User talk:AlixSaz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AlixSaz!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит памятники 2015[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:

File:Музей Домик М.Ю. Лермонтова.jpg

оказалась среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошла в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Botanical Garden, Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support maybe the white a bit clipped but good composition,reflection and colors! --Christian Ferrer 09:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Экспонат силовой энергоустановки ГРЭС имени Красина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo, it is a bit overexposed but the main object is also reflecting a lot --Michielverbeek 23:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник Кисе Воробьянинову в Пятигорске.jpg[edit]

File:Памятник Кисе Воробьянинову в Пятигорске.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A.Savin 00:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Big wheel".jpg[edit]

File:"Big wheel".jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ray Garraty (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big ferris wheel.jpg[edit]

File:Big ferris wheel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ray Garraty (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Azov coast from m Akhilleon to Pekla m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gara Garayev.jpg[edit]

File:Gara Garayev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A.Savin 13:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gara Garayev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. not perfectly sharp, but good enough for QI --Hubertl 06:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит Землю 2016[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

вошли в лонг-лист конкурса. В ближайшие дни жюри составит шорт-лист и определит победителей, обращая особое внимание на качество изображений. Пожалуйста, проверьте, что вошедшие в лонг-лист фотографии загружены в максимально возможном разрешении – это необходимое условие для победы в конкурсе.

Также убедитесь в том, что Вы указали адрес электронной почты и разрешили приём писем от других участников – без этого мы не сможем с Вами связаться.

Кроме того, Вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида.

Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2016

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The car of the Baku funicular station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view of the Baku bay, Azerbaijan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 01:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape of "Pekla", Temryuksky district. Krasnodar Krai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Field-Marshal Count Vorontsov, MS.jpg[edit]

File:Field-Marshal Count Vorontsov, MS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Эхинокактус Грузона - Echinocactus grusonii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC) Не работает почта — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlixSaz (talk • contribs) 01:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essentuki. Gallery of the source N 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girl with books.jpg[edit]

File:Girl with books.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A.Savin 08:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Destroyed railway bridge on Mekhrenga River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences of Russia (Exhibition "Japanese Garden) 2283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostankino Tower 1715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent focus to main object, a lot of details --Michielverbeek 14:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned oil-distribution unit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verkostung Weinstube "Phanagoria".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 18:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mekhrenga river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some CAs on the upper right corner, could you remove them? --Basotxerri 20:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you. Chromatic aberration in the upper right corner of the eliminated--AlixSaz 21:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thank you. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrushina Spit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Poor categories. Where it was taken? Spits of the Sea of Azov already including Sea of Azov (logically). --A.Savin 00:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Well, has made changes in the categories--AlixSaz 05:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 02:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perervinsky dam of the Moskva River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит памятники 2016[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 653 из 22580 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016

Baku Tower[edit]

Hi, I'm sorry to tell you that the Baku TV Tower cannot be hosted on Commons as there is no FOP in Azerbaijan. Here is the nom for deletion in case you want to comment it. --Poc o² 17:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same applies to the Flame Towers: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Üç alov qüllələri.jpg Poc o² 17:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, but please, edit directly in any of the two pages above where the nom for delation was created. We need to centralize the discussion. What concerns me I'd more than happy if we don't have to delete those files. --Poc o² 18:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:VS Vysotsky Monument.jpg[edit]

File:VS Vysotsky Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A.Savin 00:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maiden Tower in Baku 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ateshgah of Baku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ordinary chickpeas in a ceramic bowl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, it seems to me that these aren't peas but chickpeas (Cicer arietinum). --Basotxerri 17:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm sorry, but in Russian language peas and chickpeas has no difference. This is a machine translation. 17:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for the help, I improved category. 17:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
OK now! And don't forget to sign your comments here... ;-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC) I got carried away and forgot to sign !? Thank you. --AlixSaz 18:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Конкурс "Узнай Россию. Начни с Дона"[edit]

