User talk:Alex Cohn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello Alex

Thank you for the commet on the Hip Hop Movement logo ( Hip Hop Movement01.png) that I upload from their site, if you had clicked on the link you would and will see that they have the CC permission right next to the logo. They give people permission to use the logo. --Street sting (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Factor, April 2017.jpg

[edit]

Hello Alex,

I was perfectly within my own rights to post the revised logo for Fox News Channel's "The Factor" program (The Factor, April 2017.jpg) that you marked as a possible "copyright violation." The fact that I uploaded a screenshot of the image makes it my own work. Therefore, it is perfectly feasible for others to use it as well. I even listed the appropriate licenses as well, which are clearly visible. Therefore, I am kindly requesting that you reconsider removing this violation. Thank you for your understanding. --jmcd88(talk) 12:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcd88: Please see COM:SS. A screenshot is not entirely your own work. Alex Cohn (talk) 05:02, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then. I guess I'll just stick to editing text. Moreover, due to all of these rules surrounding the uploading of images, I can also guarantee you that I'll never be uploading another image on Wikipedia again. jmcd88 (talk) 1:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jmcd88: Yeah, the copyright rules can be a bit hard to understand at first - sorry about that! Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter has a bunch of guidelines on what you can and can't upload here. Incidentally, that image could be uploaded directly to the English-language Wikipedia with a fair-use rationale - it would likely qualify with some minor edits to remove the YouTube title and reduce the resolution. I would be happy to walk you through that if you'd like. Again, sorry - it was totally not my intention to scare you away from uploading images here. Alex Cohn (talk) 05:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. I know you're just going by the rules here (apparently, I wasn't). This was my second time posting an image here, even though I've been moderately active within the Wikipedia community for years now (as you might know, I'm best when it comes to editing text). I guess I'll just read more into some of the guidelines if I choose to upload another image from here on out. I do appreciate your kindness as well. jmcd88 (talk) 1:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

[edit]
čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 16:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:DmD Horsens 2015.jpg

[edit]

Hi Alex, The file was submitted via mail-template 2019-08-29 by the owner, photographer Flemming Ege, Ticket#2019082910009129. I have copied this into the box 'source' in the summary section on the file's page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DmD_Horsens_2015.jpg. Hope I did it right! Best regards Tjelly2 (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You might like to add File:Bitly 2019.png too Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bitly 2019.svg (and remove the use of it on ruwiki). --bjh21 (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Alex Cohn (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

[edit]
If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Alex Cohn, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Regards. T CellsTalk 08:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mold-A-Rama T. Rex

[edit]

Hello, Alex Cohn. I uploaded File:Mold-A-Rama-T-rex-01.jpg to Wikimedia Commons. You tagged it with License Review, saying "Provide a specific reason for the public domain status, please". I marked it as public domain because the creator of the image uploaded it to Flickr with a public domain license. That's here. So, please let me know what should happen next, I don't know the proper procedure. Thanks. (If you reply here, I will see what you say.) Mudwater (talk) 21:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mudwater! Unfortunately, that file's license on Flickr is listed as "Public Domain Work", which is generally not OK on Commons. The Public Domain Mark has no underlying legally-enforceable document behind it, and is intended to indicate files that are already in the public domain, not to place files in the public domain by itself. If the uploader's intent was to do that, there's the "Public Domain Dedication" license choice on Flickr, which is equivalent to the {{Cc-zero}} license tag here.
This seems pedantic, but Commons is intended as a worldwide resource and there are countries where it's unclear if someone can legally release their own work into the public domain. The CC-Zero license therefore has a backup clause that's intended to provide equivalent rights in those countries. But the person who uploaded the image to Flickr (i.e. the copyright holder) would need to have agreed to the backup clause, which they haven't done if they only tagged the image as "Public Domain Work". Please let me know if you're still confused - this is confusing, and it took me a while to wrap my head around it myself. --Alex Cohn (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that is a bit complicated, but I get the basics of what you're saying. So, what do you think is the best way to proceed? Should the image be removed from Wikimedia? And if yes, can it be added to Wikipedia instead? And if yes to Wikipedia, what licensing should it have? Mudwater (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One approach might be to ask the uploader on Flickr to change the license to one of the Commons-compatible ones? That'd allow it to stay here. Commons even has a page of sample appeals to the uploader you can use. (Also, do you know the copyright status of the original molds? COM:FOP US might mean that pictures of Mold-A-Rama figures are considered derivative works; it'd certainly be simpler if the molds were created before 1924.) Alex Cohn (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative works, eh? Well, the Mold-A-Rama machines debuted in 1962, so I'd assume that any of the figurines were created on or after that date. What about the idea of uploading the same image to Wikipedia? Is there some kind of licensing that would be good for that? Mudwater (talk) 12:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mudwater: That's where it gets tricky. Is there a copyright notice on the machines or molded into the plastic? If they were first "published" before 1977 without a notice, the figurines themselves are public domain and that point is moot. I'm not a lawyer, and this is getting a bit beyond my depth. Would you be willing to ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright? Alex Cohn (talk) 19:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps! Let me ponder this further. In any event, thanks for answering my questions. Mudwater (talk) 02:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Im new to Wikipedia, why it says "This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion"?

