User talk:Aleksander Durkiewicz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aleksander Durkiewicz!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Wielki słownik ortograficzny języka polskiego.jpg

File:Wielki słownik ortograficzny języka polskiego.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Halibutt (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Jan Liszewski Braniewo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jan Liszewski Braniewo.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

To zdjęcie zrobiłem ja sam. Proszę przywrócić je !!!

I took this photo of memorial site!!! I live there!!! Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 06:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

The relief is a work of art and thereby copyrighted. What is the location of that sculpture, indoors or at a street? --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

At the entrance to the school. It is a public place open to the public. Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 07:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Please check by yourself at Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Poland#Freedom_of_panorama, whether FoP-Poland would apply. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Elbbrücke Lauenburg3.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elbbrücke Lauenburg3.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

To zdjęcie mostu zrobiłem ja sam. Proszę przywrócić je !!!

I took this photo !!! I was there!!! Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 06:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Eksponat But Muzeum Ziemi Braniewskiej.jpg

File:Eksponat But Muzeum Ziemi Braniewskiej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 03:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Plan Braniewa 1635 Zamek Biskupi ze strzałką.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plan Braniewa 1635 Zamek Biskupi ze strzałką.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 08:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Plan Braniewa1635 2020 duży.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plan Braniewa1635 2020 duży.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 08:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Joseph Adam Lortz.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Adam Lortz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joseph Adam Lortz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 11:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Aleksander Durkiewicz, this is obviously a photography of a painting. Who is the painter? You need to proide his/her permission. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Plan Braniewa1635 2020 duży.jpg

Dobry wieczór. Widzę, że ten plik został już usunięty. Mam pytanie - czy to była reprodukcja planu sporządzonego w roku 1635, czy reprodukcja współczesnego dzieła obrazującego układ urbanistyczny Braniewa według stanu na rok 1635? Widzę, że wykonał Pan sporo pracy robiąc zdjęcia i przesyłając je na Commons, jednak występują problemy z ich prawidłowym oznaczeniem, a to, z kolei, budzi wątpliwości administratorów Commons. Chciałbym Panu, w miarę swoich możliwości, pomóc. Z poważaniem Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

• Niech zatem powtórzę Pańskie słowa, żeby się upewnić, czy dobrze zrozumiałem: oryginalny miedzioryt został wykonany w roku 1635, do dziś zachowały się kopie matrycy, a z jednej z nich wykonano tę odbitkę, której zdjęcie / skan Pan opublikował, tak? Czy mógłbym Pana najuprzejmiej prosić o przesłanie na mojego maila tego pliku? Chciałbym się mu przyjrzeć i przygotować prośbę do administratora o odtworzenie tego pliku ze względu na to, że jest to w sposób oczywisty domena publiczna (acz będzie to wymagało uargumentowania).
• I jeszcze jedna sprawa - poprosiłem Pana w mailu o informacje na temat autora obrazów, których zdjęcia Pan przesłał. Czy autor jest znany? Czy wiemy, kiedy zmarł? To bardzo ważne, inaczej zdjęcia, za przeproszeniem, wylecą. Część z nich już została zgłoszona do usunięcia. Kłaniam się i dobrej nocy Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
• Dobry wieczór. Pliki File:Plan Braniewa1635 2020 duży.jpg oraz File:Plan Braniewa 1635 Zamek Biskupi ze strzałką.jpg zostały odtworzone i już raczej nie jest możliwe, by znów je usunięto. Kłaniam się, dobrej nocy Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Eksponat But Muzeum Ziemi Braniewskiej.jpg

Jeszcze mam pytanie dotyczące tego pliku: File:Eksponat But Muzeum Ziemi Braniewskiej.jpg - co on przedstawiał? Być może też został usunięty niepotrzebnie z racji braku wystarczająco precyzyjnego opisu. Z lektury dyskusji nad usunięciem domyślam się, że to eksponat oraz że raczej przedwojenny. Czy wiadomo coś więcej na temat daty jego powstania i autora? A, i co to takiego jest? Ja, niestety, nie mam technicznej możliwości podejrzenia usuniętego pliku. Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 01:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