Здравствуйте! В настоящее время при участии Викимедиа РУ проводится конкурс "Узнай Россию. Начни с Дона", посвящённый достопримечательностям Ростовской области. Одна из номинаций предусматривает загрузку фотографий достопримечательностей. Чтобы принять участие в конкурсе, необходимо загрузить фотографии на Викисклад, а затем добавить их в конкурсную таблицу. 7 участников, набравшие наибольшее число баллов, получат приз от 2 до 20 тыс. руб. Приглашаю Вас принять участие в конкурсе! --Andreykor (talk) 13:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - January - Railways[edit]

I removed your photo of File:Railway station "Tsaritsyno".jpg because it was uploaded before the photo challenge month. -- Colin (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Contrails in the sky at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Солнечные часы в Таганроге.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Gate in the Governor's Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 17:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The time counter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Equivibrist in the streets of Baku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting contrast between performer's bright clothing and duller street colors; well done technically --Daniel Case 21:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hurricane in Taganrog on September 23 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice feeling of a storm not totally gone --Daniel Case 16:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear AlixSaz,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Spit Sea of Azov2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 19:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Spit Sea of Azov1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sky looks a little too dark blue up in the left corner and the clouds are bordering on blown, think you could fix this? --W.carter 22:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed the color of the sky and sharpness, as far as was possible. --AlixSaz 13:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 20:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FPC nomination in jeopardy[edit]

Alix, are you aware that I nominated File:Long Spit Sea of Azov2.jpg for FP? There are currently 5 supporting votes, 1 neutral and 4 opposed. You should read what the critics say, because I think there's a clear indication that if you are able to make the fixes they want, most of them would support the result. I chose to nominate the photo, but I can't choose to edit it for you (and wouldn't know how in the first place). There's another 7 days till the photo's time of consideration is up, so if you have any interest in getting what I consider a wonderful composition featured, I suggest you post to FPC as soon as you have the time and do the edits within 3-4 days.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-mountain. Karachay-Cherkessia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honey waterfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice rainbow... You could check if there is some corresponding category for it. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-mountain, big plan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is tilted (check the buildings), please correct. --Basotxerri 18:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you. Lined by buildings.--AlixSaz 19:10, 10 May 2017(UTC)
OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Узнай Россию. Начни с Дона[edit]

Добрый день!

От лица организаторов конкурса «Узнай Россию. Начни с Дона» поздравляю Вас с завоеванием призового места!

Узнать о занятом Вами месте и прилагающихся призовых можно на странице конкурса.

Для перечисления полагающихся Вам призовых сумм, прошу Вас перейти по ссылки ниже для заполнения формы для оплаты. Просьба не затягивать с заполнением формы. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1GrMSMivSbMNWVolZ3LbA5CACaAj5ZvM6DpDa2J_yh20/viewform?edit_requested=true

С уважением Дмитрий Жуков. (jukoff@wikimedia.ru)

16.05.2017 JukoFF (talk) 11:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gora Koltso tract.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 10:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gora Koltso tract1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Botanical garden. N. In. Tsitsin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baku, Seaside Park, Train for excursion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please check WB. Filename should be better. --XRay 11:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed WB. Correction of the file name.--AlixSaz 09:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support IMO it's good enough. It may be still too warm (WB). And I've improved your filename for you. --XRay 16:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baku Funicular.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please check the perspective. IMO it's tilted CW. --XRay 11:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed tilt CW.--AlixSaz 10:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Thank you. Sharpness isn't the best but good enough. --XRay 16:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Museum - reserve "Gobustan".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Church of the icon of the Mother of God 'life-giving spring'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figure (Grape) gate IMG 5084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The cavalier case No. 1 49616263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The cavalier case No. 2 4946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ArildV 18:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and use of images[edit]

Hi AlixSaz,

I'm contacting you about the use of your images in my website (www.dixon.es).

If you have a look at the website you'll see that I've added your "Ordinary chickpeas in a Turkish ceramic bowl" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=54071586) foto to a slider on the home page.

I'm not a programmer, I'm a translator, and fighting with websites is a real trial for me. However, I've got this far, and I'd like to know how you'd like me to proceed with a credit (assuming that you're ok about my using the foto in the first place, of course).

I did initially add a credit to the foto itself, but it looked really poor in the standard slider that I've used, so I removed it and added a "Credits" link on the main menu, with intention of listing all the fotos that I've used along with the corresponding credit and link.

