User talk : Anna.Massini

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Coccinella su piante.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Catherine Laurence ^discussion 14:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie

Ciao Propoli! Innanzitutto grazie per le belle immagini che stai caricando. Probabilmente da nuovo utente nessuno ti ha spiegato cosa sono le categorie, e le stai mettendo un po' a caso. Te le ho corrette per le ultime foto, dai un'occhiata. Adesso ti spiego, comunque: Commons ha milioni di foto e ci sono diversi modi per cercarle. Il primo, più semplice, è quello per titolo o descrizione, usando la casella di ricerca o Google. I tuoi titoli e descrizioni però non sono particolarmente esplicativi di cosa rappresentino le immagini, dove e quando siano state scattate, per cui rischiano di finire in un calderone dove nessuno le vedrà mai.

Il secondo modo per cercare le immagini è quello delle categorie, che sono come delle scatole ben strutturate in cui andare a colpo sicuro. Diciamo che ogni scatola può contenerne altre, ma non dovrebbe mai contenere più di qualche centinaio di foto, perché diventerebbero inutilizzabili e troppo lunghe da scorrere. Per questo è sbagliato usare categorie generiche per raggruppare le immagini, come "Nature" o "Science"... È sbagliato anche usare le categorie come "hashtag", cioè metterne un po' a caso, perché come ti dicevo ognuna dovrebbe contenere immagini ben specifiche e indirizzate nel posto giusto. Il problema è che non è facile trovare la categoria più adatta, però si può sempre trovare una categoria sufficientemente approssimativa, dove casomai qualche utente esperto poi sposterà poi i file in quella più giusta.

Prendiamo le foto di panorami, luoghi e monumenti: tu parti sempre dal Comune (Florence, Siena, Rosignano Marittimo...) e poi apri la categoria per trovare quella più specifica ("Nature of Siena", "Cityscapes of Florence", oppure un edificio specifico, che trovi sempre raggruppato dentro "Buildings in...", "Churches in...", ecc.).

Prendiamo il caso delle foto naturali: bisognerebbe conoscere la specie di quello che stiamo fotografando, però non tutti abbiamo studiato botanica o zoologia, per cui dobbiiamo arrangiarci. In ogni caso possiamo riconoscere almeno la famiglia o il nome comune ("gabbiano", "volpe", "ape", "papavero"...). Per prima cosa vai su Wikipedia e scrivi semplicemente "gabbiano" nella casella di ricerca. Vedrai che ti porterà al nome specifico della famiglia che è "Larinae". In basso e a sinistra trovi poi un collegamento a "Commons". Se ci clicchi puoi facilmente arrivare alla categoria generica per quella famiglia o specie. Se sei in grado puoi scegliere una sottocategoria più specifica, oppure usa direttamente quella generica.

All'inizio può sempbrare difficile, ma se ci provi vedrai che il sistema delle categorie è affascinante e anche divertente, oltre che utile per trovare sempre l'immagine giusta. Spero di esserti stato d'aiuto, se hai qualche dubbio in merito scrivi pure nella mia talk. --Sailko (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille. PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Anna.Massini,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie a voi! Ho risposto ben volentieri al sondaggio. PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Anna.Massini,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fragole con zucchero.jpg

La tua immagine è stata ritirata dalla sfida perché era mal posizionato. Si può sempre offrire, ma nel posto giusto, per questo vi consiglio di leggere attentamente i punti formali. cordialmente.Filo gèn' (talk) 09:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rignano sull'Arno - murales dedicato a Giovanni Falcone.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP nom

I have no idea how you manage to mess up creating the nomination page that much. You have to try again, and this time save the page properly before you add it to the list. BUT since it is the second try, you have to add a "/2", like this: Winter cherry blossom - Prunus Subhirtella Autumnalis Rosea.jpg/2 in the box at COM:FPC otherwise you will just come back to the old nom. I will get rid of the faulty page for you. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter, I give up. I wanted to try again but I'm not good at cards. But look at the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Winter_cherry_blossom_-_Prunus_Subhirtella_Autumnalis_Rosea.jpg

if it was a valid photo.

Thank you. Regards P.S. This time I managed to keep the metadataPROPOLI87 (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a very beautiful photo and I think it could have chance. At the moment I already have two active nominations, and I can't write the nom for you since it needs to be done from your account. But later when I have a free slot, I will nominate it on your behalf. --Cart (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried again and this time I did it! Thank you!PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! I'll fix it a bit for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ricategorizzazioni

Ciao, vedo che stai caricando abbastanza foto e migliorando progressivamente, sul fronte delle categorizzazioni e dei metadati. Grazie.

Son passato a dirti che l'Italia ha quasi finito di valutare le foto di Wiki Science Competition 2019 e informarti per correttezza che qui come nel caso di altri utenti ho proceduto a ricategorizzare una foto che hai caricato dopo la mezzanotte del 15 dicembre, la deadline italiana di WSC2019.

Fra qualche giorno pubblicheremo i risultati e volevo ringraziarti di aver partecipato anche se non sei arrivato/a in finale. Il motivo principale era la descrizione delle foto, che era probabilmente poco sceitifica, ma visto che probabilmente non vivi lontano se vuoi passare alla premiazione a Pisa quando la fisseremo ti posso spiegare meglio che tipo di foto hanno maggiori chance di vincere per la prossima edizione.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, mi sto impegnando per migliorare e mi fa piacere che si noti. Ho partecipato con le foto che avevo in archivio, di qualità ben inferiore a quelle che ho visto in prefinale, per cui non mi aspettavo certo di vincere, ma ho seguito tutto e sto seguendo. Sulle foto scientifiche non avrò molte occasioni di scatto, mi sto impegnando invece per il prossimo Wiki loves monuments con una macchina fotografica anzichè un telefono (usato prevalemente per la scorsa edizione) specialmente per la Toscana. Grazie mille! PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In bocca al lupo allora :)--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile PROPOLI87,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché hai caricato oltre dieci foto per Wiki Loves Monuments.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Ho inserito i miei dati. Grazie mille! Saluti.PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ricevuto il libro, Grazie mille!PROPOLI87 (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Don't do anything right now on FPC!! I'll sort it out for you before it gets any worse. --Cart (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Do NOT use the 'Removal' creation. It is only for voting to delist an existing FP. --Cart (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, but thank you once again.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cart, I apologize but I need your help again. I submitted the file

File :: Porta_secondaria_sulla_faceta_della_Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_a_Montepulciano.jpg and I also get the photo alongside. I think I have identified the error on this page to be eliminated but I would not want to make things worse. Can you fix it? Thank you and greetings. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File::Porta_secondaria_sulla_facciata_della_Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_a_Montepulciano.jpg&action=edit&section=T-1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Quirico d'Orcia A spasso sulle mura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please improve categorization before further nominations. --MB-one 11:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:German shepherd enjoying the sun.jpg