A co to było? Czy to było jakieś dzieło sztuki, czy przedmiot użytkowy? Jeśli przedmiot użytkowy, to możemy postarać się już teraz o przywrócenie. Byłby Pan uprzejmy napisać kilka słów o tym eksponacie? Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Szanowny Panie, Commons to wielki projekt, ludzie przesyłają tu każdego dnia tysiące plików. Siłą rzeczy administratorzy administratorzy nie poświęcają zbyt wiele czasu na analizowanie każdego przypadku, który wzbudził ich wątpliwości. Zwyczajnie nie mają na to czasu. W przypadku zdjęcia tego kufla administrator uznał, że to zdjęcie dzieła sztuki (a zatem przedmiotu podlegającego prawom autorskim), które nie łapie się pod pojęcie wolności panoramy. Biedny nie miał pojęcia, że to zdjęcie ozdobnego, ale mimo wszystko masowo produkowanego przedmiotu codziennego użytku. Stąd decyzja o usunięciu. Podobnie rzecz się miała w przypadku siedemnastowiecznego planu Braniewa. Administrator nie wiedział, że to reprodukcja dzieła z XVII wieku, a zatem na pewno należącego do domeny publicznej. Dlatego w przypadkach mogących budzić wątpliwości ważne jest zamieszczanie zwięzłych opisów przesyłanych plików - tak żeby administrator wiedział, co widzi. Z resztą - opis zdjęcia zawsze jest mile widziany. W miarę możliwości warto też zamieszczać opis w którymś z bardziej popularnych języków (niemiecki, angielski) - o ile wiem na Commons jest bardzo niewielu administratorów znających polski. Jeśli nie czuje się Pan na siłach sporządzać opisy po angielsku, to chętnie pomogę. Z niemieckim trochę gorzej, ale też można pomyśleć. I jeszcze jedno pytanie: czy udało się Panu ustalić cokolwiek w sprawie portretów? Dobrej nocy! Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Obrazy

Dobry wieczór! Byłoby świetnie gdyby udało się ustalić coś w sprawie obrazów. Są interesujące, a poza tym przydatne. Wiele z nich jest już wykorzystywanych w licznych artykułach na wielu wersjach językowych Wikipedii. A inna rzecz - miło słyszeć, że obecni braniewianie są w kontakcie z dawnymi mieszkańcami miasta i relacje te, jak sądzę, są serdeczne. Czekam na wieści i życzę dobrej nocy. Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Wilhelm Killing.jpg was recently deleted

File:Wilhelm Killing.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Johann Oestreich.jpg was recently deleted

File:Johann Oestreich.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Braniewo Zamek w Braniewie oprac. Nawrocki.jpg

Copyright status: File:Braniewo Zamek w Braniewie oprac. Nawrocki.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Braniewo Zamek w Braniewie oprac. Nawrocki.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Aleksander Durkiewicz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Joseph Ziegler 1902 1988.jpg

Copyright status: File:Joseph Ziegler 1902 1988.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Ziegler 1902 1988.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Where on the source-site is stated that this image is in the public domain or is CC-Zero? --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Braniewo most młyński 1920.png

Copyright status: File:Braniewo most młyński 1920.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Braniewo most młyński 1920.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Braniewo Stadtwald Glinka Pomnik poleglych 1920 1930.jpg

 

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:Braniewo Stadtwald Glinka Pomnik poleglych 1920 1930.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Old postcard from East Prussia, stara widokówka sprzed wojny, widoczne czytelne napisy na dole niej, nie później niż II wojna światowa, a zatem w przestrzeni publicznej (wszak widokówka - to została przecież upubliczniona) ponad 70 lat jest. Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Polish enough to write on it :-( Obviously, {{Cc-by-2.5}} was wrong because it did not exist on time of postcard creation. Please also fix licenses on other historical photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

You could not claim authorship over OpenStreetMap images. Also license for derivative works from OpenStreetMap must be same as for original maps. Please pay attention for such details in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

? OpenStreetMap images just have a 2.0 license ! See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bernhard Gigalski Nicolaus Coppernicus und Allenstein.png

Copyright status: File:Bernhard Gigalski Nicolaus Coppernicus und Allenstein.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bernhard Gigalski Nicolaus Coppernicus und Allenstein.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Horst Ulrich Wiechert.pdf

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Horst Ulrich Wiechert.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Horst Ulrich Wiechert.pdf]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Omphalographer (talk) 20:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Żołnierska droga Stefana Wiśniewskiego Braniewo 2020.jpg

File:Żołnierska droga Stefana Wiśniewskiego Braniewo 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.37.205.142 16:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)