So, before I go ahead, I'd like to have your feedback about the idea, and of course about the use of your foto.

Look forward to hearing from you

--Sattamassagassa (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sattamassagana,

Apologies. I have not had the opportunity to meet You as I was away.

From Your letter I understand that you want to use the file "Ordinary chickpeas in a Turkish ceramic bowl" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=54071586) photo slider on the home page. I don't speak the language and do not really understand the essence of the proposed ideas.

But I am the copyright holder of this image and give my approval for the use of the content under license and not breaking the law.

--AlixSaz (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The building of the city Executive Power, Baku City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain Golden spike IMG 5203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Taganrog MG 1946.jpg

And also:

File:Taganrog MG 1949.jpg

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave Michael Lunn (1820-1895) MG 4319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The tomb of Archimandrite Silouan, Abbot of the Dormition in the Second Athos monastery on mount Beshtau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marine (Nicholas) Cathedral, Yakornaya square. Kronstadt, a bus tour company "Vodohod", 25 September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Resurrection Church. Iconostasis. Valaam Island, excursion of the company "Vodokhod" by motor ship "Konstantin Simonov", September 26, 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vacuum electronic device 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vacuum electronic device 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument VI Lenin Karl Marx Street. Square at the Machine Tool. Yeisk.jpg[edit]

File:Monument VI Lenin Karl Marx Street. Square at the Machine Tool. Yeisk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Викимедиа РУ поздравляет Вас с победой в российской части «Конкурса Научных фотографий 2017»![edit]

Уважаемый участник AlixSaz!

Поздравляем Вас с победой в российской части «Вики-Наука 2017»!

Для вручения награды — полугодовой подписки на научно-популярное издание «Наука и жизнь» — ваш электронный адрес передан в редакцию журнала.

Финальный список победителей доступен на странице конкурса. Победители финала международгого конкурса будут объявлены позже.

С уважением,
Оргкомитет конкурса Вики-Наука 2017,
НП «Викимедиа РУ»
— Niklitov (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

СЕРИЯ ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЙ - Победитель
Превращения плода Aésculus hippocástanum (Каштана конского обыкновенного). AlixSaz

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Your image or other content, File:Girl with books.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Sealle (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower fence Belozerskaya. Башня ограды Белозерская. Большая Мережная2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 başlayır![edit]

Salam! Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 müsabiqəsi artıq başlayıb! Sizin iştirakınız Azərbaycanın təbii sərvətlərini sənədləşdirməkdə və digər Vikipediya layihələrində yaymaqda kömək edəcək.

Xahiş edirik müsabiqənin səhifəsinə daxil olub qaydalarla tanış olasınız: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan. Siz burada həmçinin müsabiqədə necə iştirak etməyi də öyrənə bilərsiniz. Hər hansısa bir sualınız olarsa mənimlə əlaqə saxlayın: User_talk:Interfase.

Təşəkkürlər,
Interfase,
Azərbaycanda Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 müsabiqəsinin təşkilatçısı

Hello! We are happy to announce that Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan is now open. Your participation will help us to document the nature of Azerbaijan and show it to the world through Wikipedia and other projects.

Please go to the page of the contest to read the rules: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan. There you can also find out how to take part in the contest. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us: User_talk:Interfase.

Thanks,
Interfase,
the organiser of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan
19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AlixSaz,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AlixSaz,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AlixSaz,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firework фейерверк 6176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Magnificent. --PtrQs 01:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AlixSaz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. There is also an international upload category with no national prize.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in the [[:c::Category:Images from Wiki Science Competition 2019 by country|national categories]] even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate such files at next step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AlixSaz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Village of ELS, Arkhangelsk region. Посёлок Елс, Архангельской обл.jpg[edit]

File:Village of ELS, Arkhangelsk region. Посёлок Елс, Архангельской обл.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://stock.adobe.com/ca/315145330?as_campaign=TinEye&as_content=tineye_match&epi1=315145330&tduid=99759859fe4e4357d8b368d6e3e103d0&as_channel=affiliate&as_campclass=redirect&as_source=arvato

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Village of ELS, Arkhangelsk region. Посёлок Елс, Архангельской обл.jpg[edit]

File:Village of ELS, Arkhangelsk region. Посёлок Елс, Архангельской обл.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Strakhov (talk) 17:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

9 апреля. Чешские производители выпустили ограниченную серию игрушек в защитных масках для лица[edit]

Добрый день, коллега!

