User talk:Alejo2083

Hi :-)

Full-wave rectifier

Can you add an image of a precision full-wave rectifier like you did the Image:Super diode improved.png? Also it would be nice if all of these images had connection dots. — Omegatron 19:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Op-amps

Images like Image:Opampintegrating.svg are great, except the asymmetry of the op-amp symbol really irritates me.  :-) Can you move the minus signs in all of your op-amps so they're symmetrical with the plus signs (equally far from the op-amp's line of symmetry)? — Omegatron 13:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

you are right, but I never noticed it! it looks like it's a bug in Xcircuit's library... As far as I know, you can't edit standard symbols within Xcircuit (unless you go to modify the source...), so you have to do it in post-processing programs like Inkscape. I can't think about any Inkscape shortcut to do it exactly, and doing it manually would be a huge waste of time. If you want to do it, go for it; you might also contact the creator of Xcircuit and ask him to fix it (it should be something very easy) Alessio Damato 18:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

You're running xcircuit in Linux, right? What version are you using? — Omegatron 19:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

yes, sure. I'm using version 3.4.21, teh latest my repositories provide; I'm using Ubuntu. Anyway, I don't think the author has been modifying it for a very long time... Alessio Damato 16:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Aha. The plus and minus were supposedly fixed in 3.4.22. — Omegatron 03:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I see. If I want to install the updated version of Xcircuit I have to upgrade the whole system I'm using now. I will do it, but not now, maybe next month... Alessio Damato 16:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Also see Talk:Instrumentation_amplifier#Gain_equation. Can xcircuit save its own proprietary format so that I can open xcircuit files and edit them myself? — Omegatron 15:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

It uses PostScript, but to tell the truth I deleted all the sources of the circuits I have published: they all looked perfect to me so I didn't think I would have the need to work on it. If you write it from scratch it's very fast. I normally waste more time in post-processing, creating text with proper subscripts is more complicated than I thought, but then you can copy and paste from my images. The page Talk:Instrumentation_amplifier#Gain_equation does not exist: which image are you refering to?? what do you want to improve?? Alessio Damato 18:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Oops. I meant w:Talk:Instrumentation_amplifier#Gain_equation. — Omegatron 19:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I tried to make some improvement. Take a look there. Alessio Damato 16:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Italian ice cream.jpg

This image of yours has been deleted because it lacked a source. If you took it, perhaps you could notify an admin so that it can be restored? It was nice! --Ranveig 18:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I've asked the admin who deleted it (User:Nilfanion) to have a look. Something wrong happened in the deletion process, because you should have been notified. --Ranveig 13:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for this, yes you should have been notified - then you could have modified the image to say it was your own work. I've restored it now.--Nilfanion 17:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Cleaning up noise

Hello, I originally wrote User talk:Dcoetzee#Cleaning_up_noise but then I noticed he doesn't have any contributions since 26 July 2006. So I wonder if you would help me with that. ~~helix84 12:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Maquina.png

I like the picture of a Turing machine, Maquina.png, but wouldn't it make more sense for the squares to be either black or white instead of shades of grey. I think this would make it easier to demonstrate that it is reading ones and zeros. Thanks -Hyad 07:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I didn't create the picture, I just got the original version (that was in GIF format and already published in Commons), converted losslessly in PNG and optimized it. If you want to change the picture itself, you have to try to contact the original author, that is Schadel. He's not very active here, you may try to contact him on his website: http://turing.izt.uam.mx Alessio Damato 17:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't really matter too much. The only reason I asked it that I'm not really skilled at editing pictures. But doesn't the {{PD-self}} template mean anyone can edit the picture, so no one needs to contact the original author if they want to change it. (Also, I don't know Spanish either, so that probably would make contacting him kind of hard. :) ) I noticed that since you converted the image, perhaps changing the colors wouldn't be too hard. But like I said, the colors don't matter much - I guess I'm just nitpicking. Great job on converting the image to PNG format. -Hyad 21:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

in this case it is not possible, unless you have the original source to be rendered to create the 3D image. I don't even know the program that was used. You have to contact the author because, if he still has the source, it's just a matter of 10 minutes. Moreover, he might export in PNG directly, without passing throught GIF, thus providing a hight quality of the image. I will try to contact him in the future. Alessio Damato 17:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I see your point. I only thought of changing the colors if it would be relatively easy to do. I probably won't bother contacting the author since he hasn't been on wikipedia since 2005. There are other things that are more important I think. -Hyad 05:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Analytic.svg

Can you plot it again with more points (or a different interpolation?) so it doesn't look blocky? It's really not an improvement over the PNG at this point. — Omegatron 05:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

yes, you are right. I couldn't get anything smoother with Octave. I think the solution would be to work directly in Gnuplot, without using Octave, but I couldn't do it so easily. I'll try again as soon as I have some time Alessio Damato 11:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Critiques

