User talk:Alain.Darles
------> Alain Darles not speak english. Sorry
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 16:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Ne pas de fair use
[edit]Pour Image:ENSP.jpg, Image:ESORSEM.jpg, Image:IHEDN.jpg, Image:Lambersart.jpg, SVP, ne pas d'usage raisonnable (fair use) ici ! Merci.--Jusjih 02:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Monde informatique.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
The legal note on the source website[1] says: you CANNOT REDISTRIBUTE our images and textures as part of an online resource site like our own, i.e. use them to directly compete with us. Either you get a written permission for that image or it has to go. --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Venus-Arles.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Venusdarles.jpg is uncategorized since 9 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Sint-Pieter.jpg is uncategorized since 16 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:VdA-Montpellier.JPG is uncategorized since 17 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:LysNoir.JPG is uncategorized since 18 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Marie-Fernand.jpg is uncategorized since 3 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:DA-concert.jpg is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Musee2.jpg was uncategorized on 23 August 2009.
- Image:WkicéMardi.JPG was uncategorized on 1 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Reunion wki.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas accès au lien suggestion catégorie. Désolé. La seule chose que je puisse faire c'est de ne plus mettre de photos. Est-ce là la bonne conclusion ? --alain.darles (talk) 14
- 58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Timbre-Belem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:TamponBelem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Tampon-Belem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Tampon-T-DA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:LaPoste2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Timbre-D.A.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Peter17 (talk) 06:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Violation de copyright
[edit]Bonjour,
Vous avez uploadé sur Commons des images dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur (timbres et autres) : ces images sont la propriété de La Poste et vous ne pouvez pas prétendre être le dépositaire des droits d'auteur. Il s'agit donc d'une violation de copyright et ces images vont être supprimées de commons.
Par la suite, merci de n'importer que des images dont vous êtes réellement l'auteur (photographies prises par vous d'objets d'objets non-soumis au droit d'auteur.
Pour plus d'informations, vous pouvez consulter : Commons:À propos des licences.
Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 06:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Je n'ai jamais prétendu en être l'auteur, par contre je ne comprends absolument rien à la règle. Pourquoi ces timbres également français n'encourent-ils pas la même règle : File:Timbre Jean Renaudie.jpg File:Timbre coupe du monde.JPG File:Znaczek.JPG File:Timbre poste yves saint laurent..jpg File:Timbre journée des tuiles - Grenoble.jpg File:Timbre J.O. Grenoble 1968.jpg File:Timbre J.O Grenoble 1968.jpg File:Timbre CNET Grenoble.jpg File:Eclairage public 1882 - Grenoble.jpg (pzr exemple) ? Je n'ai jamais vu la poste française interdire de publier la représentation de ses timbres et encore moins d'une oblitération... Cordialement --alain.darles (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Vous prétendez être l'auteur de l'œuvre en mettant "travail personnel" dans sa description. La loi française interdit de publier toute reproduction d'œuvre qui n'est pas de vous (sauf si elle est assez ancienne, consulter l'aide). Pour cela, l'auteur doit donner son autorisation explicite. Pour les timbres récents que vous citez, ils doivent aussi être supprimés. Peter17 (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- J'ai vu que vous aviez entrepris une "chasse" sur les timbres français. En dehors du fait que vous en avez oublié, il y en a beaucoup d'autres sur les timbres étrangers. Mais le problème n'est pas. En fait, je ne suis pas certain du tout que votre position soit justifiée et que les Postes françaises se réservent des droits d'auteurs sur leurs timbres en dehors des hypothèses de contrefaçon. De sorte que je serais très surpris que l'on me prouve que l'utilisation d'une image d'un timbre français pour illustrer des articles d'information, philatéliques ou non est proscrite légalement. Ceci me semble encore plus contestable s'agissant d'une oblitération temporaire commanditée par une association philatélique. Déjà, je suis pratiquement certain que les auteurs (dessinateurs, graveurs) ont abandonné leurs droits, ou les ont cédé à La Poste. J'ai un témoignage direct d'un auteur en ce sens. Ceci étant, je confesse ignorer les sources en la matière et j'aimerai bien que quelqu'un nous les donne. Je crains cependant très fort que vous fassiez d'une règle générale sur le droit d'auteur, une application sans discernement au cas d'espèce. Cordialement--alain.darles (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oui, c'est à peu près cela : sur Commons, on applique sans discernement les règles générales sur le droit d'auteur. On règle ensuite les cas particuliers avec les autorisations explicites fournies par