User talk:Ajepbah/Archive/2013

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicherstadt (Hamburg-HafenCity).Block S.Fleetseite.Detail.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siemersscher Hof (Hamburg-Bergstedt).Wetterfahne.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krematorium (Friedhof Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Uhr.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Genslerstraße (Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord).Mädchenfigur.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Empire-Riverside-Hotel (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Fassade.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 11:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Tycho Brahe

Moin Ajepbah, ich habe diesen Edit von Dir Rückgängig gemacht, weil Category:Monuments and memorials in Hamburg lediglich eine Oberkategorie der bereits vorhandenen Kategorie Category:Statues in Hamburg ist. Viele Grüße vom Mogelzahn (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Moin Mogelzahn, ist ok ;-) Allerdings sollte man m. E. die Kategorisierung von Statuen als Denkmälern mal ernsthaft hinterfragen, auch wenn (oder gerade weil) diese alle Statuenkategorien zu betreffen scheint: Nicht jeder Jüngling am Wegesrand ist ein Denkmal ... Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 08:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Da gebe ich Dir vollkommen recht. Aber an die Kategoriestruktur im Bereich der Skulpturen habe ich mich noch nicht herangetraut. Da sollten wir mal sehen, ob wir in größerer Runde einen Konsens zumindest für den deutschsprachigen Bereich finden. --Mogelzahn (talk) 14:19, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolphsbrücke (Hamburg).Kandelaber.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicherstadt (Hamburg-HafenCity).Teerhof.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathausmarkt (Hamburg-Altstadt).Flaggenmastspitze.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is perfect, sharpness is acceptable -- the windings on the bolts are not visible. But QI for me. -- Aisano 18:07, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zweite Nagelsbrücke (Hamburg-Hammerbrook).2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DAK (Hamburg-Hammerbrook).ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a slight perspective correction. Apart from that, good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)  Done --Ajepbah 19:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finanzbehörde (Hamburg-Neustadt).Fassadendetails.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickhuben 9 (Hamburg-Altstadt).Coat of arms of Sri Lanka.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Jungfernstieg 17a (Hamburg-Neustadt).Detail.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pferdestall Hoisbüttel (Ammersbek).ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorch-Fock-Wall 11 (Hamburg-Neustadt).Wappen.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büschstraße 9 (Hamburg-Neustadt).Tür.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lessingdenkmal (Hamburg-Neustadt).Sockel.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Wittmoor - hoevelgraff.jpg

Weißt Du, welches der Lemsahler Hügelgräber dort abgebildet ist? Die Geokoordinaten schicken mich nach Nordniedersachsen :-( --Mogelzahn (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Mogelzahn, das müsste das Grab am Fiersbarg sein (Fundplatz 2, Nummer 565 in der Denkmalliste). Ich habe die Position im Bild einfach mal korrigiert. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 07:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Danke schön! --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossmühle Ahrensburg.4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Holstenstraße 82 (Hamburg-Bergedorf).Detail.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri und Pauli (Hamburg-Bergedorf).Seiteneingang.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

User-Kategorien

Moin! Ich habe mich mal auf meiner User-Seite an Deiner Kategorisierung für Bilder und Qualitätsbilder in User-Kategorien bedient. Jetzt müsste ich nur noch alle alten Bilder in meiner "Images by..."-Kategorie bekommen. Muss man die wirklich alle einzeln zuordnen oder gibt es dafür irgendein Helferlein? Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Wahrscheinlich könntest Du einen Bot. beauftragen. --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich recht entsinne, habe ich die "Images by"-Kategory mit Hilfe des Commons commander befüllt. Das war aber auch ziemlich nervig ... --Ajepbah (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Das klingt ja nicht sehr viel einfacher. Ärgerlicher ist gerade, dass bei mir der Zähler scheinbar nicht funktioniert. Hast Du eine Idee, woran so etwas liegen kann? --Dirtsc (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Zur Aktualisierung speichere die Benutzerseite immer noch einmal ohne eine Änderung vorgenommen zu haben. Das ergibt dann keinen Eintrag in der Historie, aber einen aktualisierten Zählerstand. --Ajepbah (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Guter Tipp, danke. Dass es mit Änderung geht hatte ich heute schon selber gemerkt, hatte das aber für keine tolle Idee gehalten. --Dirtsc (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Funktioniert. Danke noch mal. Nur das Nachtragen wird jetzt eine langwierige Angelegenheit... :-( --Dirtsc (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Es hat mich einige Stunden gekostet, aber ich habe auch nichts besseres gefunden. --Ajepbah (talk) 16:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Verwaltungsgebäude Drehbahn