Hello! It is a very nice photo, but before you try to nominate it again tomorrow, do you think you could remove the metal pole/thing right behind the neck of the dog. I think other voters would comment on it too. With that gone, I would certainly support this photo of the beautiful dog. If you don't have the program to do such things, I can do it for you if you like. Have a very pleasant evening, --Cart (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it, I will remove the rod which is a lantern that is in the garden and at this point also the blue stems in the middle of the olive trees, near the toolbox at the bottom of the field. Then I'll tell you. Thanks a lot. I'll message you here. One question: but do I have to upload replacing the version of the file or do I do the file bis?PROPOLI87 (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLIPROPOLI87 (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think it would be best if you uploaded the file bis, as a separate file. That way you will not have any extra trouble with the name when you create the new nomination. Otherwise it can be mixed up with the first faulty nomination creation. I have put this, your talk page, on my watchlist so I will see if you respond. If you want to "call" on me, you do it by putting my name and a "u" inside double brackets, like this (look in the code): W.carter. If you do that in a post and sign it during the same edit, I will get an e-mail that you have 'pinged' me. This is how we communicate here. You can do this with any user name. Knowing how to do this is like knowing how to "use the telephone on Commons". :-) --Cart (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. I entered the application. Please check if I did everything right. PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a few small things. Many users want the location written in text in the description and among the categories too, so that it is easy to see even without clicking on the coordinates. You also need to learn to add the gallery. You have to select the gallery from Template:Commons FP galleries and serch for the right subsection. As you can see, I have fixed all this for you. Good luck now! --Cart (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was just trying to enter as much data as possible that gave me an error the first time. Now it will take a screenshot of the card and I will take it into account for the next time. Thanks a lot!PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with it, you don't have to enter it all directly. Finish the page creation first and then add all the little things later, like I did now. It works just as well. --Cart (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thank you PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Due pechinesi e un chihuahua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Fixed the category.--MB-one 14:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German shepherd enjoying the sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good composition and good lighting. But why is the quarantine period mentioned? -- Spurzem 18:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC):Because in Italy now we cannot leave the house except for urgent needs and therefore also dogs (no more than 200 meters from home). And so the German shepherd photographed is forced into the garden and enjoys the sun.--PROPOLI87 21:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless. Couldn't the picture have been created the same way a year ago? -- Spurzem 21:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stella di Betlemme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled rights given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 12:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie. PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiori Gialli Del Ranuncolo - Fiori di campo gialli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papavero comune interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PAPAVERO COMUNE IN UN PRATO NEL MAGGIO 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 maggio in Italia, inizia la fase 2. Andrà tutto bene. Indossiamo la mascherina e rispettiamo le distanze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support The description could be a bit more about what's in the image but good quality --MB-one 15:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regolatore di pressione applicato ad impianto idraulico domestico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:32, 1 June 2020(UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PRESS CONTROL - REGOLATORE DI PRESSIONE IN QUESTO CASO DI UN IMPIANTO DI IRRIGAZIONE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The blue case seems a bit distorted. Isn't it? Probably you can correct it. -- Spurzem 14:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC):I corrected it, or at least I tried. Can it be okay now?PROPOLI87 08:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good now -- Spurzem 17:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poppies popped on a wallI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana - preparazione

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con anticipo. Purtroppo non all'inizio della primavera come altri anni a causa dell'emergenza COVID-19, ma abbiamo iniziato a fine maggio dopo una pausa di due mesi. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso.

Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile!

Prossimo aggiornamento a inizio luglio, con i comuni nuovi sicuramente aderenti e le integrazioni.

La premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigeon drinking at the fountain in Vada (Livorno), after the quarantine the animals get closer and are not afraid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Torre del Faro di Vada (Livorno).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Paille cushion for children with cross-stitch embroidery, all made by me.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paille cushion for children with cross-stitch embroidery, all made by me.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad(talk) 21:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)-the image was created by me, which I sent to my son via whatsup, then I could not find the image file and I had it sent back by my son via whatsup. This step probably caused this inconsistency that results. But I took the picture.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temporale in arrivo sulla campagna rignanese (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooring chain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment A bit dark --Moroder 18:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. On careful inspection, I suspect the darkness simply mirrors the reality of the chain. --Blood Red Sandman 12:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli nella campagna di Reggello (Firenze) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli nella campagna di Reggello (Firenze).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli in fiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pastore Tedesco che cerca refrigerio nell'erba fresca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 20:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balle di paglia sul Lago di Bilancino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze Panorama del Centro con il Duomo e Palazzo Vecchio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Celeda 15:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Niccolò - Piazza Poggi - Firenze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Celeda 15:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana sta per iniziare

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Continua la preparazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Manca una settimana alla partenza e per chi fosse già in giro ricordiamo le nuove località aderenti, già riportate nelle nostre liste in costante aggiornamento.

Nel 2020 hanno completato l'iter di ampliamento le amministrazioni di Cascina, Pomarance, Pescia, Empoli, San Quirico d'Orcia, Chiusi, Santa Fiora e Piombino, mentre hanno aderito per la prima volta a tempo indefinito il Museo delle Aviotruppe di Pisa e i comuni di Pescaglia, Gallicano, Camaiore, Santa Croce sull'Arno, Casale Marittimo, Quarrata, Montelupo Fiorentino, Buonconvento, Pratovecchio Stia, Sansepolcro, Castiglion Fiorentino, Anghiari, Badia Tedalda e Campiglia Marittima. Ci sono anche adesioni solo per il 2020 di alcune dimore storiche attorno a Pisa.

Risultano al momento richieste formali o informali di partecipazione o ampliamento della copertura da un'altra ventina di enti e amministrazioni, alcune delle quali potrebbero concretizzarsi nelle prossime due settimane. Fate attenzione che alcune delle adesioni solo per l'edizione 2019 nel nord della provincia di Prato e del comune di Massa non saranno probabilmente confermate, ma non sono ancora state rimosse dalle liste.

Qui il video promozionale del 2019 e qui quello della nuova edizione.

Il prossimo aggiornamento riporterà i volantini in più lingue e gli ultimi sviluppi sulle adesioni.

Ricordiamo che la premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capra bianca domestica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama di Firenze centro visto dal Piazzale Michelangelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Well done. Of course details show that the camera/lens used are not great according to today’s standards, but with good, uncomplicated lighting (as here) the quality is still OK. I would second the hint given by other reviewers: It could be worthwhile to invest in a better camera, you seem to be a talented photographer and with a better camera/lens you could probably take very good pictures. No offence, I just want to help. --Aristeas 09:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Targa dedicata a Vallombrosa con le parole dell’Ariosto dall’Orlando Furioso Canto XXII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festività Natalizie 2019 a Piazza delle Conserve - Cesenatico 5-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capra domestica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though file size is a bit small. --Cayambe 09:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in VI

You are welcome in VI but your appointment is not admissible, on the substance and on the form read the rules. You have also damaged the interface, the whole has been repaired. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's the first time, it was recommended to me.PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added the category No violence signs, what and where should I write? I wanted to highlight the No to violence against womenPROPOLI87 (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana è in corso

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Gazie alla preparazione e al vostro impegno, WLM è un successo in regione anche per questa edizione. Siamo stabilmente primi per caricamenti a livello nazionale: qui potete vedere alcune statistiche. Al momento risultano più reattive le province di Livorno, Siena, Pisa, Prato e Firenze.