les auteurs eux-mêmes. Peter17 (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- J'ai vu que vous aviez entrepris une "chasse" sur les timbres français. En dehors du fait que vous en avez oublié, il y en a beaucoup d'autres sur les timbres étrangers. Mais le problème n'est pas. En fait, je ne suis pas certain du tout que votre position soit justifiée et que les Postes françaises se réservent des droits d'auteurs sur leurs timbres en dehors des hypothèses de contrefaçon. De sorte que je serais très surpris que l'on me prouve que l'utilisation d'une image d'un timbre français pour illustrer des articles d'information, philatéliques ou non est proscrite légalement. Ceci me semble encore plus contestable s'agissant d'une oblitération temporaire commanditée par une association philatélique. Déjà, je suis pratiquement certain que les auteurs (dessinateurs, graveurs) ont abandonné leurs droits, ou les ont cédé à La Poste. J'ai un témoignage direct d'un auteur en ce sens. Ceci étant, je confesse ignorer les sources en la matière et j'aimerai bien que quelqu'un nous les donne. Je crains cependant très fort que vous fassiez d'une règle générale sur le droit d'auteur, une application sans discernement au cas d'espèce. Cordialement--alain.darles (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Vous prétendez être l'auteur de l'œuvre en mettant "travail personnel" dans sa description. La loi française interdit de publier toute reproduction d'œuvre qui n'est pas de vous (sauf si elle est assez ancienne, consulter l'aide). Pour cela, l'auteur doit donner son autorisation explicite. Pour les timbres récents que vous citez, ils doivent aussi être supprimés. Peter17 (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour Alain, j'ai supprimé cette image, qui était une copie d'écran du magazine Des racines et des ailes. Cette émission est soumise à droit d'auteur et l'on ne peut donc pas en extraire une image dans autorisation de l'auteur. Il faudrait essayer de trouver une gravure ancienne présentant la Vénus sans restaurations. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Brassart-PO.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Pymouss Tchatcher - 22:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bronze-venusdArles.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bronze-venusdArles.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bronze-venusdArles.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Premier.jour-DA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Sebjarod (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Bonsoir, j'ai à nouveau restauré l'ancienne version, car c'est Rotatebot qui va se charger d'effectuer la rotation, sans perte de qualité (contrairement à ce qui se passe si on utilise Photoshop ou équivalent). A l'avenir, si vous téléversez une image qui n'est pas orientée correctement, vous pouvez simplement ajouter {{rotate|angle}}, où angle vaut 90, 180 ou 270 degrés. –Tryphon☂ 21:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- merci pour le tuyau mais j'avais redressé la photo une 1ère fois, puis une seconde sans perte. Pourquoi changer ?
- La première fois, vous avez tourné la photo entre le moment où j'ai ajouté {{Rotate}} et le moment où le bot a effectué la rotation, donc l'image a été tournée de 180 degrés au final. Ensuite, il est préférable de laisser faire le bot car il effectue la rotation sans décoder puis réencoder le JPEG. Regardez les tailles des fichiers (en octets): par rapport à l'original, les images que vous avez tournées sont plus lourdes; avec le bot, elle aura la même taille après rotation. –Tryphon☂ 21:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- En fait je n'ai fait que reprendre mon original initial alors que j'avais utilisé une copie déjà utilisée de diverses manières. Je ne comprend donc toujours pas cet effacement.--alain.darles (talk) 22:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- La première fois, vous avez tourné la photo entre le moment où j'ai ajouté {{Rotate}} et le moment où le bot a effectué la rotation, donc l'image a été tournée de 180 degrés au final. Ensuite, il est préférable de laisser faire le bot car il effectue la rotation sans décoder puis réencoder le JPEG. Regardez les tailles des fichiers (en octets): par rapport à l'original, les images que vous avez tournées sont plus lourdes; avec le bot, elle aura la même taille après rotation. –Tryphon☂ 21:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
File:VdArestauration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 07:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Peinture-arriere.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Raymond 09:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Vénus d'Arles au château de Vincennes