Moin Ajepbah,

könntest Du damit leben, wenn die Datei nach Category:Justizbehörde Hamburg verschoben wird, immerhin ist die Drehbahn seit unvordenklichen Zeiten Sitz derselben und als solcher auch bekannt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Moin Mogelzahn, auf jeden Fall - ich hab mich bisher nicht wirklich in diesem Bereich der Innenstadt rumgetrieben (und war peinlich berührt, da mir der Sitz der Justizbehörde bisher nicht bekannt war). Bei der Bezeichnung habe ich mich an die im Lange gehalten - es scheint in dem Bereich ja ursprünglich eine muntere Mischbelegeung von Justiz, Zoll und Post gegeben zu haben. Das Verwaltungsgebäude kann ja noch als Weiterleitung bleiben. Ansonsten können die Kategorien unter Government buildings in Hamburg generell etwas systematisiert werden - aber das dürfte vielleicht ein Thema für den nächsten Stammtisch sein. --Ajepbah (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Dann sollten wir bis dahin warten. Ich treibe mich in der Drehbahn ob der Kombination von Profession und Engagement einmal im Monat herum. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krejbjerg Kirke (Skive Kommune).Mindesten Jens Væver.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Oberpostdirektion (Hamburg-Neustadt).Detail.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fyrkat vikingecenter.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Only one small dustspot, maybe a bird, easy to remove). --JLPC 16:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Dustspots removed --Ajepbah 19:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Museum_für_Hamburgische_Geschichte

Museum für Hamburgische Geschichte has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Magst Du da mal bitte vorbeischauen und gucken, wer von uns beiden (Christoph oder ich) da gerade in die Sackgasse läuft. Vielen Dank und lieben Gruß vom Mogelzahn (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Einschätzung. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Dafürnich ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Reichenstraße 10 (Hamburg-Altstadt).Detail.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--S. F. B. Morse 05:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Hemmoor.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK, I would apply some additional overall sharpening. --Tuxyso 07:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sharpened version uploaded. --Ajepbah 12:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niedernstraße 10 (Hamburg-Altstadt).Eingang.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Structures visible in light and in shadows. --Ikar.us 09:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrengrabenbrücke (Hamburg-Neustadt).Geländer.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light. --Ikar.us 09:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenzstein L225 (Jersbek).Gut Ahrensburg.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Manuela61 19:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Tor 5 (Hamburg-St. Georg).ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ericusspitze (Hamburg-HafenCity).Spiegelung.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Somewhat small DOF for a geometrical shape like this building. --Smial 10:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Karby.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Karby.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 16:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludolfstraße 19 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f 4.5-5.6G ED VR.horizontal.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenzstein B432 Westen (Sülfeld).Hufeisen.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:36, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftung Alsterdorf (Hamburg-Alsterdorf).Wasserturm.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice light. --Tuxyso 09:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jelling church.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusual crop, but good quality. --Tuxyso 09:28, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumphator SN 75656.global.right.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medtronic Paradigm 754.global.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks ok to me --Carschten 18:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm St. Petri (Hamburg-Altstadt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Digital chess clocks..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburger Straße 25 - Haus Segeberg (Bad Segeberg).2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Börse (Hamburg-Altstadt).Uhrenturm.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f 4.5-5.6G ED VR.upright.55.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 08:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DGT 2010 digital chess clock.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellerholzhöft light house (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : Good, but I think you have to add (exterior) to the scope, please. --JLPC (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 Info :  Done Scope changed to (exterior) --Ajepbah (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Poco² 20:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Containerterminal Altenwerder (Hamburg-Altenwerder).Iris Bolten.4.phb.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfinanzdirektion (Hamburg-Altstadt).phb.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some perspective distortion at the right --A.Savin 16:08, 22 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Perspective corrected --Ajepbah 16:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)  Weak support OK now, even though there are still some tilt on the building (but presumably it's difficult to fix everything simultaneously) and the sharpness could be better --A.Savin 17:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alsterfleet.3.phb.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odin Sydfyen.funnel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 15:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nord Fast.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rolf H. 13:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großmarkt (Hamburg-Hammerbrook).hf.phb.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Unfortunate lightning: all the subjects are in shadow... and too much smoke; but I think that it can be QI--Lmbuga 19:08, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dammtorwall (Hamburg-Neustadt).phb.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs sharpening IMO. Mattbuck 18:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Sharpened --Ajepbah 05:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Still fairly soft, but better. Mattbuck 07:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Harburger Berge und was sich daraus so ergibt