Fra i nuovi beni aderenti confermati, e inseriti nelle liste, segnaliamo i comuni di Castel del Piano, Montignoso e la Domus Mazziniana di Pisa. Ci sono nuovi beni anche dal comune di Santa Fiora. Sono comunque in corso le verifiche sulla proprietà di alcuni edifici religiosi. C'è invece un aggiornamento nella lista di San Vincenzo, che aveva autorizzato annualmente nel 2019 e ha ridotto i beni aderenti. Per quanto riguarda le foto panoramiche, vengono smistate direttamente nelle categorie dei comuni e richiedono maggiore manutenzione, quindi vi preghiamo se possibile la cortesia di posticipare il loro caricamento a fine mese quando avremo più tempo di occuparcene.

La campagna sociale in concerto su tutti e tre i canali (per Facebook la pagina Wiki Loves Toscana) prevede ogni quattro giorni una serie divulgativa sulle foto delle edizioni precedenti in bianco e nero (caricate progressivamente qui su Commons) alternata a una serie sulle foto migliori dell'edizione in corso. Ogni giorno nel tardo pomeriggio o prima serata solo su Twitter e Facebook (gruppo ToscanaWiki) viene inoltre postata una foto fra quelle giunte predligendo varibailità di luogo e tema.

Qui i i volantini in più lingue.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2020 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2020 #WLM2020

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1522 una panchina rossa per ricordare tutte le donne vittime di violenza. No alla violenza sulle donne.jpg

Sorry, if you change an image in any way once it's been given VI status, it should be renominated, because the VI criteria may no longer apply. So I've reverted to the approved version. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And you did well, thanks! I hadn't thought about it, it's that it is also named in quality and it continues to point out that the magenta shade is present in the letters, so I was working hard to ensure that the letters were perfectly white.PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onde sugli scogli a Calafuria (Livorno) - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good job fixing both these images. --ReneeWrites 09:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onde sugli scogli a Calafuria (Livorno) - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - le scale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! POPOLUNIA - il castello esterno 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, nice and sharp. I think you should add some more categories that are relevant. One having to do with castles is the one that most immediately comes to my mind. There may be a category of castles in Italy. -- Ikan Kekek 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC) DonePROPOLI87 08:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)POPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC):Ikan Kekek, can this photo be nominated for featured in your opinion?PROPOLI87 11:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 11:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It wouldn't pass because there's so much sky that it's out of proportion. Solid quality image, though. -- Ikan Kekek 11:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC):I knew the sky was disproportionate, but for once it came to me well without being posterized I chose to leave it. I could reinseire by cutting the sky and nominate. I try! Let's see what result it gets, out of curiosity!PROPOLI87 12:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Stemma degli Appiani sulla Porta del Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good quality and composition but under-categorized. There has to be a category for coats of arms (and maybe subcategories within it), and I'm sure there's a category for depiction of dragons. -- Ikan Kekek 02:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC): DonePROPOLI87 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll support now, but no category for dragons? -- Ikan Kekek 11:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC):I couldn't find any category of dragon badges.I'm sorry. PROPOLI87 12:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consiglio

Caro Propoli87,

ti scrivo innanzi tutto per ringraziarti del tuo impegno e dedizione nel contribuire a Commons caricando le tue fotografie. Anch'io sono un appassionato di fotografia e, osservando i motivi per cui i tuoi scatti candidate a QI a volte non passano, vorrei darti dei consigli per provare a migliorare. Si tratta del mio punto di vista non autorevole da non professionista; spero, però, possano esserti utili e fornirti qualche spunto. Il problema principale che anch'io noto è la mancanza di dettaglio (che forse si può notare meglio su schermi ad alta densità di pixel). Per "mancanza di dettaglio" (menzionata a volte nelle valutazioni) intendo quell'aspetto "smussato" che può assumere ad esempio la sabbia, la terra, l'erba o le superfici ruvide di un castello.

È un peccato, perché la composizione delle tue fotografie è sempre molto buona e alcuni tuoi scatti sono presi davvero nel momento giusto—per la luce e per le condizioni atmosferiche.

Vorrei sottoporti alcuni elementi di riflessione riguardo a questo problema:

Noto che la compressione JPG che usi per l'esportazione è piuttosto alta. Non scenderei sotto il livello di qualità 90/100, come anche consigliato dalle linee guida. In questo modo sei sicuro che la foto quasi sicuramente non subirà un degrado visibile.
Puoi avere grandissimi benefici scattando in raw. Quando scatti in raw, la foto viene salvata con una dinamica molto ampia: questo ti permetterà di fare alcuni interventi (che spesso sono necessari, come abbassare le luci e alzare le ombre quando c'è un cielo luminoso, o aree in ombra) con un margine di manovra estremamente ampio e senza incappare in artefatti. Ciò significa che se, per ipotesi, devi (giustamente) sottoesporre una foto per non bruciare il cielo, potrai poi recuperare il dettaglio nelle ombre in post-produzione, perché la camera memorizza tutte le informazioni che riesce a catturare. Inoltre, la vignettatura e la distorsione della lente saranno compensate in automatico dal software di post-produzione, perché potrà leggere il modello della lente nei metadati del raw; anche ritoccare il bilanciamento del bianco sarà più semplice, perché verrà mostrata la temperatura colore utilizzata dalla camera durante lo scatto.
Al contrario, scattando in jpg avrai alcuni svantaggi:
– la foto verrà compressa subito una prima volta e sarà ricompressa una seconda volta dopo la post-produzione;
– se alteri di molto l'esposizione, possono emergere artifici visibili;
– in post-produzione sarà più laborioso compensare la distorsione della lente e la vignettatura (più evidenti su scatti più "grandangolari")
– qualsiasi artefatto della compressione jpeg verrà evidenziato da correzioni prospettiche
– il tuo margine di manovra per intervenire sul colore (bilanciamento del bianco, saturazione e luminanza di singoli colori) sarà molto ridotto (puoi provare a fare un confronto nel lavorare su un jpg e su un raw per capire la differenza nell'effetto dei tuoi interventi). Anche in questo caso, aumentare la saturazione (anche di un colore specifico) evidenzierà molto prima gli artefatti della compressione jpeg, mentre in raw non li vedrai mai (nemmeno con incrementi estremi).
Un ultimo beneficio del raw, un po' più avanzato, ma importante per quest'argomento, è il fatto che potrai controllare lo "sharpening" (così viene chiamato in Adobe Lightroom) e la riduzione del rumore manualmente in post-produzione. Se scatti in jpeg, questo verrà fatto in automatico dalla macchina fotografica. L'effetto collaterale di applicare molto noise reduction è proprio lo "smussarsi" dei dettagli; la macchina fotografica potrebbe scegliere di applicarne molto durante lo scatto, e questo sarà irreversibile. Inoltre, se volessi aumentare lo "sharpening" su una foto salvata in jpeg, esso evidenzierà anche gli artefatti jpeg.
Non conosco precisamente la dimensione del sensore, ma se le parti ai bordi dell'immagine non ti sembrano a fuoco prova a usare un'apertura di diaframma intermedia (per la mia camera, la Sony Alpha 5000, è f/9 o f/10; magari puoi capire qual è la tua apertura "media" dando un'occhiata al manuale).
Se fai più interventi cumulativi, parti sempre dalla foto originale (di solito è possibile salvare gli interventi di post-produzione in modo non distruttivo).