Ciao :) I just wanted to thank you very much for taking the time to give comments about my photos; I'm eager to learn so I greatly appreciate any help. guillom 09:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

no problem, I hope my comments will help you in the future :-) Alessio Damato 11:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A coruna torre de hercules sunset edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Previous versions

I don't want to butt into your conversation, so I'll leave a note here. Previous versions of a document can be obtained by clicking on the date under File History. Here's your and Beyond Silence's versions of Sighisoara ortodox trinity church tower. Thegreenj 15:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestion :-) Alessio Damato 19:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighisoara ortodox trinity church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragomirna monastery sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria borghese facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

QI

Hi your image image:Chiesa gesu facade.jpg still has to much noise. I made an edit at Image:Chiesa gesu facade edit.jpg. What do you think? Regards Lycaon 21:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

it looks better, the noise removal is more evident in the sky. How did you do it?

anyway, I wonder why the picture is so noisy... maybe because the light was too strong (summer in Italy is very hot!), I could come back there when the light is milder, e.g. in October, and re-take the pictures. Alessio Damato 09:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

These stitching errors

Hello Alejo2083, obviously this stitching error seam in your Talamone panorama is even more visible in the foreground vertically underneath the church. I presume you have optimised pitch, yaw, roll and barrel in hugin. May I suggest you change to custom parameters and select the x and y (e and f) parameters as well for optimisation. Make sure you have a dozen or more control points, finetuned and suitably spread in the overlapping area, it helps. -- Klaus with K 18:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks for giving me some suggestions: I have stitched several panoramas recently and they had all minor errors I didn't notice at first. Because of this, for some of them I think I have deleted the original pictures...

That would be a pity. I make a point in keeping both input images and pto file.

I'll look for them or I'll try to re-take as soon as I have the chance. Those are the steps I followed to create those (wrong) panoramas:

1. load the pictures in autopano-sift and create the control points. I have used the following settings: resolution 1400 (with my computer I can't go further), unlimited nuber of control points (it usually creates about 100-200 for each couple), no refinement step because it is really slow.

I set control points manually in hugin. I find that autopano-sift tends to choose poorly. I usually go for 10-12 points per image pair, but as few as 5 or 6 may be ok if well chosen. Quality before quantity, and sometimes one need to switch on "enable rotational search" in the fine-tuning preferences.

1. load the output.pto in hugin. I usually optimize position and view, if it's not enough I try "everything", but I didn't use it for any of the recent panoramas. I always use rectilinear projection.

"Everything" should be ok, although I dislike using the parameters a and c for mathematical reasons. After a recent repair I find x-shift(d) and y-shift(e) very important for my camera lense. Make sure you include "barrel" in the option you use, that could easily be the reason for the images misalignment.

1. stitch the pictures using enblend. If I see some errors, I try to delete some parts in the single TIFF files that hugin creates to feed enblend, and then I run enblend by myself. This approach gave good results (e.g. for Image:Galleria borghese facade.jpg that is QI). I didn't even try to fix stitching errors for the panoramas of Talamone because I didn't see them at first.

There is a new version, enblend3.0, the new seam finder tries to avoid areas where the overlapping images are different. Editing the alpha channels in the TIFF is fine, but with enblend3 I have to do it only rarely now. And enblend3.0 runs faster as well.

have you any suggestions? what are the parameter x, y and f you told me about? aren't they optimized if I choose one of the standard settings in the "drop down" menu? (I mean, aren't they included in "everything"?). Thanks Alessio Damato

As above, x-shift(d) and y-shift(e). With my misaligned lense axis I need them big time. I tend to start optimising with "start from anchor", then with the images reasonably in place I tended to go for "yaw, pitch, roll and barrel" or "everything", depending on optimisation quality. -- Klaus with K 15:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks :-) Alessio Damato 09:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

.svg file please

see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:DFT_approximation_to_Hilbert_filter.png

--Bob K 11:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Huffman coding example.svg

Someone recently posted a comment about your image, on en:Talk:Huffman coding. Basically, it looks like the codes for a3 and a4 in the example are swapped round. Is that just a glitch, or something else, e.g. a side-effect of the algorithm?

(PS. If you could reply on the above article's talk page, I'll catch the response there. Thanks :) CountingPine 09:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Constructive updates to "realistic" Schmitt trigger SVG (with DAZD)

Your Schmitt trigger SVG:

is very nice, but it would be better if:

• The double-Zener dombination was drawn like a double-anode Zener diode (DAZD). That is, flip the order of the Zener's so that the anodes are both facing "out." DAZD's are sold that have matched Zeners, and it would be proper to draw them with anodes "out."
• The "Z" on the top of the Zener should look like a Z (not an S). The "Z" is consistent with it being a "Z"ener, and it resembles the Zener's i–v curve.