Moin! Ich hatte mich gestern mal daran versucht, die Bilder vom Ende der Ballonfahrt zu kategorisieren. Dabei habe ich die Category:Harburger Berge und die Category:Eißendorfer Forst angelegt, die es beide bisher noch nicht gab. Bei einem Blick auf meine 1:50er Topo-Karte von 1995 habe ich dann aber gemerkt, dass der Eißendorfer Forst dort fast ausschließlich östlich der A7 bis zur Siedlungsgrenze von Eißendorf eingezeichnet ist. Das ganze große Waldgebiet westlich der A7 und nördlich der B73 hat in der Karte gar keine eigene Bezeichnung, wir haben aber eine ganze Menge Bilder gerade auch aus diesem Bereich. Hast Du eine Idee, wie man das dort nennt? Ich möchte ungern einfach alles von der Ballonfahrt mit Wald drauf als Eißendorfer Forst oder als Wald in Hamburg kategorisieren. --Dirtsc (talk) 04:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Da habe ich beim Hochladen auch vergeblich gesucht - im Prinzip ist ja alles Staatsforst Hamburg - bei der Suche nach irgendwelchen Differenzierungen bin ich aber leider gescheitert. --Ajepbah (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Schade. Wenn auch ein Kartograph nicht sagen wie das da heißt, besteht wohl kaum Hoffnung. www.forst-hamburg.de hat mir auch nicht sehr geholfen. Was hältst Du davon, wenn wir für die Gegend eine Kategorie "Staatsfort Hamburg Schwarze Berge" oder ähnlich anlegen? Ein Stück weiter westlich ist das ja wieder klar als Neugrabener oder Fischbeker Heide benannt. --Dirtsc (talk) 19:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Eine ziemlich schwierige Entscheidung - ich habe mich weiland davor gedrückt ;-) Staatsforst Hamburg Schwarze Berge ist vermutlich auch keine so richtig offizielle Bezeichnung ... --Ajepbah (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Was sagt denn die deutsche Grundkarte zu der Gegend? --Dirtsc (talk) 19:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Die nennt das auch nur Staatsforst Hamburg. NNW 07:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Wenn man nach "Staatsforst Hamburg" googelt, erhält man nur Ergebnisse, die sich auf die fragliche Gegend in den Schwarzen Bergen beziehen. Wird der Begriff "Staatsforst Hamburg" denn überhaupt noch für Wald an anderer Stelle gebraucht? --Dirtsc (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Zumindest der Klövensteen ist auch Staatsforst. NNW 09:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Auf meinem Falk-Städteatlas Hamburg Ausgabe 1996/97 (was man nicht alles noch so im Auto findet) finden sich für die fragliche Gegend (also zwischen B73, A7, Landesgrenze und Ehestorfer Heuweg) die Bezeichnungen In der Emme und In der Haake. Diese Namen scheinen als Teile eines Forstreviers auch immer noch zu existieren, siehe hier. Was haltet ihr davon, für die Gegend die Kategorie "Emme und Haake" als Unterkategorie für Hamburger Wälder anzulegen? --Dirtsc (talk) 11:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Lt. DGK5 beidesmal ohne „In der“. Die Namen kennt vermutlich kein Mensch, aber warum nicht. NNW 12:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich nehme mal an, Ihr meint das Gebiet südlich der B73, denn nördlich finde ich Wald erst wieder diesseits der Elbe. Mein ADAC-City-Atlas von 2010 kennt nördlich von Schwarzen Bergen und Eißendorfer Forst von West nach Ost folgende Waldgebiete: a) Zwischen Falkenbergsweg und Ehestorfer Heuweg = Neugrabener Heide, b) zwischen Ehestorfer Heuweg und Stadtscheide = Emme, c) zwischen Stadtscheide und Kuhtrift = Haake, d) östlich Kuhtrift = Heimfelder Holz (incl. Meyers Park). Mit Ausnahme der Neugrabener Heide, die ja nicht mehr bewirtschaftet wird, wird im Plan all dieses (und im Übrigen auch Eißendorfer Forst, Sunder und Im Stuck) zusätzlich als "Staatsforst Hamburg" bezeichnet. --Mogelzahn (talk) 09:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich hätte noch z. B. den Falk-Plan von 1988 zu bieten: "Emme" und "Die Haake" jeweils nur in Hausbruch, erstere nördlich Reiherbergswerg, letztere südlich - also das, was bei Mogelzahn "Emme" ist. Östlich der A7 "Meyers Park" mit Krankenhaus Mariahilf, das Heimfelder Gebiet westlich der A7 ist unbenannt. Für Mogelzahns Interpretation spricht aber m. E. der Straßenname "Emmetal" als südliche Fortsetzung des Ehestorfer Heuwegs. --Ajepbah (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Wenn irgendwo nördlich B73 stand, wäre das wohl ein Schreibfehler. Mogelzahns Grenzziehung kann ich mit der Karte die ich habe zur Deckung bringen. Ergänzend würde man wohl die Grenze zwischen Eißendorfer Forst und Haake als den Ehestorfer Weg nehmen, oder? Vielleicht kann NNW die Erkenntnisse in einer Karte festhalten? Dann hätte die Diskussion auch gleich ein verwendbares Ergebnis erzeugt. --Dirtsc (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Nachtrag: In einem Falk-Plan von 1985 (ihr merkt sicher, dass mein Kartenmaterial exorbitant aktuell ist...) steht Emme westlich der Stadtscheide und Haake östlich der Stadtscheide. --Dirtsc (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Zwischen Haake und Ehestorfer Forst sehe ich auch den Ehestorfer Weg als Grenze. Die südliche Grenze des Eißendorfer Forstes zum Sunder Forst wäre dann wohl der Eißendorfer Waldweg. Zwischen Sunder Forst und Im Stuck habe ich dann allerdings nichts gefunden, was als Grenze dienen könnte. --Mogelzahn (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Für die Städteatlanten wurden nur amtliche Karten abgezeichnet, dann könnt ihr auch gleich das Original nehmen: http://www.digitaleratlasnord.de/. Seid ihr wirklich davon überzeugt, den Wald so in seine Einzelteile zu zerlegen? NNW 10:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Natürlich kann man auch die Category:Wald auf dem nördlichen Balkan einrichten und alle Bilder mit mehr als drei Bäumen drauf, die zwischen Elbe und Hannover aufgenommen wurden, dort einsortieren ;-) --Mogelzahn (talk) 11:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich würde nach den neuen Erkenntnissen bei den Commons-Kategorien gar nicht zu detailliert werden. Bei den Fotos sieht man zum Schluß ohnehin immer nur Bäume. Falls jemand da einen guten Vorschlag für eine sinnvolle Kategorie hat, die das ganze Waldgebiet dort abdecken kann, dann nur her damit. Aber eine Übersichtskarte, die dieses Waldgebiet mit den Teilen und Grenzen enthält, wäre sicher hilfreich. Ich glaube nämlich, dass wir sicher einen Artikel de:Staatsforst Hamburg vertragen könnten, in dem mal der Zusammenhang aller Wälder, die im Besitz des Landes Hamburg sind, dargestellt wird. Vielleicht auch mit einer Auflistung der Förstereien und der einzelnen Teile. Dann kriegt man auch mal klar, dass sowohl in den Schwarzen Bergen, im Klövensteen, im Duvenstedter Brook und wer weiß wo sonst noch, staatliche Wälder liegen. Wenn ich Zeit habe, schreibe ich den Artikel sogar. ;-) --Dirtsc (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Dalmannkai