Un'ultima considerazione soggettiva: prova a non esagerare con quello che viene chiamato a volte "nitidezza" nei software di post-produzione (in Lightroom è "Presenza") perché può rendere il contrasto piuttosto duro e artificiale. Sfrutta piuttosto lo "sharpening" per recuperare un po' di dettaglio.

Spero che qualcuno fra questi spunti possa esserti utile. :) Ciao! --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per i consigli che studierò attentamente sulla mia macchina fotografica. Fino all'anno scorso fotografavo solo con il mio telefono cellulare e non so molto di tecnica fotografica, e non ho molto tempo per studiare teoria, però pian piano sto capendo i miei punti deboli e sto cercando di migliorarmi. La nitidezza sembra sia il mio punto debole e spesso esagero in post-produzione. Altro mio punto debole è il cielo, che spesso mi si posterizza. Farò tesoro dei tuoi preziosi consigli e ti terrò aggiornato. Grazie mille. PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prego :) Se può esserti d'aiuto, ti elenco alcuni punti teorici chiave in modo basilare che puoi tenere a mente mentre scatti:

Puoi sperimentare con il programma "Apertura". Con questo puoi scegliere l'apertura del diaframma, mentre la camera imposterà in automatico un tempo di esposizione adeguato (se il tempo diventa troppo lungo, comincerà ad aumentare l'ISO = sensibilità del sensore). Con ISO alte aumenterà il rumore (granulosità). Di giorno puoi sempre usare l'ISO minima.
L'apertura del diaframma corrisponde all' "f number":
– "f piccolo" (es. f/4) = diaframma aperto = più luce in ingresso, ma profondità di campo stretta (utile se vuoi fotografare un soggetto sfocando lo sfondo = effetto "bouquet")
– "f grande" (es. f/9) = diaframma più chiuso = profondità di campo ampia (necessaria se vuoi fotografare un paesaggio con l'intero campo a fuoco), ma meno luce in ingresso (aumenterà il tempo di esposizione)
– l'ottica rende al meglio con le aperture intermedia del diaframma; le aperture più estreme introducono dei difetti ottici (con il diaframma molto aperto aumenta l'aberrazione cromatica, con il diaframma molto chiuso la maggiore diffrazione provoca una diminuzione della nitidezza; inoltre, un diaframma molto chiuso aumenta il tempo di esposizione, con maggior rischio di foto mosse con scarsa luce). Evita quindi "f" estremamente grandi (se ad es. hai da f/4 a f/22, potresti prediligere aperture fra f/8 e f/11, evitando di andare oltre); scegli un "f piccolo" se vuoi deliberatamente profondità di campo stretta (soggetto a fuoco con sfondo sfocato). Se sei in condizioni di scarsa luce (es. crepuscolo o sera), non hai un treppiede (che ti permetterebbe di fare un'esposizione lunga) e non vuoi aumentare troppo l'ISO, apri il diaframma.
Il cielo è sempre problematico, perché di solito è nettamente più luminoso delle altre aree della scena. Quando hai cielo nelle tue inquadrature, un metodo è questo:
– esponi lo scatto in modo che il cielo non sia sovraesposto (il resto dell'inquadratura risulterà sottoesposto). Per questo, può essere molto comodo dare un'occhiata all'istogramma mentre scatti: se la forma dell'istogramma si avvicina al limite destro del grafico senza toccarlo (o toccandolo senza mostrare un picco sul bordo), il cielo non ha parti sovraesposte.
– in post-produzione, dovrai alzare le "ombre" (shadows) per correggere la sottoesposizione. Se vuoi un cielo più vivido, puoi anche abbassare le "alte luci" (highlights). In questo modo la scena potrà assomigliare maggiormente a quanto vedeva il tuo occhio. Scattando in raw, puoi regolare luci e ombre in modo molto drastico senza artefatti. Nel ritoccare le luci e le ombre, di tanto in tanto dai un'occhiata alla foto originale per controllare che non ti stia facendo prendere la mano. :)
Se mentre fotografi hai il tempo di accertarti che tutto il quadro sia a fuoco, controlla i bordi dell'immagine: è quella l'area in cui l'ottica è più "debole". Se non lo fossero a sufficienza, magari il campo della scena ha molta profondità (es. soggetto molto vicino e orizzonte) e hai bisogno di aumentare ancora l'apertura ("f grande" = diaframma chiuso = più profondità di campo).

Riguardo al problema dei dettagli, nel software di post produzione cerca un modulo relativo al controllo dei dettagli (in Lightroom si chiama "Details" e contiene "Sharpness" e "Noise reduction"). In questo modo puoi dare un tocco di chiarezza alla foto in modo naturale, senza aumentare il contrasto (ma attento a non esagerare). Questo potrebbe far emergere un po' di rumore: se necessario, successivamente usa il "noise reduction", ma con molta moderazione e cautela, perché assieme al rumore smusserà i dettagli :)
Mentre in post-produzione sistemi esposizione, ombre e luci, tieni un occhio sull'istogramma. Un'immagine più scura è descritta da una forma concentrata più a sinistra; viceversa, una forma concentrata a destra descrive un'immagine più scura. Se ci sono dei picchi sulla sinistra, sono presenti dei pixel totalmente neri; se ci sono dei picchi sulla destra, sono presenti molti pixel totalmente bianchi (possibile segnale d'allarme per parti sottoesposte o sovraesposte nell'immagine). In sostanza, l'istogramma rappresenta la distribuzione dei pixel per la loro luminosità (bordo sinistro = pixel con luminosità 0, bordo destro = pixel con luminosità 255, in mezzo tutte le gradazioni di luminosità).
Ciao :) --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille, adesso stampo i tuoi consigli e mi metterò a studiare, com macchina fotografica alla mano. Buona giornata! PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prego, buon proseguimento anche a te! --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Rocca1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calafuria - Livorno Le onde si infrangono sugli scogli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for me --Vincent60030 16:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus dopo la pioggia 10102020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olive toscane 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear PROPOLI87,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The child and the castle - The past and the future in one photo – Populonia Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SPIAGGIA A LA MAZZANTA - ROSIGNANO MARITTIMO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bandiere logorate dal vento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Fai delle foto bellissime, varebbe la pena che ti procurassi una macchina migliore :-) --Moroder 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC) CommentGrazie, lo farò più avanti, intanto continuo a cercare di migliorare le mie foto con la macchina che ho. Grazie mille. E' una sfida con me stessa. PROPOLI87 08:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fior di ciliegio invernale -.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Looks too noisy. Is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 15:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC) DonePROPOLI87 08:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is better, but still rather noisy (upper part of the flower and the background), it is strange for ISO 80 --LexKurochkin 15:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Doneimproved further PROPOLI87 07:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, IMO now it's OK. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 18:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QI candidates File:Bacche di Biancospino.jpg and File:Fiori di biancospino.jpg

