User talk:AltCtrlDel
Image deletion warning | Image:A4-Naples-17-Nov-1878 large.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
---- Deadstar (msg) 14:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Le_Petit_Journal_-_Bonnot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
83.85.95.146 00:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Edgard Leuenroth
[edit]Nenhuma das imagens acima está em domínio público. A licençã {{PD-Art}}/{{PD-old}} é inapropriada, pois não há comprovação do autor e, conseqüentemente, de sua data de morte. Exemplo: a mais antiga das três fotos seria da década de 1940. O autor da foto poderia ter trinta anos em 1940 e ter morrido apenas em 1970, com 60 anos (nada longevo, portanto). Sendo assim, ainda faltariam MUITOS anos para completar 70 anos a partir da morte do autor.
Eu imagino que você deve achar que é perseguição, mas infelizmente não há condições para que tais fotos estejam no Commons como livres de direitos autorais, já que tal fato simplesmente não é verdadeiro.
Para fotos publicadas no Brasil (apenas no Brasil) há mais de 70 anos (antes de 1938) pode-se aplicar a licença {{PD-Brazil-media}}, desconsiderando o período de vida do autor. Como todas as fotos que eu citei acima são posteriores a 1940 não é possível usar tal licença.
Dantadd✉ 20:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Bom, como eu esperava você levou para o lado pessoal e levantou razões que simplesmente são irrelevantes para a questão dos direitos autorais, como o retratado ser o maior isso ou o maior aquilo. Depois você confunde "coisa pública" com "coisa em domínio público". São coisas distintas. Vou pedir a interferência de outro administrador lusófono do Commons assim podemos sair da seara da picuinha. Do sempre só e abandonado... Dantadd✉ 16:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Caro AltCtrlDel, o que o Dantadd escreveu acima é a política que seguimos no Commons. Só podemos hospedar imagens que estejam de certeza em domínio público ou sob uma licença livre. "Provavelmente" não chega, infelizmente; nós preferimos ser um pouco conservadores neste aspecto e não jogar com as probabilidades. Por favor, compreenda que não é uma questão pessoal mas sim uma questão de política de licenciamento. Saudações, Patrícia msg 18:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Caro, se conseguir esclarecer a situação das imagens, tanto melhor para todos, em especial para os leitores da Wikipédia. Mas entenda que se não fosse o Dantadd a explicar-lhe o problema, mais cedo ou mais tarde um outro administrador viria aqui com a mesma conversa - eu por exemplo (e eu estou num pólo político totalmente oposto ao do colega Dantadd, por isso essa razão não se sustentaria comigo ;)). Se for necessário alguém enviar permissões de uso de imagens, veja os procedimentos em Commons:OTRS/pt. Saudações, Patrícia msg 21:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Diferentemente do que você diz a Patrícia, não tenho nada contra nem a favor a Edgard Leuenroth, desprezo e abomino o anarquismo, mas não anarquistas verdadeiramente pacíficos. Votaria sem dúvida o artigo para destaque se eu tomasse parte nesse tipo de votações. Se quiser posso abrir uma exceção. Dantadd✉ 14:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Edgard Leuenroth 2
[edit]Já se passou quase um mês e nada foi feito quanto às imagens relacionadas acima. Se não houver novidades nos próximos dias, vou colocá-las em deletion requests por violação de direitos autorais. Feliz 2009. Dantadd✉ 13:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, ótimo. Vou esperar então a resposta. Não esqueça de fazer via OTRS. Dantadd✉ 15:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Louise.Michel.A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ravachol_junho_1892.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ravachol_junho_1892.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Ravachol_junho_1892.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Lugusto • ※ 19:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Eric McDavid.jpg is uncategorized since 8 April 2009.
- Image:Fábio Lopes dos Santos Luz.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Caserio(cut).png was uncategorized on 17 October 2009.
- Image:Bonot(família).png was uncategorized on 21 October 2009.
Copyright status: File:Howard_Image.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Howard_Image.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Eusebius (talk) 13:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Howard_Image.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Howard_Image.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Howard_Image.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eusebius (talk) 13:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Peter_Lamborn_Wilson.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Peter_Lamborn_Wilson.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Peter_Lamborn_Wilson.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eusebius (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kropotkin's_Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:399px-Le_chat_politique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Heliooiticica.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Heliooiticica.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Heliooiticica.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sante Caserio.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sante Caserio.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Sante Caserio.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
GeorgHH • talk 12:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Paris68aCars.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Paris68aCars.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paris68aCars.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Head (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Anna Snitch.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Anna Snitch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anna Snitch.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Eric McDavid.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Eric McDavid.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eric McDavid.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Antonio Serrano Gonzalez.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Antonio Serrano Gonzalez.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antonio Serrano Gonzalez.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Anarc-Okupa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Tom Morris (talk) 00:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Footsie.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Footsie.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Footsie.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
czar 18:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Giovanni Rossi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
czar 18:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Monumento a bresci.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Monumento a bresci.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Monumento a bresci.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
czar 01:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, czar 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)