Moin! Magst Du bitte auch einmal prüfen, ob das was User:Flor!an da mit der Kategorie gemacht hat, richtig ist. Nach meinen Unterlagen stimmt es nämlich nicht, aber vielleicht bin ich (wie üblich) nicht auf der Höhe der Zeit. Ich habe ihn auf seiner Disk auf Commons schon darauf angesprochen. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo! Ich habe den Dalmannkai noch dem Grasbrookhafen zugeordnet und die Beschreibung korrigiert. Heißt eigentlich die gesamte "Landzunge" mit der Elbphilharmonie Kaiserhöft oder nur die Spitze? --Ajepbah (talk) 19:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Ein Höft ist nach meinem Verständnis (und lt. WP...) nur die Spitze der Landzunge. Für die einzelnen Landteile zwischen den Hafenbecken habe ich noch nie gesonderte Namen gefunden. Wahrscheinlich weil die Hafenbecken zunächst immer an Stellen errichtet wurden, an denen vorher schon Land war und das damit zu einer der Elbinseln (Neuhof, Grasbrook, Ross, Steinwerder...) gerechnet wurde. Wo diese Elbinseln beginnen und aufhören, kann man aber heute im Hafengebiet kaum noch erkennen. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Upload für WLM 2013

Moin! Ich habe gerade meine ersten Bilder für WLM hochgeladen und wieder den Upload-Assistenten aus dem Wettbewerb verwendet. Sowohl Du als auch an-d habt das anders gemacht und jeder von euch wieder auf andere Weise. Mir ist auf jeden Fall aufgefallen, dass der Upload-Assistent aus dem Wettbewerb etwas nervig ist, wenn man Bilder in eine Kategorie hochlädt, die selber wieder eine Unterkategorie der Kulturdenkmalkategorie des Stadtteils ist. Da werden die Bilder dann doppelt einkategorisiert. Daher würde ich gerne zukünftig auch anders vorgehen. Weißt Du, ob es reicht, einfach die WLM 2013-Vorlage hinzuzufügen, um mit den Bildern teilzunehmen? Und wenn ja, ob das irgendwo steht, ich habe es jedenfalls auf die Schnelle nicht gefunden, erinnere mich aber dunkel, dass es da mal einen Hinweis gegeben hat. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Dirtsc, ich habe es wieder wie letztes Jahr gemacht und im Commonist unter Koordinaten nach der Location-Vorlage die Vorlage {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2013|de}} angehängt und die Kategorie Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, DE-HH hinzugefügt. Die Cultural heritage monuments in ...-Kategorie muss dann ggf. manuell ergänzt werden. Ich hoffe, dass das genügt, aber meine Bilder tauchen in allen Kategorien auf, in denen ich sie erwartet habe. Für den Wettbewerb relevant dürfte m. E. die Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Germany-Kategorie sein. --Ajepbah (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Wenn Du das letztes Jahr auch schon so gemacht hast, dann wird es ja wohl offensichtlich als Wettbewerbsteilnahme akzeptiert. ;-) Dann kann ich nämlich auch einfach die Vorlage einbinden, das ist einfacher, wenn man die Kategorien genau kennt in die die Bilder hinein sollen. Danke! --Dirtsc (talk) 04:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Kirche Bargteheide

Moin! Hast Du bei der Kirche in Bargteheide nur den Kirchhof und die Umgebung fotografiert oder auch das Gebäude selber? Das eine vorhandene Foto auf Commons ist ja nicht besonders gut. Ich habe die Kirche nämlich auch so ziemlich weit unten auf meiner Liste der möglichen Artikel. Da sind gute Bilder immer gern gesehen, weißt Du doch... Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Ebenfalls moin! Ich habe noch zwei Bilder der Kirche hochgeladen, allerdings auch nicht so besonders gute. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Die beiden Bilder sind doch schon mal deutlich besser als alles, was es vorher so gab. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 21:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

WLM Gewinner

Sorry und danke. Habe 2 Tage lang nix anderes gemacht und habe jetzt einen Brummschädel, die anderen sollten das eh noch mal kontrollieren. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Dafürnich - it's a wiki. Ganz ganz vielen Dank für die viele Mühe, die Du bei der Seitenerstellung und Ihr insgesamt als Jury in den letzten Tagen aufgewendet habt. Da kann man bräsig zu Hause sitzend gerne die paar kleinen Unschärfen glätten, die einem gerade auffallen ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Ich wollte Dich auf keinen Fall unterschlagen :) Schönen Abend noch, Gruß --Nicola (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto-von-Guericke-Denkmal (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Detail.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marien (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Chor.3.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Lorenz (Nürnberg-St. Lorenz).Tür.Detail.3.fw13.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Zirkusweg