[edit]

I dont understand

@Bot01cl: The image you uploaded is from a news story, and generally photos from news sites are not available under free licenses. You had listed a Creative Commons license, which I could find no evidence of on the LA Times source you linked. Only the copyright holder (usually the person who created a work) can pick a license of their choice, and since you had listed a source (and the image appears elsewhere online) I assumed you were not the original creator of the image.
However, in this case, the image is eligible for inclusion on Commons because it was a work of an agency of a California local government, and California law makes most such works (including this one) part of the public domain. I've updated the image page to reflect this. Thanks for asking! Alex Cohn (talk) 02:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:A special composite of deers.jpg - sources

[edit]

Hello Alex. I was just about to specify the sources. Because I can not do otherwise, I have always saved the work as my own and then immediately in the edit mode, the sources indicated. But I do not know if that worked. Sorry. Beat Ruest (talk) 16:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beat Ruest: Thanks! Removed the tag and linked the images for you. Alex Cohn (talk) 16:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now it worked. I forgot the : ;-)

question

[edit]

Why want yoy delete my photo??--Dany1000 (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don't call me Watson. That's not my name. (5449250821).jpg

[edit]
File:Don't call me Watson. That's not my name. (5449250821).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TaurusEmerald (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The largest source picture I found is on this Flickr URL: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ibm_es/13623740614/. If you notice in the edited image, the height is stretched in order to have the hat fit on top of Watson, which I think is also not on Commons. An article on Gigaom titled Have at it, programmers: IBM makes Watson available via API has the photo included and credits IBM as the author. Furthermore, the original source image on Flickr does not have a Commons license of any kind. TaurusEmerald (talk) 23:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TaurusEmerald, thanks for the explanation. I just !voted to delete. Alex Cohn (talk) 02:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
thank you Henryaguc2019 (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SWAS Meadow Spring Site Upstream view (32813384613).jpg

[edit]

Hi! The file is no longer at Flickr so there is no reason to keep asking the bot to review the file again. The result will be the same. The bot will conclude that the file is no longer on Flickr. So if you think there is a problem with the file then start a deletion request. If you think it is okay then we need to find a better solution than to force the bot to add a "flickr not found"-template. --MGA73 (talk) 07:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Кузьмичёв Алексей Викторович.jpg

[edit]
File:Кузьмичёв Алексей Викторович.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.123.231.14 03:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alex, what could be the problem with the photo? I found it on creativecommons.org. The license was free. Thanks for the reply. Epifantsev (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A.Walles Maison Emile Pingat.jpg

[edit]
File:A.Walles Maison Emile Pingat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The New Orleans The cosmos salon & spa (talk) 07:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drago - Xul Solar -1927.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Drago - Xul Solar -1927.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Painting by Argentine artist Xul Solar (1887-1963) still protected in his country of origin.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alex_Cohn&oldid=873229383"