Hi Anna.Massini, I suggest that your images might show Viburnum tinus, see e.g. [1] and [2]. At least the leaves look very much alike, but I have not seen the species so far and I do not know whether there are similar, possibly cultivated species in the area. However, even if these images are supposed to be an unidentified species of Viburnum, then they should be categorized in category Category:Unidentified Viburnum, else in Category:Viburnum tinus, not in Category:Viburnum. Also, both the descriptions and file names are still entirely wrong and they should be corrected. With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commentthanks, I changed the category and submitted the request for the file name change (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bacche di Viburnum tinus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Misidentified; this is not a Crataegus species. File:20140323Crataegus monogyna2.jpg ahows the typical red Crataegus fruits. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC) :* CommentI photographed near the hawthorn flower, which category is it in your opinion? If you tell me I correct it I photographed near the hawthorn flower, which category is it in your opinion? If you tell me I correct it PROPOLI87 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)PRPOPOLI87PROPOLI87 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC):* DonePROPOLI87 09:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 09:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alright, that's better! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC):* CommentThank you! PROPOLI87 13:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 13:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiori di Prugno in marzo (Prunus domestica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 18:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bombus terrestris su Prunus domestica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Túllio F 18:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiori di Prugno in marzo (Prunus domestica) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
No color space in the EXIF-Data, otherwise OK. --F. Riedelio 07:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)* DoneSpazio dei colori sRGB - I have added by hand in the description, I don't know if it is enough. Thanks PROPOLI87 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fioritura di prugno in marzo 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 12:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New nomination

Hi! I see that you have ended up in some problems with your new nomination. Please stop what you are doing!! You are only making things worse. I will see if if I can fix and sort things out for you. --Cart (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Ok, I've fixed you nomination and put the "removal" page you accidentally created up for deletion. That is NOT how you remove pages! That is how you remove old FPs with not enough quality by today's standards, by voting on them. Try not to over-think things so much when you make a nomination. That is what usually gets you into trouble. ;-) Good luck with your nomination. --Cart (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commentthank you(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you get into trouble again and a page does not function as it is supposed to, come to my talk page and ask for help instead of trying to fix it.

--Cart (talk) 13:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commentok, honestly when I saw that the photo did not appear, I thought of removing the candidacy, but I was wrong again. I apologize. Regards. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CommentI ask your help again for a new photo in FP, I don't understand why the photo does not appear.

link https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Soffione_-_Pappo_di_dente_di_Leone,_infruttescenza_di_Tarassaco.jpg&action=edit (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soffione - Pappo di dente di Leone, infruttescenza di Tarassaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Usable. I think you could put it in Taraxacum officinale (fruit), since there are no categories for the (unindentifiable) microspecies. --Nefronus 14:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC): DonePROPOLI87 07:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Le Falle - Ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Halos at the transitions from light to dark parts of the image. --Ermell 07:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)* Donechromatic aberration removed PROPOLI87 11:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 11:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotoballe nella campagna fiorentina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoro a maglia con i ferri circolari per un cappello di lana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli in Mugello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontassieve - Via del Capitano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Maria Immacolata Rignano sull'Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[]]== Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 ==

Quest’anno partecipi al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments?

Da domani sarà possibile caricare di nuovo le foto, fino al 30 settembre!

Come ogni anno, e questo è il decimo anniversario, torna Wiki Loves Monuments, il concorso fotografico più grande al mondo che negli anni ha coinvolto quasi 50 nazioni e più di 15.000 persone e hanno prodotto un database di oltre 360.000 immagini di monumenti, patrimonio culturale dell’umanità intera a disposizione di tutti su Wikimedia Commons.

Con la tua partecipazione hai sostenuto lo sviluppo turistico del nostro Paese perché rende disponibili a tutti le sue bellezze. L’obiettivo è la valorizzazione dell’immenso patrimonio culturale italiano sul web. Le fotografie dei monumenti vengono condivise su Wikimedia Commons, il grande database di immagini di Wikipedia, con licenza libera CC-BY-SA. Wiki Loves Monuments contribuisce infatti a diffondere la filosofia di Wikimedia Italia e di tutti i progetti wiki, che si basano sulla libera condivisione della cultura.

L’Italia nelle sue prime 9 edizioni (dal 2012 al 2020) conta 145.000 immagini 15.000 monumenti, 2.000 fotografi, 2.000 enti. Uno dei 2.000 fotografi sei tu e quindi anche quest’anno non puoi mancare, partecipa!!!

Ti aspettiamo. Questo messaggio ti è stato consegnato perché hai partecipato al concorso italiano nel 2020

Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC) U:Marta Arosio:*Template:CMTSi, parteciperò, ma con poche foto perchè non ho avuto la possibilità di muovermi in questo anno. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poseidone di Aligi Sassu - Rignano sull'Arno -.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alba sulla campagna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Okay for me. Good quality. --Steindy 21:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoro a nodi su maglione, fatto ai ferri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Chiusi o "Chiaro di Luna".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campo del Sole - il centro del parco con tavola desco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Small photo for 2021 norms, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A spasso sulle "Mura" San Quirico d'Orcia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, but geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 17:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Done geocoding inserted
--Palauenc05 13:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Quirico d'Orcia Palazzo Chigi Zondadari - Eterno feminino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Quirico d'Orcia - Palazzo Chigi Zondadari - Le storie di Abramo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Targa a Garibaldi sul Canale Leonardesco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana è in corso

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Gazie alla preparazione e al vostro impegno, WLM è un buon successo in regione anche per questa edizione. Siamo stabilmente secondi per caricamenti a livello nazionale: qui e qui si possono consultare alcune statistiche. Al momento risultano meno reattive le province di Prato e di Grosseto.