Du hast meinen beiden Bildern von Gebäuden des Hafenkrankenhauses die Kategorie Wohnterrassen in Hamburg hinzugefügt. Passt das wirklich? --Hinnerk11 (talk) 11:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis! Die sind mir wohl mit durchgerutscht. Ich hatte in den Cultural heritage-Kategorien nach Ergänzungen "Haus xx" gesucht, die - hoffentlich mit nur diesen Ausnahmen - für die Hinterhäuser der Terrassen vergeben werden. Ich habe es bei Deinen Bildern korrigiert. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Da schiebe ich mal schnell noch eine weitere Frage, ohne einen neuen Abschnitt zu eröffnen, nach: Deine schicken Bilder vom Gebäude der Grundschule Thadenstraße hast du mit Schule Scheplerstraße benannt und kategorisiert. Das passt natürlich nicht zum aktuellen Schulnamen und macht das Auffinden für Ortsunkundige etwas schwieriger. Außer in der Denkmalschutzliste konnte ich bisher auch noch keine digitale Spur dieses ehemaligen (?) Schulnamens finden. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 12:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe an der Stelle auch etwas gestutzt. Da das Gebäude aber an der Scheplerstraße liegt, habe ich den Kategorienamen gemäß Denkmalschutzliste gewählt. Ich habe noch eine kleine Ergänzung in die Kategoriebeschreibung geschrieben und die Kategorie unter die Thadenstraße gehängt - wenn der Rest der Grundschule Thadenstraße einmal Bilder und eine eigene Kategorie bekommen sollte, kann man die für das Schulgebäude Scheplerstraße ja noch da mit hineinhängen. --Ajepbah (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Das Gebäude hat die Hausnummer Thadenstraße 147 (bin gerade mal schnell hingegangen). Auf der Homepage der Schule Thadenstraße läßt sich ein PDF mit der Geschichte des Gebäudes herunterladen. Die Schule hat eine Fülle von Namen getragen, keiner davon war Scheplerstraße. Allerdings hat die Geschichte eine Lücke von 1882-1960. Zu der Nutzung in diesen Jahren konnte ich noch nichts finden. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Laut Altonaer Adressbuch von 1880 liegt das Schulgebäude in der Adlerstraße und die soll heute, so man einer gewissen Enzyklopädie glaubt, Scheplerstraße heißen ... --Ajepbah (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Du meinst die Zeit, als sie 9. Knabenvolksschule zu Altona hieß?  ;) --Hinnerk11 (talk) 14:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Nein, 1880 waren in dem Gebäude die 4. Knabenfreischule ("Local: Das Erdgeschoß des Schulhauses an der Adlerstraße.", die 3. Bürgerschule für Knaben ("Local: Der 1. Stock des Schulhauses an der Adlerstraße.") und die 3. Bürgerschule für Mädchen ("Local: Der 2. Stock des Schulhauses an der Adlerstraße.") - die Volksschulen gab es ja erst ab 1892 ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Wie ärgerlich, da ist man so schön am klugscheissen und dann verhaut man sich um das eine oder andere Jahrzehnt. Aber einen halbwegs "offiziellen" Beleg für die Bezeichnung Schule Scheplerstraße hast du auch nicht gefunden, oder?--Hinnerk11 (talk) 00:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Nein - bis auf die Denkmalliste ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich gestehe eine unglaublich mißtrauische Person zu sein, deshalb: Noch ein Beleg? Einen kleinen? Mir zu Liebe?--Hinnerk11 (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich bin gutgläubig: Es steht in der Denkmalliste ;-) Außerdem steht im Altonaer Adressbuch Schulhaus Adlerstraße und da es diese unter diesem Namen heute nicht mehr gibt, sondern heute unter Scheplerstraße firmiert, kann man daraus m. E. mit einigermaßen guten Willen Schule Scheplerstraße machen. Die Grundschule Thadenstraße scheint mir jedenfalls deutlich jüngeren Datums zu sein. Interessant wäre vielleicht noch, ob man herausbekommen kann, seit wann das Gebäude unter Thadenstraße 147 firmiert und ob diese Hausnummer für die gesamte Grundschule oder nur für den Altbau gilt. --Ajepbah (talk) 22:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich bin nicht überzeugt. Muss wohl am 14. in die Ottenser Hauptstraße. Säbel oder Degen? --Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magdalenenkapelle (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Umgebung.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Vorhalle.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Spital (Nürnberg-St. Sebald).2.fw13.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In general a nice composition with appealing colurs. Could you consider to crop the lower windows below the rain spout and the spikes at the upper left window? --Cccefalon 12:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thank you for review, image cropped. --Ajepbah 19:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Looks much better. QI for me now. --Cccefalon 06:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Markt (Magdeburg-Altstadt).ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deichtorhallen (Hamburg-Altstadt).Internationale Kunst.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, sharpness, light and composition.--Jebulon 20:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg (Nürnberg-St. Sebald).Pflasterung.fw13.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK i guess. --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Eisenbartbrunnen.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptbahnhof (Hamburg-St. Georg).Uhrenturm.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicherstadt (Hamburg-HafenCity).Block U.Schild.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicherstadt (Hamburg-HafenCity).Block H.Fleetseite.Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a perspective correction.--Jebulon 20:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review, perspective corrected. --Ajepbah 12:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC) The top is leaning out slightly. Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC) I think, that's the reality: The top of the second pillar from right is not vertical ... --Ajepbah 21:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC) If you say so. Mattbuck 21:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Carillon.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 17:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marien (Magdeburg-Altstadt).1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support imo OK for QI, nice compo --A.Savin 12:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbartbrunnen (Magdeburg-Altstadt).4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:28, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldschmiedebrücke 13 (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Telemann-Gedenktafel.Tafel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Detail.7.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg (Nürnberg-St. Sebald).Burgamtmannshaus.fw13.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Ajepbah/Archive, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland

Hallo Ajepbah, etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Deine Preisträgerfotos sind... Platz 36 Platz 62 Platz 69 Platz 83 Platz 91

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?

Ein besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir, Anika (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Hallo Anika, vielen Dank für das Bärchen ;-) Auch Dir wünsche ich eine schöne Adventszeit und ein gute Jahr 2014. Wenn nichts dazwischen kommt (und der Wettbewerb stattfindet) bin ich auf jeden Fall auch im nächsten Jahr bei WLM dabei. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 08:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Wasserspeier.4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}} Brahmskontor in Hamburg-Neustadt Greetings Ajepbah I missed the chance to photograph the elephant sculpture at Brahmskontorhaus on my trip to Hamburg.I would very much appreciate one if you are ever there. Also anything related to Johan Cesar VI. Godeffroy [1] at Hirschpark (Hamburg) [2] Johan Cesar VI. Godeffroy [3] would be of much interest to me.I am a zoologist.Best regards from Ireland Notafly (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Hello Notafly, thank you for the hint - if light, weather and free time match I will try to take some photos of the elephant. Currently I have only low quality, pre-DSLR photos of them. Unfortunately Hirschpark is far away from my usual routes in Hamburg. I think other users, e. g. Hinnerk11, live more closer to this area and could take photos there much easier. Regards from Hamburg --Ajepbah (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Thankyou.It was very annoying to miss the elephant photo.I was only in Hamburg for a short time in Winter and I spent most of that in the zoo and the botanic gardens so I am not familiar with the layout of the city. I will indeed ask Hinnerk11 about Hirschpark. I know about the light - in Ireland it was dark at 15.15 today Best regards and thanks again Notafly (talk) 21:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Done ..., best regards --Ajepbah (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC) Marvellous.An impressive sculpture work (and in the spirit of Hamburg) impressively photographed.Very many thanks.Notafly (talk) 21:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC) Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Ajepbah/Archive, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karolinenstraße 45 (Hamburg-St.Pauli).Erker.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Commons Photo Challenge January 2014 Thank-you for participating in Commons:Photo challenge! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project. The December 2013 themes will close for submissions this weekend and be ready for voting from Monday 6th January: Coloured light and Silhouette. For January 2014 there are two themes: A bunch of stuff and January. I hope you are keen to participate. Please read the theme descriptions for full submission rules on each theme. -- Colin (talk)