others to help. Onwards. Ardfern (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- 1975-1995 City of Manchester cats and files amended Ardfern (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (01).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (02).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (03).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (04).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (05).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oldham
Apart that I don't understand that move, you did it wrong. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Did not do it wrong, was making it consistent with all the other Metropolitan Boroughs of Greater Manchester. Your reversion makes it inconsistent once again. You clearly do not see the difference between Oldham and the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham. Ardfern (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (02).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (03).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (04).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (05).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (06).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (07).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (08).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (09).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (10).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (11).JPG
- File:The Matter of Time, Bilbao, July 2010 (12).JPG
Yours sincerely, Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Pubs in Dublin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Fokker aircraft of Vayudoot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
New redirects for airports
Good evening. You might be interested in that I have installed some redirects for easier finding of airports with strange names and to facilitate future categorizing.
Examples:
- Category:Anchorage Airport
- Category:Las Vegas-McCarran Airport
- Category:Nassau Airport
- Category:Boston Airport
- Category:Burbank Airport
- Category:Atlanta Airport
- Category:Oshkosh Airport
- Category:Chicago O'Hare Airport and, worst of all
- Category:Johannesburg Airport
Regards --Uli Elch (talk) 18:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Good thinking Ardfern (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Unicredit Tower, Milan, May 2018 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
A7-APH
Hello! Where did you get this information? I have only found the delivery month... --GeXeS (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- [1], [2]] and [3]] has first flight as 6 December 2016 ie built in 2016. [4]] shows date of manufacture as 2016 Ardfern (talk) 22:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, didn't know about PlaneLogger and AirFleets. --GeXeS (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (02).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (03).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (04).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (05).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (06).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (07).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (08).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (09).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (10).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (11).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (12).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (13).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (14).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (15).jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia, Milan, May 2018 (16).jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)