Fra i nuovi beni inseriti nelle liste segnaliamo da parte dei comuni sempre più ampliamenti rispetto alle nuove adesioni, mentre continuano ad aggiungersi sempre più beni privati. Tutte le liberatorie annunciate da quest'anno anche su Instagram sono da ritenersi verificate. Potrebbero arrivare comuni a fine mese al momento ancora in via di approvazione.

Per quanto riguarda le foto panoramiche, vengono inviate direttamente nelle categorie dei comuni e richiedono spesso la creazione di varie sottocategorie; per questo motivo vi preghiamo di non inviare troppe foto simili, dovendole in seguito smistare a mano.

La campagna sui tre canali sociali (per Facebook sia pagina che gruppo) prevede come nel 2020 una serie divulgativa con le foto delle edizioni precedenti in bianco e nero (caricate qui su Commons) alternata a una serie sulle foto migliori dell'edizione 2021, inframmezzate con più infografiche generali. Ogni giorno solo su Twitter e Facebook (gruppo ToscanaWiki) viene inoltre postata una foto fra quelle giunte prediligendo variabilità di luogo e tema.

Qui i volantini in più lingue.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - Monumento a Giuseppe Garibaldi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Poseidone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Stemma degli Appiani posto sulla Porta del Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support The coat is just ok, focusing on that it's a QI to me --Poco a poco 13:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Porta del Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Vista dal Piazzale Michelangelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Vista dalle Rampe del Poggi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - September - COA/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Populonia - Stemma degli Appiani sulla Porta del Castello simbolo dei Signori di Piombino.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge COA, in September 202. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passeggiata sul fiume Arno in autunno - Vallina Bagno a Ripoli (Fi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--14:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maglione fatto a mano con i ferri da maglia con motivo nodi e righe a scalare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I find the top crop awkward (part of the sweater is also cropped). Fixable? --C messier 20:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)* Donemodified cut. Thank you PROPOLI87 08:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support QI for me. --C messier 19:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nevicando al Bombone - Rignano sull'Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Building verticals are not straight. Please fix. --Nino Verde 08:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC) DonePROPOLI87 10:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viale di cipressi tipici del paesaggio Toscano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak Support - Could be sharper, and the sky is a bit blotchy, but I think the overall effect of the photo makes it a quality image. -- Ikan Kekek 13:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiore di albicocco, leggermente rovinato dalla brinata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apricot blossom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pienza (Siena) Le vie romantiche - Via dell'Amore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pienza (Siena) Le vie romantiche - Via della Fortuna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Location?

Hi PROPOLI87 - could you add details of where you took your photo File:Passerotto -.jpg please? It will help with identification and adding the right categories. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

done. Thank you. PROPOLI87 (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks! At this location, Passer italiae :-) MPF (talk) 11:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana - premiazione

Ciao, un messaggio dagli organizzatori del concorso locale

La premiazione per l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 si terrà la prossima domenica 3 Aprile a Collodi, presso il giardino di Villa Garzoni, a partire dalle h. 16:00.

Come sempre tutti i semifinalisti dell'edizione 2021 sono invitati, chi volesse venire può scrivere in privato per confermare il pass all'ingresso. Se lo hai già fatto, tutto a posto.

Qui si può scaricare il volantino in formato pdf.

Post sui canali sociali:

WikiLovesToscana

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prugno in fiore - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prugno in fiore - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soffione - Fiore di Tarassaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margherite in fila indiana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality to me, but please eliminate the COM:OVERCAT. -- Ikan Kekek 05:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC) DoneI removed it--PROPOLI87 06:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 13:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stella di Betlemme - (macro).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Category for the species is missing. --Ermell 10:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)* DoneI identified the category and also added the legend hence the scientific name. Thank you.PROPOLI87 12:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albicocca in aprile - ancora acerba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Wrong category. --Ermell 10:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC) * DoneI have tried to improve the category, I have not found anything else. Please check if it's okayPROPOLI87 12:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The academic name is missing. (Prunus armeniaca) ;-) --Ermell 18:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)* Done 19:16, 19 april 2022PROPOLI87[reply]
No changes visible. --Ermell 22:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Donenow the only categorization is Prunus armeniacaPROPOLI87 06:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 06:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uova cucinate con il pomodoro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doppio arcobaleno sul Pratomagno, visto da Volognano - Rignano sull'Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentification of flowers on File:Fiori di campo - Triodanis perfoliata con a Heracleum sphondylium.jpg

Hi Anna.Massini, Your image File:Fiori di campo - Triodanis perfoliata con a Heracleum sphondylium.jpg shows a plant from the Brassicaceae (white flowers; not identifiable, but possibly a Lepidium species, such as Lepidium draba) and Geranium dissectum (with a red flower). For identification purposes you should always add a photograph of the whole plant, possibly some leaves and fruits, if there are any, even if this does not look as nice as the close-up photograph of the flowers, which are really tiny in this case. For example, it is almost impossible to identify a Brassicaceae plant when you cannot see any leaves and / or fruits. I changed the ID, but the image should be renamed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you, I'll do the same as I did for Salvia verbenaca, and I'll go and photograph the whole plant again. I will try to photograph the small fuchsia flowers again as well. I'm passionate about this wildflower thing! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna, I had a look at File:Salvia verbenica.jpg and it actually looks like it could be Salvia verbenaca (not Salvia verbenica). The only important thing that is not according to mittelmeerflora.de is that the lower bracts are longer than the calyx, but there is no species from the Salvia genus that is a better match and the leaves have the typical lobes. I also changed the category of your buttercup to Category:Unidentified Ranunculus. I am not really an expert for wildflowers from Italy, but I am rather sure that there is an amazing number of interesting wildflowers in your area. I hope that you will have a lot of fun taking wildflower photographs! Best wishes --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your contribution. There are many wildflowers in my area and every year different species sprout, I like to photograph them, but the problem is figuring out the right name to give. I could generically name them "wildflowers" by adding the color, and then with your help and also from other Wikimedians to give them the name. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rulli di paglia in Rosano (Rignano sull'Arno).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melagrana in crescita -.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melagrana in progress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campagna in Rignano sull'Arno in giugno 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiori di Oleandro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno visto dal Ponte Mediceo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noise reduction is necessary --Ermell 13:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)* DonedonePROPOLI87 18:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 18:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Marche è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Ciao PROPOLI87,

ho visto che hai contribuito a Wiki Loves Monuments. Se ti va, carica qualche foto anche per il concorso locale Wiki Loves Marche (pubblicità progresso).

Tanto per far gola al concorso nazionale, quest'anno abbiamo premi da favola: ti anticipo soltanto che la premiazione avverrà sabato 7 gennaio 2023, alle 17 al Castello di Gradara. Il resto lo lascio alla tua fantasia.