Вы загрузили файл file:9_апреля._Чешские_производители_выпустили_ограниченную_серию_игрушек_в_защитных_масках_для_лица.jpg, но насколько я могу судить по https://www.interfax.ru/lcz.asp этот файл не является свободным. Не могли бы вы уточнить лицензию? Иначе его удалят. Спасибо! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 09:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:9 апреля. Чешские производители выпустили ограниченную серию игрушек в защитных масках для лица.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:9 апреля. Чешские производители выпустили ограниченную серию игрушек в защитных масках для лица.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:9 апреля. Чешские производители выпустили ограниченную серию игрушек в защитных масках для лица.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 13:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open![edit]

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Водоёмная башня на станции Люблино Reservoir tower at Lublin station IMG 0627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support There you go :) --Poco a poco 07:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Electrical engineering pavilion Павильон «Электротехника».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --TommyG 18:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central pavilion Центральный павильон.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" Павильон «Земледелие».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --TommyG 18:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support
I would like to recommend a crop at the the right hand side to remove the person and the billboard plus a symmetrical presentation--Virtual-Pano 19:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Oк, cropped it, restored the symmetry.--AlixSaz 11:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Monument to V. I. Lenin Памятник В.И. Ленину.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 03:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spaso-Preobrazhensky Cathedral Спасо-Преображенский собор.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Very good quality. Rich of detail. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Church Церковь Александра Невского.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to V. I. Lenin Памятник В.И. Ленину.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to V. I. Lenin Памятник В.И. Ленину.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper shopping malls (GUM) Верхние торговые ряды (ГУМ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment A very impressive image. But can you reduce the chromatic aberations at the roof? --Augustgeyler 21:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Oк, the chromatic aberration removed..--AlixSaz 10:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Improved. QI now. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Надвратный храм Толгской иконы Божьей Матери Gate Church of the Tolga icon of the Mother of God IMG 0599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Надвратный храм Толгской иконы Божьей Матери Gate Church of the Tolga icon of the Mother of God IMG 0603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade of artificial ponds Каскад искусственных прудов IMG 0751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade of artificial ponds Каскад искусственных прудов IMG 0750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion Computer engineering and Informatics Вычислительная техника и информатика.j IMG 0710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. crop of basin is not ideal --Virtual-Pano 09:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Virtual-Pano. You may want to check if you have some room for a wider crop on the left. --Lion-hearted85 10:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately, the file does not allow you to make changes. --AlixSaz 11:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion Computer engineering and Informatics Вычислительная техника и информатика.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 10:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade of artificial ponds Каскад искусственных прудов IMG 0759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain Golden spike Золотой колос.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I really like this photo! Good quality, too. -- Ikan Kekek 01:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balashikha cotton mill number 1 IMG 0851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, but a bit too much of the sky. --Tournasol7 08:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AlixSaz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baku. Shamsi Badalbeyli street Баку. ул. Шамси Бадалбейли.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you crop a bit at the top, I'm fine with the hight building on the right but the unfortunate on the left is not convincing --Poco a poco 19:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks. I think it's better that way..--AlixSaz 19:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cypress alley. Kislovodsk. Кипарисовая аллея. Кисловодск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Baku banner Government House.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modern architecture style. Windows. Современное зодчество. Окна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very good. Could you please add a category for the town/city in which this photo was taken? --Aristeas 09:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ok has made changes in the categories--AlixSaz 10:27, 09 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! Good quality. --Aristeas 14:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modern architecture style Современное зодчество.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, but could you please smooth it out? It's pretty noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 05:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks. The noise was eliminated and another correction was made.--AlixSaz 10:27, 10 April 2021(UTC)
Weak support You got rid of the noise, but it's not as sharp now. If there's any way you can get the sharpness to pop out more while not reintroducing all the noise, that would probably be better, but I think it's good enough to be a QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 16:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I increased the sharpness, leaving the noise within acceptable limits.--AlixSaz 17:27, 10 April 2021(UTC)
Thanks. I see some details have returned. -- Ikan Kekek 23:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oil Pump Нефтяной насос.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 16:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drake Селезень.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to the first chairman of the City Council A. Glushko.jpg[edit]

