User talk:Angerdan

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Angerdan!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:Philips LED bulbs.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Grafikaktualisierung

Hallo Angerdan, du hattest letztes Jahr so schön diese Grafik [1] aktualisiert. Möchtest du es dieses Jahr wieder machen? Falls ja, die aktuellen Daten sind hier [2] Viele Grüße, Andol (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Andol, die Daten aktualisiere ich gerne wieder. Jedoch könnte ich etwas Unterstützung bei der sauberen Erstellung/Ausgabe in gnuplot gut gebrauchen. Die Jahreszahlen sind seit meiner Version nicht mehr bündig mit den Balken. --angerdan (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Was es mit gnuplot usw. auf sich hat weiß ich aber leider nicht. Ich kann dir deswegen nicht erklären, wieso es dort zu Problemen kommt. Viele Grüße, Andol (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Gerade erst deine Aktualisierung für 2019 gesehn, mir scheint, du nutzt da eine Voreinstellung? Ich versteh jedenfalls nicht, weshalb in der Breite bei dir 10 Extrapixel sind und du Erdgas und Kernenergie wieder getauscht hast, war das beabsichtigt? --Lightkey (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ja, du liegst in beiden Punkten richtig ;) Beides habe ich nun korrigiert. --angerdan (talk)

Warning

Hi Angerdan. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jeff, i did create and follow the instruction with best intentions and as i understood. Can you please tell me what page is affected and what's the fastest and easiest way to solve the malform? --angerdan (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:SVG_Information_Technology

Category:SVG_Information_Technology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Category:Estación_de_Canfranc_(west_entrance)

Habe ich nach Eröffnung des Hotels umbenannt in “historic entrance” Hamlet 570 de (talk) 22:10, 11. Februar 2023 (UTC)

Danke für die Info zur Umbenennung in Estación de Canfranc (historical entrance) --angerdan (talk) 12:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Takumar categories

Hi, regarding your recent moves: The resaon I had the mount in the category name is that both the Takumar 58mm F2.4 and the Takumar 100mm F3.5 also exist in M37 mount, i.e. to distinguish them from Category:Takumar 58mm F2.4 (M37 mount) and Category:Takumar 100mm F3.5 (M37 mount). I'm fine with e.g. Category:Takumar 100mm F3.5 being the main category for both versions, but the Category:Takumar 100mm F3.5 (M42 mount) should hold images of the M42 version.

You also removed a bunch of lenses from as "redundant" that are now not in any subcategory thereof, might want to fix that somehow. Cheers, El Grafo (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, currently the images don'nt show the bajonett. :What would you suggest to have a clean structure and being able to distinguish lenses with visible different mounts?

How about creating a category "Asahi lenses" analogous to Category:Pentax prime lenses to have a own subcategory? --angerdan (talk) 11:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

No, images don't show the mount (screw mount, not bayonet), but the M42 version can be clearly distinguished from the M37 version at a glance. Putting the mount in the category name is for distinguishing two lens models for different systems. This is about the lenses, not their mounts, mounts are just used as qualifer. Images used to illustrate the mounts themselves should go directly into Category:M42 mount, Category:M37 mount, etc. rather than subcategories for individual lens models.

I don't think there were any Asahi-branded lenses, all the M37 ones for the Asahiflex cameras were branded Takumar. Calling them "Asahi lenses" does not make sense. Otherwise we would have to call the M42 Takumars "Pentax lenses" too, because they came with the Spotmatics. What brand the corresponding camera had doesn't really help anything for identifying the lens. Back then, things were much more interchangeable and you could easily stick an M42 mount Takumar lens produced by Asahi Optical Corp (=later Asahi Pentax = later Pentax) on a Soviet Зени́т camera.

In my opinion, brand and mount are the best qualifiers, and in that order. So have Category:Takumar lenses as the top level and then distinguish my mount into Category:Takumar lenses (M42 mount)‎, Category:Takumar lenses (M37 mount)‎, Category:Takumar lenses (K-mount)‎, and Category:Takumar lenses (Pentax 6×7 mount). That works well for the Pentax-branded lenses too, where we distinguish, between K-mount, Q-mount, 6×7 mount, etc. El Grafo (talk) 12:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Sounds good! -- angerdan (talk) 13:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Block heaters

Why have you redirected this? Your comment says, "Angerdan moved page Category:Block heaters to Category:Auxiliary heater: Separation between preheaters, auxiliary heaters and engine heaters", yet this move has done the opposite of that and Category:Block heaters are now lumped in with Category:Auxiliary heaters, when they're very different devices.

You've also created Category:Parking heaters, but mostly put Block heaters into it. Nor is it clear what the difference between Parking heaters and Auxiliary heaters is (we don't have a clear one on WP or Commons, at least).

Also Category:Auxiliary heater is against naming policy and it should be Category:Auxiliary heaters. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

It was everything mixed together: electronic and fuel powered heaters as well as pasenger compartment and motor block heaters. To make a a start and be able to separate technology and purpose, i used the name convention mainly used by Eberspächer, Webasto, Calix and DEFA.

I did fix the "s" in "Auxiliary heaters" in the images. I didn't see the older already existing category. --angerdan (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

OK, I'll fix it. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Aktualisierung

Hallo Angerdan, kannst du wieder diese Grafik aktualisieren? Die aktuellen Daten finden habe ich hier verlinkt. Viele Grüße, Andol (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)