Coraggio, prendi la tua macchina fotografica, il tuo smartphone o quel che vuoi, e carica foto come se non ci fosse un domani!

Grazie e a presto,
Giacomo Alessandroni ^{What's up!} 15:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oliva di pianta di olivo frantoio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mahtamsv 21:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Il quartiere del Mulno si riflette nel fiume Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good enough quality for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Toscana

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments ha concluso giorni fa il suo processo selettivo.

Quest'anno non abbiamo segnalato in corso d'opera perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione molto più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali. Probabilmente il prossimo anno ci sarà un calo fisiologico, e conviene pertanto preparare i vostri scatti per il 2023.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà nel tardo pomeriggio di sabato 28 gennaio p.v. a Montespertoli (FI) presso il Museo della Vite e del Vino.

Qui i risultati finali, che saranno annunciati a breve sui canali sociali. Seguite quelli per ulteriori aggiornamenti.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Read this message in your language

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2022 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2022 #WLM2022

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Anna.Massini,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vada - Livorno - La chiesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vada - Il faro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavanderia per indumenti di animali a Firenze- Pet corner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frittelle dolci di riso che friggono in olio bollente Dolce tipico toscano per la festa del babbo - San Giuseppe che si festeggia il 19 marzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add additional relevant categories. I'm guessing there's a rice pancake category, and there certainly would be one for fried food. -- Ikan Kekek 09:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)̆ Done Thank you,I added two categories.PROPOLI87 10:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 10:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris fiorentina viola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponticelli (Pratovecchio - Stia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think some perspective correction is needed --FlocciNivis 17:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Donedone, thank you --Anna.Massini 07:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cesenatico - Il grattacielo.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For my photo you can easily delete, I had uploaded it for the contest of the month "Skyscrapers". If there are these kinds of problems Wikimedia shouldn't be running contests on these issues (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albicocche in maggio (frutto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Incisa valdarno centralina idroelettrica alla pescaia finita nel 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness ok, but the image is leaning cw. --Palauenc05 08:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC) Donedone. Thank you[reply]
Good now --Palauenc05 12:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Ponte all'Indiano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The light reflections from the windscreen should be removed --Ermell 17:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC) Done done. thank you Anna.Massini 09:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 09:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle Calafuria 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Lovely composition, and I submit that the quality is good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 01:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle Calafuria 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Wle Calafuria 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wle Calafuria 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antica burraia - Rignano sull'Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wlm 2023 crete in Asciano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SHB2000 02:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortensia Rosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle 2023 - val d'orcia 3 - Rotoballe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hello Anna. I think something has gone wrong with your signature. Best wishes, 13:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC) CommenẗYes. I still haven't figured out why, but I managed to correct it. Thank you(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle Calafuria 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle - Riserva naturale di Calafuria uno sguardo dalla scogliera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle Calafuria 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Horizon tilts to the right --Grunpfnul 08:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC) DoneAnna.Massini 14:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 14:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wle 2023 - Panorama dal Monte Oliveto e Crete di Asciano - Siena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Level of detail just acceptable for a QI, but I see a nice composition. --Terragio67 07:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempesta in arrivo al Porticciolo - Vada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 Postcard

Please help translate to your language

Hello there!

We extend our warmest greetings and gratitude to you for actively taking part in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 Commons photography competition. Your valuable contributions have significantly enriched the world's knowledge and cultural heritage.

We are delighted to inform you that your efforts have placed you among the top 100 uploaders during this project. As a token of our appreciation, we would like to send you a digital postcard.

To ensure you receive your digital postcard, kindly complete this form before August 15, 2023.

Looking ahead, we hope to see you again in February 2024 for the next exciting event.

Thank you once again for your dedication and Wikilove.

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasole con api 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is fine but there is no single category --Poco a poco 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC) DoneSorry, I added now.Anna.Massini 09:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buon Compleanno!

Nice photos in the challenge! -- RZuo (talk) 07:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bragozzo d'altura - Museo della Marineria - Porto canale Cesenatico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Susina prugna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomodori San Marzano in maturazione - biologici.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Vele del Museo della Marineria sul Canale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Rumoroso ma sufficientemente buono. --多多123 20:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Buongiorno Anna.Massini,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Grazie dei...

Un ringraziamento va bene, fa piacere... poi iniziano ad essere tutte notifiche inutili. Quindi basta una volta, grazie :) --Sailko (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scusami, sono solita ringraziare sempre, pensavo facesse piacere. Buona giornata. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pratovecchio Stia - Castello di Romena - 2023-09-01 14-24-21 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - 2023-09-01 14-43-50 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Chiesa di San Pietro in Perticaia - 2023-09-05 13-27-07 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
You should eleminate the black spot at the right side. --Ermell 06:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC) DoneDone, removed black spot on right side which was actually a ledge of the eaves of the neighboring building, which I hadn't seen. Thank you Anna.Massini 07:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 07:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - 2023-09-01 14-43-50 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality with good composition --FlocciNivis 15:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Chiesa di San Cristoforo in Perticaia - 2023-09-01 12-32-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawal of Quality Image Candidates