File:Monument to the first chairman of the City Council A. Glushko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alexander Roumega (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to the first chairman of the City Council Alexander Glushko.jpg[edit]

File:Monument to the first chairman of the City Council Alexander Glushko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alexander Roumega (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honey Falls Медовые водопады 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honey Falls Медовые водопады 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honey Falls Медовые водопады 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
~~Oppose~~ Usable, but the composition is not the best imo + the people are distracting, sorry. --Nefronus 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I believe with time people are a benefit in a photo --Moroder 13:42, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I believe sometimes people are useful in a landscape to give a sense of scale. Rodhullandemu 14:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
* Comment Okay, I delete my opposing vote so we don’t flood the discussion. Nefronus 17:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley Of Narzan Долина Нарзанов 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky. Переславль-Залесский 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO a touch too warm. --XRay 04:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I made a correction--AlixSaz 05:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 06:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky, Переславль-Залесский 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 04:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Well, Made correct perspective--AlixSaz 04:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok --Michielverbeek 06:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is out![edit]

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 7,707 images represented on commons in over 20 countries. Kindly see images here

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Biology" fragment Павильон «Биология» фрагмент 8466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Computer Engineering and Informatics" Fragment Павильон «Вычислительная техника и информатика» фрагмент 8435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Public Education" Fragment Павильон «Биология» фрагмент 8472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 6416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Atomic Energy" fragment Павильон «Атомная энергия» (фрагмент) 6821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Computer Engineering and Informatics" Fragment Павильон «Вычислительная техника и информатика» ФрагментIMG 8439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panels on the facade of the Pirogov baths Панно на фасаде Пироговских ванн.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ketskhoveli 15:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panels on the facade of the Pirogov baths Панно на фасаде Пироговских ванн. 5761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Pavilion (fragment) Центральный павильон (фрагмент) IMG 8484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The chimney Дымовая труба.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Some blown highlights, but I think quality is good for QI --Rhododendrites 18:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rybkin's estate Усадьба Рыбкина 4537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 6386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагментIMG 7192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 21:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain Golden spike Золотой колос IMG 7123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portico of the pavilion "Transport of the USSR" Портик павильона «Транспорт СССР».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotunda-colonnade Ротонда-колоннада над бюветом минерального источника № 17 Коренная струя.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 06:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The chimney Дымовая труба 5340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balashikha cotton mill number 1 Fragment Балашихинская хлопкопрядильная фабрика Фрагмент IMG 5377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This looks a bit slanted. I think the perspective needs correcting. --Y.ssk 08:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done OK, I've fixed the perspective as much as possible. This factory building was built in the 19th century and today has such a geometry.--AlixSaz 16:12, 14 September2021 (UTC)
The vertical lines still look a bit off to me, but I'll defer to other reviewers. --Y.ssk 12:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't see vertical problem. Maybe add a small amount of Unsharp mask or similar, most digital images need it. --Goran tek-en 17:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Meat Industry" Павильон «Мясная промышленность» IMG 7203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is yours, for some strange reason QICBot left it in my talk page, good work, keep it up! :) --Poco a poco (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Geology" Павильон «Геология».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rybkin's estate Усадьба Рыбкина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main house Главный дом.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exhibition of achievements of the national economy Выставка достижений народного хозяйства IMG 2925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 7271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exhibition of achievements of the national economy Выставка достижений народного хозяйства IMG 7025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exhibition of achievements of the national economy Выставка достижений народного хозяйства IMG 2891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main house Главный дом IMG 1607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