Just some suggestions. —TedPavlic (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

QIC:Confucius temple

Hello Alejo, you "declined" my picture of the Confucius temple on QIC bcs of an overexposed sky. I can tell you that the sky is not overexposed - the sky actually looked like that. And if you check the colours in Gimp or your tool of choice you can see that the colours in the sky are not overexposed. Would be nice if you could have a second look on my pic. Cheers Matthias --AngMoKio (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Alejo2083!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Eur aereo edit.JPG is uncategorized since 20 March 2009.
• Image:Biphase Mark Code.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Christ the saviour side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Borderline sharpness and noise; I can forgive those given the good composition and high resolution. Thegreenj 16:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagnoregio civita panorama 3pics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok --High Contrast 11:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Moscow_kgb_night.jpg

File:Moscow_kgb_night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 19:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Italian_traffic_signs_-_Chiesa.svg

File:Italian_traffic_signs_-_Chiesa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gigillo83 (talk) 09:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 00:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook

I would like to include your picture of the colossus of the Colosso di Constantino http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Musei_capitolini_-_Colosso_di_Costantino.jpg in a textbook. This would show at about 1/12 of a page.

I wanted to confirm that would be OK with you, and also ask if you would like any information other than your name (such as location, or Wikimedia user name, or whatever) to show in the credits, which would show in the legend immediately below the picture.

[Not sure if you get a return address with this --just in case, thechabon AT! hotmail DOT! com.]

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 18:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Oktyabraskaya statue lenin.jpg

File:Oktyabraskaya statue lenin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

window functions

Can you add gridlines to these?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Window_function_%28rectangular%29.svg

then they can replace the ones in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Window_function

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Roma ara pacis fuori lontano.jpg

And also:

• File:Roma ara pacis fuori vicino.jpg

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Statua zhukov pregamma 1 drago bias 1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Set of the tv series Rome HBO cinecitta studios edit.jpg

Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your beer charts

Helo Allejo, my name is User:DerekvG iḿ a belgian wikipedian and iḿ working om Belgian beers ( on EN NL and FR wikis) I ahve modified the article Beer in Belgium in order to make the Typecasting correct and in line with the latest standards. I've used online and paper publications and the help of the Belgian Brewers Association.

I have used English translations whenever possible, but I've used only exceptionally local terminology.

• The category "Stout" in Belgium means both "Milk Stout" and "Imperial Stout", but mostly the latter.
• You mentioned you had some doubts about "Abbey beer", although the main articles have been summarised
  • A- Trappist and Abbey beers are META categories (because they are like AOC's) that contain beers of multiple styles Dubbel Tripel and Others (which might be old brown, flemish red or saison) which are subcategories
  • B- there are other beers that are not trappist nor abbey beers, but are made in the same way those are called dubbel, tripel and quadrupel

• You mentioned: "lambics are considered other than ales and lagers, because in general lambics can be both top or bottom fermenting" which is strictly spoken incorrect they are spontaenous fermentation.

and you stated correctly that " they are made with wild yeast,"

• I don't quite understand what you mean with "Belgian ale and Dark ale are not meant to be kind of beers, by a way to group the sub-categories, by Belgian ale I meant all the particular ales that can't be classified as anything else and that were invented in Belgium. I can agree about replacing it with "Special ale", but before we should make a "Special ale" article on en.wiki (while the article "Belgian ale" already exists)"

but there is a difference between "Golden ale", and "Belgian Amber or Speciale".

• Saison is a complex type of beer because it is in reality a met category which can be anything from a Golden Ale, to a Belgian Amber and even a old brown..

I agree we should take the chart approach --DerekvG (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bomarzo parco mostri orco.jpg

Hi Alejo2083, when you uploaded this photo you added in the permission field of the {{Information}} template the restriction free to use for non-commercial use which is in conflict to our policy and the granted licenses {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} and {{GFDL}}. Could you please fix this by removing this restriction? Thanks and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Done!

Where did you get the bond length for CO2?

On the CO2 wiki page, you added a picture with a bond length of 116.3pm. NIST gives 116.21 and cites Herzberg's 1966 book. The CRC manual gives 116.0pm without a reference. Where did you get 116.3? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Universe (talk • contribs) 03:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Result announced for Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India photography competition

Hello Alejo2083!

We are excited to announce that the jury members of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India has declared the result of the photography competition. You can find the winning photographs in this page. We sincerely thank you for submitting photographs in the competition which has helped bring more value to the documentation of Indian culture, history and heritage. Hope you will contribute more on Wikimedia Commons to build open knowledge for everyone in the planet. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC) (on behalf of WLM India 2022 team)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Alejo2083,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bucuresti piata universitatii teatrul national.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 India

Hello Alejo2083!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 14th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2023. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action soon!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)