Hi Anna.Massini, you withdrew quite a lot of QI candidates. I don't know why in some instances, but if withdraw an image, then please also replace the "/Nomination" by "/Withdrawn". The bot will ignore your withdrawal unless you do that. I fixed it for your current withdrawals. Best wishes --17:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC) Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't know that and thanks to you for fixing it. Unfortunately I had nominated some photos that seemed ok to me, while then looking at the photos better on a larger screen I found many defects. Thanks again. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiusdino - Abbazia di San Galgano - 2023-09-02 21-49-03 002.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 02:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - 2023-09-01 14-43-50 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Chiesa di San Cristoforo in Perticaia - 2023-09-01 12-32-50 002.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - 2023-09-01 14-43-50 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is ok, but I miss a cat about plaques --Poco a poco 19:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC) DoneThank you. Done.Anna.Massini 19:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 19:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Comune di Rignano sull'Arno - 2023-09-08 11-10-08 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2023 - July - half/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture My birthday cake! Oops there's only half left!.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge half, in July 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Comune di Firenze - 2023-09-18 12-37-29 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze - Basilica di Santa Croce - 2023-09-05 12-22-15 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reggello - Chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta - 2023-09-18 11-56-25 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Verticals of the building are not straight, can you correct them? --Nino Verde 13:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC) DoneDone. Thank you.Anna.Massini 15:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 15:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! My birthday cake! Oops there's only half left!.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Pieve di San Leolino - 2023-09-23 20-52-00 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Pieve di San Leolino - Pittura del 2008 per il millenario della Pieve raffigurante San Leolino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a more specific category, this is not a church --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC) DoneThe plaque is placed on the Church of San Leolino so I have however maintained the category, however adding commemorative plaques, as it commemorates the 1000th anniversary of the Church in 2008 and also plaques in the metropolitan city of Florence, being in Rignano sull'Arno, province of Florence. I hope I have been exhaustive. Thank you.Anna.Massini 11:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 11:09, 24 September 2023[reply]
Support QI now, thanks --Poco a poco 18:28, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Larryasou 18:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Pieve di San Leolino - Crocifisso sulla facciata della Chiesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reggello - Comune di Reggello - Frazione San Clemente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rignano sull'Arno - Comune di Rignano sull'Arno - 2023-09-18 17-30-17 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figline e Incisa Valdarno - Chiesa Maria SS.ma Madre di Dio - 2023-09-30 22-02-39 004.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Anna.Massini, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte di Annibale in Località Bruscheto - (Reggello).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment alleged main subject almost hidden in background and out of main focus pane. Could be a QI of the rock surface though, with the right description. --MB-one 10:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC) DoneDone.Thanks, I changed the description and added the Rocks categoryAnna.Massini 13:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 13:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --MB-one 20:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte di Annibale in Località Bruscheto (Reggello).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rugiada su vetro illuminata dal sole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storm arriving at the small port of Vada - Rosignano Marittimo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support I like this, even though it is very dark on the right side. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Ciao Anna, volevo farti i complimenti per la tua prossima candidatura per immagini in vetrina (Featured)ː Rugiada su vetro illuminata dal sole Una foto in cui nessuno ti ha regalato niente, questo grazie al frutto della tua creatività. Con stima. Terragio67 (talk) 10:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie milleǃ Mi ha fatto particolarmente piacere che la mia fotografia sia stata compresa e abbia in qualche modo trasmesso un emozione visiva. Ringrazio per questo messaggio dicendo che apprezzo molto anche le tue fotografie che ho avuto modo di vedere nel WLM in corso. Grazie di nuovo. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Rugiada su vetro illuminata dal sole.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rugiada su vetro illuminata dal sole.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The fisherman's bicycle - Waiting to return from the sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--19:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partecipazione a Wiki Science Competition 2023 in Italy

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Ciao Anna.Massini,

grazie per aver caricato File:Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg, noto tuttavia che l'hai caricata troppo presto per partecipare al Wiki Science Competition 2023 in Italy, che si tiene dal 1° dicembre al 31 dicembre 2023.

Se per te non è rilevante partecipare al concorso italiano ignora questo mio messaggio. Il file sarà categorizzato nella "miscellanea" dove vanno i file fuori dai concorsi nazionali.

Se invece ci tieni a partecipare al concorso italiano, puoi far cancellare tu stessa ogni tua foto caricata in anticipo per poi ricaricarla in un secondo tempo (a dicembre) nell'ambito del concorso italiano. Basta che tu inserisca la stringa {{speedydelete|G7}} in ogni tua immagine già caricata qui. In questo modo, ne chiedi la cancellazione con motivazione G7 ("su richiesta di chi ha scattato e caricato le immagini").

Attenzione: questa procedura di SpeedyDelete con motivazione "G7" è valida solo per foto caricate meno di sette giorni prima da quando apponi la richiesta di cancellazione, e solo se la foto è inutilizzata. Ad esempio, verifica se in fondo alla pagina File:Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg nella sezione "Utilizzo del file" ci sono link a voci su Wikipedia o a Wikidata: attualmente non ce ne sono, quindi il file è (ancora) inutilizzato.

Non posso fare questa procedura io al posto tuo, purtroppo, la richiesta deve farla chi ha caricato le foto. In seguito, una volta cancellato il file, potrai rifare l'upload nell'ambito del concorso italiano (in decembre). Mi sembra che tu sia ancora in tempo, ma di poco! Spero sinceramente che tu riesca a partecipare. Fammi sapere se incontri difficiltà. Buon wiki,--Pạtạfisik 10:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Se c'è qualche ragione specifica che ti ha spinto all'errore (a caricare in anticipo nel concorso italiano) non esitare a comunicarcelo, cercheremo di migliorare la comunicazione nelle prossime edizioni. Buon wiki, --Pạtạfisik 10:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, per cortesia dove devo inserire esattamente la stringa indicata? Credo di aver già fatto, se cortemente controllate. Ricaricherò poi per il concorso. Grazie mille. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Anna.Massini, il file è stato cancellato, quando vuoi puoi procedere a ricaricarlo nell'ambito del concorso. Buon wiki, Pạtạfisik 09:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Thank you very much. I reciprocate the best wishes! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2024!

-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Season Greetings

Wishing You all the best for the
Holiday Season!

I hope You are warm, safe and treated kindly
♦
-- Cart (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your dog is gorgeous! Thank you very much, I reciprocate the best wishes! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!

✴ Happy Holidays, Anna ✴

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Thank you very much. I reciprocate the best wishes! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2024!
-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si è conclusa.

Lo scorso anno non avevamo segnalato l'inizio del concorso perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali.

Anche quest'anno l'adesione è stata alta (anzi nettamente più alta), probabilmente perché c'erano molte foto di chiese (la novità di quest'anno) negli archivi dei partecipanti storici e per questo non è stato inviato un messaggio durante settembre, mantenendo la strategia di massimizzare la promozione durante gli anni di minore partecipazione.

I finalisti son stati nel frattempo selezionati e annunciati. Qui troverete il riepiligo con i vincitori. Continuate a seguire i nostri canali social per ulteriori informazioni riguardanti la cerimonia di premiazione, che avrà luogo a Piombino nei prossimi mesi. Tutti i semifinalisti sono cordialmente invitati a partecipare.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Inviato da Alexmar983 usando MediaWiki message delivery

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Silvia Marini Rogati, 1948, Firenze, cimitero delle Porte Sante - Opera di Mario Moschi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youǃ

Happy 2024! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maglia rasata in maglione a tre fili con effetto melange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Hello Anna.Massini,

Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team! Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How can I Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload Now Icon which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

1st prize: 400 USD
2nd prize: 300 USD
3rd prize: 100 USD
Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group here

Warm regards,

Gaurav and Issac

#WeTogether

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antico mondo contadino - Antica fresa che veniva trainata da buoi per preparare la terra alla semina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lorax 05:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cotechino con fagioli e cavolo nero - cucina tradizione toscana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 13:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tradizioni familiari Raccolta olive wlk olive in cassetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antico mondo contadino - Antica fresa che veniva trainata da buoi per preparare la terra alla semina 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccolta olive in ambito familiare, tradizione toscana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antica edicola dedicata alla Madonna in Via di Ripoli a Firenze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presepe natalizio nella chiesa di Stia (Pratovecchio Stia Arezzo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Noisy in the shadows, but the composition has something. --Plozessor 17:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana - Premiazione

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si concluderà a breve con la cerimonia regionale.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà dalle 16:00 alle 18:00 di sabato 16 marzo p.v. a Piombino (LI) nella sala consiliare.

Come sempre, si consiglia di seguire i canali sociali.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it