~~Oppose~~ The traffic light at the top is just too distracting and spoils the compo IMHO, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 20:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK for me: the subject is the traffic light, with the building in the background. I'd just suggest that the title, description and categories embrace that. -- Ikan Kekek 05:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tried to fix the flaw, but the quality in my opinion is getting worse. At the discretion of the community.--AlixSaz 04:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely QI now, thank you Poco a poco 07:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The image is fine, but should you put a "retouched" notice on it? How are these kinds of edits (to some, fakeries) normally handled? -- Ikan Kekek 11:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I thank the community for participating.--AlixSaz 19:10, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature protection pavilion Павильон «Охрана природы» 8590 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Meat Industry" Павильон «Мясная промышленность» IMG 7183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grocery Store No. 1 Гастроном №1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lock on the Yauza River Шлюз на реке Яузе IMG 3353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 7210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade of artificial ponds Каскад искусственных прудов IMG 7140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pump room of the Haazo-Ponomarevsky source Бювет Гаазо-Пономаревского источника.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The highlights on the leaves to the left are blown. Can you reprocess the picture? --Zinnmann 06:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment OK, I have corrected the noted shortcomings.--AlixSaz 18:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 09:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park lantern Парковый фонарь IMG 8508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 12:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centrosoyuz Pavilion Павильон «Центросоюз».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Meat Industry" Павильон «Мясная промышленность» IMG 7201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain "Stone Flower" fragment Фонтан «Каменный цветок» фрагмент IMG 7682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 9282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 7646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain "Stone Flower" fragment Фонтан «Каменный цветок» фрагмент IMG 6359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Soviet Seal" Fragment Павильон «Советская печать» фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Pavilion (fragment) Центральный павильон (фрагмент) 6812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Public Education" Fragment Павильон «Биология» фрагмент 8461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Public assembly building Здание общественного собрания.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park lantern Парковый фонарь.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but it needs at least one category about the subject --Poco a poco 13:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThe category has been added.--AlixSaz 14:10, 28 September 2021(UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ketskhoveli 12:33, 01 Octber 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park lantern Парковый фонарь IMG 8516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but it needs at least one category about the subject --Poco a poco 13:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThe category has been added.--AlixSaz 14:10, 28 September 2021(UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ketskhoveli 12:33, 01 Octber 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 7220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 23:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 7232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Optika Pavilion fragment Павильон «Оптика» фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 6414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 7636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Public Education" Fragment Павильон «Биология» фрагмент 8463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Agriculture" fragment Павильон «Земледелие» фрагмент IMG 7710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Public Education" Fragment Павильон «Биология» фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The main facade of the restaurant Zolotoy Kolos Главный фасад ресторана «Золотой колос».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Cosmos" (formerly "Mechanization") fragment Павильон «Космос» (бывший «Механизация») фрагмент IMG 7219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial sign in honor of fellow countrymen who died during the Great Patriotic War.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Invalid category (redlink). Quality images shall be properly categorized. --F. Riedelio 14:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I added another category. The category (red link (this is temporary) is related to the fact that the file was sent to the VLM contest.--AlixSaz 18:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality (I created the redlink). --F. Riedelio 07:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostokino Aqueduct Ростокинский акведук IMG 3774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Computer Engineering and Informatics" fragment Павильон «Вычислительная техника и информатика» фрагмент 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village "Nikolskoye-Trubetskoye 1" Селище «Никольское-Трубецкое 1».jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostokino Aqueduct Ростокинский акведук.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostokino Aqueduct Ростокинский акведук 3776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostokino Aqueduct Ростокинский акведук 3759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostokino Aqueduct Ростокинский акведук 3780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance gate Ворота въездные.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker. The Bell. Церковь Николая Чудотворца. Колокол.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 08:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial sign in honor of fellow countrymen who died during the Great Patriotic War IMG 8701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 18:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Кочетков Павел Иванович.tiff[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Кочетков Павел Иванович.tiff. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Кочетков Павел Иванович.tiff]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 06:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vacuum electronic lamps. Вакуумные электронные лампы.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы вы подписать модель каждой из ламп на фотографии? Это бы сильно повысило информативность фотографии.

