User talk:Althair/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear Althair,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Filemover

[edit]

¡Enhorabuena por la recuperación del flag! Strakhov (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:HornOfAfrica1915--es.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kzl55 (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi MONUMENTA, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MONUMENTA/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 22 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 36 character 1: Unbegun comment. - Evidence: */
  2. ISSUE: line 445 character 39: Use '===' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: if ( text == null ) { return ''; }
  3. ISSUE: line 748 character 52: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: if ( self.note.content != null ) {
  4. ISSUE: line 1030 character 116: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: !Array.exists( this.annotations, function ( note ) { return note.model.id == id; } )
  5. ISSUE: line 1046 character 65: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if ( !this.main_div || this.main_div.length == 0 ) { this.main_div = null; } else { this.main_div = this.main_div[ 0 ]; }
  6. ISSUE: line 1093 character 23: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: } );
  7. ISSUE: line 1241 character 29: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function intersect_rectangles( a, b ) {
  8. ISSUE: line 1271 character 71: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: display !== 'none' && display != null &&
  9. ISSUE: line 1413 character 55: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: if ( !config || ImageAnnotator_config != null ) { return; }
  10. ISSUE: line 1429 character 62: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: self.haveAjax = ( LAPI.Ajax.getRequest() != null );
  11. ISSUE: line 1877 character 29: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function get_size( info ) {
  12. ISSUE: line 1889 character 48: Use '!==' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if ( i != 0 || !self.may_edit || !info.protection || mw.config.get( 'wgNamespaceNumber' ) != 6 ) { return; }
  13. ISSUE: line 2015 character 40: 'item' is already defined. - Evidence: for ( var item in self.defaults ) {
  14. ISSUE: line 2122 character 60: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: IA.haveAjax = ( LAPI.Ajax.getRequest() != null );
  15. ISSUE: line 2242 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function track( evt ) {
  16. ISSUE: line 2269 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function pause( evt ) {
  17. ISSUE: line 2275 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function resume( evt ) {
  18. ISSUE: line 2285 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function stop_tracking( evt ) {
  19. ISSUE: line 2332 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function start_tracking( evt ) {
  20. ISSUE: line 2365 character 21: Function declarations should not be placed in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top of the outer function. - Evidence: function add_new( evt ) {
  21. ISSUE: line 2631 character 31: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: } );
  22. ISSUE: line 3084 character 66: Use '!==' to compare with 'null'. - Evidence: self.haveAjax = ( LAPI.Ajax.getRequest() != null );

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]


Hi MONUMENTA, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MONUMENTA/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 36 column 1: Unexpected token *

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 23:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]


Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Althair!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:LaPuertaDelSol1900.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asia Minor ca 740 AD-es.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]