[edit]Bonjour. Je viens de découvrir. Je ne connaissais pas cette copie de la Vénus d'Arles. Pourriez-vous me dire précisément où elle se trouve au château de Vincennes que je ne connais pas, par ailleurs. Eventuellement d'autres précisions. Je vois qu'elle est endommagée...Merci. Cordialement --alain.darles (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour, il y a en fait deux copies au château de Vincennes. Je vous invite à visualiser cette photo, j'ai ajouté des informations de situation, en passant votre souris sur l'image, vous les découvrirez. Bonne journée à vous. --Thesupermat (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Étonnant ! Merci. Moi qui ne connais pas le château (mais j'ai vu vos photos) peux-on dire qu'elles se situent dans les galeries en arcades du pavillon du roi ? --alain.darles (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Chateau-tours-malatra.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chateau-tours-malatra.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--FritsHG eh? 14:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Pont-medieval-TOURS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sealle (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Plan aerien chateau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- suppression à tord. Ne viole aucun copyright. pas le temps de réagir --alain.darles (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- It was not wrongfully deleted. You are not the author or copyright holder of content taken from Google Maps, and the terms of Google Maps are quite clear and completely non-free. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- justement cela ne provient pas directement de Google map !--alain.darles (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- That's irrelevant. From http://www.google.com/intl/fr/help/terms_maps.html: "Sauf dans le cas où vous avez reçu une autorisation écrite préalable de Google (ou, le cas échéant, du fournisseur d'un Contenu spécifique), vous n'êtes pas autorisé à : (a) copier, traduire, modifier ou créer des œuvres dérivées du Contenu ni d'aucune partie de celui-ci ; (b) redistribuer, louer, publier, vendre, céder, commercialiser, transférer les Produits ou le Contenu, ni les mettre à la disposition de tiers ou concéder des sous-licences les concernant". —LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ce n'est pas une réponse convainquante à faire à un ancien comme moi. Ce n'est pas la peine de continuer.On dirait un robot :( --alain.darles (talk) 01:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's irrelevant. From http://www.google.com/intl/fr/help/terms_maps.html: "Sauf dans le cas où vous avez reçu une autorisation écrite préalable de Google (ou, le cas échéant, du fournisseur d'un Contenu spécifique), vous n'êtes pas autorisé à : (a) copier, traduire, modifier ou créer des œuvres dérivées du Contenu ni d'aucune partie de celui-ci ; (b) redistribuer, louer, publier, vendre, céder, commercialiser, transférer les Produits ou le Contenu, ni les mettre à la disposition de tiers ou concéder des sous-licences les concernant". —LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- If you don't find a quote from Google's own terms convincing, and you still think the deletion was wrong, you can (as mentioned above) request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- En plus d'être incorrect en n'utilisant pas ma langue, j'ai vu que vous vous vengez de manière infantile. Vous rendez le vieux monsieur que je suis bien pessimiste sur l'avenir de ce support que j'ai contribué à créer et faire vivre. Ayez la correction de ne pas me répondre svp. C'est trop triste. Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.Darles (talk • contribs) 03:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- "Incorrect?" Det är inte för min egen skull som jag skriver på engelska. Jag brukar använda engelska på den här webbplatsen därför att av de språk jag talar är det det som är mest sannolikt att läsaren förstår och för att automatöversättning till andra språk brukar funka bäst från engelska. Avsikten är alltså att göra det så lätt som jag kan göra det för dig som läsare utefter rådande förutsättningar. Men om det ändå inte uppskattas så kan jag ju lika gärna göra det lätt för mig och skriva på mitt modersmål istället. Och på vilket sätt är det barnsligt att informera dig om hur du kan begära omprövning av beslutet att radera bilden om du inte är övertygad om min förklaring till varför bilden raderades? —LX (talk, contribs) 07:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Pont-medieval-TOURS.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Considering copyvio via Google Maps/Earth. Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Historial.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Historial.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Historial.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Raidbrassart.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Historial.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Historial.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Historial.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Posterbrassart.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Posterbrassart.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Posterbrassart.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Edroth.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Ma-ct1800-42c0997.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Motos-peage.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Carte tours2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Saint-Libert-1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Saint-Libert-2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Pechoire.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Gaumont-tours.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gaumont-tours.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gaumont-tours.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Choper1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Alain.Darles,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- je parle pas un mot d'anglais ! :-( --alain.darles (talk) 00:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)