Чтобы добавить подпись, нужно нажать кнопку "Добавить примечание", которая находится прями под фотографией и выделить нужный объект. Результат получится примерно как здесь, где можно навести курсор на нужное блюдо и прочитать описание. --Emaus (talk) 03:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Я постараюсь выполнить Вашу просьбу как только смогу выделить время. Дело в том что лампы снимались много лет назад в политехническом музее и у меня нет их описания, но по маркировке наверное можно будет восстановить. AlixSaz (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! --Emaus (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Oktyabrsky narzan baths Октябрьские нарзанные ванны 5777.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultan Su Waterfalll IMG 5297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Please add a CAT for the waterfall. --Tagooty 04:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
QuestionSorry that there is a CAT(added a category)--AlixSaz 04:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambukansky Nature Reserve IMG 4964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yauza River Valley 3852-53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beshtau Mountain IMG 4914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tambukansky Nature Reserve IMG 4982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chegem gorge IMG 6002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NiaPol 08:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chegem gorge IMG 5997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NiaPol 08:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chegem gorge IMG 6048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jurfeld 08:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chegem gorge IMG 6235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jurfeld 08:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narzanov Valley IMG 3991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chegem gorge IMG 5988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The bottom half looks good, but the top-left background cliff looks hazy, and the sky is a bit blown. Perhaps correctable by removing haze? --Mike Peel 17:49, 23 July 2022
Comment Unfortunately, the shooting conditions from the dark gorge, the humid morning air and the angle of the sun's rays, saturated the aerial perspective.--AlixSaz 21:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fair enough, I think this is good enough for QI. --Mike Peel 20:39, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nicholas Church. Beloe, Kimrsky district, Tver region 1538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would do a crop at the top --Michielverbeek 19:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Answered I agree with you that there is a lot of heaven above, but this is a temple and I want to show the desire for God.--AlixSaz 20:25, 14 October 2022(UTC)
Ok, your choice --Michielverbeek 22:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Main Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Collective Farm House of Culture at VDNH" 0675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nicholas Church. Beloe, Kimrsky district, Tver region.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think, acceptable QI. But just slightly less noise reduction would be enough. Might have lost some of the texture quality. --Ximonic 20:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Collective Farm House of Culture at VDNH" 0685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Collective Farm House of Culture at VDNH" 0693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion "Collective Farm House of Culture at VDNH" 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AlixSaz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us![edit]

Hello AlixSaz,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

1st prize: 500 USD
2nd prize: 400 USD
3rd prize: 300 USD
Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

File:Hotel "Hilton".jpg[edit]

File:Hotel "Hilton".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel Absheron.jpg[edit]

File:Hotel Absheron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- MJJR 19:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spasskaya Tower Спасская башняь IMG 8932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 19:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovskaya (Tainitskaya) Tower IMG 8976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 19:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral of the Tula Kremlin IMG 8950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 19:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The estate (house) of A.R. Batashev (military Alexander School) IMG 9063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good image. The Description and Categories should indicate which part of the Monastery is depicted. --Tagooty 04:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done OK! Corrected the description--AlixSaz 16:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Hall building IMG 2846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ironbernietyrol 19:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ironbernietyrol 19:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral of the Tula Kremlin IMG 9032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baku Bay. The Caspian Sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMHO, the shadows are too dark. --C messier 20:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you. Fixed exposure and contrast.--AlixSaz 19:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but please check again the perspective correction, there is some leaning towards the left (sorry for not noticing it the first time). --C messier 20:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThank you for your attention. I saw the slope and corrected it.--AlixSaz 17:08, 19 October 2023(UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The building of the House of Soviets IMG 2586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit overdistorted on the left (Здание выглядит неестественно перекошенным) --Екатерина Борисова 01:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done I made a correction (Действительно, было совсем криво)--AlixSaz 17:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite high NR but otherwise really good. --Plozessor 10:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pollution of the Azov Sea coas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Павильон «Храм воздуха» IMG 4449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epiphany Cathedral of the Tula Kremlin IMG 9003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyatnitsky Gate Tower Башня Пятницких ворот IMG 8936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shopping malls Торговые ряды IMG 8947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Monastery IMG 2890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shopping malls Торговые ряды IMG 8953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good to me. --JiriMatejicek 15:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Усадьба художника Ярошенко Н.А. IMG 5942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]